Connect with us

Diplomacy

The Forum on Political Islam was held in Abu Dhabi

Published

on

Forum on “Countering Extremist Ideology” hosted by TRENDS in Abu Dhabi ends with call for a “comprehensive roadmap”

At the event, where Harici was among the media partners, experts highlighted common patterns of ideology-driven violence and called for a comprehensive roadmap and the strengthening of citizenship values.

Abu Dhabi – September 16, 2025 — The 5th Annual Political Islam Forum, organized by the TRENDS Research and Advisory Center under the theme “Together with Knowledge Against Extremism” at the Fairmont Bab Al Bahr Hotel, addressed the “shared patterns of violence” associated with ideology-driven extremism. Senior officials, academics, and researchers from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, France, Italy, India, Indonesia, Portugal, Poland, Egypt, and Jordan participated on the Forum.

Among the keynote speakers were former UK Defense Secretary Sir Liam Fox and French Senator Nathalie Goulet.

Participants emphasized that countering extremism cannot be limited to security measures but requires a multilayered approach encompassing intellectual, social, and cultural dimensions. Key recommendations included strengthening democratic values and the rule of law, distinguishing genuine grievances from ideological exploitation, opening civic channels for youth leadership and innovation, and protecting educational institutions from the influence of politicized religiosity.

In his opening remarks, TRENDS CEO Dr. Mohammed Abdullah Al-Ali stressed the need for “new intellectual maps” to reveal implicit intersections between extremist currents, adding that permanent results cannot be achieved without dismantling propaganda and recruitment mechanisms in the digital age. He called for going beyond dispersing hate speech to also exposing the “illusions that enable such discourse.”

Dr. Al-Ali pointed to the Muslim Brotherhood as an example of ideology’s capacity to merge missionary rhetoric with violent projects, noting that the Brotherhood capitalized on the digital revolution to recruit followers via online platforms. He warned that combating extremism requires a global roadmap that combines intellectual and political expertise with alliances, one that dismantles the illusions enabling groups to attract new generations. He concluded by calling for collective efforts that integrate academic research, public policy, technology, and political will, transforming platforms into spaces for narratives of coexistence and humanity rather than ideological violence.

The Mohammed Bin Zayed University for Humanities (MBZUH) became the first recipient of the TRENDS Global Award for Countering Extremist Ideology for its measurable contributions. Prof. Radwan Al-Sayyid, member of the TRENDS Scientific and Academic Council, highlighted the university’s role in promoting values of moderation, citizenship, and dialogue.

Throughout the discussions, speakers underlined that extremist movements share similar cognitive and behavioral structures—such as closed worldviews, “us versus them” divisions, leader cults, conspiracy rhetoric, and narratives legitimizing violence. Dr. Khalifa Mubarak Al-Dhaheri (MBZUH) explained that such movements adopt strategies rejecting national frameworks while relying on an alliances–disinformation–violence spiral.

Sir Liam Fox argued that the term “religious extremist” is misleading, emphasizing that they are “political actors instrumentalizing religion.” Referring to Popper’s Paradox of Tolerance, he stressed that intolerance must not be tolerated under the guise of tolerance. Senator Nathalie Goulet highlighted the overlapping violence and financing between political Islam and the far-right, drawing attention to opaque fund flows, misuse of charities, and crypto-assets.

The digital sphere was emphasized as crucial, with calls for cooperation between governments, civil society, and technology companies to run awareness campaigns against online extremist content, and to strengthen alternative narratives around pluralism and citizenship. Additional proposals included holding all state or organizational actors involved in ideological violence accountable before international law, establishing early warning networks, and expanding rehabilitation programs for former extremists.

