Connect with us

America

Major oil companies revive Alaska drilling plans amid global energy security concerns

Published

on

Major oil companies including ExxonMobil, Shell and Repsol are returning to oil and gas exploration in Alaska, citing new opportunities in the region amid rising energy security concerns.

According to a Financial Times report citing Wood Mackenzie analysts, the companies are seeking to capitalize on Donald Trump’s policies aimed at expanding oil drilling in the United States.

The newspaper said ExxonMobil, Shell and Repsol were among the companies that submitted a record combined $163 million in bids for land leases in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.

The US Geological Survey estimates the region may contain as much as 8.8 billion barrels of oil. ConocoPhillips and Australia’s Santos have also applied to develop more than 1 million acres on Alaska’s North Slope, an area that is difficult to access but considered highly prospective for reserves.

The Financial Times said the easing of environmental restrictions and the expansion of licensing opportunities had encouraged ExxonMobil and Shell to resume exploration activities in Alaska after an absence of nearly a decade.

According to Wood Mackenzie data, investment by oil companies in the state rose to $5 billion in 2025, the highest level in a decade, up from $4.1 billion the previous year.

Francisco Gea, head of exploration and production at Repsol, said: “Alaska is a fantastic opportunity. Reversing the decline in oil production in the state of Alaska will help increase oil supply to the Pacific region at a critical moment.”

At the same time, the Financial Times described the return of Shell and ExxonMobil to Alaska as unexpected for the industry.

Shell halted operations in the region in 2015 after a failed $7 billion campaign and years of pressure from environmental groups.

Shell Chief Executive Wael Sawan said the projects currently under consideration involved “a completely different part of Alaska.”

Sawan said the company was no longer pursuing the complex offshore projects that had previously caused difficulties, but rather “onshore production in a well-understood basin.”

According to the Financial Times, major discoveries by independent geologist Bill Armstrong in Alaska, along with new projects by ConocoPhillips and the Santos/Repsol partnership, have also fueled renewed interest from oil companies.

Armstrong said the success rate for exploration activities on the North Slope had reached 94%. He added that Alaska was “the most promising investment in the world” and could “catch up with and surpass Guyana” in terms of reserves.

Oil production in the South American country of Guyana, which began over the past decade, exceeded 600,000 barrels per day by early 2026. The country’s reserves are estimated at more than 11 billion barrels.

Most of the production comes from the deepwater Stabroek block, where ExxonMobil operates.

The Financial Times said the energy crisis and instability in the Middle East had increased interest in Alaska as an alternative supply source.

Santos Chief Executive Kevin Gallagher said the region was “extremely strategically important” for oil shipments to Asia.

Wood Mackenzie estimates that oil production in Alaska will rise to around 750,000 barrels per day by 2030, up from 475,000 barrels per day in 2024. Environmental groups, however, warn that new oil investments threaten Alaska’s ecosystem.

Donald Trump first raised the prospect of allowing oil production in protected areas of Alaska during his first presidency in September 2019.

Before Trump’s proposal, the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge had been closed to oil and gas exploration. Former US President Joe Biden revoked the Trump-era authorization in 2023, citing the need to protect wildlife.

After returning to office for a second term, Trump declared an energy emergency in the United States, signed a series of executive orders supporting oil and gas production, and said energy output should be doubled. Trump has summarized his energy policy with the slogan: “Drill, baby, drill!”

Conflict in the Middle East and the resulting energy crisis have also pushed oil companies to develop new fields.

The Wall Street Journal reported in April that Exxon Mobil, Chevron and other major energy companies were accelerating their search for new oil and gas fields in regions less exposed to war risks linked to Iran.

Companies have recently intensified exploration activities in Africa, South America and the Eastern Mediterranean.

America

Trump administration targets 60 nations with new tariff draft under Section 301

Published

on

The US administration is proposing new tariffs of at least 10% on imports from 60 trading partners, following an investigation into goods allegedly produced using forced labor.

According to a Bloomberg report citing sources within the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), the specific tariff rates will vary based on individual countries’ legislative frameworks regarding forced labor and their capacity to enforce those laws.

Under the drafted regulations, a 10% tariff rate will apply to imports from the European Union, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, and several other nations. Conversely, goods arriving from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Brazil will be subject to a 12,5% tariff.

The USTR stated that the lower tariff rate will apply to products from nations that prohibit forced labor or have committed to doing so. The agency emphasized that states failing to establish such prohibitions or lacking the capacity to effectively enforce them will face the higher tariff rate.

Bloomberg reported that this step represents a continuation of President Donald Trump’s policy to reinstate across-the-board tariffs on all countries, which had previously been ruled unconstitutional.

The proposed tariffs are the result of investigations initiated under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Commenting on the development, Deborah Elms, Head of the Trade Policy Group at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said, “This is highly significant because Section 301 is an extremely powerful tool and is highly unlikely to be overturned. This opens the door to a range of new tariff and non-tariff measures.”

The report noted that the tariffs are being introduced at what could be a turning point for the global economy.

Financial markets are already navigating a sensitive period due to rising gas and oil prices driven by conflict in Iran.

The new tariffs will not take effect immediately. Before implementation, a review and evaluation period will be conducted, which may lead to modifications in the draft proposal.

According to the timeline reported by Bloomberg, written comments on the tariffs must be submitted by July 6. Additionally, the Section 301 Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on July 7.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argued that forced labor practices in partner nations force American workers to compete on an unequal playing field. “We will no longer tolerate this unfairness,” Greer said.

On the other hand, the USTR proposed certain tariff exemptions that could affect apparel and textile imports. While these goods could enter the US at reduced tariff rates, quotas would be determined based on the respective countries’ existing textile exports to the US.

Beef, tomatoes, bananas, coffee, orange juice, and several other food products will be entirely exempt from the tariffs. Furthermore, double taxation will not be imposed on metals, specific fuel types, and chemicals that are already subject to other duties.

In May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the 10% tariff on foreign imports promoted by President Donald Trump was unlawful. Defending the White House’s objectives following the court ruling, Trump characterized the judges as “radical left-wing” and remarked, “Nothing surprises me. We always find different ways. We make a decision and act in another way.”

In February, the US Supreme Court also ruled that tariffs established by Trump were contrary to the law. The court concluded that the president had exceeded his authority in imposing those duties. Trump, however, claimed that the court was under foreign influence.

Continue Reading

America

Google seeks approval to release 32 million mosquitoes in US disease-control project

Published

on

Google is seeking federal approval to release nearly 32 million mosquitoes in California and Florida as part of a biological pest-control initiative known as the Debug project.

The little-known program aims to combat disease-carrying mosquitoes by releasing millions of sterile male mosquitoes into the environment, an approach designed to stop “bad bugs with good bugs.”

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mosquitoes are classified as the world’s deadliest animals. Of the more than 3,500 mosquito species that exist globally, only Aedes aegypti is responsible for transmitting dengue fever, Zika virus and chikungunya, diseases that sicken hundreds of millions of people each year.

In a statement published on the official website of the Debug project, Google described the issue as a difficult problem to solve, noting that many mosquito-borne diseases lack effective vaccines or treatments.

The statement argued that relying on pesticides is not a sustainable solution because such chemicals become less effective over time and can be toxic. It also said that eliminating standing water alone is insufficient because it is impossible to identify every breeding site used by mosquitoes.

For those reasons, Google said a new approach is required and that it found a solution in what it describes as “good” mosquitoes of the same species.

The project website explains the method as follows:

“Good bugs are the same mosquito species as the bad bugs that spread disease. Our good bugs are male mosquitoes carrying Wolbachia, a naturally occurring bacterium found in nature. This bacterium prevents them from producing offspring with wild female mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes do not bite and cannot spread disease, so the good bugs will stop the bad bugs from reproducing. Over time, fewer bad mosquitoes will remain.”

Scientists involved in the Debug project emphasized that the technique relies entirely on a naturally occurring bacterium, contains no chemicals or toxins, and does not involve genetic modification.

Researchers said similar approaches have been used safely for decades to control other pests. They added that the Debug team is combining scientific and engineering expertise with support from international partners in an effort to suppress disease-carrying mosquito populations.

Project scientists said their approach differs from previous eradication programs because it applies the Sterile Insect Technique on a larger scale through the use of data analytics, sensors and automation.

According to information published in the project’s frequently asked questions section, program officials are working closely with national and local governments, community leaders and research institutions.

Officials said they meet with residents in areas targeted for deployment before operations begin in order to better understand local concerns and priorities.

Google is therefore continuing to pursue federal authorization to implement the project in both California and Florida.

A notice published in the Federal Register shows that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing Google’s applications for an Experimental Use Permit under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

According to details contained in the filing, nearly 16 million mosquitoes would be released in Florida during the first year of the project.

A further 16 million mosquitoes would be released in California during the second year.

Members of the public can obtain additional information and submit comments through the federal rulemaking portal by visiting regulations.gov and entering docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-3951.

Continue Reading

America

US Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence

Published

on

US Marine Corps personnel tested a new counter-drone defense system during military exercises held in the Philippines in April.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the system is designed to avoid the continuous use of expensive missiles and instead relies on a coordinated set of countermeasures.

The system consists of two armored vehicles known collectively as MADIS (Marine Air Defense Integrated System).

One vehicle is equipped with an advanced radar system, while the other carries the Stinger air defense missile system. Both vehicles are also fitted with a small cannon, a machine gun and electronic warfare equipment.

According to the report, MADIS is intended to provide military personnel with multiple options for engaging drones, including cannon fire, missiles and electronic warfare tools.

The objective is to reduce dependence on high-cost weapons when protecting military units and other strategic assets.

US Marine Corps officials told WSJ that one of the system’s most effective features is its ability to fire specially manufactured 30-millimeter ammunition equipped with precision fuzes that detonate as they approach a target.

Steven Sawyer, a former ammunition technician at the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, told the newspaper that 30-millimeter rounds are generally less accurate than missiles but are significantly cheaper to use.

Sawyer said that even if five such rounds were required to destroy a drone, the total cost would remain around $11,250.

By comparison, a single Stinger missile costs about $430,000, while Coyote interceptor missiles used in conflicts in the Middle East are priced between $100,000 and $125,000 each.

Sawyer added that 30-millimeter ammunition has proven effective against Shahed-family drones, which cannot be neutralized through electronic warfare methods.

At the same time, he stressed that US defense companies continue to face difficulties producing sufficient quantities of the ammunition. According to Sawyer, the precision fuzes are highly sophisticated electromechanical devices and only a limited number of manufacturers can produce them at scale.

WSJ noted that countering large numbers of inexpensive drones has become one of the most pressing challenges facing modern militaries.

The US military has encountered the problem directly during operations in the Middle East, where it has been forced to expend limited stocks of extremely costly precision-guided munitions.

Previously, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Chinese scientists had developed a combat algorithm known as HG-STR based on a “kill them all” concept.

The algorithm was said to enable swarms of fixed-wing drones to autonomously scan the battlefield and destroy enemy targets even if communications are disrupted and lines of sight are obstructed.

In April, The New York Times, citing three sources within defense and intelligence agencies, reported that the Pentagon assessed Russia’s and China’s drone development programs to be more advanced than those of the United States.

The assessment regarding China’s drone capabilities was reportedly based on analysis of a military parade held in China in September 2025.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey