Connect with us

Asia

South Korean president Yoon impeached: What happens next?

Published

on

The Constitutional Court unanimously upheld President Yoon Suk Yeol’s impeachment on Friday, following his declaration of limited martial law in December.

The decision, read by Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae and broadcast live on television, took immediate effect. The country must hold an early presidential election within 60 days to choose Yoon’s successor, with the election expected to take place on June 3.

Yoon was impeached by the National Assembly in mid-December for violating the Constitution and laws by declaring martial law on December 3, deploying troops to the opposition-controlled National Assembly to prevent lawmakers from voting on the decree, and ordering the arrest of politicians.

Chief Justice Moon stated, “The negative impacts on the constitutional order and the implications of the respondent’s violation of the laws are very grave. The benefits of protecting the Constitution by removing the respondent from office outweigh the national losses incurred by the impeachment.”

The decision concluded a contentious four-month period that began with Yoon’s surprise declaration of martial law, which significantly damaged the country’s political, economic, and social fabric.

In a statement released by his legal team, Yoon apologized to the public for failing to meet their expectations and thanked them for their support.

“My dear citizens, it has been a great honor for me to work for the Republic of Korea,” he said. “I will always pray for the beloved Republic of Korea and for you.”

What offenses did the case involve?

The case centered on whether Yoon violated the law by committing five key actions: declaring martial law, preparing a martial law decree, deploying troops to the National Assembly, raiding the National Election Commission, and attempting to arrest politicians.

The court agreed with all charges, including that he did not meet the legal requirements for declaring martial law. According to the Constitution, a president can declare martial law during wartime or an equivalent national emergency.

Yoon justified his actions by accusing the main opposition party of paralyzing state affairs by repeatedly accusing officials in his administration and attempting to cut the state budget.

The court rejected this claim.

Chief Justice Moon stated, “He neglected his duty to protect the Constitution by undermining the authority of a constitutional institution and infringing upon the fundamental human rights of the people through the mobilization of soldiers and police.”

He added, “The respondent’s actions that violated the Constitution and the laws are a betrayal of the public’s trust and, from the perspective of protecting the Constitution, constitute a grave violation of the law that cannot be tolerated.”

With eight justices currently on the bench, at least six justices had to agree to approve the impeachment motion.

The key issue was not only whether Yoon violated the laws but also whether this violation was serious enough to warrant impeachment.

Yoon did not attend the court for the decision.

How did the ruling and opposition parties react to the decision?

Acting President and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo addressed the nation, pledging to do his best to manage the upcoming elections to ensure a smooth transition to the next administration.

The ruling People Power Party stated that it “humbly accepts” the court’s decision, while the main opposition Democratic Party (DP) hailed it as a “victory for the people.”

DP leader Lee Jae-myung, seen as a leading candidate in the next presidential election, read a separate statement from the National Assembly.

“The great people have reclaimed the great democratic republic, the Republic of Korea,” he said. “Together with the people, we will restore the destroyed livelihoods of the people, peace, the economy, and democracy with a great spirit of unity.”

According to a Gallup Korea poll conducted from Tuesday to Thursday on 1,001 adults, 52% wanted an opposition candidate to win the next election, while 37% supported a candidate from the ruling party.

Lee received the most support as the next head of state, with 34%, followed by Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo from the ruling bloc with 9%. The poll had a margin of error of ±3.1% at a 95% confidence level.

According to Yonhap news agency, the decision led to sharp divisions among Yoon’s supporters and opponents.

Outside the official presidential residence in central Seoul, anti-Yoon protesters gathered, holding signs that read, “Impeach Yoon Suk Yeol.”

A few meters away, a group of Yoon’s supporters expressed their shock. Some angrily hurled abuse, while others fell to the ground and wept loudly.

Second president to be impeached

Thirty-eight days was the longest time the court has taken to issue a decision on a president’s impeachment after the final hearing.

In the past cases of former Presidents Roh Moo-hyun and Park Geun-hye, the court had taken 14 days and 11 days, respectively.

It took 111 days from the day the impeachment motion against Yoon was submitted to the court on December 14.

In addition to the impeachment case, Yoon is also being tried on charges of inciting insurrection through the martial law proposal, a crime punishable by a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.

Yoon, who was arrested in January and held in a detention center until early March due to these charges, was released following a court decision that his detention was invalid.

Yoon, who rose from a senior prosecutor to president in three years, became the country’s second president to be impeached.

Yoon, 64, followed in the footsteps of former President Park Geun-hye, who was impeached in 2017 when the Constitutional Court upheld her impeachment over a corruption scandal.

Yoon’s journey

Before reaching the country’s highest office, Yoon began his career as a prosecutor in 1994. He rose to prominence by leading an investigation team into Park’s corruption scandal, ultimately leading to Park’s impeachment and subsequent imprisonment.

In 2019, he was appointed as the country’s top prosecutor by then-President Moon Jae-in but clashed with the administration as he pursued investigations into the family members of former Justice Minister Cho Kuk.

Faced with increasing pressure from the Moon administration, Yoon resigned from his position in 2021. Shortly thereafter, Yoon entered politics and won the 2022 presidential election as the candidate of the conservative People Power Party.

Yoon’s term was marked by conflicts with the National Assembly, which was dominated by the main opposition Democratic Party. Yoon exercised his presidential veto power against 25 bills passed by the National Assembly.

Tensions with the DP peaked in early December when the main opposition introduced motions to impeach the country’s top auditor and a senior prosecutor, leading to Yoon’s declaration of martial law on December 3, which ultimately led to Yoon’s downfall.

Asia

Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand

Published

on

Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.

Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.

Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.

Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.

Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.

In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.

The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.

Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.

This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.

The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.

Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.

Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.

Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.

CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange

Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.

As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.

At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.

Continue Reading

Asia

Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister

Published

on

Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests

India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.

The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.

The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.

What triggered the protests?

Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.

Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.

According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.

Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.

The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.

How the movement unfolded

Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.

Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.

The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.

Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.

CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.

Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.

Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.

Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.

In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.

Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.

Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.

Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.

On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.

On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.

Continue Reading

Asia

China’s DeepSeek prepares for 2027 mainland IPO, aims for $71 billion valuation in new funding round

Published

on

DeepSeek, the China-based startup developing artificial intelligence models, has begun preparations for an initial public offering (IPO).

According to a Bloomberg report citing sources familiar with the matter, the company plans to file its IPO application either this year or early next year.

The sources noted that the filing timeline will depend on the readiness of the company’s financial reports, with DeepSeek projected to go public on a mainland Chinese stock exchange in 2027.

Prior to the IPO, DeepSeek also aims to conduct a new funding round. In this second investment round, the company reportedly plans to raise at least 10 billion yuan (approximately $1.48 billion), a process expected to push its market valuation to at least 480 billion yuan (approximately $71 billion).

The AI startup, which secured $7.4 billion in its first funding round, saw its market valuation exceed $50 billion, rendering DeepSeek the most valuable artificial intelligence company in China.

The company’s founder, Liang Wenfeng, personally invested $3 billion of his own capital into the DeepSeek project. According to data from the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Liang’s stake in the company fell from 90% to 78% following the latest investment round.

Despite this decline, Liang’s personal wealth more than doubled, rising from $16.7 billion to approximately $36 billion.

This surge has positioned Liang as the wealthiest founder of an AI model-developing company in the world.

According to earlier reports by Reuters, the investment round was structured under an unusual partnership model that allows founder Liang Wenfeng to maintain administrative control over the company.

Under this framework, which requires investors to provide funds to a limited liability partnership managed by the company’s general manager rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, backers are not granted voting rights. Furthermore, the provided funds are locked and cannot be withdrawn for a period of five years.

The China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund was the sole institution exempted from these strict rules, investing approximately $150 million directly into DeepSeek.

Based in Hangzhou, China, DeepSeek was founded by Liang Wenfeng in 2023.

The company was structured as a unit within Zhejiang High-Flyer Asset Management, a hedge fund specializing in artificial intelligence that Liang launched alongside two former university classmates.

In early 2025, DeepSeek released a new artificial intelligence model offering performance comparable to US rivals such as OpenAI, but at a significantly lower operating cost.

Following these developments, founder Liang Wenfeng stated that the company will continue to develop open-source artificial intelligence models, emphasizing that their ultimate global objective is to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey