America
Harvard sues Trump administration over funding cuts

Harvard University sued the Trump administration on Monday, challenging the White House’s decision to cut more than $2 billion in federal funding.
In a statement announcing the lawsuit, Harvard President Alan Garber said the university chose to oppose the administration’s “unreasonable demands to control who we hire and what we teach” through an antisemitism task force.
Harvard’s administration said the White House’s demands “would impose unprecedented and inappropriate control over the university” and came without a genuine effort to address antisemitism.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Massachusetts.
In response to the lawsuit, White House spokesman Harrison Fields said, “Federal aid to institutions like Harvard, which enrich their overpaid bureaucrats with the taxes of struggling American families, is ending. Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard is not meeting the basic conditions required to access that privilege.”
The Trump administration reviewed approximately $9 billion in grants and contracts with the university, alleging that the treatment of Jewish students, including during the Gaza occupation protests that shook campuses nationwide last year, violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
The administration has already withdrawn more than $2 billion in federal funds from the school and is considering withdrawing another $1 billion in grants.
In addition, the Internal Revenue Service is reviewing the university’s tax-exempt status, and the Department of Homeland Security has threatened to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll international students, who make up approximately 27% of Harvard’s total enrollment. The Department of Education has also reviewed the university’s federal funding.
Garber said, “These actions will have very serious real-world consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the position of American higher education in the world.”
The lawsuit alleges that the federal government launched a broad attack on billions in research funding at Harvard and a number of other institutions “with very little warning and even less explanation.”
Lawyers for the institution said the federal government was “using federal funds as leverage to seize control of the academic decision-making process at Harvard.”
Earlier this month, the administration had demanded that, to avoid losing funds, the institution reform its governance, change hiring and admissions policies, report foreign and green card students for “behavioral violations,” have academic programs or departments audited for antisemitism by an outside party, end diversity programs, and reform student disciplinary procedures, among other conditions.
“Ultimately, the trade-off imposed on Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to oversee your academic institution or jeopardize the institution’s ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions,” the lawsuit stated, adding that the freezing of extensive research funds “had nothing to do with antisemitism.”
Among the lawyers representing Harvard are Republicans and those connected to the Trump administration. These lawyers include Robert Hur, William Burck, Steven Lehotsky, who clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia, and Scott Keller, who previously served as Solicitor General of Texas.
The lawyers argue that the administration’s actions violated First Amendment and Title VI compliance procedures that should have occurred before federal funding was revoked.
The university argued that the government “made no effort to follow these procedures,” such as attempting to secure voluntary compliance, holding a hearing, and issuing a findings report, before freezing or terminating its funds.
The lawyers also said the freezing of funds would force the school to reduce or halt ongoing research projects, terminate employment contracts, and make cuts to departments and programs.
If Harvard were to continue using its own resources instead of federal funds, the school would need to reduce the number of graduate students it admits and the number of faculty and research staff.
They also argued that this situation could economically harm the Boston area, as the university is one of Massachusetts’ largest employers.
America
Former CIA analyst sentenced to three years for leaking Israel’s military plans

A former CIA analyst has been sentenced to three years and one month in prison for leaking top-secret documents last year concerning Israel’s military plans to attack Iran. The documents spread rapidly on social media.
Asif W. Rahman pleaded guilty to two violations of the Espionage Act, admitting he leaked more than a dozen classified documents while working as a CIA analyst.
Rahman was arrested last year after FBI investigators traced the download of two documents detailing Israel’s military preparations to Rahman’s station at the US Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
US officials stated that two top-secret documents from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency were published in mid-October on a Telegram channel called Middle East Spectator. The documents described air drills and the movement of munitions vehicles at an Israeli airport, consistent with preparations for an attack on Iran, but contained no imagery.
Officials said the leak spread to other social media platforms and caused Israel to postpone its attack plan.
About two weeks before the top-secret documents appeared online, Iran had fired nearly 200 missiles at Israel in response to the killing of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders.
The Biden administration was publicly pressuring Israel not to target Iran’s nuclear or energy facilities during its preparations for a retaliatory strike.
Announcing Rahman’s sentence in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, US District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles said, “I don’t think the seriousness and gravity of this conduct can be overstated. Our intelligence community has a responsibility to ensure the security of our country, and actions that in any way jeopardize that responsibility endanger us all.”
Rahman, 34, also admitted to leaking more than ten classified documents whose contents were not disclosed in public court filings or proceedings.
His lawyers said Rahman had a promising life, graduating as high school valedictorian, then with honors from Yale University in three years. He left a lucrative career in finance to join the CIA, but his judgment was clouded for months under difficult circumstances.
A forensic psychologist noted that Rahman had mental health issues stemming from a traumatic assignment in Baghdad and his wife’s miscarriage last year, just before the couple planned to move to Cambodia. Rahman ultimately moved there alone.
His lawyers requested a sentence of one year and one month, stating that Rahman “had no intention of harming the United States or its interests” but was disturbed by “the events that began in the Middle East in the fall of 2023.”
In a statement before the judge on Wednesday, Rahman said, “I violated the oath I took when I joined the CIA, and I have let down my colleagues and the American people.”
America
Curfew declared in Los Angeles amid escalating immigrant protests

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared a curfew in the city center on Tuesday evening (June 10) to “prevent looting and vandalism” as immigrant protests entered their fifth day.
The decision came after the Trump administration ordered the deployment of Marines and the California National Guard to the area, despite objections from Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom.
California has filed a lawsuit to overturn this decision and is awaiting a hearing on its request for a restraining order, scheduled for Thursday afternoon.
“If you do not live or work in downtown Los Angeles, stay away from this area,” Bass told reporters, adding that the curfew would cover a one-square-mile (approximately 2.6 square kilometers) area of the city.
The curfew began yesterday at 8:00 PM Pacific Time and lasted until 6:00 AM this morning.
Exceptions to the ban include residents, commuters, and members of the media. Bass stated that the city might reimpose the curfew for the next several nights.
Democrats have consistently argued that the intervention is unnecessary to suppress the largely peaceful protests against federal immigration raids, where the number of demonstrators far exceeds that of local police.
Trump, however, has promised that immigration raids will continue daily in Los Angeles. According to the Associated Press (AP), the guard units dispatched to the area have begun supporting operations to protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from protesters.
Meanwhile, a judge has denied California Governor Gavin Newsom’s request to limit President Trump’s deployment of troops to Los Angeles.
Newsom had asked a federal judge early Tuesday to intervene immediately to restrict Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, requesting an emergency ruling by 1:00 PM that day.
However, US District Judge Charles Breyer granted the Trump administration’s request for more time to respond to Newsom’s motion. The administration has until 11:00 AM today (6:00 PM GMT) to present its arguments.
A spokesperson for Newsom told The Hill, “The court did not deny or rule on the governor’s request for a temporary restraining order. The court set a hearing date for Thursday after the federal government and the state submit additional filings, and we anticipate the court will rule on the temporary restraining order request shortly thereafter.”
On another front, some influential Republican members of Congress are objecting to the Trump administration’s deployment of Marines to the region.
Senator Susan Collins, Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, became the first prominent Republican to oppose sending active-duty Marines to Los Angeles.
However, Collins does support using the National Guard to respond to the demonstrations.
The Republican senator from Maine said that sending the National Guard to support state and local authorities is “probably the most sensible” approach amid the fierce protests against mass deportation policies. But Collins specified that she does not approve of Trump’s decision to send the Marines.
“I draw a distinction between the use of the National Guard and the use of the Marines,” Collins told reporters in Congress. “Active-duty forces are generally not involved in domestic law enforcement operations.”
Trump had ordered 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to support law enforcement during the protests.
Collins told POLITICO that she condemned the “serious” riots in Los Angeles, stating they “deserve a strong response,” and added that local leaders should cooperate with the National Guard.
“There should be an effort to get everyone on the same page to deal with this violence,” Collins said.
Collins’s comments mark the first public break from Republican leadership on Trump’s decision to send the Marines, potentially opening the door for more internal disagreements.
Pentagon officials told the House budget committee on Tuesday that the President’s decision to send troops to Los Angeles would cost $134 million.
America
Trump sends Marines to Los Angeles amid escalating immigrant protests

As the uprising against immigrant detentions intensifies in Los Angeles, California, demonstrations have also begun in other states.
On Friday and Saturday (June 6-7), federal officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began raiding streets and workplaces across Los Angeles, arresting and preparing to deport undocumented immigrants.
A major raid was conducted at Ambiance Apparel in the Fashion District, and violent clashes involving tear gas and stun grenades occurred between protesters and ICE agents in Paramount, a city southeast of Los Angeles.
Increased law enforcement pressure in the immigrant city of Los Angeles
According to New Yorker reporter E. Tammy Kim, some immigrants who arrived at the federal courthouse in Little Tokyo for registration were taken to the basement and then transported in vans to unknown locations.
The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that a nine-year-old elementary school student from Torrance, who was detained after a hearing at the end of May and transferred to a prison in a rural area of Texas, will be deported.
While lawyers were denied access to detainees, it was alleged that workers were being detained “based on their racial appearance.”
One-third of Los Angeles residents were born outside the US, and more than half speak a language other than English at home. Los Angeles is a “sanctuary city” located in a “sanctuary state,” which prohibits local authorities from cooperating with federal immigration officials.
Consequently, when the recent detentions, described by immigrant advocates as “kidnappings” or “disappearances,” spread via text messages and social media, thousands gathered to oppose the activities of federal law enforcement officers from various agencies.
This is how the first clashes between protesters who blocked the freeway and law enforcement began. Police responded with drones, batons, tear gas, and plastic bullets.
Fate of immigrants detained in raids unknown
The families of workers detained in the raid at the Ambiance Apparel warehouse, conducted by armed immigration officers and federal agents, continue their anxious wait.
Immigrants emphasize that they have no information about the status of their detained family members.
For example, according to a report in The Guardian, Yurien Contreras, whose father Mario Romaro was detained, said at a press conference in Los Angeles on Monday morning, “I saw them handcuff my father, chain him by the waist and ankles. My family and I can’t communicate with my father. We know nothing.”
Contreras said her father and other workers were “kidnapped” by the agents, adding, “I demand a fair trial for my father and dozens of other workers.”
Following the raids in the Fashion District, federal agents also handcuffed and detained workers at a Home Depot store in the nearby city of Paramount. Agents were also seen in front of a donut shop in nearby Compton and around schools.
The families of those arrested gathered in front of Ambiance on Monday, demanding the release of their loved ones. Some of the detained workers were the sole breadwinners for their families.
On the other hand, others like José Ortiz had been workers in Los Angeles’s garment district for years. Ortiz had worked at Ambiance for 18 years. His daughter, Saraí Ortiz, said, “He was always here. He was a loyal worker. He is someone who dedicated his life to this community and his job.”
At least 14 of those detained were members of the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles. Bishop John Harvey Taylor of Los Angeles said, “On Pentecost Sunday, 14 members of one of our diocesan churches could not come to church this morning. The government tore them from the arms of their families at home and from the body of Christ in the church.”
Hundreds detained, including union leaders
Police detained David Huerta, president of the California branch of the Service Employees International Union, at Ambiance Apparel on the first day. Huerta was released on June 9.
According to the LA Times, Luz Aguilar, an aide to Los Angeles City Council member Ysabel Jurado, was placed on unpaid leave after being arrested on suspicion of “assault with a deadly weapon” on a police officer during an anti-ICE protest.
“The allegations are extremely concerning, and we are taking them very seriously,” Jurado and her team said in a statement.
Authorities also prevented a delegation of elected officials and immigrant rights advocates from observing detentions at the courthouse, a practice that was previously a routine form of oversight.
According to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, federal agents detained nearly two hundred immigrants in two days. The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that one hundred and eighteen people were detained.
National Guard deployed to Los Angeles
Late Saturday night, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that two thousand soldiers from the California National Guard would be deployed to suppress what White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller described as a “violent riot.”
Miller wrote on X that there were “foreign flags waving in American cities to defend an occupation.” Some of the Mexican immigrants in the area were waving Mexican flags during the demonstrations.
Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass objected to this order, stating they could handle the situation on their own.
Nevertheless, by early Sunday morning, 300 National Guard members had reported to their posts as a series of marches and rallies were held in various parts of the city.
Despite the arrival of the National Guard, the response to the demonstrations was generally handled by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). LAPD cars, SUVs, trucks, motorcycles, and later, horses, intervened against the protesters while helicopters and surveillance drones flew low overhead.
Pentagon sends Marines to the region
Meanwhile, as of June 10, 700 Marines were sent to the city by order of President Donald Trump to support the National Guard.
According to a statement from the US Northern Command (Northcom), the command activated a Marine Corps Battalion that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had ordered to be ready for deployment over the weekend amidst ongoing protests against ICE raids.
Approximately 700 Marines from the 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, based at Twentynine Palms, California, will “seamlessly integrate” with National Guard troops already deployed to Los Angeles to protect federal personnel and property, the statement said.
The command stated that the Marines are “trained in de-escalation, crowd control, and rules for the use of force.”
In a post on X, Hegseth linked the deployment to increasing threats against federal officers and buildings. “Due to increased threats against federal law enforcement and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty US Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order,” Hegseth wrote, then took a swipe at Governor Gavin Newsom, finishing with, “It is our duty to defend federal law enforcement, even if Gavin Newsom won’t.”
California’s Democratic leaders criticized the decision, saying it would further escalate tensions that had already led authorities to use tear gas during clashes with protesters. Trump told reporters, “We will send whatever it takes to ensure law and order.”
In a statement posted on X, Newsom’s press office criticized the movement of the Marines as “mobilizing the best unit of the US military against its own citizens.” The office added, “It is completely unjustified, unwarranted, and unprecedented for the tension to reach this level.”
Trump threatens Governor Newsom with ‘arrest’
President Trump insisted that this deployment was necessary to stop the protests against ICE.
This is the second time in the last 60 years that a US president has mobilized a state’s National Guard troops without the governor’s consent.
“The troublemakers are professional agitators. They are rioters. They are bad people. They should be in jail,” Trump told reporters on Monday (June 9).
Trump also said he would support Governor Newsom’s arrest. The President said this in reference to a back-and-forth between his “border czar” Tom Homan and Newsom. When Newsom said, “Come and arrest me,” Homan replied, “No one is above the law. Those who cross the line, who commit crimes, can be arrested.”
However, Newsom accused the Pentagon of “lying to the American people” to justify the deployment of troops within the state, claiming the situation only became violent after the US military deployed soldiers.
Newsom officially requested that the Trump administration withdraw National Guard troops from the streets, and the state of California has sued the Trump administration over the deployment, which its officials have described as “illegal.”
Trump also said, “Look, I like Gavin Newsom. He’s a good guy, but he’s extremely incompetent. Everyone knows it. All you have to do is look at the little railroad he built. It costs about 100 times the budget.”
Protests spread to other states
The anti-ICE demonstrations that started in Los Angeles, California, have begun to spread to other states.
On Monday, a largely peaceful march was held in downtown Austin, Texas, to condemn the nationwide increase in immigrant detentions.
In another Texas city, Dallas, dozens gathered with banners and flags to protest the Trump administration’s harsh measures against immigrants.
Police arrested a group of protesters who occupied Trump Tower in New York on Monday, demanding that ICE release the immigrants detained in recent raids.
New York police also reported that about 20 people were arrested during protests that broke out after ICE detained numerous immigrants at a courthouse in Lower Manhattan.
According to police, 23 people were arrested when activists gathered in front of the US Immigration Court on Varick Street near West Houston Street. While 18 were released with summonses, the status of the other 5 was not immediately known.
According to Hell Gate, the detained protesters were trying to block two vans that ICE agents were using to transport detained immigrants.
Republicans want to increase penalties for assault on police
Texas Republican Representative Tony Gonzales is preparing to reintroduce a bill aimed at stiffening penalties for assaulting police officers following the recent protests in Los Angeles.
The bill, previously introduced by Gonzales in 2023, aims to “increase prison sentences and fines for crimes of assaulting or obstructing law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties.”
According to a press release from Representative Gonzales on June 9, the bill is named the “Crimes Against Police Services Act” (COPS Act).
“The chaos created by rioters in Los Angeles this weekend was far from a peaceful protest; it was complete anarchy. Radical activists damaged Border Patrol and ICE vehicles on duty, resulting in injuries. It is time to emphasize a very clear message: those who harm law enforcement officers will face severe consequences,” Gonzales said in the press release.
Gonzales stated that he will introduce the COPS Act to Congress this week.
-
Middle East1 week ago
Lindsey Graham issues threat to Greta Thunberg and Gaza Freedom Flotilla
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Trump administration reportedly orders US chip software firms to halt China sales
-
Opinion1 week ago
What does the US State Department’s criticism of Europe mean?
-
Russia1 week ago
Ukraine attacks Russian strategic bomber bases with truck-launched UAVs
-
Europe2 weeks ago
German Economy Minister Reiche seeks EU backing for industry subsidies
-
America2 weeks ago
Trump administration devises ‘Plan B’ to uphold tariffs amid legal challenges
-
Europe1 week ago
Poland’s presidential election: Karol Nawrocki secures victory
-
Europe1 week ago
German army to maintain Indo-Pacific security role despite US focus on Russia