Connect with us

Asia

IS claims responsibility for Kabul bombing that killed dozens

Published

on

There are conflicting reports about casualties in the deadly explosion near the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday which is the latest sign of a deteriorating security situation in the capital city Kabul.

Some sources confirmed that nearly 40 people were dead, while some others confirmed 20. All these were employees of the ministry. Dozens more were also wounded in the bombing claimed by the Islamic State terrorist group.

The IS terrorist group in a statement said that a “martyrdom-seeker” identified as Kheiber al-Kandahari detonated his explosive vest amidst a gathering of ministry employees and guards as they left through the ministry’s main gate.

The Taliban did not immediately comment on the IS’s claim and the groups news outlet Aamaq said the attack coincided with a ministry training course for diplomats.

The attack is aimed at the deterioration of security in Kabul and other major cities in Afghanistan in the recent past months. Targeted attacks, suicide bombings, and gun firing have occurred in several locations which resulted in the killing of Taliban members and innocent civilians.

Dozens of people killed

The Taliban police chief spokesman Khalid Zadran confirmed five casualties. But some sources and officials narrate different stories. Humanitarian organization emergency said its surgical center in Kabul had received over 40 patients.

Afghanistan ambassador in Italy, Khaled Zekriya said that “with enormous pain” the bombing “took the lives of 39 of our most precious and experienced colleagues, who for the last two decades patriotically served the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”

At least 21 people were killed in the bombing, a Taliban official told Harici. He also said that only a Taliban security guard was killed and the rest were the employees of the ministry, all of them civil staff. Another four Taliban security forces were wounded in the bombing.

Social media users circulate some pictures of several employees of the ministry who lost their lives in the bombing.

Sibghatullah Ahmadi, former spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs said that at least 50 employees of the ministry, who worked there ahead of the fall of the government to the Taliban in 2021, were killed or wounded.

First mass causality in 2023

Indeed, the Kabul bombing is the first mass casualty in 2023, but 2022 was much more deadly where hundreds of people were killed and wounded. Everywhere was a target last year, including mosques, tuition centers, shrines, and many more but the start of 2023 with high-level targets painted a dangerous picture for all officials of Taliban ministries.

Since the Taliban seized power in August 2021, there have been multiple attacks in Kabul that have claimed dozens of lives. Last September, at least 25 people, mostly young students, were killed after IS attacked their education center in Kabul.

Earlier that month, another six people, including two Russian Embassy employees, have been killed in a suicide blast near the Russian Embassy in Kabul. Again the IS claimed responsibility.

In August, an explosion at a mosque during evening prayers killed at least 21 people and wounded 33, highlighting the security failures.

In mid-December IS fighters stormed a hotel popular with Chinese citizens in which three assaults were killed and dozens innocent Afghans were wounded. Five Chinese citizens were also wounded. The Pakistan embassy was also attacked by the Daesh fighters. The Taliban members detained two men in connection.

On December 2, a blast happened in front of a mosque inside Hizb-e-Islami leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s office, in which two attackers tried to enter Hekmatyar’s office after an explosive-laden vehicle was detonated close to his office.

Hekmatyar in that time said that suicide attackers opened fire on people, killing one of his guards and injuring two others. Hekmatyar escaped the attack alive and his bodyguards killed the two assailants.

Security deterioration

Moreover, on January 1, 2023, an IS bomber exploded himself near the entrance at Kabul’s military airport that killed and wounded several people.

The Taliban did not provide exact figures, but local media citing sources reported that 10 people were killed and either others received injuries.

IS in a statement said that the purpose of the suicide attack was to “disrupt a meeting between the Taliban and foreign diplomats,”, but restrained to provide further details.

But sources said that a delegation from UNAMA, led by UN envoy Markus Potzel, had just left the ministry after meeting with Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the political deputy of the Taliban’s foreign ministry when the blast happened. Potzel and his team left the compound 10 minutes before the blast.

The incident happened in less than four minutes when Stanikzi left the compound after meeting Potzel.

World condemned the bombing

China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Qatar, Iran, US and others strongly condemned Wednesday’s attack in front of foreign ministry.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said that Beijing strongly condemns the Kabul attack and hopes the Afghan government can protect citizens from all countries, including Chinese nationals

Wang added “as far as we know, there were no Chinese citizens killed or injured in this terrorist attack, (we) hope the Afghan side will take resolute and effective measures, earnestly protect citizens and institutions from all countries, including the Chinese side, that are in Afghanistan.”

Saudi Arabia also condemned the “terrorist attack in Kabul”, emphasizing that Riyadh “condemns all forms of violence, terrorism and extremism.”

Kingdom’s foreign ministry in a statement stressed that the country stands by the Afghan people during their plight, offering sincerest condolences to the families of the victims.

Victims of terrorism

Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi visiting wounded individuals at hospital

Pakistan Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said he held a telephonic talk with Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, where both sides discussed the brutal attack in Kabul.

During the talk, Zardari condemned the attack in the strongest terms and said “both people of Pakistan and Afghanistan are victims of terrorism, and we must do all we can to defeat this menace.”

Abdullah Abdullah, former Head of the High Council for National Reconciliation also condemned the attack and called it “against all human and Islamic principles.”

Moreover, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) condemned the attack and stated that violence is not part of any solution to bring lasting peace to Afghanistan.

The UK Chargé d’Affaires Hugo Shorter, Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iran’s Embassy in Kabul, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation extended their deep condolences to the families of the victims and wished rapid recovery to those wounded.

“Need to know why/how this happened and what measures will be taken to prevent another attack,” US Charge d’Affaires Karen Decker said in a tweet referring to the Kabul bombing.

She furthered that “Afghan citizens and foreign guests alike need to be able to count on effective security.”

Confused and contradictory

Sadly, the Taliban opened gates of prisons and released the inmates detained for different crimes and terrorist related charges. Among them hundreds of IS members also managed to run away after the dramatic exit of the foreign forces and the collapse of western-backed government led by Ashraf Ghani.

From 2,000 to 5,000 IS members escaped the prison when the Taliban failed to control jails across Afghanistan when they seized power in 2021.

The most deadly attack carried out by one of the released IS members was on August 26, 2021 when it killed nearly 170 Afghans and 13 US forces.

After IS intensified its attacks, Taliban launched a campaign against IS members, and reportedly a large number of them seek refuge in neighboring Pakistan, said a source.

 

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey