Connect with us

America

The rise of BRICS: The end of dollar dominance in global economic arena

Published

on

In the current changing world, the BRICS group has emerged as a new player in the global political and economic arena. The key players in this group are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and other countries have recently joined this group, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia.

This variety of countries has increased the strength of this group in terms of politics, economy and geography. These countries, which account for more than 45pc of the world’s population and 26.98pc of the world’s gross domestic product, play an important role in global political and economic developments. In this sense, BRICS is considered as an influential factor in economic and political developments.

The tendency of new countries to join this platform shows their desire to reduce their dependence on the US dollar and western markets. Thus, BRICS seeks to create a common currency to strengthen economic cooperation and facilitate trade between member countries, which can replace the dollar in economic exchanges in the future.

Reducing dependence on the dollar:

The dominance of the US dollar over the world economy began after the end of World War II and the establishment of the Bretton Woods system in 1944, in which the dollar was introduced as the main currency for international trade, but this dominance ended with the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971.

Therefore, one of the main goals of the BRICS countries to create a common currency is to reduce dependence on the US dollar as a global currency and its dominance in international trade. BRICS member countries seek to remain immune from currency fluctuations and US economic sanctions.

The strength of economic cooperation: 

The creation of a common currency can help facilitate trade between BRICS countries and prevent additional costs related to currency conversion.

This issue can increase the competitiveness of the goods and services of member countries in domestic and foreign markets and promote regional trade in a faster and cheaper way. Increasing trade between member countries directly contributes to economic growth.

Strengthening the political position:

The BRICS countries seek to strengthen their position in the international arena and reduce the influence of Western powers and challenge the dominance of the dollar. A common currency can help strengthen international cooperation and representation of these countries in the global financial system. Building stronger ties between member states can also help strengthen them on the world stage.

Attracting and facilitating investment:

By creating a common currency and ensuring financial stability, the attraction of foreign investment will be boosted. Foreign investors can easily cooperate in many projects both independently and jointly because challenges related to costs and other currency conversion problems have been resolved, this will help facilitate trade and investment for BRICS members.

An introduction to the prerequisites for creating a new currency for BRICS members

Creating a common currency for BRICS members can help strengthen economic cooperation and reduce dependence on traditional currencies such as the US dollar.

However, certain prerequisites are necessary for this initiative to succeed. These prerequisites include strong economic cooperation among the member countries, political stability, creating a coherent financial system and suitable legal arrangements for the diverse economy of the members.

Providing these above conditions can pave the way for the adoption and effective use of the new currency and help to strengthen the position of BRICS in the global financial system.

Prerequisites:

To create a common currency, the BRICS countries need certain conditions, including providing a suitable platform for strong economic cooperation among the member countries, economic diversity, cohesion to create a financial system, and political stability, which is the most important pillar of this prerequisite. In order for the new currency to be implemented, the member countries must reach full economic convergence. This convergence includes common understanding and agreement on financial, commercial and economic policies.

Political support:

Creating a common currency requires strong political support from the BRICS leaders. Despite the symbolic support for the new currency at the meeting of the BRICS members in Russia, the members of the group must remain steadfast on the political support of this issue, otherwise it can cause difficulties in the process of this joint project.

Challenges: Major differences in size and economic structure

One of the main challenges in creating a BRICS common currency is the economic and financial differences between member countries.

BRICS countries have different economic structures and these differences can lead to conflicts in financial and currency policies.

For example, China and India as larger and faster growing economies in BRICS will have a high capacity to influence common policies, while the economies of Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran are dependent on natural gas and oil resources.

Brazil and South Africa both have smaller economies and are relatively dependent on certain industries such as agriculture, mining and raw materials.

Ethiopia is a country that has one of the highest economic growth rates in Africa, and agriculture plays an important role in the Ethiopian economy, and this country is recently trying to become a commercial and industrial center in East Africa.

As the second largest economy in the world, China is considered the largest and most industrialized economy and the driving force of BRICS, which undoubtedly plays a dominant role in the economy of this group.

This situation can lead to more dependence of member countries on China and economic differences between members; Because smaller countries may not be able to keep up with the speed of growth and economic complexity of China.

America

US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land

Published

on

Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.

For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.

Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:

“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”

The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.

Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.

Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.

Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.

Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.

Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.

Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market

The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.

Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.

The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.

Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.

Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.

Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.

William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.

Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.

Continue Reading

America

US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies

Published

on

An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.

Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.

Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.

Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.

Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.

When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.

The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.

Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.

Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war

In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.

Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.

Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.

American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.

Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.

Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.

Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise

The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.

Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.

Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.

Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.

Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.

Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.

Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.

Continue Reading

America

Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar

Published

on

Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.

The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.

In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.

During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.

The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.

Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.

Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.

The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.

Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.

The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.

Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.

According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.

Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey