Connect with us

Middle East

Iran designated London-based TV channels as ‘terrorists’

Published

on

Iran has declared war against the UK and two of the TV news channels based on the capital city London for their alleged role in broadcasting anti-Iran news to insecure the country.

In a clear warning, Iran said that the UK “will pay” for the measures it has taken to make Iran insecure. It doesn’t stop here as Iran also said it will send the bills of the recent seditious acts of UK and Saudi Arabia to London and Riyadh as they should pay for their anti-Iran actions.

The UK has been accused of having a hand in dissemination of contrived propaganda against the Iranian nation, and Saudi Arabia allegedly played a pivotal role in providing the financial support for riots especially anti-Iran rally in Germany capital Berlin.

Iran intelligence chief said that Iran International, a Farsi-language TV headquartered in London, is financed by Saudi Arabia and has been the main instigator of violence in Iran erupted after the death of Mahsa Amini, 22, in custody in mid-September.

Tehran also working to officially designating two London-based Persian-language television channels (Iran International and BBC Persian) as “terrorist” for their coverage of the country’s ongoing unrest. Tehran blamed the two channels and their hosts and backers for what it considered “inciting terrorist acts” on the Iranian soil.

Amini was arrested by Iran’s morality police for allegedly not wearing a proper headscarf (hijab); however, she was pronounced dead at the hospital just hours after her arrest. Iran has been engulfed in nationwide-protest since then, where men and women are demanding for more freedom and an end to the compulsory hijab.

Saudi Arabia, US, and Israel sponsoring protests

Iran’s chief of intelligence sees Saudi petrodollar spent on the anti-Iran scenario, including propaganda, audio and video coverage, rental of advanced equipment for aerial photography of the gathering, provision of facilities for the sizable presence of journalists, and even food distribution. For all of them, Iran said they are able to present evidence.

Iran also claimed that the US, Israel, and UK launched a kind of psychological war on the Iranian nation through social media and virtual space due to their lack of direct access to people as well as direct influence on them. The main financial support of such networks is Saudi Arabia, according to Iran’s intelligence department. There is no immediate word from Saudi Arabia on the matter, but the UK said London will stand with the people of Iran as they demand for freedoms.

UK reacted to the Iran’s statement

Anna Burt, Second Secretary Political and Human Rights said that the death of Mahsa Amini was a shocking reminder of the repression to which women and girls in Iran face. “Ordinary Iranians are now bravely risking their lives to demand accountability from their government and to insist their rights are respected. Iran must now listen: its suppression and barbarism cannot continue,” she said at the UN General Assembly Third Committee Interactive Dialogue on human rights in Iran.

She said that the UK stands with the people of Iran as they demand fundamental freedoms. “We condemn violence, including live ammunition usage. We urge Iran to respect the right to peaceful protest, to lift internet restrictions, and to release those unfairly detained. Iran’s leaders can – and must – choose another path,” she added.

Iran accused of plotting to kill two UK-based journalists

The Iran International, who is now in the terrorist list of Iran, said two of its journalists based in the UK have been warned by police of imminent and credible death threats from Iran by the Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

“Two of our British-Iranian journalists have, in recent days, been notified of an increase in the threats to them. The Metropolitan Police have now formally notified both journalists that these threats represent an imminent, credible and significant risk to their lives and those of their families. Other members of our staff have also been informed directly by the Metropolitan Police of separate threats,” the channel said but did not provide the names of the journalists.

The agency said their journalists are subject to abuse 24/7 on social media, and said that IRGC cannot be allowed to act abroad with “impunity”.

Founded in 2017, Iran International has been at the forefront of covering the recent demonstrations with exclusive footage of events on the ground, highline Iranian police brutal crackdown.

At least 300 demonstrators have so far been killed and thousands more arrested during the protests so far.

In 2018, there was a report that the agency was funded by a firm whose director has ties to Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. However, the Iran International denied connections to any government, including Riyadh or Tehran.

Iran has been denouncing BBC Persian and Iran International for years

It has been for years that Iranian authorizes denouncing the two UK-based channels BBC Persian and Iran International, but for the first time taking legal action against them over their role for guiding and “inciting riots, destroying public and private property and equipment, and terrorist acts.

BBC called the charges “completely fabricated” and said “threats of action against BBC Persian staff for the work they do as journalists is completely unacceptable, and the BBC will continue to support them.

The channel said that such false comments give countenance to the importance of BBC’s reliable reporting, which millions in Iran depend on.

Sanctions on British institutions and the two channels

Iran on Wednesday imposed sanctions on several British institutions and individuals, as well as the two channels and their parent companies. The sanctions include a ban on issuing visas for individuals, seizure of their assets on Iranian soil. Iran also blocked any bank accounts related to these individuals and companies.

Meanwhile, Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi claimed that some organizers of the “riots” have received training in eight different states, including US, UK, Israel, Germany and Saudi Arabia. However, he did not reveal the names of three other countries. Vahidi said the “enemies” want to turn the recent unrest in Iran into ethnic divisions.

The Iranian actions came shortly after the European Union and the UK separately sanctions  on a number of Iranian authorities and institutions for brutally repression of the protests and Iran’s alleged role in supplying Russia with drones used against Ukraine in the war.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey