Asia
China balances strategic caution with diplomatic support following US-Israel strikes on Iran
China’s clear yet calibrated reaction to the US-Israel strikes on Iran aligns with its long-standing strategy: avoiding direct military engagement while offering diplomatic support.
The joint US-Israel strikes, which have plunged the Middle East into deeper chaos, have turned the global spotlight on China—a pivotal element in the great power competition—and its prospective response.
Confirming the death of a Chinese national and the evacuation of 3,000 citizens from the country, China requested an emergency session of the UN Security Council alongside Russia on Saturday and condemned the military action.
In a phone conversation on Monday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi, characterized the strikes and the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as “unacceptable.”
“The international community must send a clear and unequivocal message against the world’s slide back toward the law of the jungle,” he stated.
Beyond this rhetoric, however, Beijing—which maintains a comprehensive strategic partnership with Tehran—has refrained from offering tangible support.
Beijing’s response mirrors its long-standing doctrine of providing diplomatic cover while eschewing direct military entanglement, a policy seen in its reaction to the US detention of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January. This stance has sparked debate regarding how this approach impacts the image of “reliability” among the Global South nations with which China cooperates.
According to an analysis published a day prior to the strikes by Ahmed Aboudouh, a researcher at the Chatham House Middle East and North Africa Programme, China’s diplomatic caution amid the US-Iran tension should not be misconstrued as “unreliability or indifference.”
Aboudouh contends that Beijing is playing a “long game” regarding Iran, viewing the regime’s mounting vulnerabilities as an opportunity to deepen Tehran’s dependence on China while simultaneously distracting Washington.
How have relations evolved?
Following the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1971, China-Iran ties witnessed a significant surge in 2016 when President Xi Jinping visited Tehran, elevating bilateral relations to a comprehensive strategic partnership.
This development placed China’s relationship with Iran on the same tier as its ties with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and several European nations, including France, Spain, and Italy.
In 2023, China facilitated an agreement to restore diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Tehran has also joined the China-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS as a counterweight to Western influence, endorsing Beijing’s vision of a multipolar world order.
What drives the bilateral relationship?
Economic ties deepened in 2021 when Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Tehran to sign a 25-year cooperation agreement, pledging approximately $400 billion in investments across the energy, banking, telecommunications, and infrastructure sectors. In return, the deal secured a stable supply of Iranian oil.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s visit to China last September reaffirmed Tehran’s commitment to fully implementing this long-term cooperation accord.
China has served as a vital lifeline for Iran’s sanctions-strained economy; it is reported to have purchased over 80% of Iran’s oil exports in 2025.
Beijing has dismissed reports that it exploits discounted oil through “ghost fleets” and rebranded shipments, maintaining that trade with another sovereign nation is legitimate.
Sino-Iranian trade is heavily skewed in China’s favor. According to Chinese customs data (excluding Iranian oil imports due to sanctions), the bilateral trade volume in 2025 reached approximately $10 billion, with $7 billion accounting for Chinese exports to Iran.
Beijing and Tehran also maintain a robust security partnership, which encompasses cooperation in counter-terrorism, combating illegal migration, and addressing transnational and organized crime.
The cooperation agreement also includes strengthening military and security ties through joint military exercises and intelligence sharing under the auspices of counter-terrorism.
Although China has not provided Iran with any explicit security guarantees, Beijing reportedly supplied Tehran with the YLC-8B radar system, cited as one of the few systems capable of continuously detecting and tracking Western fifth-generation fighter aircraft at long ranges.
What is China’s approach to Iran’s nuclear activities?
China opposes Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons while supporting the right to use peaceful nuclear energy within the framework of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Beijing is explicitly opposed to any military action against Iran or any infringement upon its sovereignty.
However, China remains concerned that a nuclear-armed Iran could trigger a regional war, destabilize Gulf nations, and encourage a regional arms race—leading countries not just in the Middle East, but also nations like Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to seek nuclear capabilities of their own.
What is the future of the relationship?
Experts anticipate that the bilateral relationship will persist despite any leadership changes.
According to Andrea Ghiselli, a faculty member at the University of Exeter and research director of the ChinaMed Project, Beijing may be unsettled by the loss of Khamenei but remains well-positioned to adapt to new leadership in Tehran.
In an article penned Sunday, Ghiselli noted, “Whatever happens now, this will not make Saudi Arabia and [Gulf Cooperation Council] countries less interested in or less dependent on trade relations with China; nor will it make these countries less anxious about Israel.” He added, “In other words, while there may be some losses for Beijing at the regional level, they are likely to remain limited.”
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
