Asia
China’s BYD extends olive branch to Tesla in EV market battle
China’s leading electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, BYD, has vowed to “work together” with rival Tesla to challenge gasoline-powered cars, while insisting that Beijing is “more open” to foreign business than the West perceives.
In an interview with the Financial Times, BYD’s Executive Vice President, Stella Li, stated, “Our common enemy is internal combustion engine cars. We need to work together to change the industry.”
Despite Li’s comments, the two automakers are competing to be the world’s largest EV group. BYD aims for rapid growth in advanced EV sales in Europe, offering a wider range of products than the US group. Tesla, meanwhile, has experienced a decline in European sales due to Elon Musk’s increasing political activism.
Speaking at a BYD showroom in London, Li said that despite rising trade tensions with Brussels and Washington, China is willing to share key technologies in EVs and autonomous driving with foreign companies.
“The Chinese government is more open, so maybe there are too many misperceptions here,” she said.
She added that the Chinese auto market is “the motherland of innovation,” urging foreign companies to come to China. “The government will support you and work with you to allow any technology to be realized,” she said.
Last month, BYD announced that advanced intelligent driving functions, via its “God’s Eye” autonomous driving system, would be available to customers on most of its models at no extra charge.
This announcement raised concerns across the industry about declining revenues for such driver-assistance technologies, with analysts predicting that the entire market will have to follow suit in the widespread adoption of intelligent driving functions.
The Warren Buffett-backed group is also making an aggressive push into European markets with plans for local production through factories in Hungary and Turkey, countering high tariffs imposed by the EU on imports of Chinese-made EVs. BYD is also planning to raise up to $5.2 billion through a share sale in Hong Kong to help fund its overseas expansion, according to a person familiar with the terms of the deal.
However, Brussels also wants Chinese companies to transfer intellectual property rights to European businesses in exchange for EU subsidies. Meanwhile, Beijing has signaled that it wants Chinese companies to limit some advanced overseas production in response to growing Western protectionism.
In recent years, China has gradually expanded its export controls, from restrictions on battery materials like rare earth elements to technologies and processes that convert refined rare earth elements into metals and permanent magnets used in EVs.
When asked about recent political developments in the EU regarding technology sharing, Li said she was not concerned about politics as it was “short-term” and consumers would ultimately choose the better product.
She noted that the Chinese government was helping with its overseas push and that all its innovations, including self-driving technology, would be available to global markets: “For every investment we make overseas, the [Chinese] government is very supportive [of us].”
Li said that BYD would offer European consumers options beyond EVs, such as the Seal U plug-in hybrid, as EV sales fall in leading European markets and hybrids are not subject to the EU’s anti-subsidy tariffs. It also plans to launch its Denza premium brand later this year.
According to Schmidt Automotive Research, BYD’s battery EV market share in Western Europe, including the UK, was 2% last year.
Li confirmed that BYD has no plans to introduce EVs in the US, where China imposed a 100% tariff on EV imports last year. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced additional tariffs on imports from China and confirmed that taxes would also be imposed on Mexico and Canada starting next week. Li said no decision had been made on BYD’s plans to build a factory in Mexico.
She stated that she was not concerned about a global slowdown in the transition to EVs as a result of Trump’s policies. Referring to the shift away from gasoline cars in China, she said: “Why do people now prefer EVs? Because it’s a better car, a smarter car… and of higher quality.”
Asia
Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says
The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.
According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.
The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.
The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.
The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.
The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.
According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.
Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House
The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.
In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.
In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.
According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.
Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.
Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.
Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.
Asia
Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.
Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.
The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.
According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”
Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).
Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.
During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.
Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.
Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.
The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.
“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.
Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.
Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers
Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.
In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.
Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.
The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.
Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.
Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks
Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.
A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”
The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.
At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.
According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.
Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.
A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.
Asia
South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants
South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.
The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.
Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.
Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”
“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.
Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.
The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.
Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.
Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.
According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.
South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.
South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.
The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.
Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.
After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSWP urges backing for Gulf trade routes bypassing Strait of Hormuz
-
Europe2 weeks agoLSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy
-
America1 week agoHow Elon Musk fuses private empire with state power, Ben Tarnoff explains
-
Europe1 week agoAfD leader Weidel calls funding lost Ukraine war a grave mistake
-
Middle East1 week agoEgypt delays parliamentary vote on deploying troops to Saudi Arabia
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoIMF warns global economy is nearing the limits of its resilience
-
Europe1 week agoEU rejects US proposal to resume Russian gas flows through Ukraine
-
America1 week agoAt least 47 major US data centre projects halted or cancelled
