Diplomacy
OCCRP exposed: U.S.-funded ‘independent journalism’
The French newspaper Mediapart has revealed that the OCCRP is heavily funded by the U.S. government. According to the investigation, the funding of the OCCRP has fueled the debate about its independence and has had an impact on U.S. foreign policy interests.
The French online newspaper Mediapart has published an in-depth investigation into the massive U.S. government funding of the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an independent U.S. research network for journalists.
Many media organizations collaborate with the OCCRP.
This is the result of months of joint research by Il Fatto Quotidiano in Italy, Reporters United in Greece and the American media organization Drop Site News, reports Mediapart. It is noteworthy that Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR) reportedly contributed to the investigation but later withdrew from publication under pressure from the OCCRP.
According to the report, the OCCRP, which came to prominence in recent years with the Panama Papers and the Pandora Papers, is largely funded by the U.S. State Department.
The U.S. federal government provided 52 per cent of the money spent by the OCCRP between 2014 and 2023. A comparison of the OCCRP’s annual audit reports and government budget documents shows that the organization has received at least $47 million since 2008.
Before the article was published, OCCRP founder Drew Sullivan accused the journalists of using ‘malicious and unprofessional’ methods.
Sullivan accused NDR reporter John Goetz of ‘spying for Russia’.
According to the investigation, the NDR decided to cease future cooperation with the OCCRP after learning of the extent of U.S. government funding.
In response to a question from Simon Zeise of the Berliner Zeitung, the organization flatly denied the accusation that it had ‘bowed to pressure’ and said the allegation was ‘unfounded’. NDR journalists had been investigating the OCCRP for a long time.
The broadcaster said that some editors had independently and autonomously decided not to continue the investigation or not to publish it. In the opinion of the legal department and the editorial staff, the investigation was not ready for publication.
The NDR announced that the departments working with the OCCRP had suspended their cooperation and shared the current research with other foreign broadcasters. To the accusation by OCCRP President Sullivan that John Goetz was a ‘Russian spy’, the NDR gave a short and clear ‘no’.
Award-winning American investigative journalist Lowell Bergmann (the character played by Al Pacino in Michael Mann’s 1999 film The Insider) said he resigned from the OCCRP board in 2015 over concerns about funding.
“I became aware of the U.S. government’s intervention. Given the complexity of the issue, I respectfully communicated my concerns and resigned from the board,” Bergmann said.
Although the OCCRP had previously indicated that it was seeking government funding, the support was unprecedented. Journalistic standards may have been violated when the OCCRP promised not to conduct research in the U.S. in exchange for funding from the U.S. State Department.
“Our policy is that a country should not report on that country with its own money. I don’t think the U.S. government would allow that,” said OCCRP President Drew Sullivan.
According to Mediapart, the U.S. government not only shuns OCCRP reporting, but also exerts significant influence by directing funds for reporting that focuses on specific countries. These countries include Russia and Venezuela, which Washington regards as enemies.
In an email sent in 2023, Sullivan acknowledged that the organization did not report on the U.S. in its early years, and that its budget was funded by Washington and George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. We couldn’t take money from the U.S. government or Soros and report on the U.S.,’ he admitted to Mediapart.
The OCCRP’s board of directors, however, said that all grants were given without the donors’ right to interfere in editorial policy. However, the OCCRP management refused to provide copies of the contracts in question.
On the other hand, Shannon Maguire of the U.S. Agency for International Development claimed that the Washington administration does not interfere in the OCCRP’s editorial decisions and that they are 100 per cent independent. Sullivan, on the other hand, argued that the U.S. government is “professional and does not try to influence the media, unlike bad actors like Russia”.
The reference to Russia is no accident. The OCCRP has received several grants from the U.S. government for research in countries that Washington considers to be ‘priority problems’.
Between 2015 and 2019, the State Department allocated $2.2 million to the OCCRP for a mission called ‘Stabilizing the Russian Media Space’.
Mediapart also pointed out that the OCCRP led an international media study called Russian Asset Tracker from 2021-2022. The project created the largest database of non-state assets of Russian billionaires and personalities.
📰 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE
• Les liens cachés de l’OCCRP avec le gouvernement américain
• La télé allemande NDR a censuré sa propre enquête sur le consortium mondial de médias
• La douleur d’une enquête, la nécessité d’une révélation👉 https://t.co/ATPD50WG9t pic.twitter.com/X2Zet4DdYX
— Mediapart (@Mediapart) December 2, 2024
According to the report, the U.S. government, through the Global Anti-Corruption Consortium (GACC), used the reports produced by the OCCRP as a kind of “weapon”.
The GACC was established in 2016 following a request for proposals from the U.S. Department of State, and the U.S. government is the largest donor. To date, it has transferred a total of $10.8 million to the OCCRP.
