Connect with us

America

Oil industry lobbies White House to avert potential Trump export ban

Published

on

Oil industry executives and White House officials are engaging in a new push to prevent any move by the administration to restrict US oil exports.

According to a report by Politico, industry representatives say these efforts extend to the White House Domestic Policy Council, the National Energy Dominance Council, the Department of Energy, and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

Trump believes that oil prices could harm the Republicans’ chances of maintaining control of Congress in the November mid-term elections.

“Everyone from the industry and within the administration is working hand in hand to prevent this,” an energy industry executive said.

The individual added that White House officials had not formally raised the idea, “but everyone knows Trump will act like Trump again.”

The White House maintains that export restrictions are not on the agenda.

White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement: “While the President and the entire energy team are taking various measures to mitigate temporary disruptions in the energy market, the administration has been very clear: there is no plan to impose restrictions on oil and gas exports.”

White House representatives did not confirm whether industry lobbyists had approached specific agencies or officials to discuss the export issue. Department of Energy representatives did not respond to queries.

However, although administration officials have guaranteed since the early days of the Iranian war that an export ban was off the table, Trump’s directive to the Department of Justice in June to investigate oil companies on charges of price gouging put the sector on high alert.

Concerns within the industry mounted after Trump stated on Monday that oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron were making “too much money.”

Industry executives now fear Trump may try to make a move against them by restricting fuel export activities abroad, which have boomed since the start of the US-Israeli war against Iran.

Another industry official said the sector had reiterated its concerns regarding export controls to the White House “very recently.”

The Trump administration has already tried several different approaches to lower prices that enjoy broader support from the oil industry.

These include the release of millions of barrels of oil from the country’s strategic petroleum reserve and the temporary suspension of the Jones Act to make it easier for non-American vessels to transport oil and natural gas between US ports.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former oil company CEO, and Vice President JD Vance have repeatedly opposed the idea of limiting or banning exports.

Wright stated in May that the administration had “definitely” ruled out the option of banning diesel exports.

Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute, said he was “confident” Trump understood the need to maintain oil exports, recalling that early in the crisis, the president had encouraged other countries to buy American oil:

“The administration has repeatedly expressed that they are opposed to [export controls]. Therefore, I do not think there is any change in their stance at the moment. Frankly, it feels as though we have to clarify this issue every three weeks.”

In a note sent to clients on Tuesday, consultancy firm ClearView Energy stated that the moment for the White House to take a step toward limiting fuel exports “might be approaching.”

The firm noted that former President Joe Biden had considered imposing export restrictions ahead of the 2022 mid-term elections following a “long summer of high petrol prices” caused by the war in Ukraine.

US crude oil exports increased by approximately 30% compared with last year, reaching nearly 3.5 million barrels per day by the end of July.

Shipments of refined products such as diesel, petrol, and other types of oil rose by 20%, exceeding 8 million barrels per day.

Opponents of exports argue that sending these cargoes abroad leads to rising prices domestically.

However, the oil and gas industry contends that closing the door to exports would harm the domestic market and cause their production to decline.

“Export bans may seem politically attractive, but ultimately they will lead to the exact opposite of the intended effect,” said a refining industry lobbyist who noted they were in contact with the White House on the matter, arguing that cutting off American exports from international markets would mean “a decline in US production, supply shortages, further upward pressure on domestic prices, and even greater disruptions in the global market.”

Chet Thompson, president and CEO of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, stated that export controls would force US refiners to produce less petrol because they would lose commercial channels to ship other surplus fuels, such as diesel, produced during the process.

America

Tech giants pour billions into media licensing to fuel AI systems

Published

on

Investments by Silicon Valley-based technology giants in mainstream media organisations have taken on a new dimension in recent years, pivoting around direct cash flows, technology transfers, and legal strategies.

Aiming to shield their artificial intelligence models from copyright infringement lawsuits and feed them high-quality, real-time data cleansed of low-grade AI-generated material circulating online, tech companies are engaged in a billion-dollar licensing race.

OpenAI stands out with aggressive licensing drive

Building the industry’s most extensive content licensing portfolio, OpenAI is not only purchasing data but also integrating media outlets into its own ecosystem via AI integration.

The five-year agreement struck between the company and News Corp encompasses more than $250 million in cash and technology credits. The deal’s average annual cash flow stands at around $50 million.

Under this collaboration, the archives and live news feeds of The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, MarketWatch, The New York Post, The Times, The Sunday Times, and The Sun have been opened to OpenAI systems. OpenAI uses this data both to train its GPT models and to summarize News Corp articles with source attribution links within ChatGPT search results.

The Media Copilot Citation Study and analyses by The Wall Street Journal on market dynamics reveal that publishers entering into licensing agreements gain a 48% priority advantage in ChatGPT citations.

OpenAI also signed an agreement valued at between $25 million and $30 million over three years with Axel Springer—whose portfolio includes publications such as Politico and Business Insider—securing the right to provide users with real-time summaries of European and US political news.

In its partnership with Dotdash Meredith, a fixed annual guarantee fee of $16 million was established alongside variable commercial revenue-sharing arrangements.

According to IAC financial filings and Adweek data, millions of articles from brands including People, Better Homes & Gardens, Lifewire, and InStyle are transferred to OpenAI, while the technology company supports the AI optimization of Dotdash Meredith’s advertising targeting platform, D.M.A.P.

On another front, The Walt Disney Company partnership announced by Disney CEO Bob Iger and Sam Altman involved a combination of a $1 billion equity investment and stock warrants.

The agreement aimed to secure the legal use of more than 200 characters from the Disney, Pixar, Marvel, and Star Wars universes inside Sora, the text-to-video AI model.

However, according to details reflected in reports by The Guardian and OpenAI Index filings, Hollywood’s resistance to artificial intelligence, the rights of actors and voice artists, and shifting priorities within OpenAI regarding the Sora application have plunged the operational process of the billion-dollar integration project into crisis.

Alongside traditional media, OpenAI is also turning to alternative and emerging media platforms. The company acquired TBPN last April. TBPN is a podcast hosted by John Coogan and Jordi Hays, both of whom come from the venture capital world. Daily from a Los Angeles studio, the duo hosts a three-hour show reminiscent of mainstream media business or sports broadcasts.

The podcast and its team fall under the responsibility of Chris Lehane, an experienced lobbyist who rose to prominence managing scandals during the Clinton administration. Lehane serves as OpenAI’s head of public relations.

Silicon Valley’s “parallel media ecosystem” does not consist solely of ventures by tech investors. Andreessen Horowitz, for instance, is investing heavily to build its own media empire. The venture capital firm publishes podcasts to showcase its tech investment portfolio and promote pro-technology politics. In this context, bespoke publications such as Future were established to disseminate optimistic perspectives on technology and feature founders in their portfolio without subjecting them to external critical scrutiny.

Furthermore, tech-backed ventures such as the AI platform State Affairs—supported by Peter Thiel’s venture capital firm Founders Fund and Khosla Ventures—employ human reporters to feed state legislative data into large language models (LLMs) for corporate subscribers.

Meta pivots to AI data over social traffic

Having faced disputes with publishers after restricting external link traffic directed to traditional media via Facebook and Instagram, Meta has deployed its AI budgets as a solution.

According to reporting by The Wall Street Journal, the company is executing multi-year agreements reaching up to $50 million annually with News Corp and a global pool of publishers.

Meta is making this investment to ensure its open-source Llama models avoid copyright complications when delivering news in internet searches and inside the Meta AI assistant.

Rather than using the data directly to train model weights, the company employs it within a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) infrastructure that enables the assistant to deliver instant, legally cleared news to the user.

Apple negotiates with legal liability clause

Entering the AI arena with its “Apple Intelligence” integration, Apple held talks with publisher groups including Condé Nast, NBC News, and IAC to conduct its data collection process on an entirely legal footing.

As reported by The New York Times and PCMag, Apple tabled multi-year offers with a baseline price of at least $50 million per group for decades-long archives of institutions such as Vogue, The New Yorker, GQ, Vanity Fair, and NBC News.

A primary factor prolonging negotiations was reportedly Apple’s demand that publishers also assume potential legal liabilities arising from the processing of data within the system.

Perplexity AI shares ad revenue

Confronted with accusations of plagiarism and content theft from media organisations, Perplexity AI established a revenue-sharing pool under the name “Perplexity Publishers Program” to pre-empt potential copyright lawsuits.

Under the partnership, which includes TIME, Fortune, Der Spiegel, and the Los Angeles Times, an initial cash pool of $42.5 million was created.

According to the model examined by The Wall Street Journal and Digiday, Perplexity AI, which has begun introducing advertisements into search results, transfers between 50% and 80% of generated ad revenues to the publisher when it draws on the relevant media outlet’s article while generating an answer.

The company also provides enterprise AI subscriptions to employees of these media organisations.

Continue Reading

America

US in talks to acquire equity stakes in Venezuelan oilfields

Published

on

The Trump administration is in talks with Venezuela’s interim government to acquire an equity stake in the country’s vast oil reserves.

According to a report by Axios, this historic agreement would more than double US oil reserves by securing resources from the country that holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves.

“To call this deal ‘big’ would be an understatement. This is a massive deal,” one official said.

Another factor driving the push to sign the agreement is the wars in Iran and Ukraine, which have disrupted global oil supplies and pushed up prices.

The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve currently stands at a 40-year low.

The details are still being worked out, but the talks cover more than a dozen producing oilfields, rather than the entirety of Venezuela’s 300 billion barrels in proven reserves.

The fields in question hold 90 billion barrels in proven reserves and were previously controlled by former Venezuelan officials, including some who face criminal charges.

Interests once controlled by China were also linked to these fields.

In exchange for granting the US an ownership stake, the Venezuelan government would benefit from private firms, including American companies, developing these fields and generating increased oil revenues for the country.

According to Axios, the Venezuelan oil deal would represent a legacy-defining moment for President Trump, who has made US energy security and dominance in the Western Hemisphere cornerstones of his “Donroe Doctrine”.

“President Trump is very close to securing America’s energy future for generations to come, not only in the US, but across the entire hemisphere,” another official said.

Trump had reportedly begun discussing ways to acquire a stake in Venezuelan oilfields in secret even before Nicolas Maduro was abducted by the US on 3 January.

The negotiations are being led by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodriguez.

Last month, senior officials from the Departments of State and Defence met with their counterparts in Caracas to discuss the details in greater depth.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is also playing a significant role in the process.

An official noted that the White House is sensitive to accusations that Rodriguez will hand over Venezuela’s natural resources to the US, stating: “We are doing everything we can to show this will benefit the Venezuelan people, because it genuinely will.”

It remains uncertain exactly when the agreement will be finalised. US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright is discussing plans to travel to Venezuela next week, as his department examines ways for US companies to boost oil production.

Continue Reading

America

US urges Mexico to curb undocumented crossings at southern border

Published

on

The administration of US President Donald Trump is demanding that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum implement additional measures against illegal crossings along the US border.

According to a Bloomberg report citing sources familiar with the matter, US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio conveyed this demand to Mexican Foreign Minister Roberto Velasco during a closed-door meeting in Washington on 26 August.

The Washington administration is demanding that Mexican authorities prevent their own citizens from attempting to cross the US border illegally.

Bloomberg noted that fulfilling this request could encounter constitutional and legal obstacles, as Mexico’s constitution guarantees its citizens freedom of movement across national territory.

US State Department Spokesperson Tommy Pigott stated that Rubio urged Mexico during the meeting to take decisive steps in combating migration, drug trafficking, and cartel operations.

The Mexican Secretariat of Foreign Affairs has not yet issued a statement regarding the matter.

According to data cited by Bloomberg, US border patrol units detained more than 9,200 migrants in July. This figure represents the highest monthly tally recorded since Trump returned to the White House in January 2025.

The July figure was reported to have doubled compared to the same period of the previous year, yet it remained at approximately one-sixth of the level recorded in the final July of Joe Biden’s presidency.

Under Trump, who declared a state of emergency on the southern US border upon taking office in January 2025, illegal border crossings were recorded at 28,635 in February and 29,065 in March.

In the corresponding months of the preceding year, those figures stood at 256,071 and 246,505, respectively.

Following negotiations between Trump and Sheinbaum in February 2025, Mexico pledged to deploy 10,000 National Guard personnel to its northern border to counter drug shipments heading into the US.

Washington, in turn, suspended for one month the tariffs planned on goods of Mexican origin and pledged to work towards preventing illegal firearms shipments into Mexico.

Following Trump’s threats of launching ground operations against drug cartels in Mexico, Sheinbaum called in January 2026 for enhanced security coordination with Washington.

The Mexican leader had assigned then foreign minister Juan Ramon de la Fuente to hold talks with US Secretary of State Rubio.

Sheinbaum expressed that she considered a US invasion of her country unlikely and that Trump’s statements to that effect should not be taken seriously.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey