Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Wang Yi meets Kissinger – message to Washington

Published

on

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with former U.S. Secretary of State and Beijing-Washington diplomatic talks architect Henry Kissinger in New York. About the meeting, the Chinese press underlined that handling the Taiwan question was an ‘urgent task’ in bilateral relations.

Celebrating Kissinger’s upcoming 100th birthday, Wang Yi called him “an old and good friend of the Chinese people”, stressed that Kissinger has always been friendly.

Discussing China-U.S. relations and complaining about Washington’s failure to keep his promises, Wang Yi recalled Kissinger’s warning that China-U.S. relations were “on the brink of the Cold War” and stressed that such a war would be a disaster not only for China and the U.S., but also for the whole world.

Pointing out that the U.S. side should return to a “rational and practical Chinese policy”, Wang Yi noted that the most important priority at the moment is the proper management of the Taiwan question, otherwise it will have a subversive impact on China-U.S. relations.

The Taiwan question is at the center of relations

Kissinger recalled how he and Chinese leaders prepared Shanghai Communique in 1972 and emphasized that the Taiwan question is at the center of China-US relations.

Stressing that it is necessary to fully understand how important the Taiwan question is for China, Kissinger noted that “the U.S. and China should engage in dialogue rather than conflict and establish bilateral relations to live peacefully together”.

“One-China” principle is a prerequisite for normalization

Zhang Tengjun, deputy director of the Asia-Pacific Studies Department of the China Institute for International Studies, told the Global Times that Wang Yi’s meeting with Kissinger, a key figure behind the normalization of U.S.-China relations 50 years ago, was a clear message: “One-China principle is the basis for the normalization of bilateral relations.”

U.S. President Biden told CBS’s 60 Minutes program on Sunday that US troops would defend Taiwan in the event of a “Chinese invasion.”

The goal is to prevent the development of China

“US keeps hollowing out its one-China principle and its commitment over the Taiwan question so it can strangle China in the chip and semiconductor sector and amplify its democracy vs authoritarian narrative” Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of International Affairs at the Renmin University of China, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The Biden administration banned U.S. ‘advanced tech’ firms that receive federal funding from building facilities in China for 10 years. It was announced that the decision was made to reduce the dependence of the US on China in the production of semiconductors.

Wang Yi listed five conditions

This year marks the 50th anniversary of former U.S. President Richard Nixon’s visit to China and signing of the Shanghai Communique.

“An important year to take stock of the past and move on from a new starting point,” told Wang Yi at a meeting in New York with representatives of the U.S.-China National Relations Committee, the U.S.-China Business Council, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Wang Yi said there is a lot of uncertainty in current China-U.S. relations and listed China’s five “certainties”:

*China’s development prospects are certain, and this development will provide larger markets and opportunities for the U.S. and other countries.

*China’s resolve to further advance reform and opening-up is certain and will continue to advance economic globalization.

*China’s policy toward the U.S. is certain and what is most critical for the U.S. right now is to reinstate a reasonable and pragmatic policy towards China as soon as possible.

*China’s commitment to strengthen economic and trade cooperation is certain.

*China’s readiness to engage in multilateral coordination with the U.S. is certain. For this to happen, it is vital to maintain the political basis of China-U.S. relations and to support the one-China principle specially.

Shanghai Communique

In 1972, Richard Nixon became the first U.S. President to visit China. Nixon’s visit to China and the publication of the Shanghai Communique are considered a turning point in China-U.S. relations.

The communique acknowledged that the two countries have different forms of governance. China and the U.S. agreed on the normalization of bilateral relations based on peaceful coexistence, the expansion of contacts covering all areas, and the development of bilateral trade.

Most importantly, in the joint communique signed, the U.S. acknowledged that it had adopted one-China principle and that Taiwan was an integral part of China.

Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan ramped up tensions in relations between the two countries.

Pelosi insisted on visiting Taiwan despite China’s concerns and opposition.

Beijing described the visit as an intervention in its internal affairs, a violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity and stressed that the visit was a violation of the one-China principle, undermining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.

DIPLOMACY

EU, Mercosur aim to finalize trade deal by early December

Published

on

The European Commission and Mercosur countries are working to complete negotiations on a long-anticipated trade deal by early December, sources familiar with the discussions told POLITICO.

Farmers are expected to rally against the deal in Brussels on Wednesday, with additional protests in France later in the week.

The upcoming G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro was initially seen as the ideal opportunity to finalize the agreement, which has been under negotiation for nearly 25 years.

“All the cards are on the table,” said one person familiar with the EU-Mercosur talks. “They want to ensure a near-finalized deal, so Ursula [von der Leyen] doesn’t make the trip in vain.” However, the signing of the agreement might be delayed over concerns that China could overshadow the summit.

A European Commission official confirmed that face-to-face talks are scheduled for the week of November 25 in Brazil to resolve any outstanding issues. While the official refrained from specifying a completion date, they emphasized that the Mercosur nations—Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and new member Bolivia—are pushing to sign the agreement promptly.

Uruguay is set to host the Mercosur summit from December 2–4, with Argentina, under newly elected Javier Milei, assuming the bloc’s presidency.

China concerns accelerate EU-Mercosur deal timeline

This “cows-for-cars” trade deal would eliminate trade barriers and establish a common market encompassing around 800 million people, representing 20% of global GDP. For European countries, particularly Germany, this agreement is viewed as overdue, especially given China’s expanding economic footprint in South America, where European firms are increasingly being sidelined.

“If we don’t reach a trade agreement with [Mercosur], China will inevitably fill the void,” remarked Kaja Kallas, the EU’s new foreign minister, on Tuesday. Citing data, she added that Chinese investment in Latin America surged 34-fold between 2020 and 2022.

Those familiar with the negotiations indicated that certain issues remain unresolved, including public procurement regulations, environmental provisions, and the legal structure of the agreement.

Mercosur nations are particularly keen on securing more flexibility from the EU and additional time for local firms to compete with European counterparts. Brazil has also expressed a desire to protect its domestic automotive industry from EU imports, especially electric vehicles.

France’s reluctance and Macron’s challenges

French Trade Minister Sophie Primas recently stated to POLITICO that Mercosur countries are eager to finalize the deal before the Mercosur summit. However, Primas remains skeptical that the agreement will enable the EU to effectively counter China’s influence in Latin America.

Amid concerns over a potential surge in agricultural imports, France successfully blocked the Mercosur negotiations in January, just as they were nearing completion. This time, however, President Emmanuel Macron faces a tougher challenge, especially after recent electoral setbacks in the European Parliament and National Assembly.

In a recent letter published in Le Monde, over 600 French MPs from both parliamentary chambers urged von der Leyen not to proceed with the deal, citing unmet democratic, economic, environmental, and social standards for an agreement with Mercosur.

Paris falls short of blocking coalition

Despite recent efforts to secure opposition, Paris is unlikely to gather the qualified minority—representing at least 35% of the EU population—needed to block the deal when it comes to a vote among EU member states.

France has also launched a diplomatic campaign to persuade other EU nations to oppose the agreement. However, two diplomats with direct knowledge report that Italy has not been swayed.

Italy remains cautious in supporting the deal, wary of the potential for political fallout like that seen in France.

‘France’s opposition is symbolic; the battle is lost’

Over the weekend, Macron traveled to Argentina to meet with Milei ahead of the G20 summit in Brazil. Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is scheduled to visit Buenos Aires on November 20.

Although French ministers have vehemently opposed the deal and increased efforts to build a blocking minority, Prime Minister Michel Barnier has kept a low profile. Barnier is expected to meet with von der Leyen and EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis in Brussels today (November 13) and will likely address the Mercosur agreement, which he opposes in its current form.

Critics argue that France’s resistance is mostly symbolic, and that Paris has already lost this battle.

For years, France has insisted on incorporating the Paris Agreement and enacting legally binding deforestation commitments as part of the Mercosur deal. In response, the European Commission has indicated its intent to support French demands in the final phase of negotiations, although Mercosur countries have repeatedly signaled their resistance to any form of sanctions.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Japan, UK to launch bilateral economic dialogue ahead of potential Trump tariffs

Published

on

Japan and the UK are set to initiate an economic version of the “two plus two” dialogue—a regular meeting between foreign and trade ministers—due to rising concerns about possible tariffs from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and his British counterpart, Keir Starmer, are scheduled to meet in Rio de Janeiro during the upcoming G20 Summit on Monday, November 18. According to officials from both governments, the goal is to establish a bilateral economic dialogue.

This development follows Trump’s recent election victory and his anticipated return to the White House in January. During his campaign, Trump pledged to impose tariffs of 60% on imports from China and 10-20% on imports from other nations, including Japan and the UK.

The Japan-UK economic dialogue aims to strengthen cooperation in upholding the international economic order, including principles of free trade.

Topics at the meeting will cover a wide range of strategic and geopolitical issues. Both partners are expected to explore ways to initiate a trade dialogue with the U.S. to prevent a potential tariff hike. Sources indicate that countermeasures may also be on the table if U.S. import tariffs do increase.

In 2023, 20% of Japan’s exports and 15% of the UK’s exports were destined for the U.S., underscoring the potential economic impact of increased tariffs.

Additionally, the UK hopes that a strengthened partnership with Japan can help offset its reduced influence since leaving the European Union (EU) in 2020.

During the previous Trump administration, the EU (of which the UK was then a member) imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel and motorcycles in response to Washington’s high import duties.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Azerbaijan plans to boost oil and gas production as it hosts COP29

Published

on

The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has commenced in Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital. As the host nation, Azerbaijan is also looking to expand its fossil fuel production, positioning itself at the intersection of climate policy and energy expansion.

According to the Financial Times, Azerbaijan’s state oil and gas company SOCAR (State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic) is set to increase production of new fossil fuel sources during the COP29 summit. The summit, a key gathering on global climate change, underscores a paradox for Azerbaijan: pledging climate action while pursuing expanded oil and gas output.

A report by campaign group Global Witness, which analyzed data from independent consultancy Rystad Energy, estimates that 44% of SOCAR’s production will be new oil and gas by 2050—the second-highest proportion among national oil companies globally. This report examined production projections based on both developed and undeveloped fields as well as undiscovered fossil fuel reserves.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), new long-term oil and gas projects conflict with the goal of limiting the average global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels—the target set by the Paris Agreement. This expansion aligns Azerbaijan with Europe’s aim to diversify energy sources, especially given the EU’s push to replace Russian gas following the Ukraine conflict.

Meanwhile, SOCAR has increased production in recent years as Europe seeks to replace Russian natural gas with resources from other nations, including Azerbaijan. This has drawn criticism, particularly as Azerbaijan—through Muhtar Babayev, COP29 President and Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources—continues to call for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

At COP28 last year in Dubai, almost 200 nations committed to phasing out fossil fuels by mid-century. Nevertheless, Azerbaijan has signed multiple oil and gas deals since securing COP29 hosting rights, including SOCAR’s first international investment in upstream oil and gas—a $468 million stake in UAE gas projects.

“Azerbaijan is Europe’s strategic supplier of natural gas and is expanding capacity to meet European energy demands after the 2022 supply disruptions,” a COP29 spokesperson stated. Additionally, Azerbaijan is “expanding its renewable energy exports to serve the region and European markets,” he added. SOCAR did not respond to requests for comment.

Azerbaijan’s COP presidency has sparked criticism, echoing concerns raised during the UAE’s COP28 role. Richard Kinley, former executive secretary of the UN climate panel, expressed disappointment: “It is deeply disturbing that they can’t even seem to draw a ‘sanitary cordon’ around the COP presidency to prevent fossil fuel interests from undermining its purpose.”

Danish Climate Minister Lars Aagaard—attending COP29—remarked that Azerbaijan’s energy strategy also includes renewable energy initiatives, with Ørsted, a prominent wind energy company, present at the summit. However, European diplomats told the Financial Times that Azerbaijani officials have raised gas deal discussions alongside climate negotiations, mainly in relation to replacing Russian gas supplies transiting through Ukraine, with this contract ending soon.

According to Bloomberg, companies in Hungary and Slovakia are finalizing a deal with Azerbaijan to substitute gas from the Ukrainian pipeline. Energy analysts have cautioned that this agreement could mask continued Russian gas flows. Additionally, a recent report from Chatham House highlighted Azerbaijan’s strategy to secure long-term European gas supply agreements.

“By positioning itself at the heart of the multilateral climate process, the Azerbaijani government may seek to shape the global energy transition dialogue to ensure its oil and gas reserves remain profitable as long as possible,” the report suggests.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey