America
Harvard sues Trump administration over funding cuts

Harvard University sued the Trump administration on Monday, challenging the White House’s decision to cut more than $2 billion in federal funding.
In a statement announcing the lawsuit, Harvard President Alan Garber said the university chose to oppose the administration’s “unreasonable demands to control who we hire and what we teach” through an antisemitism task force.
Harvard’s administration said the White House’s demands “would impose unprecedented and inappropriate control over the university” and came without a genuine effort to address antisemitism.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Massachusetts.
In response to the lawsuit, White House spokesman Harrison Fields said, “Federal aid to institutions like Harvard, which enrich their overpaid bureaucrats with the taxes of struggling American families, is ending. Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard is not meeting the basic conditions required to access that privilege.”
The Trump administration reviewed approximately $9 billion in grants and contracts with the university, alleging that the treatment of Jewish students, including during the Gaza occupation protests that shook campuses nationwide last year, violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
The administration has already withdrawn more than $2 billion in federal funds from the school and is considering withdrawing another $1 billion in grants.
In addition, the Internal Revenue Service is reviewing the university’s tax-exempt status, and the Department of Homeland Security has threatened to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll international students, who make up approximately 27% of Harvard’s total enrollment. The Department of Education has also reviewed the university’s federal funding.
Garber said, “These actions will have very serious real-world consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the position of American higher education in the world.”
The lawsuit alleges that the federal government launched a broad attack on billions in research funding at Harvard and a number of other institutions “with very little warning and even less explanation.”
Lawyers for the institution said the federal government was “using federal funds as leverage to seize control of the academic decision-making process at Harvard.”
Earlier this month, the administration had demanded that, to avoid losing funds, the institution reform its governance, change hiring and admissions policies, report foreign and green card students for “behavioral violations,” have academic programs or departments audited for antisemitism by an outside party, end diversity programs, and reform student disciplinary procedures, among other conditions.
“Ultimately, the trade-off imposed on Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to oversee your academic institution or jeopardize the institution’s ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions,” the lawsuit stated, adding that the freezing of extensive research funds “had nothing to do with antisemitism.”
Among the lawyers representing Harvard are Republicans and those connected to the Trump administration. These lawyers include Robert Hur, William Burck, Steven Lehotsky, who clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia, and Scott Keller, who previously served as Solicitor General of Texas.
The lawyers argue that the administration’s actions violated First Amendment and Title VI compliance procedures that should have occurred before federal funding was revoked.
The university argued that the government “made no effort to follow these procedures,” such as attempting to secure voluntary compliance, holding a hearing, and issuing a findings report, before freezing or terminating its funds.
The lawyers also said the freezing of funds would force the school to reduce or halt ongoing research projects, terminate employment contracts, and make cuts to departments and programs.
If Harvard were to continue using its own resources instead of federal funds, the school would need to reduce the number of graduate students it admits and the number of faculty and research staff.
They also argued that this situation could economically harm the Boston area, as the university is one of Massachusetts’ largest employers.
America
Tariffs cause major drop in China-US sea cargo

Following the onslaught of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs, there has been a significant drop in sea cargo shipments from China to the US.
According to global logistics company Flexport, sea cargo shipments from China to the US fell by 65% within three weeks after the tariffs took effect in early April, due to a drop in demand for goods on which China imposed a 145% tariff.
Sea cargo ships canceled approximately 80 voyages from China to the US this month. This is nearly 60% more than the voyages canceled during the peak period in May 2020, when Covid-19 disrupted the supply chain.
The Port of Los Angeles, a major entry point for Chinese goods into the US, expects a one-third reduction in the number of incoming ships next week compared to the same period last year.
Since China is one of the US’s largest suppliers for everything from kitchen appliances to combs, the chief economist at Apollo Global Management said last week, “The result of the tariffs will be empty shelves in US stores within a few weeks and Covid-like shortages for consumers and firms using Chinese products.”
According to Apollo, the drop in sales is likely to lead to layoffs in the trucking, logistics, and retail sectors and a recession over the summer.
