Asia
Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Pakistani Taliban
Nine Pakistan army soldiers were killed in attacks carried out by the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) in one of its bases in Zhob garrison in northern Balochistan.
Pakistan’s army said that the militants launched the attack, following which four soldiers were killed and five others were injured. Later, in an update, the army said that five soldiers who got critically injured earlier while “fighting gallantly” had succumbed to their injuries, putting the death toll to nine.
“Security forces and the nation remain resilient and determined to thwart all such dastardly attempts of the enemy aimed at destroying the peace of Balochistan and Pakistan,” the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said in a statement.
Days after the attack, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Gen. Asim Munir visited the wounded in a hospital in Quetta, and several criticized Afghanistan’s government under the rule of the Taliban for such an attack in Pakistan.
Later, Khawaja Asif, Pakistan’s defense minister took a similar position and blamed Afghanistan for such attacks.
“Irrespective of Afghanistan’s stance, Pakistan stands resolute in uprooting terrorism from its soil, whatever the source. This is regardless of whether or not Kabul has the will to reign in militants from within its borders,” Asif said.
Pakistan blames Taliban for not respecting the neighbors
He blamed the Taliban for not respecting the neighbors, and said that the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) roam freely in Afghanistan.
Asif also criticized the government of Imran Khan, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, who allegedly supported the transfer of TTP from Afghanistan to Pakistan.
The government of Afghanistan is currently under the control of the Taliban. During nearly three decades of struggle, including political and military engagement, they were accused of being very close to the government of Pakistan.
There is even an accusation of the establishment of Taliban by the Pakistani army and especially its intelligence department.
When the Taliban were defeated in Afghanistan in 2000, they used Pakistan’s soil as a shelter and a training and re-equipment camp.
On the other hand, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) considers itself a branch of Afghan Taliban.
The TTP has even pledged allegiance to the current supreme leader of the Taliban, Mullah Hebatullah Akhundzada. Meanwhile, the Afghan Taliban has been accused of giving to the leaders, fighters and families of TTP members in Afghanistan.
TTP is being transformed to Afghanistan by help of Pakistan
But, many say that the Afghani Taliban in coordination with the government of Pakistan and at the expense of Islamabad had transferred the Pakistani Taliban from the south and east to the north and northeast of Afghanistan.
The Afghani Taliban during their war against the US forces had received full support from the TTP.
Therefore, the relationship between the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban is bilateral and durable.
But such an apparent relationship depicts a cycle of violence, in which the Pakistani army and government support the Afghan Taliban, the Afghan Taliban support the Pakistani Taliban, and the Pakistani Taliban attack the people and government of Pakistan.
Lack of seriousness against the TTP
The government of Pakistan under the leadership of Shahbaz Sharif is nearing its end. Prime Minister Sharif has recently promised to step down from power at the end of the legal deadline and pave the way for the establishment of the future government.
Therefore, the life of Sharif’s government will end on August 13, and within 60 days after that, the elections of this country must be held, where a new government will be formed as a result.
Indeed, this election is more sensitive than other elections. One of the reasons for its sensitivity is the conflict between the Tehreek-e-Insaf party, led by Imran Khan, the ousted Prime Minister of Pakistan, with the army and the current government.
The current government, which is led by the Nawaz branch of the Muslim League, has powerful parties such as the People’s Party led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and the Jamaat Ulema Islam led by Maulana Fazal Rehman in a fragile coalition.
This coalition was not formed based on the closeness of the political beliefs of these parties – the main reason for its formation is having a common enemy named Tehreek-e-Insaf. Otherwise, the People’s Party, which claims to fight for the secularization of Pakistan, and the Jamaat Ulema-e-Islam Party, which is at the opposite end of this claim, cannot be combined.
TTP issue is part of electoral propaganda
Now, despite the fact that Imran Khan is under severe pressure from the army and the current government, and even he was forced to resign from this party and some of his members also forced to withdraw from politics, Imran Khan is still popular among the masses of Pakistan. It can be the main rival of the parties included in the current coalition government.
There are speculations that the army and the current government of Pakistan are trying to find a way to exclude Tehreek-e-Insaf from participating in the upcoming elections, but they do not succeed, there is a possibility that Tehreek-e-Insaf will come to power again.
Therefore, this election is of special importance for people like Khawaja Mohammad Asif, who became a member of the parliament to the Ministry of Defense, and General Asim Munir, who currently leads the Pakistan Army as a potential enemy of Tehreek-e-Insaf.
Imran Khan will win again
If Imran Khan and his political team can take power once again, the fight against the unlimited powers of the army, its interference in civil affairs, and especially the generals who, according to him, plotted against Tehreek-e-Insaf and then filed a case against its leaders– is not far from possible.
Khan tried to fight against the army during his rule but failed. However, if he wins again, his fight with generals like Asim Munir is very likely.
Therefore, what Khawaja Asif and Gen. Munir have said in recent days, after the TTP attack on the Zhob military center, can have a propaganda aspect and be a part of the unofficial and premature election campaign.
The previously mentioned cycle of violence continues to take victims from the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan. This cycle of violence is carried out in Afghanistan by different militant groups, inducing the Islamic State (IS), and in Pakistan by TTP. Now, on the eve of Pakistan’s decisive elections, the wounded people of this country are angry and saddened by the attacks of fundamentalist groups.
The public opinion in such a situation demands that the army and the government of Pakistan take steps to fight terrorism. Since the origin of terrorist groups ends in Rawalpindi, the words of Pakistani government officials and the head of the army of this country do not seem very serious.
Pakistan must stop blaming Afghanistan for its own failure
If they are honest and serious in their fight against terrorism, they will stop blaming the Afghan government for harboring TTP instead focus on its solution which has two options – 1, the start negotiations and second to carry out comprehensive military operations.
Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid has said that there is no TTP in Afghanistan and asked Pakistan to share any evidence in regards if there is any.
“In case we receive evidence, we will consider it and take action. Pakistan blames us for its own failure in maintaining the law and order situation internally,” Mujahid said.
In a major move, the Ministry of Defense of Pakistan and the army have guided the Afghan Taliban to the “Doha” agreement and the international commitments of this group and asked them to adhere to these commitments and prevent the use of Afghan soil for terrorist acts against other countries.
Again Mujahid said that Doha agreement was signed between Taliban and US and refuted Pakistan’s role in the peace agreement.
Pakistan’s role in Doha peace agreement
However, Asif said that in reality, Pakistan played a pivotal role in facilitating the Doha Peace Agreement. “The constructive contribution of Pakistan in enabling the peace agreement between the United States and the Afghan Taliban on February 29 received commendation from various notable figures, including former Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Qatari Foreign Minister, and Taliban leaders, among others,” Asif added.
However, if the government and army of Pakistan really consider TTP as an enemy, they will not be able to fight this group by moving them from one place to another. They have sufficient access to the territory of Pakistan through one and other ways.
The best way to fight the TTP is that the government of Pakistan should take the issue seriously and start the fight with their terrorist policies and in the second step takes practical action against terrorist religious schools in Pakistan.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
