Middle East
HTS declares Kurdish neighborhoods in Aleppo military zones as civilian death toll rises
The Operations Room, composed of groups under the command of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in Syria, declared the Kurdish-majority neighborhoods of Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafieh in Aleppo as “closed military zones” yesterday.
Authorities ordered the closure of all entry and exit points to the area, though they announced that two humanitarian corridors—via the Avariz Crossing and Zuhur Street—would remain temporarily open to allow for the evacuation of civilians.
Tensions in the region escalated sharply after HTS-affiliated forces launched military operations within and around these densely populated neighborhoods.
The Operations Room warned residents to stay away from positions held by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), declaring that all SDF outposts within the neighborhoods would be considered “legitimate military targets.”
Civilian casualties mount: Death toll surpasses 40
As the intensity of the clashes grows, reports regarding civilian casualties continue to emerge.
The Syria Justice Archive announced that at least 43 civilians have lost their lives in the region since Tuesday.
According to unofficial data from local sources, at least nine people, including women and children, were killed in the last 24 hours alone, with dozens more sustained injuries.
Schools and public institutions in the Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafieh neighborhoods have remained closed for two days due to the ongoing hostilities between HTS-affiliated forces and SDF units.
Evacuations have accelerated as the humanitarian situation in the area deteriorates. Sources speaking to Kurdistan24 reported that Syria Civil Defense (White Helmets) teams had evacuated 850 civilians from the two neighborhoods by Wednesday afternoon. These evacuations are being conducted through designated assembly points in the Avariz area and Zuhur Street.
Parties trade accusations
The General Council of Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafieh accused HTS-affiliated groups of indiscriminately shelling civilian residential areas with heavy weaponry.
During a press conference, council representatives argued that the bombardment was intended to terrorize the local population and break the will of Kurdish civilians.
“The attacks began with all types of heavy weaponry,” the General Council stated, emphasizing that despite the onslaught, they would not abandon the defense of the region.
On the SDF side, officials held groups such as the Hamza Division, the Suleiman Shah Brigade, the Sultan Murad Division, and the Nour al-Din al-Zenki Movement—groups that formerly operated under the Turkish-backed Syrian National Army before coming under HTS command—responsible for the clashes, which broke out as integration talks reached a deadlock.
The SDF alleged that these groups are deliberately targeting civilian settlements.
In response, HTS-affiliated groups maintained that the operation was a reaction to a “major offensive” launched by the SDF against Aleppo neighborhoods.
The Operations Room accused the SDF of “committing numerous massacres” against civilians and targeting Syrian army positions.
The HTS-affiliated Ministry of Defense echoed these claims, alleging that the SDF had struck military outposts.
Allegations of ‘ethnic cleansing’ and ‘war of extermination’
The escalation of conflict has drawn sharp condemnation from Kurdish political representatives and human rights organizations. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) issued a strongly worded statement accusing the HTS leadership of committing “sectarian crimes and ethnic cleansing” against various segments of society.
The Observatory claimed that government forces had previously targeted Alawite communities in coastal regions and Druze residents in Suwayda, and were now directing similar actions toward Kurds. SOHR stated that the current operations reflect a “racist mindset.”
Ilham Ahmed, the Foreign Relations Co-Chair of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES), stated on the X platform that the Ministry of Defense had declared war on neighborhoods filled with civilians.
Ahmed characterized the move as a “war of extermination” against Kurds, many of whom had already faced persecution and were forcibly displaced from Afrin.
Sipan Hemo, a member of the SDF General Command, issued a message to the residents of Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafieh, describing the neighborhoods as symbols of resistance.
Hemo noted that the local population has withstood attacks and sieges for over 15 years, asserting that the neighborhoods would remain “fortresses of resistance” in the face of these latest assaults.
Middle East
Israel military weighs legal steps against Gaza documentary makers
Israel’s Chief of General Staff, Eyal Zamir, has instructed officials to examine criminal and legal steps against the production team of the documentary “NAZA”, which focuses on testimonies from soldiers and intelligence personnel who served in Gaza operations.
While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu targeted the production, describing it as “unacceptable”, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers published a joint statement backing the directors.
Maintaining that the documentary slandered the military, Chief of General Staff Zamir asserted that the work had no intention of uncovering the truth.
