The first major debate between influential figures of the new US administration and Trump’s ‘Make America Great Again’ (MAGA) movement erupted over the contentious issue of skilled labor migration.
Among the priorities of Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley billionaires is facilitating the migration of skilled migrant workers to the U.S. With Silicon Valley’s growing influence on Trump and the Republican Party, preliminary discussions in Congress have begun. Republican members are openly considering new plans to increase the number of high-tech immigrants.
However, this week’s heated online exchanges suggest immigration hardliners will not easily capitulate to Trump’s new tech allies.
On Sunday, President-elect Trump appointed Sriram Krishnan, a former partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, as an adviser on artificial intelligence. The move triggered panic among Trump’s base, many of whom are concerned about Krishnan’s previous advocacy for lifting green card restrictions for highly skilled workers.
Laura Loomer, a prominent anti-immigration advocates close to Trump, criticized Krishnan’s appointment, calling it “deeply troubling.” She accused tech leaders of cozying up to Trump to “enrich themselves” and secure Pentagon contracts.
Elon Musk and David Sacks, another venture capitalist appointed as Trump’s AI and crypto czar, defended Krishnan against MAGA critics. Musk argued on X (formerly Twitter) that there is a “persistent shortage of excellent engineering talent” in the U.S., warning that America risks losing its competitive edge without more highly skilled immigrants. “The number of super talented engineers AND super motivated people in the U.S. is too low,” Musk emphasized.
Vivek Ramaswamy echoed Musk’s concerns, suggesting the lack of competitive American engineers is partly a cultural issue. Writing on X, he argued that American culture has long glorified “mediocrity over excellence,” citing societal preferences for athletes over valedictorians or math champions.
“The reason top tech companies hire foreign-born engineers isn’t an innate lack of American IQ but a cultural problem,” Ramaswamy stated. He expressed hope that a Trump presidency would usher in an era valuing “hard work over laziness.”
Conservative tech leaders, including Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, defended Krishnan’s appointment. Lonsdale endorsed a merit-based approach to immigration, stating, “For the U.S. to have the highest standard of living and the strongest military, we need to hire the best and brightest.”
David Sacks also supported Krishnan, clarifying that his proposals focus on lifting per-country green card caps rather than making the program unlimited. “Sriram supports a limited number of highly skilled immigrants based on merit—a common view on the right,” Sacks noted.
Republican lawmakers, including Jay Obernolte, co-chair of the House Artificial Intelligence Task Force, suggested that every PhD in STEM fields from U.S. universities should come with a green card. “This is an issue Congress should address,” Obernolte stated, adding that more foreign technologists are essential for competing with China in artificial intelligence.
However, conservative groups, including the Federation for American Immigration Reform, warned that tech lobbyists expecting leniency on visas “are in for a big surprise.”
The debate over high-skilled immigration highlights a growing divide within the Republican Party. While some remain staunchly opposed to immigration reforms, others, influenced by Musk and other tech billionaires, are open to expanding H-1B visas and green cards to secure America’s competitive edge.
Tech industry leaders view this as a unique opportunity to reshape the debate on immigration policy. As John Neuffer, CEO of the Semiconductor Industry Association, remarked, “Musk and Silicon Valley leaders could restart the discussion productively.”