To save time, US companies are importing more goods from other manufacturing hubs like Vietnam and Cambodia, where tariffs have been suspended. Nevertheless, thousands of businesses will need to replenish their stocks by mid-May, when retailers typically tend to increase their inventories ahead of the back-to-school and holiday seasons.
Executives from Walmart, Target, and Home Depot told Trump last week that they foresaw serious risks, such as shelves remaining empty and prices increasing. When relief will come is uncertain: The Trump administration said active negotiations with China were ongoing, but China denied this.
Even if tariffs are eased, a sudden surge in shipping demand could strain sea transport. Vespucci Maritime CEO Lars Jensen told Bloomberg, “Ports are designed for stable flows, not for intermittent volume changes.”
America
SpaceX gains local control as Starbase becomes a city

Elon Musk’s SpaceX company is getting its own official “company town.”
Residents around SpaceX’s Starbase launch site in South Texas voted overwhelmingly on Saturday to gain town status. The town will also be named Starbase.
According to results published on the Cameron County Elections Department website, there were 212 votes in favor and only 6 votes against.
Musk wrote in a post on the social media site X that Starbase in Texas “is now a real town.”
The majority of the new city’s residents are believed to be SpaceX employees. On Saturday, three current and former SpaceX employees (Bobby Peden, Jordan Buss, and Jenna Petrzelka) were elected unopposed to serve as Starbase’s mayor and two commissioners.
The Associated Press (AP) reported that SpaceX has not provided many details on why it wanted to incorporate this area. The company stated that it already manages roads, utilities, and education and health services, and also plans to transfer authority from the county to the new city government to close the nearby Boca Chica beach and state park for launches.
While Musk recently announced he would reduce his role at the controversial Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to “one or two days” a week, last year he announced he would move SpaceX’s headquarters from El Segundo, California, to the Starbase facility in Texas.
At the time, Musk said he was “tired of dodging gangs of violent drug addicts to get in and out of the building” and that the “final straw” was a bill in California prohibiting schools from disclosing students’ sexual orientation or gender identity without their consent.
Following last night’s elections, a new X account representing the town shared the message, “Becoming a city will help us continue to build the best possible community for the men and women building the future of humanity’s place in space.”
Turning the 1.45 square mile (approximately 3.75 square kilometers) area in South Texas, which currently contains little more than SpaceX launch pads, rocket assembly facilities, and employee housing, into a city will give Musk’s company a more direct say in local decision-making processes.
As municipal leaders, SpaceX executives can generate revenue through taxes and acquire land through eminent domain, while also encouraging employee housing construction by relaxing zoning rules.
More importantly for SpaceX’s operations, the municipality will be able to close the local public beach for weekday launches, which currently requires permission from county officials.
On the other hand, many residents of the nearby city of Brownsville are concerned that SpaceX wants to deprive them of an important destination where they can enjoy the waves and the sun. Additionally, rising housing prices due to the influx of SpaceX employees are also causing general dissatisfaction.
However, county officials largely support the company’s plans due to SpaceX’s impact on the local economy. The company states that over 3,400 jobs have been created in the area.
Moreover, Starbase will not be the first example. While a population center so directly controlled by a company is unusual in 21st-century America, there are many historical examples. For example, the city of Gary in Indiana was founded in 1906 as a US Steel company town.
America
Liberals secure victory in Canada, minority government likely

The Liberal Party, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, has reportedly won the early general election held in Canada on April 28.
According to CTV and CBS news channels, Carney retained his position as prime minister with this result, but his party is not expected to achieve a majority needed to form a government alone.
Although the final results have not yet been announced, CBS estimates that the Liberals will secure 158 seats in the 343-seat House of Commons.
The main rival Conservative Party is projected to win 148 seats, the Bloc Québécois 25, and the New Democratic Party (NDP) 10 seats. A majority government in Canada requires 172 seats.
The decision for an early election was initiated by the 60-year-old Liberal Party leader Mark Carney, who succeeded Justin Trudeau after his resignation.
In late March, Carney requested an early election from Mary Simon, the Governor General of Canada appointed by the Queen of England.
According to the normal schedule, the elections were planned for October.
