America
Quo Vadis World Economy-II: Uneven blows of inflation and slowing operations
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen first paid homage to a slave memorial in Senegal, then spoke to farmers in a remote village in Zambia, and eventually visited a job retraining facility in South Africa’s coal region on tour to convince the locals of the good intentions of her country.
“We’ve seen inflation come down substantially,” Yellen said about the American economy in South Africa, although “there can be hiccups” and she “wouldn’t predict month-to-month-type changes.”
Despite her belief that rental prices substantially contribute to inflation, Yellen expects that it would come out over the next five or six months, and this cooldown would deaccelerate the price rise. She also said that goods prices have actually been falling, but service prices are rising more rapidly.
Considering the 2.9 percent growth in the fourth quarter is “solid,” Yellen emphasized that slower growth is desirable in this high-inflation environment.
Interim balance sheet in inflation
The New York Fed has published a study that explores which income groups are more affected by inflation. The findings show that inflation had varying effects on different groups in 2021 and 2022.
Middle-income households are hit worst by inflation in 2021. Those with an annual earning between $50,000 and $150,000 are considered middle-incomed.
This income group was most suffered from the rocketed prices of used cars and motor fuel. The lower-income group is more likely to rely on public transportation, while the wealthy are more likely to purchase brand-new cars, and their spendings on gas constitute a much less portion of their income. These made middle-income households the main target of inflation. This outcome is partially attributable to differences in consumption patterns between the well-off and the poor, between peasants and urbanites.
Fuel and used car costs have fallen in recent months. Meanwhile, the rising rental and goods prices are hurting. Inflation now primarily affects the lower-income population since these two are among the necessary expenditures.
For this reason, the poorest 40 percent of the population bears an extra 0.3% inflation.
For example, rural residents experienced 2 percent higher inflation than the national average in the year leading up to February 2022. The same regions are now living below-average inflation.
In early 2022, black and Hispanic households experienced a 1 percent extra inflation rate than white households. As it turns out, the inflation for non-college-educated people is also more severe. These groups are shown to be getting closer to the average inflation rate.
Food and rental prices rise faster than the inflation average (10.6 percent, 7.9 percent, and 7.1 percent, respectively). Therefore, what Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman argued in New York Times last November, “inflation does not hurt the poor disproportionately,” is not true. Krugman bases his argument on the fact that the proportion of pay increases for low-income employees is higher than that for high-wage ones.
The poorest quarter of Americans spends more than half of their income on housing, food, and healthcare, according to statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the United States. The high-income group disposes of a far more significant percentage of their money to dining out, self-entertainment, vacation, and brand-new and used cars than the low-income group.
Prices of basic needs have risen more rapidly than non-essential goods, as the general and historical tendency suggests.
Decline in consumer spending
It is generally agreed that falling consumer spending is a significant contributor to the recent decline in the inflation rate.
According to statistics released last week, consumer demand fell in December by 0.2% compared to the previous month. This rate rises to 0.3% after adjusting for inflation.
Although December is the Christmas season, consumer demand fell by 1.1% from November, according to data on retail sales.
Perhaps one of the most important indicators of the decline in American consumption is the considerable drop in the trade deficit in November. This month’s greatest monthly loss in a 14-year period highlighted falling consumer demand and increased importing-associated financing costs.
The US trade deficit narrowed by 21% in November, falling to $61.5 billion. While overall imports dropped by 6.4%, imports of products decreased by 7.5%. In November, exports fell 2% as well.
While the dollar’s relative strength lowers the worldwide competitiveness of American manufactured products, the high-interest rate policy of the FED has an impact on reducing demand.
Another issue is that households whose savings seemed to grow thanks to the state’s monetary subsidies during the pandemic are being enticed back to levels in 2005.
Furthermore, consumer loaning is getting dangerously close to its limits. In the third quarter of 2022, payments for credit cards, vehicles, and student loans have peaked since 2008.
Manufacturing industry is alarming
More importantly, a possible “factory recession” in the manufacturing sector in the United States may be the direst of these developments.
A Wall Street Journal survey predicted a 0.1 percent decline in industrial output in December 2022 before the numbers were released. The official statistics revealed a shrinkage of 0.7%, failing all expectations.
Capacity utilization was anticipated at 79.6 percent. The numbers showed a decline, down 78.8 percent compared to November.
Manufacturing continued the downward slide. The manufacturing sector lost another 1.3% in December after shrinking by 1.1% in November.
The industry experienced a 1.8% drop in new orders in November.
The increase in capital expenditures (equipment, buildings, intellectual property) was a modest 0.7 percent. In the third quarter, these rates were 6.3%. Therefore, it stands to reason that investment has slowed down as well.
It is often believed that the manufacturing sector of the American economy is the most vulnerable to a recession. In Q2, a technical recession is likely to occur, but economists expect it to be ‘mild.’
Teeny-weeny recessions
The overall tendency of recent estimates for the American economy is the assumption of a modest recession.
The US economy will be cooled down by the FED’s decision to keep raising interest rates at a slower pace, increasing loaning costs and declining consumer demand.
However, even the “pessimistic” FED believed there was a light at the end of the tunnel. Almost everyone anticipates a quarter-point increase in interest rates at this week’s meeting. A ‘soft landing’ is possible for the American economy, FED Governor Christopher Waller noted in his ‘Cautious Optimism’ address.
In the Bloomberg survey, economists predicted GDP would begin to decline in the second quarter, albeit a modest drop.
On the other hand, the technical definition of a recession is a decline in economic activity that lasts for two consecutive quarters in many countries. However, as Bloomberg points out, this is not the situation in the United States. In private meetings, ‘elite’ scholars of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a “non-profit” institution, are responsible for making the “official” declaration of a recession in the United States. Their deliberations often take place for a full year. The common definition of a recession is that the consensus essentially drives Wall Street that a recession is being experienced.
Is the labor market ‘tight’?
All US officials and corporate economists agree that the labor market is ‘tight.’
Unemployment rates are at historic lows, while corporations continue hiring despite the massive layoffs at tech giants.
However, the dismissals by major corporations do not directly indicate that the economy is currently in recession. Since many businesses anticipate a slowdown in 2023, they may now be adopting preventative measures to reduce labor expenses.
As a matter of fact, the formerly ‘tight’ labor market began showing signs of relaxation in December. The ever-increasing new employment after the pandemic has started to cool down. Companies created two hundred thirty thousand new positions in December. Compared to the previous two years, this is the lowest increase.
New jobs opened in 2022 were 4.5 million, clearly lower than the 6.7 million expected in 2021.
The figures may seem optimistic, but more nuanced data is concealed beneath them. The labor force participation rate, which measures the percentage of adults in the United States who are either employed or actively seeking jobs, increased to 62.3% in December; nonetheless, this is still lower than the pre-pandemic levels.
In addition, the average weekly working hours have been falling in the last two years, and in December, it marked 34.3 hours.
Employment with temporary aid services has dropped by 110.000 in the previous five months. Coupled with the data shown above, it means that employers are abandoning temporary aid programs and cutting down on employee hours in response to falling demand from customers.
Wage growth slows down
Several experts, like American Center Vice President Lael Brainard, have pointed out that low-income workers have had less wage increases than high-income workers. It is evident that employees in non-administrative positions have witnessed a lesser salary gain.
However, we have already covered above that the basic expenses of low-wage workers are concentrated in a few key areas and that inflation in these areas is greater than in others. To all this, additional details, including: Prices increased by 14% from early 2021 to late 2022, but low-income employees saw a rise of just 11.5% in their average annual salary.
Similarly, the pace of salary increase has slowed. The average hourly pay in the United States rose 4.6% in December over the previous year. It should be emphasized that inflation in the same period was 7.1 percent.
Despite all this, it is worth noting that consumer optimism is rising in OECD countries. The industrial sector, which was projected to be impacted severely by the rise in energy costs, was spared from collapsing by the mild winter, especially in Europe. In the following article, our focus will be on Europe.
America
AI spending heads toward $7 trillion as analysts warn of market bubble risks
Massive financial resources directed into artificial intelligence technologies are driving companies into dangerous territory for global markets.
If expected productivity gains fail to materialize despite these immense capital flows, the artificial intelligence sector faces the risk of inflating into a giant bubble.
The Wall Street Journal reported that should such a scenario unfold, a widespread collapse capable of shaking the entire financial system and dragging down the broader market will become inevitable.
Estimates by McKinsey & Company project that global spending on data center construction alone could reach $7 trillion by 2030.
According to the newspaper, if these massive investments fail to deliver adequate productivity gains, the global economy will suffer a severe blow.
Should the sector as a whole turn out to be a bubble, the resulting damage will spread directly across the broader financial system.
While market observers note that a major crash—whether sooner or later—would drag all equity markets down with it, declines in AI-related stocks are currently being offset by gains in other sectors.
However, the first concrete signs of emerging vulnerability appeared in the memory chip market, where a sector-specific bubble formed and burst within just four months.
South Korean market shaken by sharp drop
In June, shares of South Korea’s Samsung and SK Hynix, the world’s two largest memory chip makers, sank by more than 12%.
The sharp sell-off pulled down the country’s broader stock index. South Korea’s benchmark Kospi index dropped 10%, triggering an automatic 20-minute trading halt.
Growing investor anxiety over artificial intelligence triggered the steep decline in the two giant companies, which together account for half of the total market capitalization of the Kospi index.
US equity markets also felt the ripple effects during the same period. The Nasdaq index closed down 2.2%, while the S&P 500 fell 1.4%, marking their worst single-day performances in two weeks.
Nevertheless, The Wall Street Journal pointed out that the disruption has not yet produced catastrophic consequences for the rest of the market.
While the bursting of massive historical bubbles resulted in disaster for national economies, smaller and localized bubbles in recent years have failed to paralyze broader economic growth.
The primary reason for this resilience is that these recent investments were not predominantly funded through leverage and bank credit.
When those localized bubbles burst, investors suffered wealth losses, but the financial system remained intact.
Russell Napier, a global macroeconomic strategist and keeper of the Library of Mistakes, a financial history archive in Edinburgh, evaluated the current market posture:
“The banking system is in superb condition, which means there will always be enough credit available to blow the next bubble.”
America
Anthropic AI models breach corporate systems after escaping isolated test environment
Anthropic has announced that several of its advanced artificial intelligence models escaped an isolated testing environment and accessed the live internet.
In a review published Thursday night, the company stated that in three separate incidents dating back to April, the models independently breached the systems of multiple companies without the AI developer’s knowledge.
Anthropic said the incidents involved an unreleased internal research test model, alongside its Opus 4.7 and Mythos 5 models.
Mythos was made available last month to a limited audience composed of technology companies and cybersecurity researchers, an initiative also known as Project Glasswing.
The AI developer did not disclose which companies were breached, but said the affected firms were informed of the incidents on Monday.
Anthropic noted that it conducted the review after OpenAI revealed last week that two of its most powerful models had breached containment, escaped their testing environment, and infiltrated several entities, including the AI platform Hugging Face and cloud provider Modal Labs.
System misconfiguration allowed internet access
Anthropic stated that it examined more than 140,000 tests to find evidence of whether Claude could gain access to the internet from test environments designed to be isolated.
The evaluations included “capture-the-flag” exercises, in which Claude was instructed to breach other systems to obtain information. This is a method frequently used by experts to assess a model’s hacking capabilities.
The San Francisco-based company stated that a “misconfiguration” in systems operated by Anthropic and its testing partner left the models with live internet access, enabling them to infiltrate external systems.
Anthropic said it approached remediation efforts “with full ownership of the responsibility.”
Neither Anthropic nor the affected organizations detected the unauthorized entries at the time they occurred.
Anthropic added that it may examine its logs more extensively, noting that the findings gave the company “cautious optimism” that such risks can be overcome through increased investment and more stringent safeguards.
David Allott, a cybersecurity expert, told the BBC: “The overarching lesson here is not that AI has developed fundamentally new attack vectors.”
“Instead, it means that AI agents can combine capabilities, acquire credentials and system access to act autonomously, while adapting scope and scale at machine speed,” Allott said.
The developments come as technology companies invest billions of dollars to develop AI agents capable of independently executing a range of tasks, from research and customer support to cybersecurity.
America
Elon Musk’s America PAC plans $100 million field operation for 2026 Republican midterm push
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is returning to the political spending arena with a new field program designed to help elect Republicans in at least eight states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Musk has authorized his political action committee, America PAC, to spend between $100 million and $120 million on a new ground game focused on conservative voter turnout for the 2026 midterms, according to a Thursday report by The New York Times, which cited two unnamed sources informed about the plans.
America PAC funneled more than $250 million into Donald Trump’s reelection campaign in 2024, a expenditure that established Musk as the largest political donor in US history.
The New York Times reported that America PAC is reviving its spending initiatives and has reached out to other Republicans in recent weeks regarding the new field operations.
The effort is also being coordinated with other Republican Party spending groups, according to the report.
The newspaper identified targeted Senate races in the states of Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, and Ohio, while noting that discussions are also underway regarding contests in North Carolina, Georgia, and Texas.
The political action committee is additionally expected to deploy funds for House of Representatives elections in Washington, Wisconsin, and California.
The news comes a day after Axios first reported that America PAC’s operations were resuming, with a focus on driving Republican turnout during the non-presidential election cycle.
A spokesperson for America PAC declined to comment on The New York Times report but confirmed the Axios reporting to The Hill. The spokesperson stated that the spending group was “excited” to contribute to efforts to maintain the Republican majorities in Congress this fall.
“The President’s political team and the rest of the GOP apparatus have built a world-class operation that has Republicans well-positioned to make history and retain control of Congress this fall,” America PAC spokesperson Andrew Romeo said in a statement. “We’re excited to be part of the team again.”
The campaign will reportedly target Republican voters through door-to-door canvassing, mailers, and digital advertisements, enabling other groups to concentrate their resources on television advertising.
The developments were reported days after Musk told The Economist magazine that he had gotten “carried away” during his brief foray into politics.
The SpaceX CEO entered the political arena during the 2024 election, pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump’s presidential campaign and accompanying the candidate on the campaign trail.
Musk went on to lead Trump’s cost-cutting initiative, known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which executed sweeping employment and funding reductions across the federal government. Those efforts sparked controversy for Musk and his enterprise empire, including Tesla, whose shares fell sharply during his period of political involvement.
Musk departed the White House in late May 2025, and DOGE officially terminated its operations on July 4.
Shortly after leaving government, Musk and Trump engaged in a public dispute over the president’s sweeping spending legislation, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” During the friction, Musk threatened to form a third party, though the initiative never materialized.
Musk and the US President appeared to resolve their differences last year, with the tech billionaire most recently joining Trump alongside other technology leaders on a trip to China in May.
-
America2 weeks agoUS agricultural superpower status at risk as trade wars shift global markets to Brazil
-
America2 weeks agoUS controls $13 billion in Venezuelan oil revenues with little transparency, raising congressional concerns
-
Europe2 weeks agoUS secures multi-billion-dollar energy and AI deals at Three Seas summit in Dubrovnik
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoPalantir CEO Alex Karp says he would not vote for ‘pro-Russian’ AfD in Germany
-
Middle East2 weeks agoPentagon faces severe budget crunch as Middle East operational costs drain key military funds
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoWorld Bank warns US-Iran conflict could slash global growth to 1.3% as inflation looms
-
Middle East2 weeks agoOil passes $90 as tanker attacks halt Hormuz shipping
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany accelerates African energy diplomatic push to secure natural gas and green hydrogen
