America
Trump order seeks to expand involuntary commitment for the homeless
US President Donald Trump has instructed federal agencies to find ways to involuntarily commit homeless individuals with mental illness and addiction for longer periods.
This is an initiative to combat what the administration considers a threat to US cities, a phenomenon it calls “vagrancy.”
An executive order signed on Thursday compels federal agencies to challenge state and federal legal precedents that limit the authority of local and state governments to involuntarily commit individuals who pose a risk to themselves or others.
The order claims that placing homeless individuals in long-term institutions will ensure public order. “Surrendering our cities and citizens to chaos and fear is neither humane to the homeless nor to other citizens,” states Trump’s order.
The impact of Trump’s executive order is still unclear, as states set the laws and manage the process of involuntary commitment. Critics warn that such a policy could lead to a return to a darker era when people were often unjustly confined to mental institutions and that it will not help people secure housing.
“The safest communities are not those that criminalize being poor or sick, but those with the most housing and resources,” said Jesse Rabinowitz, communications director for the National Homelessness Law Center, in a statement.
Rabinowitz also described the practice of forced treatment as “unethical and ineffective.”
Opponents of the order argue that cash-strapped states will not have the facilities to detain more people.
However, the executive order states that federal resources could ensure “inmates with serious mental illness are not released into the community” due to a lack of beds in prisons or hospitals.
The order also directs agencies to prioritize funding for mental health and drug courts and to defund “harm reduction” programs, which the administration says facilitate illegal drug use.
Furthermore, agencies are asked to prioritize funding for states and cities that “to the maximum extent” enforce laws related to open-air drug use, urban camping, loitering, and trespassing.
The executive order was issued after the Trump administration cut over $1 billion from COVID-19 era grants managed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and proposed cutting hundreds of millions more from the agency’s grants.
The perception that homelessness and street crime have become widespread has become a significant issue for Trump and Republican leaders as the country grapples with a growing housing crisis.
Last year, the Supreme Court declined a constitutional challenge to a series of camping bans, ruling that cities can prohibit homeless people from sleeping outdoors.
Trump signed the executive order about three months after asking the Department of Justice to have agency officials brainstorm ways to clear encampments and pursue involuntary commitment as part of an aggressive initiative to remove homeless people from public spaces.
In the last decade, dozens of states, including those controlled by Democrats, have expanded or enacted new laws for involuntary commitment.
For example, in the Democratic state of Oregon, lawmakers are close to passing a bill that would make it easier to force individuals who pose a danger to themselves or others into treatment, following years of contentious negotiations and failed attempts.
In another Democratic state, California, a law that took effect this year expanded the criteria for those eligible for involuntary commitment to include individuals with substance use disorders.
Governor Gavin Newsom, who is frequently criticized by Trump on public safety and is rumored to be a potential candidate for the 2028 presidential election, argues the law will ensure “no one falls through the cracks and that people get the help they need and the respect they deserve.”
In New York, state lawmakers this year codified a previous state directive allowing first responders to involuntarily commit severely mentally ill individuals who cannot meet their basic needs for medical care, shelter, or food.
The law was supported by Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul, who has faced criticism on public safety due to high-profile violent incidents involving mentally ill individuals in New York City and pressure from Mayor Eric Adams for “more involuntary treatment.”
The country has long struggled with the issue of involuntary commitment. In a landmark 1975 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals with mental illness could not be involuntarily hospitalized unless they were proven to be dangerous, thus securing their right to due process.
Four years later, the court established a higher legal threshold for forcing an individual into treatment against their will.
During his campaign, Trump claimed that US cities were being surrendered to “drug addicts” and the “dangerously mentally ill,” and he floated the idea of placing them in state-sponsored tent cities, vowing to put people in “the mental institutions where they belong.”
America
Trump intervention prompts FIFA to lift suspension of US striker Balogun ahead of Belgium clash
US President Donald Trump intervened with FIFA to request a review of a red card suspension handed to US footballer Folarin Balogun, leading the global governing body to unexpectedly lift the ban, it has emerged.
Belgian football authorities have reportedly been granted the right to appeal the FIFA decision, which overturned a one-match suspension given to Balogun, a striker for the US Men’s National Team.
The two teams are scheduled to face each other tonight at 03:00 Turkish time (TRT) in a Round of 16 fixture. The winner of the match will advance to the quarterfinals to play either Portugal or Spain.
Trump welcomed the decision by FIFA, which enables the 25-year-old Balogun to play in tonight’s match against Belgium in Seattle despite receiving a red card during Wednesday’s 2-0 victory over Bosnia and Herzegovina.
“Thank you to FIFA for doing the right thing and correcting a major injustice!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account.
According to a report by The Athletic, the Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) has been granted the right to formally appeal the decision.
Sources told the publication that to avoid any conflict of interest, Belgium’s appeal will be evaluated by a member of the FIFA Appeal Committee who does not represent any federation from Europe or the Americas.
UEFA, the governing body of European football, is expected to issue a statement on the matter later today.
On Wednesday, Balogun received a controversial red card for a foul, resulting in the top US goalscorer being sent off during his team’s 2-0 victory against Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The red card carried an automatic, immediate one-match suspension, which traditionally allowed no right of appeal.
However, for the first time in more than 60 years of World Cup match history, FIFA announced it would allow Balogun to play in the subsequent fixture.
“The automatic match suspension imposed on the US player Folarin Balogun is suspended for a probationary period of one (1) year,” FIFA said in a statement on Sunday.
Citing Article 27 of its disciplinary code, FIFA stated: “The judicial body may decide to suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure fully or closely.”
The New York Times, citing three people familiar with the conversation, reported that Trump called FIFA President Gianni Infantino on Wednesday to request a review of Balogun’s suspension.
Sports broadcaster Ben Jacobs first reported that the White House had contacted Infantino for this purpose.
MS NOW confirmed that Trump called the FIFA president. Citing a US official, MS NOW reported that during the call, Trump sought to better understand why Balogun was shown the red card and why it resulted in a suspension.
The official said the US government submitted “additional evidence” to FIFA, and the federation’s Disciplinary Committee utilized this information in the process that led to the lifting of Balogun’s suspension.
According to officials, the government focused on the fact that referees reviewed slow-motion replays before the red card was shown.
“Ultimately, a correct and appropriate result was achieved,” the official told MS NOW.
The Royal Belgian Football Association stated it was “astonished” by FIFA’s change of stance regarding Balogun’s suspension and argued that the move violated FIFA’s written regulations.
The federation said it was “exploring all possible options.”
Trump has been heavily involved in the tournament, which the US is co-hosting alongside Mexico and Canada. The president maintains a close relationship with FIFA President Infantino.
Trump’s 2025 financial disclosure, made public last week, revealed that Infantino gifted Trump 10 tickets worth $15,000 for the FIFA Club World Cup final held last July at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.
Trump attended the match, in which Chelsea defeated Paris Saint-Germain 3-0, and appeared on the pitch alongside Infantino to present the trophy.
The US military has begun taking delivery of F-35 fighter jets without radar systems after Northrop Grumman was unable to manufacture the aircraft’s new AN/APG-85 radar quickly enough for installation on upgraded Lockheed Martin jets leaving the production line.
The aircraft are being delivered without the radars, each valued at about $9 million, which are considered essential for combat operations and battlefield effectiveness.
According to The Bunker, six US Marine Corps F-35s have already been delivered without radar systems.
An unspecified number of F-35s destined for the US Air Force and US Navy will also be delivered without radars. The new radar systems are not expected to be available before 2028.
The current radar cannot be fitted into the upgraded F-35 configuration.
One reason the approximately $196 million F-35 carries such a high price tag is its complex shape, stealth coating and integrated electronic architecture, all designed to reduce its radar signature.
According to The Bunker, the situation is comparable to “carbines without bullets, tanks without armor, ships without oceans, or nuclear weapons without the nuclear.”
The issue has become emblematic of the broader F-35 program. The $2 trillion project continues to struggle with readiness problems, in part because the Pentagon has not purchased enough spare parts to keep its fleet operational.
The radar shortfall is particularly notable because it marks a second instance in which perceived future threats have contributed to procurement complications.
A decade after the program began, then-Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall said in 2012 that the initial rush to put the F-35 into production while its design was still evolving had been “acquisition malpractice.”
This time, the Pentagon says it deliberately accepted the risks of a “highly concurrent development and production program” to upgrade the F-35 so it could “maintain air superiority against future threats.”
In simple terms, “highly concurrent” means manufacturing components before the aircraft’s design has been finalized.
That approach ultimately left the aircraft without their new radar systems, repeating the same practice that Kendall criticized 14 years ago.
The radar-less F-35s will not remain grounded while awaiting the new electronic equipment.
Instead, the Pentagon now possesses a growing fleet of what has effectively become some of the world’s most expensive jet trainers.
A new public opinion survey in the United States suggests that nearly one-third of voters would be willing to support a democratic socialist candidate in an election.
According to the joint Economist/YouGov poll, 29% of respondents said they would be willing to vote for a democratic socialist candidate, while 45% said they would not support such a candidate. Another 26% said they were undecided.
The survey comes after democratic socialist candidates posted recent electoral successes in New York, Washington, DC, Los Angeles and the state of Colorado.
The democratic socialist movement in the US has gained significantly greater visibility, particularly since the election of New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani last year.
Independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders brought the modern democratic socialist movement into the mainstream of US politics during his 2016 presidential campaign, a process that was followed several years later by the election of Democratic New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The two politicians are widely regarded as the most prominent figures of democratic socialism in contemporary American politics.
In a post on social media platform X, Senator Bernie Sanders said: “When I look at the recent progressive victories in Colorado and elsewhere, and at the successful organizing campaigns taking root across the country, I believe we may be on the verge of the political revolution we have been fighting for.”
The Economist/YouGov survey also examined broader public attitudes toward the concept of socialism. It found that 32% of respondents viewed socialism “very favorably” or “somewhat favorably,” while 39% said they viewed it “somewhat unfavorably” or “very unfavorably.” Another 29% said they were undecided on the issue.
The Economist/YouGov survey was conducted between June 26 and June 29 among 1,606 respondents. The poll’s margin of error was 3.2%.
The Story Left Untold in the Summit Hall: The True Price of NATO Membership
China launches submarine missile into Pacific, triggering alarm in Japan, Australia, and New Zealand
UK diplomatic, NHS, and local government credentials put up for sale on darknet
France eases opposition to Turkish SAMP/T air defense acquisition, sources say
Oil market recovery toward pre-war levels erodes Iran’s leverage over Strait of Hormuz
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEU, US and China intensify competition over Africa’s strategic minerals through Lobito Corridor
-
Europe2 weeks agoFour European countries move to make citizenship harder to obtain
-
America2 weeks agoVenezuela prepares record $240 billion sovereign debt restructuring
-
Asia2 weeks agoAnthropic accuses China’s Alibaba of systematic data theft targeting Claude AI model
-
Europe1 week agoBuckingham Palace updates King’s official role to focus on securing faith in multi-faith Britain
-
Middle East1 week agoQatar and Saudi Arabia acquire hundreds of millions of dollars in Israeli defense technology, report says
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoDefense tech startups raise $12.3 billion as investors bet on next-generation warfare
-
America2 weeks agoIsrael looks to Latin America as Isaac Accords seek to expand regional partnerships