“In light of the available data, this production is not a work that constructively criticises the military,” Zamir said. “On the contrary, it relies on blood libels, a deliberate distortion of the reality on the ground, and baseless accusations directed at our soldiers and commanders.”
Zamir further claimed that the military was presented as an entity acting unlawfully and that the arguments of anti-Israel circles were adapted for the film.
The Israeli military is establishing a new multidisciplinary, inter-agency working group involving domestic and international experts to counter such allegations.
Meanwhile, the military’s most senior legal official, Itai Ofir, is reviewing the legal procedures that could be initiated against the documentary’s producers.
The military leadership contends that the testimonies lack credibility because the identities, ranks, and operational details of the personnel interviewed in the film were concealed.
Rejecting the assertion that targets were selected by artificial intelligence, military officials stated that all strikes and target approvals were decided by human hands within the framework of military directives.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the production in a video message shared on Telegram.
“This situation is appalling,” Netanyahu said, voicing his reaction. “While resisting antisemitic incitement conducted globally, it is unacceptable for a similar approach to arise from within ourselves. Two Israeli directors presenting the Israeli military as war criminals are being applauded at the Venice Film Festival.”
The 80-minute production was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival and received a 25-minute standing ovation in the auditorium at the end of the screening.
In reactions emerging from the cabinet, Minister of Culture and Sports Miki Zohar accused directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor of “high treason”.
“The self-hatred displayed by these producers, who risk harming their own country to win the praise of antisemitic circles worldwide, is beyond comprehension,” Zohar said. Announcing that he would launch an initiative to revoke the directors’ citizenship, Zohar stated that direct accusations of treason could be brought against the individuals.
Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also addressed the directors, stating: “You are a source of shame for the entire people of Israel. Get out of here.” Under current Israeli legislation, the culture minister does not have the authority to unilaterally revoke citizenship; decisions in this direction can be made only as a result of legal processes involving the Ministry of Interior and judicial bodies.
Following the mounting backlash, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers, including Ari Folman, Shlomi Elkabetz, Ran Tal, and Michal Aviad, signed a joint declaration of solidarity. The text emphasised that “the primary duty of art and the profession of journalism is to hold up a mirror to the society from which it arises.”
Produced in partnership with The Guardian and JW Films, “NAZA” conveys testimonies from 24 military and intelligence personnel whose identities were kept concealed and who took part in surveillance, targeting, and air strike decisions in Gaza.
Deriving its name from a Hebrew military acronym that designates the number of civilians expected to lose their lives during an operation and corresponds to the concept of “collateral damage”, the film documents that targets were determined using artificial intelligence and mass surveillance networks.
Describing high-tech weaponry and AI-assisted targeting mechanisms, one interviewed soldier made the comparison: “Because everything runs on remote control, the process resembles a video game.”
Another soldier described the deaths on the ground as “unbelievably fun”.
Director Yuval Abraham said: “The intelligence personnel we interviewed stated that the mass deaths were not an accident, but on the contrary rested upon a designed and systematic choice.”
Abraham and Szor stated that the production did not scrutinise individual soldier violations, but directly examined the institutional chain of command and operational doctrines.
The two directors had previously made the Oscar-winning documentary “No Other Land”, which addressed the displacement of Palestinians and settler violence in the occupied West Bank, alongside Palestinian filmmakers Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal.
While the Ministry of Health in Gaza announced that the number of Palestinians who have lost their lives in the attacks exceeded 73,700, the actual death toll is projected to be far above this figure due to destroyed healthcare infrastructure and casualties lost beneath the rubble.
Middle East
Saudi Arabia asks UK for military aid to counter Houthis in Yemen
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering responding to requests for military assistance directed at Yemen from the Saudi Arabian government.
According to sources speaking to Bloomberg, the prime minister has received various requests for diplomatic and military support from Saudi Arabia.
The sources stated that Saudi Arabia’s requests include providing operational support to its military to repel the advance of Ansarullah (the Houthis) along Yemen’s Red Sea coast towards the strategically vital Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as assistance in defending against attacks on oil infrastructure.
Under pressure to take action because of the economic difficulties generated by the war with Iran, Burnham is also concerned about creating the impression that he supports Donald Trump’s war against Iran, given that the UK public overwhelmingly opposes the war.
Reports had emerged that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked Donald Trump to conduct air strikes against the Yemeni resistance.
At present, the UK has approved the deployment of only British military advisers to Saudi Arabia.
This comes despite Saudi Arabia’s request for operational support to halt operations carried out by Yemeni forces along the coastline.
Former UK prime ministers Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer had provided more comprehensive support to Saudi Arabia against the Yemeni resistance.
The prime minister was also warned by UK officials that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is of vital importance to global maritime transport and the economy, and that the capture of this strait by the Houthis must be prevented.
Earlier on Monday, Bloomberg reported that Saudi Arabia was seeking to increase the volume of oil shipments transiting the Strait of Hormuz after shutting down its East-West crude pipeline.
Middle East
Saudi exportable crude stocks risk depletion within a week
Saudi Arabia risks exhausting its exportable crude stockpiles if the East-West pipeline to the Red Sea fails to resume operations, according to reports.
Citing companies purchasing Saudi crude as well as market traders, the Reuters news agency reported that such an outcome could trigger a severe contraction in global oil supply.
Oil flows through the pipeline were halted following drone strikes. The government in Riyadh has not yet issued an official statement regarding the extent of the damage or the expected duration of repair works.
Sources familiar with the matter have offered differing estimates regarding the repair timetable.
One source speaking to Reuters noted that works could take five to six weeks, while another source stated that the damage could be repaired more quickly and that partial oil flows could be restored before repairs are entirely completed.
Stocks at Yanbu port reach critical threshold
Traversing the Arabian Peninsula to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, the pipeline carries approximately 4 million barrels of oil per day. This volume represents roughly 4% of global oil supply.
The line previously provided Saudi Arabia with an alternative export route, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz where maritime traffic has faced disruptions due to regional conflict in the Middle East.
Three sources closely tracking shipment schedules indicated that, following the stoppage, oil reserves at Yanbu port would suffice to sustain exports for only five to seven days.
A fourth source stated that additional reserves held in Egypt at the Red Sea port of Ain Sokhna and the Mediterranean terminal of Sidi Kerir afford buyers shipments for several more days.
Storage capacities stand at approximately 35 million barrels at Yanbu, 18 million barrels at Ain Sokhna, and 20 million barrels at Sidi Kerir.
However, sources stressed that these facilities are not currently filled to maximum capacity and warned that these inventories will be entirely depleted if the pipeline is not brought back online.
Output at lowest level in 30 years
According to International Energy Agency data, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea transit corridors pushed Saudi oil supply in August to its lowest level in 30 years.
Data submitted by the Riyadh government to OPEC show that the kingdom’s crude production fell from 10.9 million barrels per day in February to 6.2 million barrels per day in August.
In July, the Houthis in Yemen announced the launch of a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. On 8 September, the Saudi Ministry of Energy announced that operations had been suspended at several energy facilities in the southern part of the country.
On the same day, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement condemning Houthi strikes targeting facilities in the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jizan, and Najran.
Riyadh authorities reported that 73 civilians, including women and children, were injured in the attacks. US President Donald Trump stated that Iran might be behind this attack on Saudi Arabia.
In oil markets, Brent crude futures recorded their sharpest single-day gain since late July on Thursday, 10 September.
The price of November Brent crude contracts rose by 6.3% to reach $107.6 per barrel. Prices retreated below the $105 mark the following day.
-
Europe1 week agoGermany’s CDU drafts tougher citizenship rules to counter AfD
-
Russia2 weeks agoWhat to know about Russia’s upcoming State Duma elections?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoGeoffrey Roberts sees Ukraine war concluding within coming months
-
Middle East2 weeks agoIran expands deterrence as Gulf strikes expose US munitions limits, analysts say
-
Europe2 weeks agoGerman industrial bosses push for return to 40-hour working week
-
Asia2 weeks agoBOJ faces critical rate decision as US presses for faster hikes
-
Middle East2 weeks agoIsrael sees Türkiye as competitor rather than enemy, diplomat says
-
Europe2 weeks agoEight EU states push to curb foreign policy vetoes