Key Session Highlights

  • High-Level Session moderated by Paul Cruickshank (Editor-in-Chief, CTC Sentinel, West Point):
    • Fiyaz Mughal (Faith Matters) explained that extremism feeds on the fusion of real grievances and identity crises, with social media creating echo chambers that accelerate radicalization.
    • H.E. Dherar Belhoul Al Falasi (Al-Majlis Group) noted that some structures attempt to channel students into networks through boycott campaigns, thus gaining influence and funding in the education sector.
  • First Session:
    • Prof. Alessandro Ferrari (Insubria) presented the concept of “militant democracy” as a tool that safeguards freedoms while countering democracy’s enemies.
    • Prof. Radwan Al-Sayyid stressed the need for a new reading of history and that the modern nation-state is the necessary framework for fighting extremism.
    • Dr. Vael Salih highlighted common emotional mobilization, binary worldviews, and symbolic violence across movements.
    • Prof. Patrice Brodeur (Montreal) emphasized holistic cooperation across political, religious, educational, and social domains.
    • Dr. Orla Lynch (Cork) urged a focus on participation motivations.
  • Second Session:
    • Spasimir Domaradzki (Warsaw) shared Central and Eastern European experiences of dismantling extremism’s intellectual foundations.
    • Mohammed Halfan Al-Sawafi noted ideological extremism spans a broad spectrum, including nationalism and neo-Nazism.
    • Meshari Al-Taydi (Asharq Al-Awsat) called for systematizing source research.
    • Dr. Anne Speckhard (ICSV) defined terrorism’s “deadly cocktail” as group–ideology–social support–individual motivation, stressing that “group” dynamics trigger violence.
    • Aimen Dean (UK) shared methods for practically analyzing participation motivations.
  • Third Session:
    • Dr. José Pedro Zúquete (Lisbon) examined “reciprocal radicalization” between identity movements and Islamist groups in Europe.
    • Imam Mohammed Tawhidi called on religious leaders to prevent the misuse of sacred texts to justify violence.
    • Prof. Yon Machmudi (Indonesia) proposed a combination of “hard power” (law, security) and “soft power” (deradicalization, education, community empowerment).
    • Dr. Orla Lynch added that lessons from former members could inform audience-targeting strategies.
  • Fourth Session:
    • Omar Al-Bashir Al-Turabi (Al-Mesbar) explained the “supply chain” of extremist thought, built on social bases through education and charity.
    • Abdullah bin Bijad Al-Otaibi pointed to the historical continuity of extremism.
    • Hamad Al-Husani (TRENDS) stressed that some movements pose combined threats to religion, state, and society.
    • Osama Al-Dalil (Al-Ahram) suggested the term “Islamized political culpability” instead of “politicized religion” for conceptual clarity.
    • Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Saleh Al-Muaita (Jordan) called for a regional strategy separating peaceful thought from violence.

Final Declaration

The forum’s final communiqué outlined pillars of the roadmap: drafting ethical principles/charters for religious platforms and charitable work, strengthening critical thinking in education, opening civic leadership channels for youth, and establishing digital early-warning and monitoring networks. It emphasized spreading alternative narratives that reinforce pluralistic citizenship through media–academia–policy–technology cooperation.

The event was organized in collaboration with the Mohammed Bin Zayed University for Humanities and the UAE Cybersecurity Council, with media support from The National, Sky News Arabia, Al-Ain News, Harici Media, Aletihad News Center, and Al-Khaleej.

Tunç Akkoç, founder of Harici Media, and journalist Sarp Sinan Hacır attended from Türkiye.

About TRENDS

Founded in Abu Dhabi in 2014, TRENDS Research and Advisory is an independent think tank. Through research programs, publications, and regular events conducted with global partners, it aims to generate impact regionally and internationally.

Diplomacy

CSTO strips Armenia of voting rights over two-year budget debt

Published

on

Members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) have stripped Armenia of its voting rights and its ability to appoint representatives to official positions due to a two-year debt to the organization’s budget.

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, “This decision was taken based on the organization’s charter due to Armenia’s failure to fulfil its obligations for several years.”

Prior to the CSTO leaders’ summit in Moscow, Peskov had stated that member states would “react” to the Caucasus country’s non-participation in the organization’s activities.

Ahead of the Moscow summit, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said his country’s “interest has run out” regarding the CSTO. Through his press spokesperson, he announced that he would travel to Türkiye on 11 November to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP31) instead of going to Russia.

The CSTO leaders’ meeting was held with the participation of Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.

The leaders jointly took the decision to revoke Armenia’s voting rights.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants also signed a joint declaration.

The declaration stated: “We confirm our unconditional commitment to the goals set out in the CSTO treaty and charter towards creating favourable and stable conditions for the comprehensive development of member states.”

Pashinyan had frozen Yerevan’s de facto participation in the CSTO in February 2024, citing the organization’s failure to aid the Armenian side during the armed clashes in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023.

Having referred to the CSTO as a “soap-bubble alliance” since that time, Pashinyan accused the organization’s members of “planning war” together with Baku. He stated that Armenia would not return to active work within the alliance at least “over the next five years”, adding that he would welcome it if the country were expelled from membership.

Relations between Armenia and Russia grew tense once again in the spring of 2026, after Yerevan moved closer to the European Union (EU) and the Kremlin responded with a trade war.

In May, Pashinyan refused to travel to Moscow to attend the Victory Day parade and declared that he did not support Russia on the Ukraine issue.

In response, Putin called on Yerevan to determine its foreign policy course through a referendum, advising Armenian authorities not to forget the fate of Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

US urges Russia to draft proposals for new European security pact

Published

on

The US administration has reportedly called on Russia to submit proposals for a prospective security treaty with Europe that would include measures to ease tensions between European nations and Moscow.

According to a report by news site Axios citing sources familiar with the matter, the US side conveyed the request during trilateral negotiations held in Abu Dhabi.

During the talks, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner suggested that the Russian delegation prepare a fresh proposal outlining its security concerns and demands.

The US delegation reportedly asked that this proposal clarify what kind of “symmetrical steps” Moscow is prepared to take to de-escalate tensions and “provide non-aggression guarantees to Europe”.

Another source familiar with the White House’s approach said the Trump administration aims to run the processes for a new European security architecture and a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine simultaneously.

Under this plan, the actual implementation of the security understandings would take effect only after the signing of an accord ending the conflict in Ukraine.

Assessing the approach to the process, the source said: “[Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy will not agree to any compromise without knowing what will happen next regarding security guarantees. Putin also wants to see the exact same picture clearly. This is precisely why the security portfolio is so decisive.”

The same official noted that the US will not reach a security agreement with Russia without the support of Europe and Ukraine, adding that Washington will not grant Moscow veto power over European security decisions.

Vladimir Medinsky, aide to the Russian president and head of the delegation in the Ukraine negotiations, previously stated that the fundamental objective was building a comprehensive new security system in Europe.

Medinsky noted that the structure in question must take on the character of “a fair, new, modern Yalta and Potsdam that carries the spirit of Helsinki 1975 and responds to contemporary realities”.

The Russian official argued that if such a system were established, peace lasting for decades, or even centuries, could be secured in Europe.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also announced that Moscow possesses its own position paper on how a new security architecture in Eurasia should take shape.

Lavrov stated that Russia hopes the Washington administration will “maintain its determination to pursue dialogue aimed at achieving an honest balance of interests where nobody’s security is impaired”.

Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the country has no intention of attacking Europe.

Pointing out that they have no reason to fight NATO countries, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously said: “We have no interest whatsoever, neither geopolitical nor economic, political nor military.”

In a statement in October, Putin said Russia has no plans to attack anyone “in 2029, in 2030, or in the year 2050”.

On the other hand, Putin claimed that “all NATO countries are fighting Russia” and stated that the Russian military is currently the most combat-ready armed force in the world.

Following the contacts in Abu Dhabi, Kushner announced that he and Witkoff would travel to Moscow.

Explaining that they plan to meet Putin during the visit to discuss European participation in negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict, Kushner argued that the parties could make “far greater progress” if the Russian leader consents to such involvement.

Yury Ushakov, aide to the Russian president, stated that the US special envoys will arrive in Moscow on 12 November, with the planned meeting with the Russian president scheduled for the first half of the day.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks

Published

on

US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.

According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.

This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.

US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.

Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”

According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.

Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.

Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.

In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.

Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.

Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.

Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.

On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.

Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.

On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”

The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”

Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.

On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.

According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”

Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey