Connect with us

Diplomacy

US and China reach framework to ease export curbs and salvage trade truce

Published

on

US and Chinese officials have agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and resolve China’s export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced this on Tuesday following two days of intensive negotiations in London.

Lutnick told reporters that the framework agreement adds “concrete substance” to the deal reached in Geneva last month, which aimed to ease retaliatory tariffs that were disrupted by China’s restrictions on critical mineral exports. The agreement will also lift some recently imposed US export restrictions.

“We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the meeting between the two presidents,” Lutnick said. “The idea is to go back and talk to President Trump and make sure he approves. They will also go back and talk to President Xi and make sure he approves. If approved, we will implement the framework.”

Top economic officials from the US and China have been pushing for a deal to ease mutual export restrictions that threatened to derail the Geneva agreement, which had lowered tariffs that had reached triple-digit figures.

In a separate briefing, Chinese Vice Minister of Commerce Li Chenggang also confirmed that a trade framework had been agreed upon to be presented to the US and Chinese leaders.

“The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state in their phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,” Li told reporters.

“We hope the progress made at the London meeting will contribute to strengthening trust between China and the US and to the healthy and stable development of economic and trade ties between the two countries,” he added.

While Li did not provide details on the progress made in the talks, the parties are expected to announce the content of the agreement after receiving approval from their respective national leaders.

Lutnick stated that China’s restrictions on the export of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a “fundamental” part of the framework agreement.

“There were also a series of measures implemented by the United States when these rare earths were not forthcoming. You should expect those to be lifted in a balanced way, as President Trump has said,” Lutnick noted.

The new round of negotiations, initiated by the US and China to resolve trade tensions that had escalated with mutual tariff hikes, took place on June 9-10 at Lancaster House, a government mansion within walking distance of Buckingham Palace in London.

The historic venue, which also houses the British government’s 39,000-bottle wine cellar, was provided by the British government as a neutral ground for the talks between the two economic superpowers.

The US delegation was represented by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The Chinese side was represented by Vice Premier He Lifeng, who is responsible for economic relations, Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao, and International Trade Representative Li Chenggang.

The London meeting was the first face-to-face encounter between He and Bessent since the signing of the 90-day truce agreement in Geneva.

The high-stakes negotiations were initiated to prevent two challenging issues—China’s rare earth exports to the US and US controls on technology exports to China—from derailing the broader talks.

Before the first round of talks in Geneva, Bessent had warned that the high tariffs imposed by both sides amounted to an embargo on bilateral trade. Highlighting the risks, China’s exports to the US in May saw their sharpest year-on-year decline since the 2020 pandemic.

The US accused China of failing to honor its commitment made in Geneva to ease restrictions on rare earth element exports, while Beijing increased pressure on Washington to lift its technology-related export controls. China also reacted strongly to the US announcing new restrictions after the Geneva meeting.

The US accused China of foot-dragging on approving shipments of rare earth elements, which are vital for the defense, automotive, and technology sectors. The slow pace of approvals has affected manufacturing supply chains in the US and Europe.

Beijing, in turn, accused Washington of “seriously violating” the Geneva agreement by issuing new warnings about the global use of Huawei chips, halting the sale of chip design software to Chinese companies, and canceling the visas of Chinese students.

On Monday, a senior White House official indicated that Trump might ease restrictions on chip sales to China if Beijing agreed to expedite the export of rare earth elements.

This would represent a significant policy shift from the Joe Biden administration’s “small yard, high fence” approach, which sought to limit China’s ability to acquire US technology.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey