Connect with us

Diplomacy

US wants UK military to shift focus to Europe

Published

on

This appears to be a completely different strategy from the one during the Joe Biden era, where the US asked its allies to focus on the Indo-Pacific region.

According to five sources cited by the Financial Times (FT), Elbridge Colby, former US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, told British officials that a Trump administration would require the British military to increase its focus on the Euro-Atlantic region.

Colby, formerly the Pentagon’s third-highest ranking official, also expressed concern about London sending the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier on a deployment that would also operate in the Indo-Pacific. Colby has long argued that European countries should take more responsibility for the security of their region, especially concerning the war in Ukraine. He states that this would allow the US military to focus more on China and the Indo-Pacific.

This move represents a 180-degree turn from the Biden administration. The Biden administration argued that increasing Europe’s military presence in Asia would help counter “aggressive Chinese military activities” in the region and could help deter a potential decision for a Taiwan war.

In recent years, European countries, including Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the Netherlands, have sent warships to the South China Sea despite Beijing’s objections.

In 2021, the Pentagon welcomed the United Kingdom’s “historic” deployment of the Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier to the Indo-Pacific. During the first half of the Biden administration, Kurt Campbell, the White House coordinator for the Indo-Pacific, urged Europe to take more steps in the Pacific, arguing that the Atlantic and Pacific regions are interconnected.

Zack Cooper, an Asia security expert at the American Enterprise Institute, said, “This decision indicates that the Trump administration would try to separate the two regions. This could cause allies in both regions to become more concerned about the continuation of the US presence in the region,” he added.

A source familiar with the matter said that the United Kingdom “is always active globally, including close cooperation with the US on Euro-Atlantic priorities,” but that it “will also consider its own interests as well as its global partnerships, whether in Europe, the Middle East, or the Indo-Pacific.”

While US military officials are generally pleased with a greater European military presence in the Pacific, the civilian policy team within the Pentagon under the Trump administration wants countries to focus more on their own regions.

Colby this week described increasing Europe’s defense spending to 5% of its GDP as “key.” Encouraging countries to increase defense investments, Colby recently told Congress that Japan should exceed its 2% target and Taiwan should spend 10%.

Eric Sayers, an Asia security expert at Beacon Global Strategies, defended the plan, saying, “Given Europe’s limited military power, it is natural for a Trump administration to want this power focused on the European continent and the Russian threat rather than being spread to Asia or elsewhere. Practicing naval diplomacy in other regions during peacetime is not a luxury Europe can afford these days,” he added, defending the plan.

However, critics of the strategy say that increasing cooperation between Iran, Russia, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), and China means the US needs help from allies outside its own regions.

An official from a country in the Indo-Pacific region said, “The regions of Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific have always been deeply interconnected. But today, security is more indivisible than ever; not least because of the re-emergence of a strong global axis of authoritarian revisionist powers,” they added.

The British Ministry of Defence said, “We are in close cooperation with the US and our Indo-Pacific allies regarding the deployment of the carrier strike group for exercises later this year with HMS Prince of Wales.”

Diplomacy

Armenia signals potential complete withdrawal from CSTO

Published

on

Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanyan announced that Yerevan might decide to withdraw entirely from the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) if member states fail to “demonstrate a clear political stance” regarding Azerbaijan’s actions. Kostanyan emphasized that Armenia is no longer making insinuations but is speaking very openly.

According to the Novosti-Armenia news agency, Kostanyan stated, “Ultimately, if our partners in the CSTO, including the Russian Federation, do not make the political statements that were mentioned several years ago after the aggression against the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia, then Armenia will make a final decision.”

The Deputy Minister also underscored that Armenia, as a sovereign state, will determine the right time for its next steps.

Membership was frozen

Relations between Armenia, Russia, and the CSTO deteriorated following the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, after which Yerevan formally requested support from its allies.

Following this process, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan repeatedly criticized the CSTO for not assisting Yerevan.

Pashinyan described the organization as a “bubble alliance,” claiming it was “planning a war” against Armenia alongside Baku.

Last February, Prime Minister Pashinyan announced that Armenia had frozen its participation in the CSTO. By May, the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that the country would refuse to finance the organization’s activities.

Intelligence report points in the same direction

In January of this year, a public report released by the Armenian Foreign Intelligence Service stated that the country has no intention of returning to full participation in the CSTO in the near future.

The report noted, “We find it highly unlikely that the reasons that led to Armenia suspending its membership will change in 2025. Based on this situation, the organization’s prestige continues to be seriously questioned and has become a ’cause for reflection’ for other member countries.”

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

BRICS internal trade volume hits the $1 trillion mark

Published

on

Kirill Dmitriev, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation and CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), announced that the internal trade volume among BRICS countries has reached $1 trillion.

In a statement on his Telegram channel, Dmitriev noted that surpassing this significant milestone confirms the strengthening of economic ties between member states and the bloc’s growing role in shaping the new global economic architecture.

He also emphasized that Russia continues to strengthen trade relations, particularly through the BRICS Business Council, in line with the directives of President Vladimir Putin.

BRICS’ share will continue to grow, Putin says

During a plenary session at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 20, Russian President Vladimir Putin recalled that at the beginning of the 21st century, BRICS countries accounted for only one-fifth of the global economy, whereas today this figure has reached 40%.

The Russian leader stated that this share will continue to grow, describing it as a “medical fact.” According to Putin, this growth will primarily be driven by the countries of the Global South.

In April, Maxim Oreshkin, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration of Russia, also said that the BRICS countries, operating on principles of consensus, have become a key force in the world economy.

BRICS expansion agenda

Initially composed of five countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—BRICS expanded in 2024 with the inclusion of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran, Ethiopia, and Egypt.

In January of this year, Indonesia became the bloc’s tenth full member.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Xi Jinping to miss BRICS summit in Rio for the first time

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping will not attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro next week.

According to multiple sources cited by the South China Morning Post on Tuesday, this marks the first time Xi will miss the gathering of leaders from major emerging economies.

Officials familiar with the matter stated that Beijing informed the Brazilian government of a scheduling conflict. Premier Li Qiang is expected to lead the Chinese delegation in Xi’s place, a similar arrangement to the 2023 G20 summit in India.

Chinese officials involved in the preparations suggested Xi’s absence is due to his two meetings with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva within the past year. The first occurred during the G20 summit and a state visit to Brasília last November, while the second took place at the China-CELAC forum in Beijing this May.

Xi has never before missed a BRICS summit. In 2023, he was scheduled to deliver a speech at the meeting in South Africa but, at the last minute, sent Commerce Minister Wang Wentao instead. Beijing provided no official explanation for the change.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Xi participated in BRICS meetings virtually, with Russia hosting in 2020 and China in 2021.

On Tuesday, the Brazilian Foreign Ministry told the Post it “would not comment on the internal deliberations of foreign delegations.” The Chinese embassy in Brazil did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

However, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S.Paulo, “information regarding participation in the summit will be shared at the appropriate time.” Guo added that China supports Brazil’s BRICS presidency and aims to “promote deeper cooperation” among member nations. “In a volatile and turbulent world, the BRICS countries are maintaining their strategic resolve and working together for global peace, stability, and development,” he said.

In Brasília, officials have not concealed their disappointment regarding Xi’s absence. A source informed the Post that Lula had traveled to Beijing in May as a “show of goodwill” and had hoped “the Chinese president would reciprocate the gesture by attending the Rio summit.”

There was also speculation that Lula’s invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a state dinner after the BRICS summit may have influenced Beijing’s decision, as Xi might have been “perceived as a supporting actor” at the event.

Lula’s special adviser for international relations, Celso Amorim, met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing, where he clearly expressed Brazil’s desire to host Xi. “I told them, ‘BRICS without China is not BRICS,'” Amorim stated, recalling that then-President Hu Jintao attended the first BRICS summit in Brazil despite a major earthquake in China at the time. “He only stayed for one day, but he came.”

Amorim emphasized the particular importance of Xi’s attendance in the current global context, citing the “US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization” as a “violation of international rules.”

Premier Li is expected to arrive in Brazil next weekend for the summit, which is scheduled for July 6 and 7 in Rio.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey