Connect with us

RUSSIA

Telegram founder Durov: From saviour to demon in the West

Published

on

Telegram founder Pavel Durov, once lauded by Western media and politicians for his stance against censorship and his refusal to cooperate with intelligence agencies, has been arrested in France for actions that previously earned him praise.

This dramatic shift in Western attitudes towards Telegram and Durov is worth a closer look.

‘The good old days’: Maidan protests in Ukraine

Telegram was launched in 2013, and it did not take long for the app to come under scrutiny. Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) soon demanded information on the organisers of the Maidan protests in Ukraine, which were coordinated via Telegram.

Durov refused to comply and left Russia six months later, citing the impossibility of running an independent internet business in the country. In an interview with TechCrunch, “Unfortunately, you can’t run an internet business in this country. I’m afraid there’s no going back for me, especially after I publicly refused to cooperate with the authorities,” Durov lamented in an interview with TechCrunch.

After leaving Russia, Durov became a well-known figure in the West. He was praised for standing up to the ‘evil Russian regime’, protecting user data and opposing censorship.

Telegram became a popular tool among Western politicians and media, especially during the 2020 protests in Belarus, which were largely coordinated through the app.

Covid-19 pandemic: Telegram’s image in the West

But this positive attitude towards Telegram lasted until the Covid-19 pandemic, when Western platforms such as YouTube, Facebook and WhatsApp began implementing strict censorship measures to ‘fight disinformation’.

Telegram, which allowed dissenting voices to be heard, was suddenly labelled a ‘dangerous platform’ by the same Western media that had once praised it.

The Western establishment, which had praised Telegram for protecting the right to protest in Russia and Belarus, now saw it as a threat to public order within its own borders.

Strict censorship policies in the West are also worth mentioning. In the European Union (EU), a law was passed forcing internet platforms to actively monitor content, essentially censoring anything that contradicts the dominant transatlantic narratives.

Moreover, it is no secret that Western internet platforms share user data with government authorities. Ironically, what the Russian state demanded of Durov years ago, the West is now demanding of tech companies.

But the situation in the West is even worse. Neither Durov nor his associates, some of whom still live in Russia, have been detained or arrested in Russia. Moscow has only asked for targeted access to specific information under certain conditions, as opposed to the general surveillance now common in the West.

From the West’s dear friend to the devil

Pavel Durov, who once attracted enough Western attention to be included in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Young Global Leaders programme, now faces a prison sentence.

Russian authorities and prominent figures have long advised Durov to return to Russia for his own safety, but he has ignored these warnings. Now, as his arrest in France hits the headlines, the reactions of Russian officials and public opinion paint a picture of irony and vindication.

How did Moscow react?

In a statement on Durov’s arrest, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova highlighted the hypocrisy of the West’s position:

“The Russian Embassy in Paris immediately began its work, as it does when it is informed of the detention of Russian citizens by local authorities. There is no need to remind our diplomats of their duties. But I recall that in 2018 a group of 26 NGOs, including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Freedom House and others, condemned the decision of the Russian judiciary to block Telegram. They called on the UN, EU and other governments to stand up to Russia’s actions and defend the fundamental rights to freedom of expression and privacy.”

Zakharova asked whether the same organisations would appeal to Paris for Durov’s release, or whether this time they would remain silent.

The deputy chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, also referred to Durov’s case, pointing out the risks of trying to take a principled stand without cooperating with law enforcement:

“Some time ago, I asked Durov why he refused to cooperate with law enforcement when it came to serious crimes. That is my principled position,’ he replied. I told him: ‘Then there are serious problems in every country. He felt that he had the most serious problems in Russia and left the country, taking up citizenship or residence elsewhere. He wanted to be a brilliant ‘citizen of the world’. He miscalculated. To all our common enemies he is just another Russian and therefore unpredictable and dangerous.”

RUSSIA

Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok will revive, Deripaska says

Published

on

One of Russia’s wealthiest men, Oleg Deripaska, announced his belief that the project to create a unified economic zone between Russia and Europe, stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, will be revived.

In a statement on his Telegram channel, Deripaska noted that this project would exclude Britain.

Deripaska stated, “The inevitable rapprochement after the conflict between Russia and Germany will completely change the political map of the European continent and lead to the revival of the project to create an economic zone from Lisbon to Vladivostok. This situation, along with Scotland’s secession from the United Kingdom, will definitively bury the British Empire in history.”

Deripaska stated that Britain’s problems have been accumulating for years, chief among them being “the virtual bankruptcy of public finances” and the complete failure of Brexit hopes.

Deripaska added, “No one came up with the dream of creating a Singapore on the Thames, and there was no desire for it in a society full of leftist ideas and not inclined to meticulous work.”

Deripaska assessed, “The collapse of the legal system and the terrible incompetence of judges in London have virtually destroyed the investment environment, and tax changes for foreigners have completely finished this situation.”

“But the worst is yet to come,” said Deripaska, adding, “All we have to do is wait and ignore the audacious ideas like ‘boots on the field.’ Let them crow a little.”

Continue Reading

RUSSIA

Ukraine retreats from most occupied areas in Russia’s Kursk oblast

Published

on

According to military analysts and soldiers who spoke to The New York Times (NYT), the Ukrainian army has withdrawn from almost all of the territory it occupied in Russia’s Kursk oblast.

As a result of Moscow’s counterattacks, Ukraine’s months-long operation to seize and occupy Russian territory is nearing its end.

At the peak of the offensive, the Ukrainian army controlled approximately 1,295 square kilometers of Russian territory.

According to Pasi Paroinen, a military analyst at the Finland-based Black Bird Group, as of Sunday, the Ukrainian army was trying to hold on to a narrow area of approximately 78 square kilometers along the Russia-Ukraine border.

“The end of the war is coming,” Paroinen told the newspaper.

While the amount of Russian territory under Ukrainian control could not be independently verified, intense fighting was reported in the region.

With Russia’s rapid advance, supported by continuous air strikes and drone attacks, the Ukrainian army withdrew last week from several villages in Kursk oblast and from Sudzha, the main city they controlled.

The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces announced that the troops had withdrawn to more defensible areas inside Russia and were taking advantage of the rugged terrain to provide better fire control against the approaching Russian forces.

On Sunday, it published a map showing the narrow area that Ukraine still controlled in Kursk oblast.

However, it remains unclear how long the Ukrainian army will be able to hold this area.

Ukrainian soldiers stated that the ongoing fighting in Kursk is no longer about holding Russian territory, but rather about controlling the best defensive positions to prevent the Russians from entering Ukraine’s Sumy oblast and opening a new front in the war.

An assault company commander, who identified himself only by his radio code, Boroda, said in a telephone interview, “We continue to maintain our positions on the Kursk front,” and added: “The only difference is that our positions have moved significantly closer to the border.”

Military experts say that although Ukraine’s withdrawal from most of Kursk oblast was rapid, it came after months of Russian attacks and bombardment that gradually weakened Ukraine’s foothold in the region and cut off supply routes, eventually making withdrawal necessary.

Austrian military analyst Franz-Stefan Gady, who visited Ukraine’s Sumy oblast on the Kursk border last month and met with Ukrainian commanders, said, “What has happened in the last few months was an operation that prepared the conditions for a successful advance.”

Serhiy Kuzan, the head of the non-governmental organization Ukrainian Center for Security and Cooperation, said, “There was no danger of encirclement of Ukrainian troops, and there is no evidence to the contrary.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s special representative for the Middle East and also a mediator with Russia, Steve Witkoff, told CNN on Sunday that he expected Trump to meet with Putin this week.

Witkoff said he had a positive three-to-four-hour meeting with Putin last week. While refraining from sharing the details of their discussions, Witkoff expressed his continued optimism that an agreement could still be reached.

Continue Reading

RUSSIA

Kremlin rejects temporary ceasefire in Ukraine, seeks long-term solution

Published

on

Yuri Ushakov, aide to the President of Russia, stated that Moscow is interested in a long-term resolution to the war in Ukraine and does not want a temporary ceasefire.

In an interview with Rossiya-1 television, Ushakov said, “We believe that our goal is a long-term peaceful solution; we are trying to achieve this. We want a peaceful solution that takes into account the legitimate interests and known concerns of our country. I think that steps imitating peace actions will not benefit anyone in this situation.”

Ushakov also mentioned that he conveyed Moscow’s position on this issue to US National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.

“Of course, I interpreted the agreements on the temporary ceasefire and stated our position that this is nothing more than a temporary respite for the Ukrainian army,” he added.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey