Connect with us

Middle East

Israel details plan for ‘humanitarian zone’ in Rafah, called a ‘concentration camp’ by critics

Published

on

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has announced that a plan is being developed to relocate the entire civilian population of the Gaza Strip to a closed “humanitarian zone” to be built on the ruins of Rafah. However, experts describe this plan as a “concentration camp” for all Palestinians in Gaza.

Katz stated that he has instructed the Israeli army to prepare a plan for establishing a “humanitarian zone” on the ruins of Rafah, adding that the ultimate goal of this artificial settlement is to house the entire population of the Gaza Strip.

According to Katz, approximately 600,000 Palestinians, primarily from the Al-Mawasi area, will be transferred to this zone in the first phase after security screenings. The defense minister also explicitly stated that the relocated civilians will not be permitted to leave the area.

Under the plan, security for the zone will be provided by the Israeli army, but military forces will not govern the area or distribute humanitarian aid. Katz noted that they are seeking international partners to manage the zone. The plan is being coordinated by Amir Baram, the Director-General of the Ministry of Defense and former Deputy Chief of the General Staff.

Message of an ‘impending migration plan’

In a briefing with journalists, Defense Minister Katz outlined Israel’s strategy to weaken Hamas, listing key objectives such as targeting the organization’s leadership, seizing territorial control, demilitarizing Gaza, and what he described as a “migration plan that will be implemented.”

Katz stated that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leading the process of identifying countries willing to accept Gazans.

However, according to an official who spoke to Haaretz, the Israeli government does not consider the population transfer plan to be realistic, and no preparations are currently underway to facilitate a mass migration from Gaza. Israel has reportedly offered to send Palestinian refugees to several countries, but none have accepted.

A crime against humanity

Michael Sfard, one of Israel’s leading human rights lawyers, said Katz’s plan violates international law.

“He (Katz) has laid out an operational plan for a crime against humanity. It is nothing less than that,” Sfard said. “This is nothing short of preparing for the transfer of the population to the southern tip of the Gaza Strip and their expulsion from the Strip,” he added.

Speaking to The Guardian, Sfard explained, “To expel someone from their homeland is a war crime in the context of war. If it is done on a mass scale, as he plans, it becomes a crime against humanity.”

Professor Amos Goldberg, a Holocaust historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, also stated that the defense minister has put forth clear plans for ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the establishment of “a concentration camp or transit camp before deporting the Palestinians.”

Professor Goldberg noted that Katz’s plan raises the question of what will happen to Palestinians who refuse to comply with Israel’s order to move to the new settlement. “What will happen if the Palestinians, not being completely helpless, do not accept this solution and revolt?” he added.

Contradiction with the General Staff’s statement

On the morning of the same day, the Israeli General Staff informed the High Court that the army was not carrying out forced population evacuations within or outside of Gaza. A statement from the office of Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir claimed that objectives such as “displacing the population or concentrating them in specific areas” were not part of their operational plans.

However, this statement contradicts the “Gideon’s Chariots” operational order given to the army in May. According to this document, previously revealed by the Haaretz newspaper, one of the operation’s goals was explicitly stated as “managing and displacing the civilian population.” The Israeli army confirmed the details in the report but did not issue an official statement.

Meanwhile, speaking at the White House on Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said that the US and Israel are working with other countries that will offer Palestinians a “better future.”

As he prepared for dinner with Trump, Netanyahu said, “If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave.”

Concentration camps under GHF’s purview

Separately, Reuters reported that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israeli-backed aid organization, has proposed the construction of camps described as “Temporary Humanitarian Settlement Areas,” which could be established both inside and outside of Gaza.

The relationship between this proposal and the plan announced by Katz is unclear, but Israel is known to be involved in the establishment and activities of the GHF.

The plan, uncovered by Reuters, aims to “end Hamas’s control over the population” by placing the people of Gaza in these areas.

This nearly $2 billion plan was presented to the Trump administration and was recently discussed at the White House. The presentation document, which is undated but contains photos from February 11, states that the GHF is trying to secure over $2 billion to build large-scale “Temporary Humanitarian Settlement Areas” inside and outside Gaza.

The plan reportedly began at the end of May with the GHF opening food distribution points in Gaza, with these camps being the second phase.

According to the document reviewed by Reuters, the camps are described as “voluntary areas” where the people of Gaza can “be temporarily housed, de-radicalized, reintegrated into society, and prepared for resettlement if they wish.”

The presentation file obtained by Reuters delves into technical details, including how these camps would be built and their costs. According to a timeline in the presentation, a camp project would become operational within 90 days of its launch and would house 2,160 people, along with a laundry, showers, toilets, and a school.

A source involved in the project said this presentation is part of a planning process that began last year and envisions the construction of eight camps, each capable of housing hundreds of thousands of people.

However, the plan does not provide clear information on how or by what means Palestinians would be moved to these camps. It is also unclear where the camps might be established outside of Gaza. On a map, arrows pointing to Egypt and Cyprus, along with the phrase “other possible destinations,” are noteworthy.

The document states that these large-scale facilities will be used to “build a relationship of trust with the local population” and to “realize President Donald Trump’s vision for Gaza.”

The GHF has denied submitting such a proposal, stating that the slides in the document are not theirs and that they were only “exploring theoretical options for safely delivering aid to Gaza.”

However, the cover of the presentation features the GHF’s name, and some slides mention SRS (Safe Reach Solutions), a company founded by former CIA agent Philip Reilly that provides logistics and security services for the GHF.

A source working on the project indicated that the plan has not progressed due to a lack of funding. Reuters previously reported that the GHF wanted to open a bank account in Switzerland to collect donations, but banks such as UBS and Goldman Sachs refused to work with the GHF.

On February 4, Trump publicly announced for the first time that they “want to take over Gaza and turn it into the Riviera of the Middle East,” which would require the relocation of 2.3 million Palestinians.

Tony Blair’s team also involved

Meanwhile, the Financial Times recently reported that the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), the think tank of former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair, is pursuing a project led by Israeli businesspeople that includes a manufacturing zone named after Elon Musk.

It was revealed that this project is the same plan that the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) worked on and presented to Trump, which envisions de-Palestinizing Gaza and redeveloping it as the “Middle East Riviera.” The TBI is reportedly partnering with BCG on this project. Both TBI and BCG have denied the allegations.

A spokesperson for Tony Blair said the former prime minister has not spoken with the planners and has not commented on the plans.

“The TBI team is in discussion with many different groups and organizations with ‘post-war plans’ for Gaza, but it has no involvement in the writing of this plan,” the spokesperson said.

A BCG spokesperson denied the claims, stating: “We completely deny this work. BCG has not received any payment for this work.”

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey