Europe
German state prepares Deutsche Bahn and Lufthansa for war

War plans by the German Federal Ministry of Defence foresee a broader use of civilian logistics companies such as Deutsche Bahn or Lufthansa for transporting supplies to the front, training soldiers, and maintaining military equipment.
This information was published by the newspaper Handelsblatt. According to this, in the event of a war with Russia, the transport of NATO soldiers to the eastern front by Lufthansa aircraft is on the agenda.
It is stated that Lufthansa, which has been involved in the training of German Armed Forces (Bundeswehr) transport pilots since the 1960s, could also undertake the training of fighter jet pilots in the future.
Furthermore, the company Lufthansa Technik Defense will transform into a defence company by undertaking the maintenance and repair of the Bundeswehr’s fighter jets, helicopters, and maritime patrol aircraft in the future.
German Railways (Deutsche Bahn), on the other hand, has committed to providing flat wagons for the transport of tanks upon request. According to reports, German Railways is also in talks with the German Armed Forces regarding the conversion of ICE wagons into sleeping cars for the transport of the wounded.
The Bundeswehr always officially utilizes civilian logistics companies for the transport of military equipment, as well as personnel transport.
The Operational Command Command confirmed to the newspaper Handelsblatt that “outside of crisis areas,” this is “almost entirely” the case.
Even in crisis areas, private companies carry out a “significant portion” of German military transport. For this purpose, the Bundeswehr has signed numerous transport framework agreements.
For example, contracts have been signed with Deutsche Bahn (DB) and Schenker, a long-standing subsidiary of DB which has now been taken over by the Danish logistics company DSV, as well as with DHL, Hermes, and Kühne & Nagel.
Among the most important contractors in road transport is Transa, a subsidiary of DB Cargo in Offenbach.
According to the Operational Command Command, the Bundeswehr is 100% dependent on civilian companies for the sea and air transport of oversized and heavy materials. For air transport, it uses wide-body aircraft belonging to Ukraine’s Antonov Airlines, which depart from Halle/Leipzig airport.
For strategic sea transport, a cooperation agreement has been signed with Denmark’s DFDS Seaways. Under this agreement, DFDS Seaways must provide three RoRo (roll-on/roll-off) vessels within 15 to 30 days if required.
In land transport, the central role in the transport of military equipment belongs to the DB company. DB holds a 24.9% stake in BwFuhrparkService, a service provider for the Bundeswehr.
DB, which is currently transporting heavy military equipment for troops stationed in Lithuania, coordinates the planning and execution of rail transport 100% together with its subsidiary DB Cargo, according to information provided by a Bundeswehr officer.
Logistics experts argue that the German railway system is in very poor condition and that sufficient transport capacity cannot be provided in a war situation.
Considering this situation, a large part of the 500 billion euro special fund will be used for the renovation of the railway network. The CDU/CSU and SPD coalition agreement prioritizes the expansion of railways eastward, towards Poland and the Czech Republic.
DB Cargo committed to providing 343 flat wagons in the short term for the transport of tanks in 2023. Furthermore, the conversion of container wagons into flat wagons is also planned if needed.
According to reports, the Bundeswehr is also in talks with DB regarding the conversion of ICE wagons into sleeping cars for the transport of the wounded.
The Bundeswehr is making extensive plans to expand cooperation with Lufthansa. These plans are not limited to transport projects.
Observers note that Lufthansa played a role in the evacuation of thousands of people from Afghanistan in August 2021: While Bundeswehr transport aircraft took the evacuees from Kabul to Tashkent in Uzbekistan, Lufthansa undertook their transport from there to Germany. The German airline reportedly earned approximately 5 million euros for a total of 17 Lufthansa charter flights.
However, in a war situation, Lufthansa’s aircraft will not be needed solely for evacuation. It is also on the agenda for the airline, which is still officially civilian, to conduct flights to transport thousands, or even tens of thousands, of soldiers from Germany and possibly other NATO countries to a new eastern front should conflicts break out.
Whether there are enough pilots and other crew members available is also uncertain, and theoretically, they cannot be assigned to wartime duties.
According to some insider information obtained by Handelsblatt, there are some pilots with a background in the air force who might volunteer, but it remains uncertain whether this will be sufficient.
Beyond this, the issue of expanding military training provided by Lufthansa has also come up.
This is not new in principle. Since 1963, there has been cooperation between the German Armed Forces and the Lufthansa Civil Aviation School in Bremen, and military transport aircraft pilots are also trained at this school.
Lufthansa Aviation Training also trains German armed forces transport pilots in Phoenix, US, and in simulators near Munich airport.
The airline also began training German Armed Forces drone pilots in 2012; these pilots must first undergo normal pilot training to acquire general aviation knowledge.
Currently, it is being discussed whether Lufthansa will also enter the basic training of air force fighter jet pilots. The company’s CEO, Carsten Spohr, announced in March that “very interesting and positive discussions” had taken place on this matter in recent months.
Handelsblatt states that if this happens, fighter jet pilots will receive their basic training at Lufthansa; only “certification and military pilot training” will be carried out by the Air Force, and in this case, the Air Force’s burden will be significantly reduced.
Finally, Lufthansa is trying to get new orders from the Bundeswehr for its technical division. It has been undertaking the Bundeswehr’s flight services for over 60 years and specifically carries out maintenance and repair work.
The company management had decided to get more involved in military business in 2019. This plan gained further momentum with the federal government’s initial allocation of a 100 billion euro special fund.
To benefit from these and future military expenditures, Lufthansa Technik established a subsidiary named “Defense”. This entity is conducting talks with the German Armed Forces regarding potential orders for the maintenance and repair of the US F-35 fighter jet and the Boeing Chinook CH-47 transport helicopter. Both aircraft will be purchased by the German Armed Forces.
In addition, Lufthansa aims to win the maintenance and repair tender for the P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to be delivered to the German Navy. It is stated that the aircraft is based on the civilian short and medium-range Boeing 737, for which Lufthansa Technik has extensive maintenance experience.
Furthermore, Boeing also transferred the maintenance and repair of the P-8 maritime patrol aircraft supplied by the New Zealand Armed Forces to the German consortium at the end of 2022.
Therefore, Lufthansa wants to enter the military business not only nationally but also internationally.
Europe
Germany’s SPD faces ‘Russia rebellion’ at party congress

Divisions within Germany’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) over rearmament and relations with Russia are set to culminate at its upcoming congress, where party leader and finance minister Lars Klingbeil faces backlash from a faction within his party.
According to a report in the Financial Times, one of the critics of the SPD leadership is the eldest son of former SPD Chancellor Willy Brandt, who still holds significant influence over the party with his Ostpolitik (Eastern Policy), a policy of rapprochement with the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War.
Peter Brandt, a 76-year-old historian, has co-signed an SPD motion criticizing the government’s rearmament plans and advocating for “de-escalation and a gradual return to cooperation with Russia.”
The manifesto, published ahead of this week’s SPD party conference, states, “There is a long road ahead to return to a stable order of peace and security in Europe.”
While acknowledging that strengthening the defense capabilities of Germany and Europe is “necessary,” the authors emphasize that these efforts must be “part of a strategy aimed at de-escalation and the gradual restoration of trust, not a new arms race.”
Peter Brandt told the Financial Times that Klingbeil approved the new defense spending increase “without checking if it was the majority view.” He added, “This is a problem. There isn’t as clear a stance among the members as is reflected in the leadership.”
The criticism comes as Klingbeil, deputy chancellor in the coalition government led by Christian Democrat Friedrich Merz, prepares a major “funding injection” for the military, aiming to increase the country’s defense budget by 70% by 2029.
Brandt’s words are a reminder that many Social Democrats remain reluctant to fully embrace the country’s “Zeitenwende” (turning point) in defense policy, announced by former SPD Chancellor Olaf Scholz following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
The internal rebellion could create problems for Klingbeil, who negotiated the coalition agreement with Merz after the SPD’s worst-ever election result in February. The dissenters could make it difficult for the government, which holds a slim majority of just 13 seats, to pass legislation on the budget, arms deliveries, and the planned return to compulsory military service.
Uwe Jun, a political scientist at the University of Trier, noted that while the rebels are not a majority in the SPD, they are not a small minority either. “There is a long tradition in the SPD of people who came from the peace movement of the 1970s and 1980s,” he said. “They are critical of anything related to the military.”
Klingbeil’s reorganization of the party leadership following the election fiasco has further fueled the controversy. The 47-year-old politician is accused of consolidating his power after replacing 66-year-old Rolf Mützenich as the head of the SPD parliamentary group. Mützenich is also a signatory of the manifesto.
“Personal and political tensions are also playing a role,” said Gesine Schwan, a political scientist and SPD member who was asked to sign the motion but declined.
Klingbeil, who grew up after the fall of the Berlin Wall, has tried to shift the party’s foreign policy stance. In a series of speeches and editorials in 2022, he admitted that the party had “failed to realize that things in Russia had already been moving in a very different direction.”
The manifesto’s signatories argue that the pursuit of peace must be the priority. Ralf Stegner, who helped draft the text, caused controversy last month when it was revealed he had traveled to Azerbaijan in April to meet with Russian officials, including one under EU sanctions.
Stegner, 65, who at the time served on the parliamentary committee overseeing Germany’s intelligence service, defended the meeting, stating that MPs from Merz’s CDU had also attended to keep communication channels with Moscow open.
“You have to keep talking to everyone,” Stegner told the Financial Times. “The insinuation that this means agreeing with what others say or being a secret agent for a third party is, of course, complete nonsense.”
Stegner’s stance reflects the continued nostalgia within the SPD for Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik. According to a party insider, members who joined the SPD under Brandt’s leadership, now in their 60s, make up 58% of the membership.
Peter Brandt, who said he never fully shared his father’s views, explained that he signed the manifesto because he believes the Russian threat is exaggerated.
“I do not agree with the idea that Russia will attack NATO,” said the younger Brandt. “The Russian army has shown weakness in the Ukraine war.”
He added that NATO is “currently superior to the Russian army in conventional terms, even without the Americans,” and called NATO’s goal of dedicating 5% of GDP to defense “unreasonable.”
Klingbeil, however, pointed out that Willy Brandt, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1971, also oversaw large defense budgets exceeding 3.5% of GDP.
“And ultimately, I don’t think anyone would associate Willy Brandt with someone who focused solely on military matters,” the SPD leader remarked.
Jun said Klingbeil symbolizes the “new school of thought within the party,” adding that the SPD’s younger MPs are “quite pragmatic” on Russia.
But Schwan believes Klingbeil will have to contend with the “old guard” for a while longer. “De-escalation, security, and peace policy are still part of the SPD’s DNA,” she said.
Europe
New MI6 chief’s grandfather was a Nazi collaborator known as ‘The Butcher’

The grandfather of the new head of MI6 was reportedly a Nazi spy known as “The Butcher” in German-occupied Chernihiv.
Blaise Metreweli was appointed earlier this month as the first female spy chief in the 116-year history of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).
According to documents cited by the Daily Mail, Metreweli’s grandfather, Constantine Dobrowolski, was a Nazi collaborator who boasted of killing Jews.
The newspaper reports that Dobrowolski, a Ukrainian, defected from the Red Army to become a chief informant for the Nazis and Adolf Hitler in the Chernihiv region.
Metreweli, 47, never knew her grandfather. He remained in Nazi-occupied Ukraine when his family fled in 1943 as the Red Army liberated the area.
Documents found in German archives reveal that Dobrowolski was known to the Nazis as “Agent No. 30.”
At one point, the Soviet Union placed a 50,000-ruble bounty on Dobrowolski’s head (approximately £200,000 today), labeling him “the greatest enemy of the Ukrainian people.”
According to the newspaper, Dobrowolski sought revenge against Russia for killing his family and confiscating their property during the 1917 revolution.
One file reportedly contains a handwritten letter from Dobrowolski to his Nazi superiors, signed “Heil Hitler.”
In another file, he is said to have boasted that he “personally participated in the destruction of the Jews” and had killed hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers.
A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office commented on the allegations, stating, “Blaise Metreweli did not know and had never met her father’s father. Blaise’s ancestors are characterized by conflict and division, and like many with Eastern European roots, she has a history that is only partially understood.”
The spokesperson suggested that it is “precisely this complex heritage” that “contributes to Blaise’s determination to prevent conflict and protect the British people from the modern threats of hostile states” as the next head of MI6.
Metreweli grew up abroad before studying anthropology at Cambridge, where she was part of the winning team in the 1997 Boat Race.
Joining MI6 in 1999, Metreweli served for two decades in Europe and the Middle East.
Metreweli currently holds the position of “Q,” the head of the technical section of MI6, made famous by the James Bond films.
Europe
Merz urges Brussels to secure a US trade deal within days

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is demanding that Brussels sign a trade deal with the US within days.
Bringing the issue to the agenda of today’s EU leaders’ summit, Merz described the European Commission’s negotiating strategy this week as “too complex.”
Calling for greater urgency and focus in negotiations with the US president, Merz said he would convey this demand to other EU leaders, alongside Emmanuel Macron and Giorgia Meloni.
The leaders are eagerly awaiting an update from the EU’s executive body during dinner on its talks with the Trump administration.
Concerns are growing that if Brussels and Washington fail to reach an agreement, “reciprocal” 50% tariffs will be imposed on all goods starting July 9.
The bloc, which had previously dismissed the recent UK-US trade deal—a pact that imposed a 10% baseline tariff while offering some relief for car and steel exports—is now coming to terms with the reality that securing a better outcome will be challenging.
“I still hope that a trading power like the EU, with its 450 million people, will have more leverage than the UK,” a senior EU diplomat said on Wednesday.
The German chancellor stated that the priority must be to protect Europe’s key industries—particularly Germany’s automotive, manufacturing, semiconductor, pharmaceutical, steel, and aluminum sectors—from the sector-specific tariffs that Trump has either imposed or threatened to impose.
However, Trump is heavily reliant on these tariffs, having implemented the highest rates since the Great Depression of the 1930s to compel manufacturers to move production to the US and close the nation’s trillion-dollar trade deficit.
The US trade deficit with the 27 EU member states reached a total of $232 billion in 2025, accounting for approximately 19% of the total figure.
Underpinning Merz’s demands is a persistent concern that Brussels might establish a broad framework centered on a flat 10% tariff for most common goods, rather than isolating sectoral tariffs on items like cars, which he argues harms German exporters.
Another EU diplomat noted that keeping a broad-based tariff in place was “not a task we gave the European Commission,” adding, “We hope the Commission will try to find a solution for the most at-risk sectors.”
Merz’s call to “get the job done” faces two primary obstacles. First, the EU negotiating team has warned that Washington will likely offer only minor concessions, such as limited tariff reductions tied to restrictive quotas, after which full tariff rates would apply.
This is a far cry from the zero-tariff agreement Merz had initially hoped to achieve and closely resembles the UK deal, the only one struck with Trump so far.
Meanwhile, negotiations with the US on Germany’s biggest demand—automobiles—are proving particularly difficult.
Merz and German automakers are pushing for a mechanism that would allow them to offset their vehicle imports into the US with models they export from their American production facilities.
Economy Minister Katharina Reiche presented such a proposal during her visit to the US earlier this month. Both BMW and Mercedes-Benz operate large factories in the US that produce certain models for global export. However, considering the EU exports over 750,000 vehicles to the US annually, it remains unclear how much relief a limited quota agreement would provide to car manufacturers if Trump rejects this proposal.
Brussels, on the other hand, is hopeful that Trump’s long-standing desire for the EU to align with US automotive regulations will serve as a strong enough bargaining chip to ease the pressure on the auto sector.
In a scoping paper sent to member states in May, the Commission revealed it had offered to align with US regulations on autonomous vehicles. This is seen as a major concession, especially after similar discussions on automotive reciprocity led to the collapse of a transatlantic trade deal a decade ago.
-
Middle East1 week ago
US to launch major bombing campaign against Iran this weekend, Hersh reports
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former diplomat warns forcing Iran out of the NPT is the greatest danger
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iran targets Mossad and Unit 8200 in missile attack on Tel Aviv
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Former CIA analyst says Israel used ceasefire talks as a trap
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iranian missile attack causes heavy damage across Israel
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Iran signals NPT withdrawal amid rising tensions with Israel
-
Russia2 weeks ago
Russia alleges UK-Ukraine plot for false flag attack on US Navy in Baltic Sea
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Iran’s uranium enrichment program since 1979