America
Hegseth defends $1.5 trillion budget and Iran war strategy in heated House hearing
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, appearing alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, testified before the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday regarding the Pentagon’s record-breaking budget request for fiscal year 2027.
Hegseth provided his first formal responses to congressional inquiries concerning ongoing military operations conducted by the US and Israel against Iran. During a tense, hours-long session, Hegseth and Caine faced pointed questions regarding the long-term objectives and timeline of the conflict, which began with strikes on Iran on Feb. 28. Hegseth largely demurred on providing a specific exit strategy or schedule.
Throughout the hearing, Hegseth defended the policies of President Donald Trump and reaffirmed the White House’s request for a historic $1.5 trillion defense budget.
Testifying alongside Hegseth, Pentagon Acting Comptroller Jules Hurst III disclosed the official cost of the war for the first time, placing it at $25 billion. Hurst stated that the bulk of these expenditures is tied to munitions, the repositioning of military assets to Western Asia, and equipment lost in combat. Under subsequent questioning, Hegseth did not provide clear details on whether this figure accounts for damage sustained by US military bases in the region or the total cost of replenishing depleted weapons stockpiles.
While US media outlets have reported that the administration is considering a request for an additional $200 billion in war funding from Congress, no formal supplemental request has yet been submitted.
Democratic members of the committee pressed Hegseth on the war’s impact on domestic gasoline and food prices. Hegseth dismissed these inquiries, labeling them a “trap” designed to pivot toward internal political issues. In a sharp exchange with Democratic Representative Salud Carbajal over the financial burden on US taxpayers, Hegseth struck a defiant tone, asking what the acceptable price would be to ensure Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon.
The Secretary faced his most rigorous questioning regarding Iran’s nuclear program, as lawmakers challenged the fundamental objectives of the military campaign.
Democratic Representative Adam Smith highlighted what he characterized as contradictory statements from the Secretary. Smith noted that Hegseth had previously claimed Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was “leveled” following a 12-day conflict in 2025. Smith questioned why the program was described as an “imminent threat” necessitating a new war 60 days ago if it had already been destroyed, suggesting the program remains in the same state it was prior to the current hostilities.
Hegseth responded by stating that while physical facilities had been bombed and destroyed, Tehran’s “ambitions” remained intact and that the Iranian leadership had focused on constructing a “conventional shield.”
In one of the day’s most heated moments, Hegseth reacted strongly after Democratic Representative John Garamendi characterized the war as a “quagmire” and a “political and economic disaster at every level.” The Secretary accused the congressman of providing “propaganda material” to adversaries, arguing that the greatest challenge the administration faces is the “defeatist rhetoric” from Democrats and certain Republicans in Congress.
Representative Seth Moulton later revisited those remarks, asking whether it was “wise or incompetent” for Congress to have given the Bush administration a “blank check” for the Iraq War. Hegseth, an Iraq War veteran, rejected the comparison as a “false equivalence.”
Moulton further questioned Hegseth on his past statements suggesting US forces should show “no quarter” or mercy to enemies. When asked if he stood by rhetoric that could imply the killing of surrendering soldiers—a war crime under international law—Hegseth stated that the Department of Defense “fights to win” and ensures that combatants have the rules of engagement necessary to operate with maximum effectiveness.
Representative Ro Khanna questioned the Secretary on the cost of missiles used in a strike on a school in Minab, where at least 120 children were reportedly killed. Hegseth declined to provide a cost estimate, noting that the incident remains under investigation.
Democratic Representative Sara Jacobs shifted the focus to President Donald Trump’s mental fitness for office within the context of his rhetoric regarding Iran. Jacobs asked if the President was mentally competent to serve as Commander-in-Chief. Hegseth countered by asking if similar questions had been directed at Joe Biden during his four-year term, alleging that Biden had been “hardly able to speak” and suffered from health issues.
In response, Jacobs presented an image shared by Trump depicting himself as Jesus Christ. Jacobs, noting her Jewish faith, stated that while the image did not personally offend her, it could be seen as sacrilegious by many Christians, and asked Hegseth to explain the post.
While Democrats on the committee maintained a confrontational stance, Republican members largely signaled support for Hegseth and the war effort.
This political alignment is critical as Friday marks 60 days since Trump officially notified Congress of the strikes. Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, the President must begin withdrawing troops after 60 days unless he receives a formal authorization for the use of military force (AUMF) from Congress. Despite controlling both the House and the Senate, Republican leadership has indicated they may avoid a formal authorization vote, a move that could leave the legal basis for the ongoing conflict in a state of uncertainty.
Republican Representative Nancy Mace reaffirmed her support for the Secretary, stating that Hegseth had “exceeded all expectations.”
America
US nuclear weapons spending jumps 22% to $69.2 billion, ICAN says
US spending on nuclear weapons rose by 22% in 2025 compared with the previous year, according to a report published by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).
Washington spent $69.2 billion on its nuclear arsenal during the year, a figure that exceeded the combined nuclear weapons expenditures of all other nuclear-armed states.
The world’s nine nuclear powers — the United States, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — increased total spending on their arsenals by 19%, reaching a record $119 billion.
China ranked second in spending with $13.5 billion. The United Kingdom spent $12.6 billion, overtaking Russia to become the third-largest spender. France’s nuclear weapons expenditure reached $7.7 billion.
According to data cited in the ICAN report, nuclear-armed states have spent a combined $471 billion on their arsenals over the past five years.
The report emphasized that the amount spent on nuclear weapons in a single day during 2025 would have been sufficient to provide food for 2 million people for a year, while total annual spending could fund the United Nations’ regular budget for 32 years.
Before those developments, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Andrey Belousov commented on the issue.
Belousov said Russia continues to insist on the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons from Europe and the dismantling of all infrastructure established in the region to support their deployment.
Under its nuclear-sharing programme, the United States has stationed nuclear weapons in NATO countries across Europe since the 1950s.
Today, US-made B61 nuclear bombs are stored at military bases in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Türkiye.
Although NATO does not possess its own nuclear weapons, operational control over those weapons remains with Washington.
Earlier, the Financial Times reported that the United States was considering expanding its nuclear presence in Europe beyond the countries currently participating in the nuclear-sharing programme.
According to the newspaper, Poland and the Baltic states had expressed interest in hosting US nuclear weapons.
Sources cited by the Financial Times linked those discussions to concerns among European allies that the United States could reduce its military presence in the region.
America
Trump-linked crypto ventures gained $2.3 billion as investors suffered losses
Cryptocurrency projects linked to US President Donald Trump and his family have generated roughly $2.3 billion in gains for the family since Trump’s return to the White House, while investors have collectively lost about the same amount, according to a Reuters investigation.
The review examined four major projects associated with Trump and his family: the TRUMP memecoin, World Liberty Financial, American Bitcoin and AI Financial Corp.
According to Reuters, the value of shares or assets tied to those projects has fallen by dozens of percentage points, despite the ventures following a similar operating model.
The investigation found that the Trump family provided branding, promotional support and political visibility to the projects.
Reuters reported that the family either contributed very limited capital to the ventures or, in some cases, made no investment at all.
Investors, meanwhile, committed substantial funds to the projects on the expectation that Trump’s political position and his support for the cryptocurrency industry would generate long-term returns, the report said.
However, Reuters found that while the value of the underlying assets declined sharply over time, the Trump family continued to generate income from capital supplied by investors.
Some individuals interviewed by Reuters argued that investors entered the projects voluntarily and should have been aware of the risks involved.
Wilbur Ross, who served as commerce secretary during Trump’s first administration, said: “If people are buying something speculative, they should understand the risk. If they decided to hold on in the hope of further gains, that was their choice.”
As an example of how the model operated, Reuters cited the experience of investor Fatima Elrgadawi.
Elrgadawi invested $2,000 in the TRUMP memecoin, saying she trusted the “Trump brand.” By the end of May, however, the value of her investment had fallen to just $120.
Reflecting on the experience, Elrgadawi said she believed investors had been exposed to what is commonly known as a “pump and dump” scheme, in which prices are artificially inflated before large-scale selling triggers a sharp decline.
America
World Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
The obstacles imposed by the United States government on African and Middle Eastern referees and football players designated to work at the World Cup are drawing widespread scrutiny.
In the latest development, a World Cup referee from Somalia was denied entry into the United States. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) stated on Monday that Omar Artan was turned away over the weekend upon landing in Miami on a flight from Istanbul.
CBP did not disclose the specific reason the referee was barred from entry, but Somalia is among approximately 40 countries subjected to enhanced screening or travel restrictions under policies enacted by President Donald Trump.
“Following inspection, it was determined that the passenger, a FIFA World Cup referee, was inadmissible due to security screening, and admission to the United States was denied,” CBP said.
FIFA confirmed it was aware of the US decision to block Artan’s entry and indicated that his status would not change for the time being.
“As has been the case with previous FIFA events, the host government ultimately decides who receives a visa and who is admitted into the country,” the governing body said in a statement.
While this is the first known instance of a World Cup referee being barred from entry by US immigration authorities, several players, coaching staff, and numerous fans have previously encountered difficulties entering the country.
The US State Department said it is working in coordination with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and FIFA to support visa processing for World Cup participants, but emphasized that it must simultaneously enforce US laws and administration policies.
“The administration will never compromise on applying US law and the highest standards of national security and public safety in the administration of the visa process,” the State Department said in a statement.
Artan, a former football player who transitioned to refereeing due to injuries, was set to become the first individual from his country to officiate at a World Cup.
In an interview with Al Jazeera prior to the tournament, Artan spoke about the challenges he faced in his home country. “You cannot give up. If you want to reach a place like the World Cup, you have to fight,” he said.
Somalia is one of 12 nations whose citizens were effectively banned from entering the US by Trump in December 2025, with the administration citing terrorism risks.
Trump has repeatedly demonstrated open hostility toward the East African nation, previously describing the country as “smelly” and labeling individuals originating from there as “garbage.”
The administration has also revoked temporary visas for thousands of Somali citizens residing in the US and accused members of the Somali diaspora in Minnesota of fraud.
Beyond entry denials, the treatment of participating teams has sparked significant backlash. Members of the Senegal national team were subjected to exhaustive baggage searches directly on the airport tarmac in San Antonio.
Separately, players from the Uzbekistan national team reportedly faced drug-detection dogs and metal-detector sweeps upon arriving at their training facilities in New York.
Footage and photographs of these security checks rapidly circulated on social media, triggering anger among football fans.
Many observers accused American authorities of treating international footballers “like criminals” rather than guests attending one of the world’s premier sporting events.
The controversy intensified further following reports that Iraqi forward Aymen Hussein was detained for seven hours at Chicago O’Hare International Airport.
Additionally, the photographer for the Iraqi national team was reportedly denied entry into the country after undergoing a security screening that lasted approximately 10 hours.
-
America1 week agoUS Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
-
Europe1 week agoUkraine reburies OUN leader Melnyk as Poland and Israel condemn honoring of wartime nationalist figures
-
Asia1 week agoChina launches patrols east of Taiwan after Japan and Philippines open maritime boundary talks
-
Diplomacy1 week agoUN faces insolvency risk as US and China delay membership payments
-
Middle East1 week agoReport challenges official assessments of damage from Iranian attacks on US military assets
-
Diplomacy1 week agoZelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
-
Europe1 week agoHungary’s new PM Magyar vows absolute ban on illegal migration, challenging Brussels over fines
-
Opinion1 week agoChinese diplomacy ascendant under Xi: All roads lead to Beijing
