Europe
Doubts grow over the future of the Franco-German FCAS fighter jet project
Doubts are growing at Airbus and within German politics regarding the development of the new Franco-German European fighter jet, the “Future Combat Air System” (FCAS).
Airbus’s defense subsidiary, the Germany-based aircraft manufacturer expected to lead Europe’s largest defense project, and the French aircraft manufacturer Dassault have so far failed to reach an agreement.
Michael Schöllhorn, head of Airbus’s defense division, told Handelsblatt, “Germany and Europe need a next-generation air combat system, and Airbus is ready to develop such a system.”
Thomas Röwekamp, chairman of the CDU’s Bundestag defense committee, stated that “they cannot give up on this important technology, neither from a military nor an industrial policy perspective.”
However, negotiations between Airbus and Dassault have been stalled for months. This situation is already causing discontent among employees.
Airbus to the French: There are other attractive partnerships
Thomas Pretzl, chairman of the Airbus Defence and Space works council, told Handelsblatt that employees in Germany want clarity and that a decision on how to proceed with FCAS must be made soon.
For instance, Pretzl believes FCAS could continue without Dassault, saying, “Partnership is based on cooperation, not competition. There are more attractive and suitable partners in Europe.”
FCAS is planned to be a combination of fighter jets, unmanned aerial vehicles, and a data platform. The system aims not only to protect European airspace but also to free the continent from its technological dependence on America.
Development costs alone are expected to reach tens of billions of euros, but the system will not be operational before 2040. Critics argue this is too late and too expensive.
French Dassault wants the lion’s share of the profit
During his visit to Spain last Thursday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz complained, “We are making no progress on this project. Things cannot continue as they are.”
Efforts will be made to find a solution by the end of the year “so that this project can truly be realized,” and according to industry sources, a decision could be made as early as October.
Spain is the third partner in the FCAS alliance, alongside France and Germany. The contracts stipulate that German and Spanish industries will receive more than half of the project’s added value.
Dassault is said to have recently demanded 80% of the added value for the aircraft, the main component of FCAS. Although Dassault denies this figure, CEO Eric Trappier reaffirms his company’s leading role in the aircraft’s development.
Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron had tasked their defense ministers with finding a solution to the deadlocked dispute. Ultimately, FCAS is also intended to be a symbol of effective European cooperation, similar to what Airbus achieved in civil aircraft production.
The fragile political situation in France has increased budget uncertainty
But the complex joint venture structure between the German Airbus divisions and the rival Dassault Group continues to fuel competition and mistrust.
In recent months, both sides have tended to drift apart. Additionally, France is politically paralyzed. Former French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu was appointed as the new French prime minister on September 9, but he has neither a majority in parliament nor a budget.
According to the project plan, a multi-billion-dollar development contract with a fixed industrial workshare must be approved this year to advance FCAS.
Meanwhile, an increasing number of European countries are purchasing the F-35 from the US company Lockheed Martin, which possesses stealth capabilities and superior digital features. Germany has also ordered three dozen F-35s, which can be equipped with American nuclear bombs in emergencies.
However, a disadvantage of the F-35s is that only the US has full control over the aircraft’s software. Another drawback is that Europe’s arms spending flows to US industry.
Germany sets its sights on the British-Italian-Japanese fighter jet project
On the other hand, other projects are underway in Europe. The “Global Combat Air Programme” (GCAP) is a joint project of BAE Systems from the UK, Leonardo from Italy, and Mitsubishi from Japan.
The intensive development phase for GCAP has not yet begun. However, at the DSEI defense fair in London in September, the three GCAP partners emphasized their willingness to accept other companies and partner countries.
The more partners there are, the lower the costs per country.
Experts advise Airbus to change course. Aviation expert Michael Santo says, “If the FCAS project continues to develop at its current pace, we will have an obsolete system by 2050. The French are setting a benchmark by demanding 80% of the project. The Germans seem bewildered and refer to the contracts.”
Arguing that it would be “economically irresponsible” to proceed with confidence in FCAS’s future, Santo claims, “Airbus Defence needs a strong partner, and BAE would not be a bad choice.”
Competition with Rafale unsettles the Germans
A partnership with British and Italian industry is possible. Airbus, BAE Systems, and Leonardo jointly build the Eurofighter. French industry withdrew from the project in the 1990s and developed the Rafale. Since then, the Eurofighter and Rafale have been competitors in the global market. This is another reason for the significant mistrust between Airbus and Dassault.
With BAE Systems and Leonardo, Airbus could benefit from established processes from Eurofighter production. The disadvantage here is that Airbus and German industry would be joining the consortium relatively late.
In fact, Germany has more financial leeway than the UK and Italy, as the debt brake for defense projects has been largely lifted. Works council chairman Pretzl says it is also possible to work with other partners in Europe, adding, “Theoretically, we could also develop our own fighter jet in Germany.”
A partnership with Saab is also possible
An independent development in Germany seems unlikely. Therefore, the option of the Swedish company Saab is also being discussed within German industry.
Saab produces the Gripen, a fighter jet comparable to the Eurofighter, which has also been delivered to South Africa, Brazil, and Thailand.
Germany has many connections to this project, and relations are considered excellent. Sweden has been a NATO member since 2024 and, like Germany, is significantly increasing its defense spending.
For example, the Airbus subsidiary MBDA supplies guided missiles for the Gripen’s armament. In March, the Swedish government announced it would also upgrade the Gripen for the latest version of the Taurus cruise missile.
In June, Helsing, a Munich-based defense startup specializing in artificial intelligence (AI), tested an air combat AI agent called Centaur on the Gripen.
This forms the basis of a future joint air combat system. Furthermore, since the Eurofighter and Gripen were developed in the 1990s, their updates and the introduction of a possible successor could be synchronized.
On Tuesday, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius will meet with his Swedish counterpart, Pal Jonson. According to Bloomberg, one of the topics on the agenda will be the modernization of the Eurofighter with Saab technology.
Dependence on Eurofighters may continue a while longer
The German Armed Forces’ modernized Eurofighters could operate with larger unmanned aerial vehicles, similar to the FCAS concept.
Airbus has formed a partnership with the US supplier Kratos and plans to begin deliveries to the German Armed Forces from 2029.
In addition, the Eurofighter may remain in production longer than previously thought. Spain and Italy have ordered new aircraft, and Germany intends to order at least 20 more in October. There are also export demands from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey.
Airbus defense chief Schöllhorn says, “In the past, we struggled to maintain the necessary production rate of ten aircraft per year. Now, we are doubling this rate as we expect new orders.”
Berlin does not want to end the partnership with Paris immediately
New Eurofighter orders and strong business related to tanker and reconnaissance aircraft provide Airbus Defence with new room for maneuver. Losses in the satellite business recently forced Schöllhorn to cut 2,500 of approximately 33,000 jobs worldwide. A new dynamic could develop with new Eurofighter orders and a new FCAS launch.
But German politicians are not yet ready to write off the Franco-German FCAS system. CDU politician Röwekamp says, “It is not technical limitations that are currently slowing down the project, but national industrial interests.”
He expects the political issues regarding the program’s further development to be clarified by the end of the year at the latest, stating, “Our security policy objective should not fail due to trivial industrial policy issues.”
Europe
EU states hold talks with Taliban in Brussels on Afghan returns
Representatives from 15 European Union member states met with the Taliban in Brussels on June 23 to discuss the return of Afghan nationals to Afghanistan.
A European Commission spokesperson said on Tuesday that the meeting was co-chaired with Sweden. Belgium and the Netherlands also took part.
The Commission stressed that the discussions primarily focused on the return of Afghan citizens with criminal records or those considered security threats.
Talks covered a wide range of issues, including the identification of returnees, the issuance of travel documents and procedures related to their repatriation.
However, Johannes Luchner, a senior European Commission official who travelled to Kabul in January, had previously indicated that the scope could extend beyond convicted individuals.
Addressing European lawmakers at the end of January, he said: “Our primary concern is the return of criminals, but the number of non-criminal Afghans who have received return orders is also increasing.”
Another EU source has now expressed a similar view. Speaking to EUobserver on Tuesday ahead of the meeting, the source said the discussions would also cover the return of asylum seekers whose applications had been rejected.
Earlier in the day, the Commission declined to provide details about the meeting.
As a result, questions remained unanswered regarding who covered the Taliban delegation’s travel expenses, where the meeting would take place, whether women would participate and what the Taliban expected in return for assisting the EU with deportations of Afghan nationals.
The EU and its member states have not recognised the Taliban government since it returned to power five years ago.
Brussels defended its decision to maintain limited contacts with Afghanistan’s “de facto authorities,” arguing that such engagement is necessary to facilitate the deportation of rejected asylum seekers who have committed crimes or are considered dangerous.
A European Commission spokesperson said officials from the Commission and 15 EU member states attended the Brussels meeting, which followed a previous gathering held in Kabul in January.
“The Commission services and Sweden today co-chaired a technical-level meeting in Brussels together with technical-level representatives of Afghanistan’s de facto authorities responsible for return and readmission matters,” the spokesperson said.
A spokesperson for Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry said the agenda was broader and included the possibility of a future consular presence in the EU, the resumption of consular services for Afghans living there and “the need for confidence-building measures.”
Spokesperson Abdul Qahar Balkhi added that the meeting raised hopes of creating “positive momentum to safeguard the consular rights of Afghans residing abroad.”
According to a European Commission letter addressed to Balkhi and reviewed by Reuters, the discussions would focus on “the return and readmission of Afghan nationals without a right to reside in the EU.”
Europe
EU defence chief calls for integration of Ukraine’s military into European defence architecture
The European Union’s Defence Commissioner, Andrius Kubilius, said the bloc should integrate Ukraine into a future European defence union, speaking at the European Defence and Security Summit in Brussels.
According to remarks reported by Reuters, Kubilius said: “It would be difficult to make sense of things if we did not regard the integration of Ukraine’s armed forces into our defence architecture in Europe as a vital issue.”
Kubilius stressed that Ukraine currently holds a dominant position on the battlefield thanks to the transformation of its military doctrine.
Calling for the integration of Europe’s defence industry and Ukraine’s manufacturing facilities into a single military structure, Kubilius said Ukraine should be fully integrated into the EU’s military market.
He added that the European Commission could present a detailed analysis of the defence market and initial proposals for next steps as early as next week.
At a later stage, the commissioner said, the Commission would propose changes to defence procurement rules and other market regulations.
Kubilius also outlined a strategic objective for the European Union.
He argued that EU member states should spend around €7 trillion on arms production over the next decade in order to surpass Russia in military strength and weapons stockpiles. According to Kubilius, such spending would be consistent with commitments under NATO to raise defence budgets to 5% of gross domestic product.
Urging Europeans to be prepared to bear the cost, Kubilius described it as “the price of peace.”
At the same time, he suggested moving away from the production of highly sophisticated weapons that are difficult to manufacture in large quantities. Instead, citing the example of drones used in Ukraine, he called for a focus on producing “enormous quantities of satisfactory weapons.”
The EU Defence Commissioner also underscored the need to integrate Ukraine’s innovative defence industry into Europe’s broader defence and technological base.
Europe
Hungary blocks joint EU letter backing Ukraine and Moldova accession process
Hungary has refused to endorse a joint letter intended to be sent on behalf of all 27 European Union member states to the European Council and the European Commission in support of Ukraine’s and Moldova’s accession to the bloc.
According to Politico, citing sources familiar with the matter, the letter is required for Kyiv’s and Chisinau’s membership applications to advance to the next stage of the accession process.
The sources said Hungary was the only member state that declined to back the document. Because approval requires the consent of all 27 member states, the issue is expected to be revisited next week.
Hungary, which previously blocked Ukraine’s accession negotiations for an extended period, was led at the time by Prime Minister Viktor Orban. His successor, Prime Minister Peter Magyar, has not opposed the launch of the negotiation process but has insisted on removing the phrase “as soon as possible” from the draft letter’s reference to Ukraine’s accession.
Magyar said Hungary does not support opening all negotiating chapters simultaneously in an effort to accelerate Ukraine’s membership bid.
Explaining the government’s position, he said: “Partly because the ink on the documents relating to the first chapter has barely dried, and partly because this would send the wrong message to Western Balkan countries such as Serbia, Albania, Montenegro and North Macedonia, which have been working for years to become members of the European Union.”
The European Union formally opened the first chapter of accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova in June. The process was launched during a ceremony in Luxembourg attended by the foreign ministers of member states and is divided into six thematic clusters covering different areas of legislation and policy.
The opening of the first cluster, which covers core issues including the rule of law, the functioning of democratic institutions and public administration, marks the transition from the preparatory phase to practical work on meeting accession requirements.
The EU’s ambassador to Ukraine, Katarina Mathernova, has said Kyiv could join the bloc by 2030, although the final timeline will depend on how quickly the Ukrainian authorities complete the required legal and institutional reforms.
Mathernova also said she hoped all 33 negotiating chapters could be opened by the end of the summer.
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
America1 week agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
Russia1 week agoPatrushev urges assertive Russian naval presence to counter NATO encirclement strategy
-
Diplomacy1 week agoIran discloses 14-point draft US peace accord detailing sanctions relief, regional security measures
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSpaceX IPO raises concerns over European capital outflows and telecom competition