The GACC has two main functions: To initiate corruption-related criminal investigations and enforcement actions based on the OCCRP’s findings, and to mobilize civil society and persuade states to strengthen their anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws.
In May 2024, the OCCRP produced a report on Russian sanctions evasion. The report was produced in collaboration with the U.K. think tank Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and funded by the U.K. Foreign Office. One of RUSI’s vice presidents is former CIA Director General David Petraeus.
Mediapart wrote that for a journalistic organization to carry out such activities on the initiative and with the financial support of the United States, even in a ‘just cause’, raises important ethical questions.
OCCRP president Sullivan disagreed: “While some initially found this approach controversial, it has been adopted by other media organizations. We believe the GACC has been very successful.”
Diplomacy
Vance leads indirect push for US-Iran ceasefire and nuclear talks
US Vice-President JD Vance has been personally involved over the past two weeks in indirect talks with Iran aimed at securing a fresh ceasefire and restarting nuclear negotiations.
According to Axios, Vance’s intense engagement indicates that he has taken it upon himself to extract the US from the conflict, which he views as responsible for the Republican Party’s shocking losses in this week’s elections.
This elevates the latest round of indirect talks to the highest echelons of the administration.
US officials and regional sources state that Trump is currently willing to let diplomatic efforts run their course to see whether any agreement is achievable.
Asked by reporters on Friday what his message was to Iran, Trump said, “We are talking to them.”
According to sources with direct knowledge of the matter, Vance speaks almost daily with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, and other mediators regarding the negotiations with Iran.
White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, are also involved in the process.
Sources say Vance and the Qatari and Pakistani mediators have been discussing the possibility of holding a working-level technical meeting between the US and Iran in the coming days, though this has not yet materialized.
Before the war began in late February, Vance was among the most sceptical voices in Trump’s inner circle on the issue, advocating instead for a diplomatic solution.
In April, he led the US negotiating delegation at the Iran summit held in Islamabad and was personally involved in the talks that yielded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between the US and Iran in June.
Vance subsequently headed the US delegation during a series of direct talks with Iran in Switzerland.
Two weeks ago, Vance sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, proposing that direct negotiations resume.
Rezaei is one of the closest advisers to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.
Iranian officials noted that Vance’s letter generated positive momentum toward restarting talks.
On Wednesday, Vance said the war was the primary reason for the Republicans’ repudiation at the polls.
Sources involved in mediation efforts report that while progress is being made, the process is moving very slowly.
On Friday evening, the prime minister of Qatar said, “Over the past few weeks, we worked with our colleagues in the US administration who have a sincere intention to contain the situation and de-escalate. Thanks to them and the voices of reason in Tehran, we prevented the situation from spinning out of control.”
The prime minister added that discussions with the Trump administration continued following the midterm elections, though they were not as active as in previous days “because there are other matters.”
Nevertheless, he noted that the US intention to find a diplomatic resolution “remains ongoing” and emphasized that an agreement is possible.
On Friday morning, Trump and the Emir of Qatar discussed Qatari efforts to bridge differences between the US and Iran as part of an accord.
According to a statement from his office, Sheikh Tamim emphasized the necessity of “pursuing dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve differences, prevent the region from facing further escalation, and ensure freedom of maritime navigation as well as the security of energy supplies.”
Separately, Trump confirmed on Friday that the US military conducted a strike on an anti-aircraft missile launcher on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz after it fired a missile at a US fighter jet.
Diplomacy
Ukraine faces demographic collapse as fertility rates slide
British magazine The Economist reported that mobilization, conflict casualties, and pervasive uncertainty have left Ukraine confronting the threat of demographic collapse.
According to data cited by the magazine, Ukraine’s fertility rate has declined from 1.2 children per woman in 2020 to between 0.8 and 0.9.
This rate marks a lower level than that of any major nation except South Korea.
In the first half of 2026, the number of deaths in Ukraine surpassed the number of newborn babies threefold.
The report noted that ever since independence was gained in 1991, the number of births in the country has lagged behind the number of deaths every year.
The Economist emphasized that the demographic collapse driven by the ongoing fighting constitutes an “existential threat.”
The magazine identified mass refugee migration as the principal driver of the population loss.
More than 5 million Ukrainians reside abroad, predominantly in Europe.
The proportion of those wishing to return among those who left the country is also steadily shrinking.
According to data from the Centre for Economic Strategy (CES), the share of those seeking to return dropped from 74% in 2022 to 43%.
The fact that the majority of refugees consist of Ukrainian children and women under the age of 44 further aggravates the demographic picture.
The Kyiv government decided to exempt men under the age of 25 from mobilization to alleviate the demographic decline.
The magazine reported, however, that many young people have fled the country, while those who remain do not plan to start families.
Projections cited in the report indicate that even if hostilities cease in the coming years, Ukraine can, at best, expect merely a deceleration of depopulation.
Olga Duhnich, an expert at the Ukraine-based think tank Frontier Institute, stated that the generation born in the 1990s and 2000s is the least populous in Ukraine’s modern history, meaning the country cannot expect a post-conflict baby boom.
The United Nations (UN) projects that Ukraine’s population will decline by 0.7% to 0.9% each year over the next two decades.
Under this projection, Ukraine’s population will fall to approximately 25 million by 2040.
If hostilities drag on, people are expected to abandon plans to have children, deepening the crisis even further.
Beyond exempting men under 25 from mobilization, the Kyiv government is rolling out various support packages to boost birth rates.
Under legislation enacted in the country, parents who have children receive a direct payment of 50,000 hryvnias (around $1,100).
Parents are also paid 7,000 hryvnias each month during the first year.
Other state programmes subsidize childcare costs, while Ukrainian soldiers are granted free freezing of egg and sperm cells.
Ukrainian Minister of Social Policy Denis Ulyutin said in May to the Livyi Bereh media outlet that roughly 22 to 25 million people lived in government-controlled territories.
Ulyutin characterized the prevailing picture by saying: “This is a catastrophe.”
Ella Libanova, Director of the Institute for Demography and Quality of Life Research, estimated the population at 29 million during the same period.
Libanova attributed the steep fall from a population of 30 million in 2025 to high death rates and the demographic crisis.
In a statement in October, Libanova announced that Ukraine’s population had slipped to 28.5 million.
Institute Director Libanova said: “The population is already at 28.5 million; we lost half a million people. We lost them, but thankfully this was still caused by migration rather than casualties.”
Diplomacy
Armenian opposition urged to form joint front against constitution
Narek Karapetyan, a lawmaker and head of the Strong Armenia faction in the Armenian parliament, has urged opposition parties to unite around four core principles set out in a joint declaration.
The key points of the declaration include resisting territorial concessions and blocking the adoption of a new constitution, which the opposition has termed the “Aliyev constitution”.
According to a report by Aysor.am, Narek Karapetyan stated that the opposition meeting was originally planned to be led by his uncle, businessman and Strong Armenia movement leader Samvel Karapetyan.
“We initiated the meeting, but the authorities took preemptive steps to prevent Samvel Karapetyan from launching the national unification process,” Narek Karapetyan said.
Noting that, despite these events, opposition representatives convened and signed a joint declaration based on four agreed articles, Narek Karapetyan invited other opposition forces and members of the public to join the alliance.
“We will not allow them to implement the Aliyev constitution in Armenia. We must unite,” Karapetyan said.
Ahead of these developments, Armenian National Security Service personnel detained Strong Armenia Party leader Samvel Karapetyan following a search of his home.
The party’s press secretary, Agavni Sukiasyan, announced that on the morning of the same day, the Investigative Committee of Armenia searched the homes of both Samvel Karapetyan and Narek Karapetyan.
In a report citing the Investigative Committee, Armenpress stated that Samvel Karapetyan was detained as part of a case involving allegations of causing large-scale financial damage to the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) company, embezzling entrusted property, and money laundering.
According to committee figures, the total damage inflicted on the company exceeds $179 million.
Narek Karapetyan’s home was also searched at the end of July as part of a criminal case.
On 22 July, Armenia’s Central Electoral Commission approved the Prosecutor General’s request to strip Narek Karapetyan of his parliamentary immunity, and Karapetyan was charged with large-scale money laundering.
According to information reported by Sputnik Armenia, the investigation is linked to charges brought against Strong Armenia supporter Aleksan Aleksanyan.
Investigative authorities allege that Aleksanyan received approximately $4.4 million and €230,000 from the Karapetyan-owned Tashir Foundation under the guise of gifts and loans.
Several criminal cases had previously been opened against Samvel Karapetyan.
In 2025, Karapetyan was charged with publicly calling for the violent seizure of power after backing the Armenian Apostolic Church, which had been criticized by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.
In January, legal proceedings were also launched against Karapetyan on charges of large-scale tax evasion and money laundering.
Separately, in early July 2025, the Armenian parliament approved a bill enabling the nationalization of the Electric Networks of Armenia company.
In March, Armenia’s Constitutional Court ruled that the nationalization process in question complied with the law.
-
Diplomacy1 week agoSecular dress code dispute exposes deeper Türkiye-Azerbaijan strains
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russia weigh energy deals and corporate return in peace talks
-
Europe2 weeks agoMerz visits Asia to seek new markets for German defence firms
-
Opinion2 weeks agoGaza exposes the myth of the “most moral army in the world”
-
Middle East2 weeks agoUS warns Gulf allies of possible Iran strikes after midterms
-
Europe5 days agoEU urges citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits for crises
-
America2 weeks agoDemocrats target Trump-Putin Russian diesel deal with legal push
-
America2 weeks agoBolsonaro reportedly leaves Brazil on jet linked to scandal-hit firm
