Connect with us

Europe

AfD faces internal rift over compulsory military service demand

Published

on

Few demands are as consistently featured in the Alternative for Germany (AfD) platform as the reintroduction of compulsory military service. Long before other parties began discussing the return of conscription, the AfD had repeatedly raised the issue. In its 2016 manifesto and all subsequent manifestos for Bundestag and European elections since 2017, the party linked this demand to the argument that Germany’s defense capabilities needed to be strengthened.

However, for the past two and a half years, debates over conscription have been ongoing within the party. According to WELT, the behind-the-scenes discussion is now reaching a climax. This is due to the intervention of eastern regional associations, which want to block a related motion from the Bundestag faction.

For example, a statement released last Sunday by the leaders of the East German AfD parliamentary groups declared, “No compulsory military service for foreign wars.”

According to information obtained by WELT, the Thuringia state association, led by Björn Höcke, is at the forefront of the eastern leaders who argue that Germany does not “act sovereignly in its foreign policy.”

Party co-chairman Tino Chrupalla, who has spoken out against compulsory military service several times in the past during the ongoing war in Ukraine, is also reportedly involved in this plan.

Previously, a meeting of the AfD parliamentary group’s working group leaders in the Bundestag had approved the motion “Securing Germany’s defense capability – reinstating compulsory military service” without changes, as seen in the minutes from September 9, which are available to WELT.

Only two leaders voted against the motion. The motion was then placed on the agenda for the parliamentary group meeting.

But when the statement from the eastern parliamentary group leaders arrived, this decision was reversed. According to an email sent to the parliamentary group by a staff member on Sunday evening, the motion was “prepared prematurely due to a misunderstanding” and “postponed for further consultation.”

At the initiative of parliamentary secretary Bernd Baumann, an internal meeting was held in the Bundestag on Wednesday. Defense politicians and representatives from Thuringia and Saxony-Anhalt reached a compromise. As a result, the sentence “The deployment of soldiers in foreign wars must be excluded” will be added to the beginning of the motion’s explanatory section.

However, this is not enough for the critics, as they accuse the federal government of a “propensity for escalation.” They are also concerned about their carefully constructed image as a party of peace and point to the state elections in Saxony-Anhalt in September 2026.

Indeed, the AfD has managed to attract new voter groups with its peace policy, especially in the eastern part of the country.

But in western Germany, this situation is viewed much more critically. State elections are also approaching there: in the vote in Baden-Württemberg in March, the lead candidate Markus Frohnmaier, a close confidant of co-chairwoman Alice Weidel, is one of the strongest proponents of compulsory military service within the parliamentary group and has taken a clear position within the party. The majority of the parliamentary group also sides with him.

The conflict has been ongoing since February 2023. At that time, Bundestag faction leader Chrupalla ensured that a motion on compulsory military service from his colleagues, which had already been announced for debate in the plenary session on the Bundestag website, was sent back for internal consultation.

According to information obtained by WELT, Chrupalla argued at the parliamentary group meeting at the time that he did not want his sons to be used in “proxy wars” or “for American and foreign interests.”

Several supporters from Saxony shared the same view. Internally, there was anger over a parliamentary group magazine that rejected the text prepared by the defense policy working group, which called for the “urgent reintroduction of compulsory military service.”

Since then, the debate has repeatedly flared up. In October 2024, the AfD’s federal program commission decided, with Chrupalla’s vote, to remove this demand from the election program for the Bundestag elections.

In a December 2024 interview with WELT, the AfD leader justified his no-vote by stating that the current debate gave the impression that the aim was to introduce compulsory military service “to send young people to the front lines of the war in Ukraine.”

Shortly thereafter, approximately 71% of participants in a non-public member survey supported the demand in the election program. The federal party conference followed the vote in January of this year.

After a closed-door meeting of the parliamentary group in July, it seemed the dispute had been resolved. Despite some critical voices, the majority decided to include compulsory military service in a position paper.

Chrupalla later claimed that “no one needed to convince him.” The defense working group then submitted a corresponding motion for discussion within the parliamentary group.

Now, due to the intervention from the east, the issue is back on the table. In response to a query from WELT on Monday, AfD leader Weidel said that the position of the party and the parliamentary group is clear: they are in favor of conscription.

However, Weidel added that this is “not an effective way to prevent German soldiers from being misused to serve in Ukraine” and claimed that “the leaders of the SPD and CDU want our youth and our children to be sent to war.”

The parliamentary group plans to make a decision at one of its upcoming meetings.

Europe

EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups

Published

on

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.

For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.

“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.

Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.

Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.

The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.

Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.

This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.

As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.

In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.

Continue Reading

Europe

Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability

Published

on

Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.

The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.

Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.

“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.

According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.

The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.

The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.

The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.

That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.

That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.

Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.

Continue Reading

Europe

Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation

Published

on

The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.

Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.

The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.

The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.

However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.

Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.

Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.

Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.

In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.

The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.

Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey