Asia
South Korean president Yoon impeached: What happens next?
The Constitutional Court unanimously upheld President Yoon Suk Yeol’s impeachment on Friday, following his declaration of limited martial law in December.
The decision, read by Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae and broadcast live on television, took immediate effect. The country must hold an early presidential election within 60 days to choose Yoon’s successor, with the election expected to take place on June 3.
Yoon was impeached by the National Assembly in mid-December for violating the Constitution and laws by declaring martial law on December 3, deploying troops to the opposition-controlled National Assembly to prevent lawmakers from voting on the decree, and ordering the arrest of politicians.
Chief Justice Moon stated, “The negative impacts on the constitutional order and the implications of the respondent’s violation of the laws are very grave. The benefits of protecting the Constitution by removing the respondent from office outweigh the national losses incurred by the impeachment.”
The decision concluded a contentious four-month period that began with Yoon’s surprise declaration of martial law, which significantly damaged the country’s political, economic, and social fabric.
In a statement released by his legal team, Yoon apologized to the public for failing to meet their expectations and thanked them for their support.
“My dear citizens, it has been a great honor for me to work for the Republic of Korea,” he said. “I will always pray for the beloved Republic of Korea and for you.”
What offenses did the case involve?
The case centered on whether Yoon violated the law by committing five key actions: declaring martial law, preparing a martial law decree, deploying troops to the National Assembly, raiding the National Election Commission, and attempting to arrest politicians.
The court agreed with all charges, including that he did not meet the legal requirements for declaring martial law. According to the Constitution, a president can declare martial law during wartime or an equivalent national emergency.
Yoon justified his actions by accusing the main opposition party of paralyzing state affairs by repeatedly accusing officials in his administration and attempting to cut the state budget.
The court rejected this claim.
Chief Justice Moon stated, “He neglected his duty to protect the Constitution by undermining the authority of a constitutional institution and infringing upon the fundamental human rights of the people through the mobilization of soldiers and police.”
He added, “The respondent’s actions that violated the Constitution and the laws are a betrayal of the public’s trust and, from the perspective of protecting the Constitution, constitute a grave violation of the law that cannot be tolerated.”
With eight justices currently on the bench, at least six justices had to agree to approve the impeachment motion.
The key issue was not only whether Yoon violated the laws but also whether this violation was serious enough to warrant impeachment.
Yoon did not attend the court for the decision.
How did the ruling and opposition parties react to the decision?
Acting President and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo addressed the nation, pledging to do his best to manage the upcoming elections to ensure a smooth transition to the next administration.
The ruling People Power Party stated that it “humbly accepts” the court’s decision, while the main opposition Democratic Party (DP) hailed it as a “victory for the people.”
DP leader Lee Jae-myung, seen as a leading candidate in the next presidential election, read a separate statement from the National Assembly.
“The great people have reclaimed the great democratic republic, the Republic of Korea,” he said. “Together with the people, we will restore the destroyed livelihoods of the people, peace, the economy, and democracy with a great spirit of unity.”
According to a Gallup Korea poll conducted from Tuesday to Thursday on 1,001 adults, 52% wanted an opposition candidate to win the next election, while 37% supported a candidate from the ruling party.
Lee received the most support as the next head of state, with 34%, followed by Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo from the ruling bloc with 9%. The poll had a margin of error of ±3.1% at a 95% confidence level.
According to Yonhap news agency, the decision led to sharp divisions among Yoon’s supporters and opponents.
Outside the official presidential residence in central Seoul, anti-Yoon protesters gathered, holding signs that read, “Impeach Yoon Suk Yeol.”
A few meters away, a group of Yoon’s supporters expressed their shock. Some angrily hurled abuse, while others fell to the ground and wept loudly.
Second president to be impeached
Thirty-eight days was the longest time the court has taken to issue a decision on a president’s impeachment after the final hearing.
In the past cases of former Presidents Roh Moo-hyun and Park Geun-hye, the court had taken 14 days and 11 days, respectively.
It took 111 days from the day the impeachment motion against Yoon was submitted to the court on December 14.
In addition to the impeachment case, Yoon is also being tried on charges of inciting insurrection through the martial law proposal, a crime punishable by a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.
Yoon, who was arrested in January and held in a detention center until early March due to these charges, was released following a court decision that his detention was invalid.
Yoon, who rose from a senior prosecutor to president in three years, became the country’s second president to be impeached.
Yoon, 64, followed in the footsteps of former President Park Geun-hye, who was impeached in 2017 when the Constitutional Court upheld her impeachment over a corruption scandal.
Yoon’s journey
Before reaching the country’s highest office, Yoon began his career as a prosecutor in 1994. He rose to prominence by leading an investigation team into Park’s corruption scandal, ultimately leading to Park’s impeachment and subsequent imprisonment.
In 2019, he was appointed as the country’s top prosecutor by then-President Moon Jae-in but clashed with the administration as he pursued investigations into the family members of former Justice Minister Cho Kuk.
Faced with increasing pressure from the Moon administration, Yoon resigned from his position in 2021. Shortly thereafter, Yoon entered politics and won the 2022 presidential election as the candidate of the conservative People Power Party.
Yoon’s term was marked by conflicts with the National Assembly, which was dominated by the main opposition Democratic Party. Yoon exercised his presidential veto power against 25 bills passed by the National Assembly.
Tensions with the DP peaked in early December when the main opposition introduced motions to impeach the country’s top auditor and a senior prosecutor, leading to Yoon’s declaration of martial law on December 3, which ultimately led to Yoon’s downfall.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
