Asia
Pentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
The Pentagon has designated dozens of Chinese companies, including Alibaba, BYD, Baidu, Unitree, Huawei, and CXMT, as entities with alleged links to the Chinese military.
The move signals an intensifying effort by Washington to broaden the definition of “dual-use technologies” amid heightened national security concerns.
In an updated Section 1260H list released Monday evening, the US Department of Defense (DoD) asserted that these Chinese corporations were found to be supporting the modernization and strengthening of the People’s Liberation Army, despite operating directly or indirectly within the US.
The newly listed entities represent a wide spectrum of technological sectors, including artificial intelligence, semiconductors, autonomous systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, robotics, and battery technology.
A previous version of the list had been briefly published in February before being withdrawn, after it was discovered that memory chip manufacturers ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) and Yangtze Memory Technologies (YMTC) had been mistakenly omitted.
The term “dual-use” refers to technologies that have both civilian and military applications.
While inclusion on the 1260H list does not trigger automatic sanctions, it can result in restrictions on US government procurement, trigger investment reviews, and pose significant reputational or regulatory risks for the affected companies.
Major Chinese firms, including Tencent and CATL, were added to the same 1260H list in January 2025.
Following the latest announcement, American depositary receipts for both Baidu and Alibaba saw slight declines in New York trading, while their shares in Hong Kong remained largely flat on Tuesday.
Winston Ma, an adjunct associate professor at NYU School of Law, told Nikkei Asia that the inclusion of companies like Alibaba, Baidu, BYD, Tencent, and Xiaomi indicates a major expansion of what is considered strategic technology through a national security lens.
Ma noted that the updated Pentagon list aligns with earlier moves by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to broaden its scope for reviewing commercial mergers and acquisitions.
That expansion, which occurred in early 2025, was aimed at restricting investments from geopolitical rivals, specifically China.
“Both developments reflect a broader reality: the boundary between commercial technology and national security is becoming increasingly blurred,” Ma said.
The updated list was released less than a month after President Donald Trump met with President Xi Jinping in Beijing.
The two leaders secured a fragile ceasefire in the ongoing trade war, leading some analysts to speculate that the administration may have delayed the list’s release until after the summit.
Alibaba and other companies named in the update have pledged to challenge their inclusion.
“There is no basis for concluding that Alibaba should be included on the 1260H List,” an Alibaba spokesperson said. “Alibaba is not a Chinese military company and is not part of any military-civil fusion strategy. We will pursue all legal avenues to contest attempts to mischaracterize our company.”
Baidu also contested its inclusion in a statement to Nikkei Asia. “There is no credible justification for Baidu’s addition to the list. The claim that Baidu is a military company is entirely without merit. We will not hesitate to use all available options to seek the company’s removal from the list,” a Baidu spokesperson stated.
Since Trump returned to power in January 2025, the US has significantly expanded restrictions on Chinese companies through various blacklists and regulatory frameworks, targeting a wider range of sectors even as China’s AI and biotechnology firms continue to advance.
In contrast to the Pentagon’s list, the Bureau of Industry and Security’s (BIS) Entity List carries more immediate consequences by restricting a company’s access to US technology and mandating export licenses.
According to a report by the Center for a New American Security, 95 Chinese entities were added to the Entity List last year, approximately two-thirds of which were linked to China’s military modernization.
Last year, the BIS expanded export controls by introducing the “Affiliated Entities Rule,” which extended licensing restrictions to non-listed foreign affiliates where blacklisted entities hold a 50% or greater stake.
However, the enforcement of that rule is currently suspended.
Asia
South Korea unveils $518 billion plan for new southwestern semiconductor cluster
South Korea plans to develop a new semiconductor manufacturing hub in the southwestern region of the country through an 800 trillion won ($517.9 billion) corporate investment, which will establish four memory chip production facilities, Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan announced on Monday.
Kim disclosed the investment plan, which aims to transform the Gwangju and Jeolla regions into the country’s second-largest semiconductor cluster alongside the existing hub in the Seoul metropolitan area, during a national investment briefing chaired by President Lee Jae Myung at Cheong Wa Dae.
“To meet the rising demand for semiconductors, relying solely on a single production base in the Seoul metropolitan area is no longer sufficient,” Kim said, noting that constraints on power and water resources under current plans limit further expansion.
The semiconductor investment is part of the government’s “three mega projects” initiative. This initiative envisions large-scale investments by chip giants such as Samsung Electronics Co. and SK hynix Inc., alongside other companies, in the fields of semiconductors, physical artificial intelligence, and AI data centers.
To meet the increasing packaging demand as chip production expands, the Chungcheong region will be transformed into an advanced semiconductor packaging hub with an 81 trillion won investment, Kim said. He added that the Daegu and North Gyeongsang regions will be developed as innovation hubs for semiconductor materials, components, and equipment.
Kim also stated that the government will assist companies in accelerating their semiconductor investments by bringing forward the construction schedule of the new manufacturing facilities by up to 12 years. Consequently, the construction of the plants will be moved to the mid-2030s instead of the mid-to-late 2040s.
To support this expansion, the government has committed to streamlining permitting and construction processes, as well as investing in critical infrastructure, including the supply of electricity and industrial water.
At the meeting, which was also attended by Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong and SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won, Kim presented a plan for a 30 trillion won investment by the government and industry over the next 15 years to support the entire semiconductor value chain, from research and development and chip design to testing and manufacturing.
The ambitious industrial roadmap aims to transform the country from a global manufacturing powerhouse into a leading player in the era of artificial intelligence. At the core of the strategy are semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and physical AI.
Regarding the robotics sector, Kim said the government will develop the AI-powered robotics industry to strengthen South Korea’s manufacturing competitiveness amid intensifying global competition.
Kim warned that China has already begun mass-producing humanoid robots through regional manufacturing hubs, emphasizing that South Korea must accelerate the commercialization and mass production of its own humanoid robots.
“We must accelerate the foundation for mass production,” Kim said, adding that the government plans to generate early domestic demand by supplying humanoid robots in the fields of education, defense, and disaster response.
The initiative aims to increase South Korea’s share of the global humanoid robot market to 20% in the long term, up from just 1% last year.
As the third pillar of the strategy, the government announced an ambitious plan to expand the country’s AI data center infrastructure.
In collaboration with SK Group, GS Group, and portal operator Naver, the government plans to invest approximately 550 trillion won by 2029 to construct AI data centers with a total capacity of 8.4 gigawatts (GW). The total investment is expected to exceed 1,000 trillion won by 2035, expanding capacity to 18.4 GW.
To support this initiative, the government has pledged to secure sufficient power and industrial water supplies and to strengthen the energy infrastructure around existing semiconductor clusters.
Asia
Anthropic accuses China’s Alibaba of systematic data theft targeting Claude AI model
US-based artificial intelligence startup Anthropic has accused Chinese technology giant Alibaba of using thousands of fake accounts to gain unauthorized access to its proprietary AI model, Claude.
According to reports by Bloomberg, the Financial Times, and Reuters, which cited an official letter sent by the company as well as informed sources, the allegations were formally communicated to US senators and White House officials.
In the letter, Anthropic asserted that activities conducted by operators linked to Alibaba targeted the most valuable capabilities of the Claude model, including its software development functionalities.
The company characterized the incident as the largest attempt to date by a Chinese firm to leverage pioneer US artificial intelligence technologies for its own benefit.
Twenty-nine million suspicious transactions in three months
According to data compiled by Anthropic, approximately 29 million transactions linked to the Claude model were executed through roughly 25,000 fake accounts between April and June.
The company noted that Alibaba and other China-based firms systematically exploit leading US technologies to develop their own chatbots.
In the letter, as reported by Bloomberg, Anthropic officials evaluated the process, stating:
“These attacks, carried out through distillation methods, were executed systematically and on an industrial scale to illegally copy advanced US AI technologies from leading laboratories, bypassing training and research-and-development costs to present them as their own products.”
The Financial Times pointed out that the distillation method is widely used in the technology sector to train cheaper and smaller versions of artificial intelligence models.
However, US officials are concerned that the use of this method by Chinese competitors to develop their own models could carry serious national security implications.
Call to Congress to close loopholes
According to the Financial Times report, Anthropic urged the US Congress to close legal loopholes that allow Chinese AI firms to access advanced US technologies, and to penalize the Chinese companies responsible for these cyber activities.
The company also stated that Alibaba pursued this activity brazenly, even after the White House issued a directive emphasizing the need to prevent intellectual property theft at artificial intelligence firms.
As reported by Reuters, Anthropic emphasized in its letter that it supports the Washington administration’s efforts to combat cyberattacks.
On June 13, Anthropic announced that the US government had mandated blocking access to its most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, for all foreign users who are not US citizens.
Subsequently, David Sacks, a US investor and co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, explained that the decision was taken following the detection of possibilities that the built-in security mechanisms of the models could be bypassed.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
-
Opinion2 weeks agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
America2 weeks agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Middle East2 weeks agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoIran discloses 14-point draft US peace accord detailing sanctions relief, regional security measures
-
Russia2 weeks agoPatrushev urges assertive Russian naval presence to counter NATO encirclement strategy
-
Asia2 weeks agoBank of Japan raises interest rate to 1% for first time since 1995
-
Europe2 weeks agoFormer Merkel advisor Erich Vad likens Ukraine conflict to Verdun, warns of European war risk
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussian regional budget deficits nearly double to 294 billion rubles in Q1