In late December last year, the Liberals’ chances of staying in power seemed quite low due to the rapid decline in Trudeau’s popularity, and polls indicated that the Conservatives were leading by more than 20 points.
However, the leadership change in the Liberal Party allowed the party not only to close the gap but also, according to public opinion polls, to pull ahead of their rivals by a few points.
According to research conducted by Abacus, Carney’s public support (46%) was also higher than that of his Conservative rival Pierre Poilievre (39%) before the election.
Unlike his younger rival Poilievre, Carney is a new name in politics. Carney earned a bachelor’s degree in economics from Harvard University in 1988, where he also played on the university’s hockey team.
He continued to play hockey while earning his master’s and doctoral degrees at Oxford. Parallel to his education, Carney began working at Goldman Sachs, where he served for 13 years in the company’s Boston, London, New York, Tokyo, and Toronto branches.
In 2003, Carney left the private sector to become Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada, and later served as Senior Associate Deputy Minister in the Department of Finance.
He took the helm of the Bank of Canada in 2007, on the eve of the 2008 financial crisis. His successes in this role led to an offer to return to London in 2013, this time as Governor of the Bank of England.
Carney, the first foreigner appointed to this position, witnessed two significant referendums in the history of the United Kingdom: Scotland’s separation from the UK (which failed) and the UK’s departure from the European Union.
The final weeks of his tenure at the Bank of England coincided with the beginning of another sharp crisis, the Covid-19 pandemic. Carney acquired British and Irish citizenship in 2018 (although he announced plans to relinquish them in 2025).
After leaving the Bank of England, Carney advised the Trudeau government on economic matters and returned to the private sector.
In September last year, he was appointed chair of the party’s economic growth working group by then-Prime Minister Trudeau.
Following Trudeau’s resignation in January 2025, Carney entered the party’s leadership race, his first election, and won an overwhelming victory, receiving approximately 86% of the votes. Along with the Liberal Party leadership, he also took the prime minister’s seat.
According to the Abacus poll, relations with the new US President Donald Trump and the response to his tariff policy were among the most important issues for Canadian voters in these elections, after the cost of living crisis.
Carney described the US tariffs as a “direct attack” on Canadians and stated, “There is no going back. As Canada, we will have to build new relations with the United States.”
Carney is focusing on retaliatory tariffs and diversifying trade partners.
In this context, his first foreign visits as prime minister were to France and the UK; however, the New York Times notes that opportunities to increase exports to European markets appear limited for now.
Carney is not rushing to make a trade agreement with the US immediately and argues that Canada has sufficient leverage to adopt a “wait and see” position.
“My government will make the right deal,” Carney promised.
Even before taking office, Trump had threatened to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico, citing their insufficient efforts to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking across their shared borders.
On March 4, 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico came into effect, but products covered by the trilateral trade agreement were later exempted from these tariffs.
On March 12, the Trump administration imposed 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum (Canada is a key supplier of both), and on March 26, 25% tariffs on all automobiles imported into the US, including American brands manufactured abroad.
Trump even threatened on April 23 that he might soon increase the rate for cars imported from Canada, stating, “With all due respect, we don’t need your cars. We really want to make our own cars.”
Carney also promised support for Canadian workers affected by the tariffs, funded by revenue from retaliatory tariffs.
According to information on the Liberal Party’s website, the Canadian prime minister also announced tax cuts that will ease the economic burden on 22 million Canadians, particularly those with middle and low incomes.
Carney also pledges to double the pace of housing construction, modernize the healthcare system, and continue the policy of reducing emissions and using alternative energy sources.
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Japanese investors sell $20 billion in bonds amid tariff turmoil
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
Seven-year Gaza ceasefire proposal emerges
-
America2 weeks ago
OpenAI eyes Google’s Chrome browser amid antitrust trial
-
Asia2 weeks ago
New Russia-China payment network cuts trade costs
-
America2 weeks ago
Three prosecutors resign in New York Mayor Adams case
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Russia offers deeper gas discount to China
-
Opinion6 days ago
The UAE’s Bold Leap into the Global LLM Race
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Revisiting the Bandung spirit in a multipolar world