Connect with us

ASIA

The impact of current changes in Bangladesh and regional implications

Published

on

The ongoing changes in Bangladesh are creating ripples not only within its borders but also across the region. The nature and consequences of these changes, although not fully clear yet, appear detrimental to both Bangladesh and its neighboring countries. Since mid-August 2021, a new global dynamic has been unfolding, with significant upheavals influenced by dominant forces, particularly the United States and its allies.

Contrary to typical movements, the current resistance against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government did not originate from religious or linguistic biases. Instead, it stemmed from dissatisfaction among the youth, military officials, and state employees over the allocation of a 40pc quota for certain groups. This quota system, particularly favoring soldiers’ children, ignited widespread protests. The discontentment, coupled with increasing extremism, signals troubling times ahead for Bangladesh, potentially transforming the country into a military stronghold, reminiscent of the post-1971 era after Pakistan’s partition.

The 1970s witnessed South Asia experiencing a series of trans-formative events, beginning with Pakistan’s division, largely due to misguided policies by its military, especially General Ayub Khan. This period marked significant shifts that primarily benefited the United States, enhancing its influence in the region. Today, similar patterns seem to be reemerging, with the U.S. unwilling to relinquish its strategic gains from the 70s and 80s.

Political crisis is being systematically cultivated in the region

Post-1971, the collapse of Pakistan led to monumental changes in neighboring countries. The imperial regimes in Iran and Afghanistan were overthrown. Saudi Arabia’s King Faisal was assassinated by his nephew, and Egypt’s Anwar Sadat met a similar fate. In Pakistan, on July 5, 1977, General Zia-ul-Haq, despite an existing understanding between the ruling party and the opposition, ousted Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, establishing a regime with the support of conservative religious factions.

Today, with substantial financial and technical backing from the U.S., former Mujahideen, now the Taliban, have seized power in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, in Pakistan, a political crisis is being systematically cultivated. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, led by Imran Khan, is seeking power. Despite holding power, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party find their hands tied by the military establishment.

Current crisis is due to the influence of the US and its allies which is spreading across the Asian-and-Gulf countries and beyond

The influence of the United States and its allies extends beyond Pakistan. Saudi Arabia, once a steadfast ally, has lost its credibility. The UAE, Qatar, and other loyalists are investing trillions of dollars, aligning more closely with American interests. Intelligence operations by the U.S. have systematically targeted Iran, asserting control over the Arab world.

Meanwhile, Russia is preoccupied with the Ukraine conflict, reducing its influence in the region. China’s focus remains on economic expansion, aiming to dominate global consumer markets rather than directly confronting the U.S. These geopolitical maneuvers suggest that the instability in Bangladesh could have broader implications for regional politics, particularly for Pakistan.

The internal turmoil in Bangladesh poses significant challenges for the region

The internal turmoil in Bangladesh, largely manipulated by Jamaat-e-Islami and other factions with vested interests, reflects a broader regional strategy. The majority of Bangladeshis regard Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as their true political leader, and state institutions have classified Jamaat-e-Islami’s militant wings, Al-Shams and Al-Badr, as terrorist organizations. Conversely, Pakistan’s political landscape is marked by a long list of alleged traitors, yet leaders like Sher-e-Bangla Maulvi Fazlul Haq and Hussain Shaheed Suhrawardy remain revered figures.

In conclusion, the evolving situation in Bangladesh, driven by both internal dissent and external influences, poses significant challenges for the region. The lessons from the past, particularly the events of the 1970s, highlight the importance of regional stability and the risks associated with foreign interventions. As these dynamics continue to unfold, it is crucial for region countries to prioritize their internal stability and contribute to regional peace.

ASIA

Afraid of the gun; Taliban supreme leader fears of a coup

Published

on

Hibatullah Akhundzada, the supreme leader of the Taliban, has ordered the security institutions that without his permission, “no one can distribute or use the military equipment registered by the ministries of defense and interior, the directorate of intelligence and other independent institutions.”

Experts and analysts have considered this move by Hibatullah as last resort to weaken the position of defense minister, Yaqoob Mujahid, interior minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani and the head of Taliban intelligence, Abdul Haq Wasiq in order to prevent a possible internal coup that was initiated by these three top officials.

In the first article of the order, it is mentioned that no person can distribute military equipment registered in the reserves of the ministries of defense, interior and intelligence, or issue an order to distribute it without the order of Hibatullah.

This decree titled “Regarding the distribution, protection and supervision of registered military equipment”, specifies that whenever an Emirate entity (Taliban-related entity) needs weapons, ammunition, night vision cameras, telecommunications and other military equipment” must receive the approval order from the leader of the Taliban.

Also, in the second article of this decree, it is stated that whenever one of the military departments of the Taliban needs military equipment, it must send its request to Hibatullah’s office in Kandahar.

In the third article of the decree, it is emphasized that if the military equipment was distributed or used without the permission of the Taliban leader before the issuance of this decree, they must be returned to the reserves.

Ministries of defense, interior and head of intelligence department are banned from disturbing military weapons.

According to this article, Hibatullah entrusted the ministries of defense and interior, as well as the general directorate of Taliban intelligence, with the responsibility to report the list of available military equipment to the directorate of registration, and protection of military equipment.

This order of the Taliban leader has been considered as another step in the direction of concentrating more power in the hands of Mullah Hibatullah in Kandahar. Many have seen it as a sign of Hibatullah’s increasing distrust of senior Taliban officials in Kabul. Previously, some senior Taliban officials, including Sirajuddin Haqqani, have openly disobeyed Hibatullah’s order to prohibit photography and filming and have not followed the order of their supreme leader.

(R) Defense Minister Mullah Yaqoob Mujahid and (L) Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani.

Previously, several reports have been published about the sale of military equipment left over from the US troops and Afghan security forces during the republic government. Even the US-elected president Donald Trump, repeatedly mentioned this issue during his election campaigns. Not long ago, the government of Pakistan also announced that the Pakistan security forces have discovered and confiscated a car carrying US weapons smuggled from Afghanistan.

Pakistani media reported that this equipment included M4 assault rifles, night vision cameras and thousands of rounds of ammunition, which were transported in a truck carrying vegetables. Pakistani security officials have estimated the total value of weapons smuggled from Afghanistan in this truck to be 126,354 US dollars.

The cost of US’s remaining equipment in Afghanistan estimated over 7 billion US dollars

The Pentagon has already announced that after the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan, about 7 billion dollars of military equipment fell into the hands of the Taliban. This equipment reached the hands of the Taliban after the fall of Afghanistan on 15 August, 2021.

It has been reported that when the US forces left Afghanistan, there were 78 US-made aircrafts in the country, whose value reached 1 billion dollars. According to CNN, with the end of the US military presence, a total of more than 9,000 air-to-ground munitions worth more than six and a half million dollars have remained in Afghanistan.

The report also states that out of a total of 96,000 military vehicles, more than 40,000 units, including 12,000 Humvees (armored tanks), fell into the hands of the Taliban. Moreover, out of a total of more than 400,000 weapons that the US gave to the forces of the former Afghan government, about 300,000 remain in the country.

Almost all “communications equipment, including mobile base stations, portable and hand-held commercial and military radio systems, and associated transmitters and encryption devices, all remain in Afghanistan,” according to the report.

The report added that “almost all” of the equipment for night vision cameras, surveillance, biometric and positioning equipment,” a total of nearly 42 thousand pieces of specialized equipment, remained in Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, Five Mi 17 helicopters of the then Afghan army, which were transferred to Ukraine for repair before the collapse of the government, have also returned to Afghanistan and now are used by the Taliban.

It should be noted that the internal rivalries in the Taliban, especially among the different factions of this group, is one of the important reasons for Mullah Hibatullah’s distrust of some Taliban officials. Some officials, including interior minister Sirajuddin Haqqani and defense minister Mohammad Yaqub Mujahid, gained a lot of power, especially during the Taliban’s war against foreign forces, and Mullah Hibatullah may be worried that these officials are trying to expand their power, which is a clear threat to his position as the Taliban leader.

Continue Reading

ASIA

China’s BYD prepares to launch latest SUV, the Sealion 07, in Europe despite EU tariffs

Published

on

BYD, the world’s largest electric vehicle (EV) maker, is set to launch its latest SUV, the Sealion 07, in Europe, undeterred by recent tariff increases on Chinese-made electric vehicles. This strategic move highlights BYD’s commitment to expanding overseas sales despite economic barriers.

Deliveries of the Sealion 07 are scheduled to begin in 2025, marking BYD’s seventh all-electric model in the European market, the company announced on Wednesday. Additionally, BYD plans to enter the South Korean market next year, adding to its existing presence in 95 countries worldwide.

This European expansion comes on the heels of the European Union’s decision last month to impose new tariffs—ranging from 17% to 35.3%—on Chinese electric vehicles following an anti-subsidy investigation. BYD’s EVs are subject to a 17% tariff, in addition to the standard 10% tariff applied to all pure electric cars imported from China. These tariffs, which took effect last month, will remain in place for five years. Meanwhile, U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made EVs increased from 25% to 100% as of September, citing similar concerns.

Despite the added costs, BYD’s vehicles continue to hold strong appeal in export markets. “BYD’s vehicles remain attractive even after the additional tariffs, so it’s not really a big problem for the company,” said Chen Jinzhu, CEO of Shanghai Mingliang Auto Service, a leading industry consultancy. “The Sealion 07 exemplifies how BYD’s cost advantage enables it to counteract such trade barriers in key export markets.”

Shenzhen-based BYD has yet to disclose the European pricing for the Sealion 07. On the mainland, the SUV—featuring a range of 450 kilometers—starts at 189,800 yuan (approximately US$26,272), with deliveries beginning in May.

According to a report last year from UBS analysts, BYD has a sustainable cost advantage of 25% over traditional European brands.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Singles’ day promotions target overseas Chinese as China’s domestic demand slows

Published

on

After last year’s Singles’ Day shopping festival in China was dubbed the “quietest in history,” China’s e-commerce platforms focused on a new strategy this year.

For this year’s Singles’ Day event, major e-commerce companies such as Alibaba, JD.com, and Pinduoduo invested heavily in expanding overseas markets, targeting the estimated 100 million Chinese living abroad with offers like discounts and free or low-cost shipping.

The central question, however, is not whether these efforts will succeed in the short term, but rather if this shift can help platforms grow their user bases as online sales growth in China reaches a bottleneck.

“Domestic consumption is quite weak right now, and every company is certainly considering new ways to drive growth for Singles’ Day,” said an executive at a leading online retailer, who requested anonymity. “The overseas market is widely seen as a promising source for additional growth,” he added in an interview with Nikkei Asia.

Singles’ Day, a one-day sales event launched by Alibaba in 2009 as a celebration for singles, has since evolved into a month-long campaign with special offers and deep discounts, culminating on or around November 11.

This year, China aimed to revitalize its retail sector with the event. Total consumer goods sales rose by 3.3% year-on-year in the first three quarters of 2024, though high-end consumer spending remained stagnant. Cosmetics sales fell by 1%, while gold and silver jewelry sales declined by 3.1% year-on-year.

Last month, Alibaba’s Taobao launched a significant marketing campaign in Hong Kong and Taiwan, flooding subway stations with advertisements for “free shipping on orders over 99 yuan,” among other offers. According to the company, the campaign cost 2 billion New Taiwan dollars ($61.7 million) in Taiwan and 1 billion yuan ($138 million) in Hong Kong.

Following Alibaba’s move, JD.com announced it had invested 1.5 billion yuan to offer discounted product prices and cheaper shipping to Hong Kong shoppers. Bargain platform Pinduoduo took it a step further, offering free shipping via courier SF Express for Hong Kong shoppers, regardless of the item’s price. All products on these platforms are shipped from mainland China.

A spokesperson from Alibaba’s International Digital Commerce Group noted that since the overseas initiative launched in October, Taobao Hong Kong has achieved double-digit growth in both orders and gross merchandise value (GMV)—a metric that excludes canceled orders—on both a monthly and year-on-year basis.

The platforms are also targeting Chinese shoppers in Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore.

This year, unlike in previous years, shoppers could combine online discounts with a subsidy program introduced by the Chinese government to boost domestic consumption, primarily for home appliances and household products. Analysts suggest these incentives will likely boost sales for JD.com, which is known for selling high-quality large appliances and offering after-sales services.

While JD.com has yet to release sales or GMV figures for home appliances during the shopping festival, it is expected to share its June-September results, along with Alibaba, later this week.

Last year, data provider Syntun estimated that total GMV on major e-commerce platforms grew by only 2.1% to 1.14 trillion yuan, falling short of the 2.9% growth forecast for 2022. Similarly, consultancy Bain predicted that Singles’ Day sales would reach 1.15 trillion yuan in 2023.

On Tuesday morning, Alibaba announced “strong GMV growth” and a “record number” of active shoppers for this year’s Singles’ Day event.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey