Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

A first ever at the Iraq security summit: PKK listed as a banned organization

Published

on

The results of the Iraq trip of Minister of Foreign Affairs Hakan Fidan, Minister of National Defense Yaşar Güler and MİT President İbrahim Kalın were announced by the Turkish Foreign Ministry.

At the second Türkiye-Iraq Security Summit held in Iraq, the Iraqi government, Hashd al-Shaabi Commission and Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government were also represented on the Iraqi side of the table. The Security Summit, attended by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Iraq, Mr. Fuad Hussein, the Iraqi Minister of Defense, the Iraqi National Security Undersecretary, the Chairman of the Hashd al-Shaabi Commission, the Deputy Head of the Intelligence Organization and the KRG Minister of Internal Affairs, took place in Baghdad on 14 March 2024.

Iraq accepted joint fight against PKK for the first time

The joint declaration published at the end of the summit marked a first in terms of Türkiye’s fight against the PKK in Iraq. At the Security Summit in December, PKK was defined as a common threat for the first time. This time in Baghdad, PKK was defined as a “banned organization” by Iraq in the joint declaration published. At the end of the meeting, Türkiye and Iraq, together with its factions, talked about a joint fight against the PKK for the first time. Following this summit, where the PKK’s targeting of Türkiye using Iraqi territory was accepted by the Iraqi authorities, it was reported that the two countries would establish joint permanent committees in this context and the security and diplomacy bureaucracy would coordinate the work at the ministerial level.

Türkiye’s anti-terrorism operations in northern Iraq since 2008 were considered a violation of territorial integrity by the Iraqi government for a long time. The operations often caused the Iraqi side to give a diplomatic note to Türkiye and the Turkish Ambassador to be summoned to Iraqi Foreign Ministry.

The Turkish Armed Forces carried out its first operation against the PKK in Northern Iraq in 1984. After the Murat operation in 1998, Türkiye could not intervene in Northern Iraq until 2008, especially after 2003, when Iraq faced the American invasion. However, with the restoration of relations with the Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government, many camps and ammunition depots of the terrorist organization PKK were destroyed with the Operation Sun in 2008.

Operations “Claw” targeting Hakurk, Metina, Zap and Haftanin regions in the Kurdistan Regional Government of Northern Iraq have been continuing for five years now. The situation in which the Turkish Armed Forces’ operations against the PKK, which was the target of the Iraqi government until recently, andcaused a crisis between the two countries will now come to an end after the Security Summit held in Iraq. It seems that Turkish security and diplomatic leaders persuaded both the Iraqi government, the Kurdish administration and Shiite groups to act together against the PKK.

Erdogan to visit Baghdad after 12 years

The Iraqi side requested that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s expected visit to Iraq be mentioned in the final declaration of the second Security Summit held in Baghdad. This is interpreted as Baghdad attaching great importance to Erdogan’s expected visit and also wants to guarantee the visit. Erdoğan last paid an official visit to Iraq in 2012, when he was Prime Minister.

During his visit to Iraq, in addition to the fight against the terrorist organization PKK, Erdoğan is expected to discuss several headlines on economic cooperation, logistics and energy-related topics, including the reopening of the oil pipeline and the Development Road project that will pass through Türkiye and Iraq. The fact that the Russia-Ukraine war affects the economic-logistical routes of the whole world is of great concern to the region. While the Development Road project, which will pass through Iraq and is expected to be completed in 2029 and to generate an annual resource of 4 billion dollars for the Iraqi economy; meanwhile the project will also be able to be the complement of China’s One Belt One Road project and the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor.

Spectrum in Iraq requires wider cooperation

Both cooperation initiative regarding the figh against PKK in Iraq and Development Road Project requires a wider cooperation for Türkiye, that is to include Iran and Gulf countries’ investments for the road.

MIDDLE EAST

Netanyahu government moves to dismiss Attorney General

Published

on

The Israeli government unanimously declared “no confidence” in Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara during its cabinet meeting on Sunday. This step officially initiates the process of Baharav-Miara’s dismissal, marking a first in the country’s history.

Justice Minister Yariv Levin accused the Attorney General of obstructing government policies and argued that cooperation had become impossible due to “long-standing fundamental disagreements” between them.

Baharav-Miara’s response was swift. Stating that the government was trying to place itself above the law, the Attorney General said, “They are seeking unlimited power; an unchecked administration is being targeted.”

The attempt to dismiss Baharav-Miara, along with the dismissal of Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar and discussions on judicial reform, is seen as a new crisis regarding the independence of the judiciary.

The process has been initiated despite many legally required steps. According to the current cabinet decision, the dismissal file must first be sent to a special five-member committee, and then the attorney general must be given the right to defend herself. However, this commission has not yet been formed.

It was leaked to the press that some ministers made sarcastic comments about Baharav-Miara during the cabinet meeting. Economy Minister Nir Barkat said, “She probably attended a meeting of another government,” while Environment Minister Idit Silman said, “She was a secretary in the previous government, now she acts like an opposition leader.”

Baharav-Miara, who did not attend the meeting, accused the government in her letter of trying to evade legal oversight, saying, “This initiative aims to weaken the judiciary and intimidate loyal public servants.”

Opposition leader Yair Lapid called the attempt to dismiss the Attorney General “illegal,” stating, “Netanyahu first wants to dismiss his investigator, and now his prosecutor. Gali Baharav-Miara is an honest and competent attorney general. That’s precisely why she’s a target. This is illegal, this is corruption. They will not succeed.”

National Unity Party leader Benny Gantz claimed that the government’s move was motivated by a law that would grant military service exemptions to ultra-Orthodox Jews: “Netanyahu wants an attorney general who will bypass the Supreme Court and disregard the reserve soldiers joining the army. We are all paying the price.”

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Shin Bet Director dismissed amid ‘Qatargate’ probe

Published

on

The Israeli government has unanimously dismissed Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar. Bar stated that the real intention behind his dismissal was to “continue ceasefire negotiations without reaching an agreement.” Referencing the Qatargate scandal investigated by Shin Bet, Bar said his dismissal “smells of foreign interests and an unprecedented conflict of interest.”

In a first for Israel, the director of Shin Bet, considered an independent institution, was dismissed by a cabinet decision. Bar did not attend the meeting where the dismissal was to be voted on, despite being summoned, but sent a letter to the ministers.

In his letter, Bar refuted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that there was a trust issue between them, which Netanyahu cited as the reason for the dismissal. Bar stated, “There has been intense and effective cooperation between Shin Bet under my leadership and the Prime Minister.”

Arguing that the Shin Bet Director should be loyal to the people, not the Prime Minister, Bar said, “Netanyahu could not support the reasons he put forward for my dismissal. Despite my request, no concrete examples were provided.”

Bar argued that Netanyahu’s insistence on the lack of trust between them was not a valid basis, but that his real intention was to continue ceasefire negotiations in Gaza without reaching an agreement.

Bar stated that Netanyahu’s decision to exclude him and Mossad Chief David Barnea from the ceasefire and prisoner exchange negotiations harmed the delegation and prevented any progress in the release of prisoners.

Bar added that Netanyahu is taking steps that will “weaken the country both internally and against its enemies.”

According to Bar, the decision is driven by “foreign interests and conflict of interest.”

Shin Bet Director Bar also referred to the “Qatargate” investigation in Israel, conducted by Shin Bet, regarding allegations that Netanyahu’s close advisors received money from Qatar through shell companies.

Bar stated, “Important investigative steps are being taken. Following the disruption of these steps by a sudden and hasty dismissal based on completely unfounded allegations, there is a smell of foreign interests and an unprecedented conflict of interest.”

He warned that the dismissal, initiated by Prime Minister Netanyahu, sends a dangerous message to those under investigation and could jeopardize the outcome of the investigation.

The government’s decision to dismiss the Shin Bet Director has been taken to the High Court.

The Movement for Quality Government requested the decision be halted in a petition to the High Court.

The decision also drew a swift reaction from the opposition. Yisrael Beytenu party leader Avigdor Liberman said, “By firing Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar, Netanyahu is doing exactly what our enemies dream of.”

The main opposition leader Yair Lapid says that the government dismissed Bar “for one reason only”: to stop the Qatargate investigation.

Lapid stated, “The opposition parties will jointly object to this reckless move to legitimize the infiltration of a hostile state into the prime minister’s office.”

The “Qatargate” discussions began with allegations that millions of dollars were taken from Qatar and transferred to Netanyahu’s election campaign.

These allegations turned into an investigation conducted by Shin Bet, with Prime Minister Netanyahu’s spokespeople Eliezer Feldstein and advisors Jonathan Urich and Srulik Einhorn in the defendant’s seat.

Israeli media reported that Netanyahu also received $15 million from Qatar in 2012 and $50 million in 2018.

It was reported that Feldstein was paid by an international company to support Qatar’s image, and Netanyahu’s advisors Urich and Einhorn also provided image consultancy for Qatar.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Gaza ceasefire: The bell of war ringing again

Published

on

The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas did not last long, and eventually the bell for war had sounded again. According to media reports, hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza Strip as a result of Israeli airstrikes. Israeli officials also warned that the gates of hell had opened on Gaza. The United States also announced that it had responded positively to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request to resume the war.

The question: Why has the Gaza war resumed?

First: These days, US President Donald Trump has been feverishly pushing for talks with Iran, which is not pleasing to the Israeli side. Trump has repeatedly emphasized the need to negotiate with Iran before pursuing other options.

More importantly, he recently sent a letter addressed to the Iranian Leader and also informed the media. The content of the letter is also focused on starting negotiations with Iran, although it is spoken from a position of power. Furthermore, Adam Boehler, Trump’s representative for Israeli hostage affairs, met with the Hamas leadership in Doha, the capital of Qatar, and evaluated the meeting as constructive, while in response to Tel Aviv’s criticism, he described Hamas members as good people.

Of course, it was recently claimed that he was removed from his position. Now, in order to prevent Trump and Iran from entering the negotiating line and for the US to avoid direct talks with Hamas, the Israeli side has wanted to make the situation critical so that the atmosphere for consultations remains unfavorable. Furthermore, by intensifying the attacks, Netanyahu wants to force Hamas to accept conditions that the group has so far refused to accept.

Second: In the meantime, Trump also has specific goals that he is seeking to achieve: forcing Iran to negotiate. Trump has repeatedly emphasized establishing peace; but from the position of exercising power, using the tools of sanctions and military threats. The deadly airstrikes by the US military on Yemeni Houthi positions and the hints and insinuations of Trump and his entourage towards Iran are also intended to force Tehran to agree to negotiations, and that is, negotiations whose terms and conditions are determined by the American side.

Trump’s green light to resume the Gaza war could also be in this direction, because if the ceasefire goes ahead as included in the agreement, the American and Israeli sides believe that Iran and the so-called “axis of resistance” will declare themselves victorious, and in that case Tehran will either refuse to negotiate or will try to enter the arena from a strong position.

Third: It is true that Trump signed the plan to resume the war, but he will not support the continuation of the war and its spread, for three reasons:

1- it would contradict the slogans that Trump has constantly chanted to end wars. More importantly, since he values ​​the principle of “cost-benefit” so much, his support for a long and consequential war would harm the achievement of the larger goals he has in mind.

Therefore, it supports what Netanyahu wants to a certain extent, which is natural; but it seems unlikely that the previous US administration would want to continuously pump advanced weapons and military equipment into Israel for more than a year.

2- Second, Trump’s support for a long war that results in the deaths of Palestinian civilians could undermine the prospects for expanding the Abraham Accords, an agreement that Trump holds in high regard and cites as the most important achievement of her first administration.

Arab governments also have a sense of dignity and prestige and will not join this treaty for free, especially Saudi Arabia. Therefore, Trump does not want the scope of this treaty to remain narrow.

3- If Trump agrees to support a large-scale and high-consequence war in Gaza, America will be stuck in the Middle East, which will sideline the rest of the White House’s priorities: Ending the war in Ukraine, a trade war with China, Canada, Europe, etc. When the US is once again involved in the Gaza conflict, Russia will become bolder and, instead of giving in to Trump’s demand to sign a ceasefire agreement, will insist on continuing the war to occupy more territory in Ukraine. The trade war with China and Europe also requires that Trump be comfortable with the Middle East.

4- Netanyahu’s cabinet is grappling with numerous internal problems. For example, Internal Security Minister Ben-Governor resigned and left the government in response to accepting the first phase of the ceasefire. Smotrich, another Netanyahu ally, has also warned that he will resign in response to accepting the second phase, which would lead to the collapse of the cabinet.

Apart from that, the risk of launching a comprehensive investigation to clarify the dimensions of the October 7 attack is also prominent, which is possible in the absence of war conditions. In recent days, a serious disagreement between Netanyahu and Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar has flared up, leading to the latter’s dismissal. This dismissal is said to be related to the risk of leaking documents that could jeopardize Netanyahu’s political life.

Now, the simple and inexpensive way to keep the government going and quell internal disputes is to resume the war with Hamas, so that the opposing and supporting view of the external enemy is fixed. In the meantime, the protests of the families of the hostages and the opposition forces are important as a deterrent; but not to the extent of the internal conflict in the cabinet, the disclosure of documents and the preparation of the investigation file into the October 7 attack, which could put an end to the life of the Netanyahu government.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey