Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

Construction of mosques amid economic crisis

Published

on

Based on the decree issued by the Taliban supreme leader, 75 mosques are to be built on the highways of Afghanistan, including six mosques on the Kabul-Kandahar highway and eight more mosques on the Kandahar-Herat route.

The construction of these mosques has been entrusted to the Ministry of Public Works of the Taliban — a ministry whose main responsibility is building roads and bridges, not mosques.

It seems that the Taliban, with the new function it has defined for the Ministry of Public Works, is directing the process and the amount of budget allocation for national programs in a direction that has never been seen before.

The decree comes at a time when the Afghans have been facing an unprecedented economic crisis as over 23 million out of nearly 40 million population is in urgent need of assistance.

However, the Ministry has announced the cost of building eight mosques along the Kandahar-Herat highway of more than 259,895,000 Afghani currency (3,812,307 US Dollars). If we calculate the average cost of building these mosques, the cost of building each mosque will be more than 32,486,000 Afghanis (471,018.66 US Dollars). If 75 mosques are built, then two billion, 436 million and 515 thousand Afghanis will be the cost of these mosques.

This is part of the huge budget that has been or will be spent on building mosques or religious schools in these three years. The Ministry of Hajj of the Taliban also plays a role in the construction of mosques. Similarly, mosques have been built with the money of private and foreign organizations and even on the people’s expenses.

Road reconstruction and reduction of horrific deaths

The Ministry of Public Works spends its budget on building mosques along highways, while the country’s public facilities, including roads, are in poor condition and are deadly for citizens.

At the same time, the ministry has imposed a toll on highways for what it calls road reconstruction, and this fee is already being collected from citizens. Taliban also said that the second line of Kabul-Jalalabad highway is going to be built with the cost of toll. Now, instead of building mosques on the side of the roads, shouldn’t the roads themselves be built first?

The Ministry of Public Works says it will rebuild the Kabul-Kandahar highway. The cost of its renovation and development has not been announced; However, the author’s investigation shows that the cost of rebuilding only one 80-kilometer section of the Kabul-Kandahar highway is 400 million Afghanis.

If we consider the length of the Kabul-Kandahar highway to be 480 km, it will be six 80 km sections. In this case, the reconstruction of all six sections, that is, the entire Kabul-Kandahar highway, will cost two billion and 400 million Afghanis. According to this calculation, with the money spent on the construction of mosques on the highway, the entire Kabul-Kandahar highway can be reconstructed, and another 36 million and 515 thousand Afghanis will remain.

Production of needed goods – support to the poor community

If the money spent on building mosques is to be invested in the field of industry, what can be done and what will be achieved?

The Office of the Economic Deputy of the Taliban Prime Minister had said that a camp manufacturing factory has recently been established with an investment of 930 million Afghanis. It is said that 900 people have been provided with work opportunities in this factory. Well, now with two billion and 436 million Afghanis, two such factories can be established and provide jobs for more than 1,800 people.

If two billion and 436 million Afghanis are to be distributed among needy families and 30,000 Afghanis are considered for each family, then 81,200 families will benefit from cash assistance. 30,000 Afghani is the minimum three-month needs for a small family.

According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), in 2024, more than 23 million people in Afghanistan will need assistance.

In its recent report, OCHA said that only $961.7 million of the requested budget of $3.06 billion for Afghanistan in 2024 has been provided until mid-October, and aid organizations are severely short of funds. According to OCHA, Afghanistan has received about $6.7 billion in humanitarian aid since the Taliban took office on August 15, 2021. Nearly 3.3 billion dollars of aid has been received in 2022 alone.

According to the report of the US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), only the United States provided $3.33 billion in humanitarian and development aid to Afghanistan after the Taliban took over.

MIDDLE EAST

UN to hold conference on two-state solution

Published

on

The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has approved a resolution to organize a high-level conference aimed at advancing a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and achieving lasting peace in the Middle East.

The 193-member body adopted the draft resolution, introduced by Senegal and co-sponsored by several nations, including Turkey, with 157 votes in favor, 8 against, and 7 abstentions.

The resolution mandates the conference, titled the “High-Level International Conference on the Peaceful Resolution of the Palestinian Question and the Two-State Solution,” to take place in New York from June 2 to 4, 2025. It calls for the adoption of a final declaration outlining a roadmap to resolve the Palestinian issue peacefully and establish a two-state framework.

The resolution emphasizes resuming negotiations on the final status of the Middle East peace process, holding a separate peace conference in Moscow, and reaffirming Israel’s obligations under international law and previous agreements.

It demands that Israel, as the occupying power, immediately cease settlement activities, evacuate settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and halt demographic and territorial changes in East Jerusalem, Gaza, and other areas.

The resolution reiterates the illegality of acquiring land by force and highlights how such actions undermine a two-state solution. Additionally, it calls for an immediate cessation of violence, including military attacks, destruction, and terrorism.

The UN also urged its members to continue providing economic, humanitarian, and technical assistance to the Palestinian people and the Palestinian Authority, emphasizing the dire situation in Gaza.

Citing the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the resolution reaffirmed Israel’s obligation to “fully compensate” for damages caused by its unlawful acts.

Resolution on the Golan Heights

Separately, the General Assembly adopted a resolution demanding Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied Golan Heights, with 97 votes in favor, 8 against, and 64 abstentions. This resolution, sponsored by countries including Egypt, Lebanon, and South Africa, stresses that territorial acquisition by force violates international law and the UN Charter.

The document denounces Israel’s settlement activities in the Golan Heights as illegal and highlights its failure to comply with UN Security Council Resolution 497, adopted in 1981. The resolution asserts that Israel’s continued occupation constitutes de facto annexation and impedes comprehensive peace in the region.

The General Assembly urged Israel to resume negotiations with Syria and Lebanon and reiterated the demand for its withdrawal from the Golan Heights under relevant UN Security Council resolutions. It also expressed concern over the stalled Syrian peace process and called for its revival.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Flights resume between Iran and Saudi Arabia after nine-tear hiatus

Published

on

Flights between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which had been suspended for nearly nine years, have officially resumed with the reinstatement of the Mashhad-Dammam route.

According to the Iranian Students News Agency (ISNA), the first passenger plane from Mashhad landed at King Fahd International Airport (commonly known as Dammam International Airport) in Saudi Arabia. As part of the agreement between the two nations, this route will operate twice weekly, marking a significant step in restoring ties.

Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia were severed on January 3, 2016, following a series of escalating events:

On January 2, 2016, Saudi Arabia executed 47 individuals, including prominent Shia cleric Nimr al-Nimr, on charges of “terrorism.”

The executions provoked widespread anger in Iran, leading to protests. Demonstrators in Tehran and Mashhad attacked and set fire to the Saudi embassy and consulate buildings.

In response, Saudi Arabia formally cut off diplomatic relations with Iran the following day.

Compounding these tensions, the Yemen crisis, which began in March 2015, further strained relations. The two nations found themselves on opposing sides of the conflict, deepening the rift.

On March 10, 2023, Iran and Saudi Arabia reached a groundbreaking agreement to normalize relations. Facilitated by diplomatic initiatives from Iraq and China, the agreement includes reopening embassies in both countries, resuming direct flights, and streamlining the visa process to encourage travel and exchanges.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Organisations waging war against the Syrian army: Which organization, backed by whom, is attacking where?

Published

on

The attacks of the terrorist organizations led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which captured the rest of Idlib, all of Aleppo and the northern countryside of Hama in Syria, were followed by the attacks of the Turkish-backed FSA in Tal Rifaat, the U.S.-backed FSA in al-Bukamal and the YPG in Deir ez-Zor. The Syrian army looks disorganized in the attacks, which ‘coincided’ with a period when Russia and Iran, which support the Syrian government, were busy with their own agendas. The Syrian army’s unopposed retreat from Aleppo could have profound implications for Syria’s political future.

So which organizations are fighting in Syria, where and against whom? Which powers are supporting them and why?

1- Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS): Idlib-Aleppo-Hama

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) is the leading terrorist organization targeting the Syrian army in the battlefields of Aleppo, Idlib and Hama.

The Fateh al-Mubin Operations Room, formed with the participation of HTS and other organizations, launched an attack against the Syrian army on 27 November under the name of “Operation Deterring Aggression”. The groups took control of Aleppo, 310 kilometers from the Syrian capital Damascus, and captured some small settlements towards Hama province. According to AA, the groups also took control of the settlements of Jalime, Alzeka, Beridej, Jubbeyin, Tal Meleh, Kirkat, Mughayyir and Mabtan in Hama, and the villages of Tuwayne, Huwayz, Sheria and Bab Taka in the Gab Plain.

A ‘commander’ from Fateh al-Mubin’s operations room, who requested anonymity, told Majalla that in addition to HTS, Jaysh al-Izzah and Jaysh al-Nasr, as well as some of the groups under the umbrella of the Turkish-backed FSA, such as the Nour al-Din Zengi Movement, the National Liberation Front and the Joint Force, are involved in attacks in the area.

Around 40,000 opposition fighters are involved in attacks against the Syrian army in Aleppo, Idlib and Hama. The commander said that the groups have about 80,000 fighters in reserve, all of whom have received military training in various forms of warfare and conflict, how to deal with circumstances, how to use weapons and how to confront regime forces and their allies.

HTS, formerly al-Nusra, was formed under the leadership of Abu Mohammed Golani, who was sent to Syria in 2011 by the Islamic State of Iraq (ISIS), the Iraqi branch of al-Qaeda led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

When Golani, the leader of al-Nusra, which had grown rapidly by exploiting the chaos in Syria, and Baghdadi fell out, Baghdadi announced the dissolution of al-Nusra in 2013. In the same statement, Baghdadi announced the creation of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and declared that ISIL was expanding into Syria.

Meanwhile, al-Nusra declared its allegiance to al-Qaeda, but this did not prevent ISIS from seizing the vast majority of al-Nusra’s human, ammunition, and financial resources in Syria. The crisis between the two organizations also went to al-Qaeda’s central arbitration center, but the crisis could not be resolved.

Because of its links to al-Qaeda, al-Nusra was quickly placed on terrorist lists by various countries. Turkey added it to its list of terrorist organizations in 2014. From 2014, as ISIS spread rapidly across Syria, al-Nusra and other groups were trapped in the Idlib region.

Russia’s intervention in Syria and the Syrian army’s rapid operations to ensure territorial integrity led al-Nusra to unite with other groups. To this end, it announced that it had severed its ties with al-Qaeda and adopted the name Jabhat Fateh al-Sham Front (JFC).

Of course, the ‘break’ with al-Qaeda was only superficial. For al-Nusra’s move came immediately after al-Qaeda’s leadership advised it to ‘do whatever is necessary for the benefit of the jihad in Damascus and to unite with other organizations’. However, even the name changes only resulted in the unification of the SFC with a few small groups.

In 2017, HTS was formed under the military leadership of Golani, along with a few other groups such as the Nureddin Zengi Movement, Liwa al-Haq and others. HTS declared its goal to be “the rule of Sharia and the rejection of secularism”.

In January 2017, a ceasefire was declared in Idlib as part of Astana, excluding ISIS and al-Nusra. However, HTS took advantage of the ceasefire to engage in a confrontation with Ahrar al-Sham, the other main group in Idlib, in the summer of 2017, and suffered a major defeat. Since then, HTS has rapidly expanded and recruited other organizations, either by force or voluntarily, and by the end of 2019 it controlled 95% of Idlib. With around 30,000 fighters, it is the most effective armed force in the region.

2- Turkey-backed FSA (SNA): Northern and Northern countryside of Aleppo

The Turkish-controlled FSA (Syrian National Army – SNA), the most ideologically mixed front organization, is the military organization of the Coalition of Syrian Opposition and Revolutionary Forces (SMDK). They also have a government called the ‘Syrian Interim Government’.

There are dozens of organizations within the SNA, such as Faylaq al-Sham, Jaish al-Ahrar, Jaish al-Nasr, Ahrar al-Sham, Nour al-Din Zengi. Many of these organization are known to have received military and financial support from the CIA-controlled Military Operations Coordination Room and Gulf states in the past.

While some of the SNA-affiliated organizations took part in the HTS-led Aleppo offensive, some of them captured the Tal Rifaat district center as part of Operation Dawn of Freedom launched against the PKK/YPG.

According to Majalla, the day after the HTS launched its offensive, Turkey summoned the SNA factions in its area of influence in northern Aleppo for a secret emergency meeting. One of the SNA commanders said that during the meeting an agreement was reached with the Turkish side to expel the YPG from the areas it controls in the neighborhoods of Ashrafiya and Sheikh Maqsoud in northern Aleppo, Tal Rifaat and Manbij in the northern countryside of Aleppo, in parallel with the HTS operation.

3- PKK/YPG: East of the Euphrates in Deir ez-Zor

The US-backed terrorist organization PKK/YPG, which was forced to withdraw from Tel Rifaat after the Turkish-backed FSA attack, has launched an attack to drive the Syrian army out of 7 villages in Deir ez-Zor province, east of the Euphrates.

According to AA, the PKK/YPG launched an offensive against the Syrian army in the villages of Murrat, Hashsham, Mazlum, Tabiya, Husseiniye, Salihiyyah and Hatlah, and clashes are ongoing.

The Syrian army is known to be present in the area from Deir ez-Zor city center to al-Bukamal district near the Syrian-Iraqi border.

The PKK/YPG occupy almost all of Deir ez-Zor east of the Euphrates River, while the center of the province and other rural areas are under the control of the Syrian army.

4- US-backed FSA: Iraqi border in Deir ez-Zor

The U.S.-backed FSA launched an attack on the towns of al-Bukamal and Meyadin in Tanf, where US forces are stationed in the Syrian provinces of Homs and Deir ez-Zor.

The aim of these attacks is to sever Syria’s link with Iraq. Iranian groups supporting the Syrian army are concentrated in al-Bukamal, close to the Syrian-Iraqi border. This area is critical for the land link with Iranian-aligned forces in Iraq.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey