Connect with us

EUROPE

Why Rishi Sunak?

Published

on

Rishi Sunak of the Conservative Party has become the new leader of the UK after the end of Liz Truss’s brief 49-day prime ministerial term. Sunak has become the new prime minister without even needing British citizens’ votes; following the resignation of Boris Johnson, together with Liz Truss, he was one of the new candidates for prime minister but had lost the race to his predecessor.

Brought down by Truss and Sunak, Boris Johnson’s understanding of the economy during and after the Covid crisis was somewhat “heterodox” and “populist”: Contrary to the general downsizing trend in western countries, Johnson had prioritized economic growth and low taxes and declared that he favored measures to pump demand. In fact, Johnson had signaled that he could implement state-led fiscal policies that were not well received by the mainstream.

Boris Johnson took office after the Brexit process, when Britain left the EU, and acted to bring his country back on the world stage as a strong player. When Covid was added to the great recession that plagued capitalist economies, Johnson’s “unstable” actions lead to his downfall. Johnson, who wanted to pursue a looser monetary policy, was thought not to have a coherent and comprehensive economic policy towards the Bank of England’s and the finance’s “orthodox” understanding.

And that’s when Liz Truss became Johnson’s successor. In her debate with Sunak, she also talked about economic growth and the reduction of taxes. She also tried to implement this plan: a $50 billion tax deduction package came into effect to be compensated by borrowing, but the response of the “markets” was harsh. Sterling has declined to unprecedented levels, panicked investors have sold $500 million in assets, and the real estate industry is on the brink. The Bank of England launched an emergency bond-buying program to prevent pension funds from going bankrupt, and the IMF criticized Truss and urged her to reconsider the program.

Perhaps the sign of the resignation came from her ally on the other side of the Atlantic: on October 16, US President Joe Biden called Liz Truss’s tax package a “mistake”. Liz Truss had already begun her U-turn and fired finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng, but it was too late.

Britain’s stalemate

We must accept that Sunak “warned” Truss in a way. During the debate, he said that Truss’s promises of tax cuts, borrowing and economic growth were unrealistic and argued that these policies would not work in an inflationary environment: Raising borrowing to historic and dangerous levels would mean pouring gasoline over the fire.

Speaking to the Financial Times before Truss’s resignation, he said the new prime minister and the new government’s overriding priority was to control inflation. He explains that Truss’ unfunded debts will exacerbate the situation and fuel inflation, and calls out directly to her, “Liz, we have to be honest. Borrowing your way out of inflation isn’t a plan, it’s a fairytale.”

Thus, ex-Goldman Sachs executive and parliament’s richest deputy, Rishi Sunak, emerged as a heartfelt supporter of monetary policies in developed capitalist countries: focusing on fighting inflation, cutting spending, raising interest rates, tight monetary policy. The new prime minister says he supports the Bank of England’s “independence” but promises tax cuts only after inflation is controlled.

But the dilemma persists. Britain went into recession as of October, according to polls published by Financial Times. Interest rate increases and monetary tightening have not been able to reduce inflation fueled by rising energy costs due to the Ukraine-Russia war and sanctions imposed on Russia. Sunak’s plan to cut expenditures seems to trigger the social crisis even more, given the increasing number of people in need of help in society. Besides, when he was the Ministry of Finance between 2020 and 2022, Sunak brought in the highest taxes Britain had seen since the 1950s. Again, even though he preaches “discipline”, Sunak promises higher public expenditures.

There is no jolt in the foreign policy line

Sunak was a supporter of Brexit policy, but there are those in his party who think he has too much sympathy for Brussels. The debate on the Northern Ireland Protocol (NIP) will also be a test for Sunak in this sense. NIP kept Northern Ireland within the EU’s integrated market for goods; it left it loose on its border with the Republic of Ireland and subjected it to additional controls in trade with the rest of Britain. NIP, signed by Boris Johnson in 2020, is criticized by Sunak, but Sunak believes a more conciliatory language is needed, unlike the hardcore Brexiters in his party.

Rishi Sunak, on the other hand, wants to tighten border controls, especially on the issue of immigrants, and to get rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) “obstacle.” Arguing that the ECHR was exploited by “lefty ” lawyers and its designation was gradually expanding, he said that the option to leave the ECHR was also on the table. Sunak also supported the plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.

Stressing the “special relationship” between the United States and Britain in a phone call with Joe Biden, Sunak reiterated his support for Ukraine and said they would stand up to China. In Ukraine, the prospect of Boris Johnson’s return was welcomed, and after Truss’s resignation, the government’s official Twitter account even tweeted about Boris and quickly deleted it, but Sunak’s appointment of the ministries of defense and foreign affairs to Ben Wallace and James Cleverly, who also served in the previous cabinet, was recorded as a gesture that Ukrainian politics would remain unchanged. It was also meaningful that Sunak’s first telephone conversation as prime minister was with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy. However, Sunak does not support Liz Truss’s and Ben Wallace’s promise to raise defence spending to 3% of GDP. In addition, allies of Johnson’s pushed rumors that during his polemic with Sunak, the new prime minister was less committed to the war than Johnson, and a deal would one day have to be done with Putin.

Internal tensions of the Conservatives and The Talented Mr. Sunak

On the other hand, Sunak is not settled on a solid ground within the party. Boris Johnson’s leadership was the result of contradictions within the Conservative Party (Tories). Most of the Tory MPs in parliament depend on the politics of low taxation and free market sovereignty. But on the other hand, especially representatives from the northern regions of the party demand more government spending, a larger and more interventionist state, and they are very influential within the party.

The Northern Research Group (NRG), an influential team within the party, called on Liz Truss to continue the Tories’ levelling-up policy in the 2019 election manifesto. The NRG is composed of Tories selected from regions traditionally held by the Labour Party and wants more investment in the north.

Johnson chose to manage these contradictions rather than solve them. He was both conservative and pro-free market; he had promised to increase government spending and cut taxes. His speeches in the Brexit campaign included “more prosperity, less Europe”, “more freedom, less regulation”, “more dynamism, less migration.”

Apparently, Rishi Sunak is the answer given in Britain to these contradictions and the current trends of world capitalism. The economy needs to be reorganized under titles such as “green transition” and large investments are required, and the public power needs to increase at a time when private sector investments are in the bottom due to the crisis. The distance between capital groups and the state should be shorter. In addition, the ongoing war in Europe means that the regulatory authority of the state over the society is also extended to wider areas.

All this highlights a figure like Rishi Sunak. He is the member of an Indian family, who were cooperative during the colonial period, ex-Goldman Sachs manager; wealthy; professional and self-educated child of cooperative families of former colonial countries who had migrated to the West in the 1960s and had the opportunity to get into good universities…

EUROPE

Poland urges EU to increase spending on eastern defence

Published

on

Poland, NATO’s largest defence spender, has urged its EU partners to bolster border defences with Russia and Belarus. The move aims to demonstrate a firm commitment to European security, particularly in light of Donald Trump’s influence on global defence policies.

Magdalena Sobkowiak-Czarnecka, the deputy minister responsible for preparations for Poland’s EU presidency, set to begin in January, told The Financial Times (FT) that the EU should invest in strengthening border fortifications and air surveillance systems under the Eastern Shield initiative.

“I think solidarity on the Eastern Shield could help show Trump that, as the EU, we understand what needs to be done for defence. If Trump says he will only work with countries that invest in defence, that’s fine for Poland, because we already spend 4% of GDP on defence. But what about the others? Funding the Eastern Shield would demonstrate the shared commitment of European countries,” Sobkowiak-Czarnecka explained.

The Eastern Shield, announced in May, comprises advanced fortifications and air surveillance systems along Poland’s borders with Belarus and the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. This initiative is central to Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s strategy to counter what he describes as “Russian aggression”, including the “hybrid war” linked to facilitating illegal migration from Belarus into Poland.

The Tusk government has allocated PLN 10 billion (€2.3 billion) for the Eastern Shield as part of broader defence expenditures. These investments will increase Poland’s defence spending from 4.1% of GDP in 2023 to 4.7% by 2025, the highest in NATO and more than double the alliance’s 2% GDP target. In contrast, some EU nations, such as Italy and Spain, have yet to meet this benchmark.

“All our partners must understand that the Eastern Shield is not solely about Poland but also about safeguarding the EU’s borders,” said Sobkowiak-Czarnecka.

Trump’s potential return to the presidency has heightened concerns across EU capitals, given his promises to impose tariffs on the bloc and signals of a potential resolution to the Ukraine conflict that could favor Russia.

Sobkowiak-Czarnecka underscored Poland’s commitment to enhancing EU security on multiple fronts, from increasing military equipment production to countering disinformation and securing energy supplies.

“This Polish presidency comes at a critical juncture. As an expert on Ukraine and one of the strongest U.S. allies in Europe, Poland will be a guiding light in these challenging times,” she concluded.

Continue Reading

EUROPE

European energy market in turmoil: Gas prices reach one-year high

Published

on

The European energy market faces significant challenges as natural gas prices soar to their highest levels in a year. A combination of escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine, Gazprom’s suspension of natural gas supplies to Austria, and colder-than-expected weather has placed substantial pressure on the market.

Industry representatives acknowledge that while sufficient gas supplies exist, the supply-demand balance remains fragile. Negative developments or geopolitical news could quickly trigger additional price surges.

On Thursday, Dutch TTF futures—a key European natural gas benchmark—rose to €48.8 per megawatt-hour (MWh) (equivalent to $538 per 1,000 cubic meters), a level last observed in November 2023. Since the end of the heating season on 31 March, prices have climbed by more than 150%.

The price surge accelerated on Wednesday after Ukraine targeted Russian territory using British-made Storm Shadow missiles. By the close of the trading day, prices had increased by 2.5%, reaching €46.8/MWh.

On the same day, the United States issued a warning based on intelligence reports, predicting a major air strike in the region. Following this warning, many Western countries evacuated their embassies in Kyiv.

Adding to the tensions, the Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russia test-fired an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of carrying nuclear payloads. This event aligns with speculation about changes in Russia’s nuclear doctrine and the US’s authorization for Ukraine to target Russian territory with long-range missiles.

While liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand in Asia remains low, traders are turning their focus to Europe to capitalize on surging prices, according to Bloomberg.

Despite the increased volatility, Gas Infrastructure Europe reports that gas storage facilities across Europe are 90% full. However, the heating season, combined with freezing temperatures in Northern Europe, has amplified concerns about market stability.

Torgrim Reitan, Equinor’s Chief Financial Officer, emphasized that the market’s fragile balance increases the influence of external factors on pricing dynamics.

The state of pipeline gas supplies from Russia is another major concern. On 16 November, Gazprom halted deliveries to Austria’s OMV, citing unresolved payment issues. The company is attempting to recover part of a €230 million arbitration judgment through this suspension.

Despite this, Gazprom continues to supply 42.4 million cubic meters of gas daily to Europe via Ukraine. However, OMV cannot access these supplies and must turn to other sources, such as Slovakia, to meet Austria’s energy needs. According to OMV officials, Austria’s energy requirements are fully covered by alternative suppliers.

Jon Treacy, editor of the investment newsletter Fuller Treacy Money, noted that although Austria maintains official neutrality, most of OMV’s customers are NATO members. Treacy added that Russia’s “long, cold winter” strategy aims to exert pressure on regions beyond Ukraine over the long term.

Market analysts warn that transit through Ukraine—a minor contributor to the European Union’s total gas imports—could be entirely cut off by January 2024. Such a development would further strain an already delicate market, potentially driving prices even higher.

Continue Reading

EUROPE

Operationsplan Deutschland: The debate over ‘planned economy’ in Germany

Published

on

As Ukraine fires U.S.-made long-range missiles at Russia for the first time and Russian leader Vladimir Putin updates his country’s nuclear doctrine, European countries are preparing for an all-out war on the continent.

According to a 1,000-page document drawn up by the German armed forces called ‘Operationsplan Deutschland’, Germany will host hundreds of thousands of troops from NATO countries and act as a logistics hub to send huge amounts of military equipment, food and medicine to the front line.

The German military is also instructing businesses and civilians on how to protect key infrastructure and mobilize for national defense in the event of Russia expanding drone flights, espionage and sabotage across Europe.

Businesses have been advised to draw up contingency plans detailing the responsibilities of employees in the event of an emergency, and told to stockpile diesel generators or install wind turbines to ensure energy independence.

More state intervention in the economy under discussion

In this context, state intervention in the economy and in companies is being discussed more intensively.

The German state has far-reaching rights in crisis situations. The energy crisis showed how quickly the state can intervene: At the time, the German government filled gas storage facilities by law, nationalized the gas importer Uniper and supplied floating LNG terminals.

According to Bertram Brossardt, CEO of the Bavarian Business Association, even a “transition to a planned economy” could be possible in an emergency.

This ‘planned economy’ could involve the state issuing food vouchers or even forcing people to work in certain sectors, such as water or transport companies.

Companies could also benefit if they have employees who volunteer for disaster relief, the Federal Agency for Technical Relief (THW) or the fire brigade.

Lieutenant Colonel Jörn Plischke, who conducted the company training in Hamburg, said: “It costs you a few days a year to support this. But in a crisis, you have a direct link to the people who protect people and infrastructure,” he said.

Hamburg: The intersection of civil and military economy

Hamburg, where Lieutenant Colonel Plischke attended the event, is a central hub for the transport of goods and troops.

“If our infrastructure is used for military purposes, the risk of cyber-attacks and sabotage increases significantly,” the mayor of the Hanseatic city, Peter Tschentscher, told the Faz newspaper.

The Hamburg Senate has therefore created additional staff to strengthen civil defense. A third ‘home defense corps’ has been introduced, made up of volunteers who do not fight in the troops but work to ensure protection and security.

Exercises are currently being held in the Hanseatic city with the German armed forces and civilian forces.

According to the report, this exercise, called ‘Red Storm Alpha’, is training in the protection of port facilities.

The next exercise, ‘Red Storm Bravo’, will start soon and will be on a larger scale.

The lessons learnt from these exercises will then be incorporated into the ‘Operationsplan Deutschland’. This plan is intended to be a ‘living document’, constantly evolving and adapting to new information and threats.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey