Connect with us

ASIA

Pakistan: Khan to start long march from Lahore to Islamabad on Friday

Published

on

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imarn Khan says he will begin a protest march with his supporters from Lahore to the capital city Islamabad on October 28.

The march will start from Lahore’s Liberty Square as Imran Khan seeks early elections. Distance between the two cities is about 380km.

Khan, 77, the Chairman of Pakistan’s Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) party said he agreed for a long march in order to pressurize the government to announce elections immediately. But, he called on his supporters to exercise extreme caution and avoid violence.

Khan claimed that the authorities urged him constantly not to stage a long march as the country is in trouble at the moment. But Khan said that people have become fed up with the “imported” government and really want a change.

Since being removed from office in a no-confidence vote in the legislature in April, Khan had several times staged protests and one long march, demanding for early elections. However, the government frequently rejected the demand, and said the national elections will be held as scheduled in October or November 2023.

Security tightened in Islamabad

Authorities are heightening security in the capital city Islamabad, especially in Red Zone areas, including the diplomatic enclave and other sensitive installations, government buildings, President’s House, Prime Minister’s House, ministers’ offices, parliament, and other important offices.

Islamabad was put on high alert after Khan’s announcement of the long march, and the Interior Ministry is strengthening the deployments of its forces to take necessary actions in case of fresh unrest.

Already 30,000 police, rangers, and paramilitary troops dispatched in Islamabad in preparations to block Khan’s supporters from entering the city, and more importantly to safeguard the Red Zone in case of any possible violence.

Containers also placed the surroundings of Islamabad to barricade all entry points before the arrival of the “long march”.

Khan’s last march was on May

Former PM Imran Khan (C on vehicle) and his supporters take part in a protest rally in Swabi on May 25. AFP

On 25 May, Khan reached Islamabad with hundreds of his supporters, demanding fresh elections just days after his removal from office in April. However, the march soon turned violent after police crackdown on PTI leaders and supporters in Islamabad, Lahore, Karachi and cities. Police also restored to shelling on protestors when they attempted to enter Islamabad in march that was meant to be peaceful.

Police also went on a shooting spree on families who gathered in Lahore’s Liberty Square, including children and women. They received injuries in firing.

Pakistani authorities banned the protest march after a police officer was shot and killed during the crackdown on Khan’s supporters, but PTI workers defied the ban and continued to march toward Islamabad.

Police became more violent and restored to more shelling and firing tear gas as some protesters tried to remove shipping containers with a crane.

Defining moment for Pakistan

This Friday will be another test for Pakistan. Khan’s long march announcement comes after the Election Commission of Pakistan disqualified him for failing to disclose gifts and proceeds of their alleged sale he received while he was in office. However, Islamabad High Court said he is not barred from contesting in the upcoming elections. Earlier this month, Khan already won six of seven National Assembly seats in a by-election, a win not only highlighting his popularity but also raising expectations that he could succeed in next general elections to once again run the nuclear-state.

Indeed, political tension is growing in Pakistan aimed at a fragile economic situation also in the wake of preparation for an important meeting in China as Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is scheduled to visit Beijing in early November. All is set for the 11th JCC meeting of CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor), a billion dollars infrastructure projects which are underway through Pakistan since 2013.

Without doubt, political instability has fuelled economic uncertainty as the country is scrambling to recover. Pakistan can’t pay its billion dollars debt to the International Monetary Fund, while recent flooding catastrophes had sustained an estimated as high as $30 billion. “Today, when we go to any friendly country or make a phone call, they think that we have come (to them) to beg for money,” Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had earlier said at a gathering in Islamabad while describing the uphill battle to secure aid.

Pakistan’s economic woes worsen.

Indeed, Pakistan is in a dire situation, but it would be naïve to think that foreign powers should come up to the fore to help them. Pakistan has to act now and should not hope for its allies to come for help because “hope” is not a strategy.

The first option that can help Pakistan to restore its economy and political stability is to establish a new government by an election which is acceptable to the people.

ASIA

Reasons for US withdrawal from Afghanistan

Published

on

America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan was not a one-time decision, but was formed gradually. The US left Afghanistan when it was sure that the Taliban regime would implement its terms. Months of negotiations took place in Doha for a safe exit.

Some reasons are as follows:

1- The excessive pressure of the Eastern Front against US, NATO and India

The US entered the region which is bordered with China, Iran and the borders of the former Soviet Union. This was not digestible for the regional powers. China’s fear of Uyghurs being strengthened by the US and also China’s need for Afghanistan to expand the Silk Road caused it to directly and indirectly support the opposition of the republic and the withdrawal of US from the region.

This is why before the fall of the Republic in Afghanistan, we witnessed the presence of Taliban delegations in China. In 1395, this delegation traveled to China under the title of peace.

India brought itself closer to Afghanistan by building the Salma Dam. Salma Dam is the biggest project of India for the reconstruction of Afghanistan, which is worth 300 million dollars.

The construction of Salma Dam was one of the big projects of the government of Mohammad Dawood Khan, the first president of Afghanistan, which started in 1976 with the help of India. The construction process of this dam, which was stopped due to the conflicts in Afghanistan, started again in 2005.

Salma Dam was put into operation in the presence of Ashraf Ghani, the former president of Afghanistan, and Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India. India had a special economic view on Chabahar port to export goods to Afghanistan and Central Asia through this port. Pakistan was against increasing India’s influence in Afghanistan and Central Asia, and by strengthening the Taliban, it tried to make the republic fall in order to reduce India’s influence. For that purpose, Pakistan sent all its extremist groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) to Afghanistan for suicide attacks.

Pakistan’s subversive operations in Afghanistan were carried out for three purposes:

First: Due to the reduction of India’s influence through the fall of the Republic.

Second: By transferring suicide bombers and extremist groups to Afghanistan and guaranteeing its unity and security by moving extremist groups away from Pakistan to neighboring countries.

Third: Weakening the desire for independence in the Pashtunistan region of Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) by strengthening extremist groups.

But these extremists were all focused on confronting the republic, not the Pakistani army. After the fall of the republic, TTP was automatically activated – because it did not have a playground and the best playground was their own land (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) which was located in Pakistan. For this reason, TTP has made some areas insecure and caused border conflicts and Pakistani attacks on Afghanistan.

Iran also felt very threatened by the US, so it was trying to plan to drive the US out of Afghanistan. The president of the United States at the time called Iran a part of the axis of evil.

Axis of Evil is a term coined by George W. Bush, the president of the United States on January 29, 2002, in his annual speech to the Congress, used it in referring to the three countries of the Islamic Republic of Iran, North Korea, and Iraq.

Bush is the one who started the global war against terrorism after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the main results of which were the occupation of Afghanistan in the same year and the occupation of Iraq in 2003.

When such a person occupied two countries, one in the east and the other in the west of Iran, and also considered Iran as the axis of evil, he also planned to attack Iran from a political point of view. For this reason, Iran was not happy with the presence of the US in Afghanistan.

We all remember that an American archive 170 plane fell into the hands of Iran. This spy plane, which was sent by the US to Iran, caused the Iranian security authorities to become more suspicious of the US and to work indirectly against the US in Afghanistan.

The Russians, who once had a physical presence in Afghanistan in the form of the Soviet Union, and their agents such as Taraki and Najib could not fulfill their hopes and dreams, considered America the cause of their failure.

During the height of the war between the Mujahideen and the Soviet Red Army, the Americans sent many weapons through Pakistan to Afghanistan to prevent Soviet influence and expansion.

Both because revenge against the US and Washington had penetrated to spread terrorism, the Russians determined all their will to expel the US from the region. The Taliban’s visit to Russia before the fall of the republic indicated Moscow’s determination to overthrow the republic and drive the US out of Afghanistan.

2- Internal differences and the failure of nation building

The lack of formation of nation building in Afghanistan made the US regret staying and start negotiations with the Taliban.

When a government system cannot institutionalize nation building, division and corruption will spread and it will lose the ability to deal with external and internal threats in a coherent and unified manner. The US were fully aware of this and did not see the national army as the main supporter or protector of the country.

3- Countering China’s economic power

The only country in the world that has been able to challenge the US economically is China. The Chinese dragon is getting stronger day by day and is taking over the world markets.

The US’s staying in Afghanistan would cause it to lose the necessary focus for economic competition and struggle with China. In addition, the presence of the US military in Afghanistan and in the neighborhood of China was a weak point, which could be indirectly attacked by China at any moment. Meanwhile, the US’s focus on the Yellow Sea and Taiwan Island will increase the pressure on China.

4- Failure to realize democracy in Afghanistan

The US stayed in Japan and Germany, but left Afghanistan. One of the important reasons is the issue of culture and economy. Japan did not have a religious ideology and quickly accepted democracy.

The culture of liberalism permeated all the cultural layers of the Japanese people and the people also accepted this culture. West Germany also accepted American culture and with the collapse of the Berlin Wall, East Germany also joined the liberalism system.

The fall of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989 was the starting point of liberalism in Eastern and Central Europe. This did not happen in Afghanistan. The people of Afghanistan have been accustomed to Islamic culture for about 1,400 years and were also caught up in internal wars for many years. Extensive damage caused democracy to not penetrate in the city and village.

As long as a culture is not indigenous and is not accepted from within the society, it is not possible to impose it with external pressure. The communists did this in Afghanistan and failed. The US also failed to influence culturally in the middle and lower layers of the Afghan society and saw no hope of realizing democracy and liberal culture and therefore, the US left Afghanistan.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Yoon Suk Yeol’s fate uncertain as Constitutional Court considers impeachment

Published

on

Prolonged uncertainty continues over the fate of deposed South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol. Yoon, who was suspended from office on December 3 after a brief imposition of martial law and is under criminal investigation for a possible uprising, has been guarded for weeks by a small army of personal security personnel at his hilltop residence in Seoul, where he survived the first attempt to arrest him.

In a National Barometer Poll released on Thursday, 59% of respondents wanted Yoon to be arrested, while about 37% said his arrest would be excessive. A similar percentage also expressed support for the Constitutional Court, which is currently considering lawmakers’ decision to remove Yoon from office.

Analysts say that Yoon’s return to office is uncertain, but the break has emboldened his supporters gathered near the presidential residence. In the weeks since Yoon’s dismissal, support for the ruling People Power Party (PPP) has also seen a slight rebound, which some analysts say indicates that conservatives are uniting to fight a possible presidential election later this year.

According to a Realmeter poll released on Monday, the PPP’s approval rating rose for the third week in a row to 34.4%. The main opposition Democratic Party, which holds a parliamentary majority and has put Yoon’s impeachment to a vote, had a 45.2% approval rating.

Facing a new attempt to arrest him, Yoon’s lawyers continue to challenge the anti-corruption officials who sought his arrest, claiming that they do not have the authority to investigate him for the offense of sedition, even though an arrest warrant has been issued by the court.

Yoon will accept the Constitutional Court’s ruling

However, lawyers told reporters on Thursday that the Constitutional Court’s ruling on Yoon’s political future would be accepted. Decisions of the court, one of the country’s two highest courts along with the Supreme Court, cannot be appealed.

“The president is still standing strong,” Yoon’s lawyer Seok Dong-hyeon told supporters outside his residence on Wednesday, saying he did not want people and public officials to be harmed by this but could not accept illegal investigations.

Continue Reading

ASIA

China faces deflationary pressures as consumer prices grow at a record-low pace

Published

on

Consumer prices in China rose marginally in December, highlighting persistent deflationary pressures in the world’s second-largest economy, which have driven bond yields to record lows.

Consumer prices increased by 0.1 percent last month compared to a year earlier, aligning with Reuters’ average analyst forecast. This marks the slowest growth in nine months and is lower than November’s 0.2 percent rise, as reported on Thursday.

The producer price index, a measure of ex-factory prices, declined by 2.3 percent. This was slightly better than analysts’ forecasts of a 2.4 percent drop and an improvement from November’s 2.5 percent contraction. December’s data indicates that the index has been in the deflationary zone for 28 consecutive months.

The Chinese economy has been grappling with deflation for months, exacerbated by a three-year property crisis that has dampened consumer demand and led to industrial oversupply.

Beijing is expected to achieve its 5 percent economic growth target for 2024 through a combination of price competitiveness in global markets, domestic deflation, and strengthening exports supported by government stimulus measures.

However, analysts caution that this strategy is being undermined by U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat of significant tariffs, which could sharply slow China’s export growth.

Additionally, Beijing has faced challenges in boosting domestic demand, even after a September monetary policy shift aimed at stimulating the stock market and enhancing household wealth through higher stock prices.

The yield on China’s benchmark 10-year government bond has remained at record lows since the start of the year, reflecting investor expectations of slow economic growth and a deflationary outlook.

On Thursday, Chinese stocks displayed mixed performance. The benchmark CSI 300 index was unchanged, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index rose by 0.4 percent. Yields on 10- and 30-year government bonds remained stable.

In currency markets, the renminbi was steady at Rmb7.33 against the dollar after the People’s Bank of China set the daily trading rate at Rmb7.19. The renminbi is permitted to trade within a 2 percent range of the central bank’s daily rate.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey