Connect with us

Diplomacy

India eyes shift from Russian to Venezuelan oil as US takes control of Caracas supplies

Published

on

Venezuelan oil is poised to replace Russian supplies in the Indian market as the South Asian nation’s refiners pivot toward a shifting energy landscape.

Indian refiners, which historically sourced significant quantities of raw material from Venezuela, are currently evaluating the new geopolitical reality following the US removal of Nicolas Maduro and Washington’s subsequent announcement that it has taken control of the Latin American country’s oil exports.

Reliance Industries enters talks with Washington

Reliance Industries, India’s largest private corporation, is in discussions with the Washington administration to secure permission to purchase Venezuelan oil, according to two sources familiar with the matter who spoke to Reuters.

The company previously imported between 300,000 and 400,000 barrels per day (bpd) from Venezuela during the middle of the last decade, but halted these operations when US sanctions were implemented.

In 2025, under a limited license granted by the US Treasury Department, Reliance managed to import an average of 63,000 bpd between January and April.

The company’s processing complex at Jamnagar—the largest of its kind in the world—possesses an infrastructure perfectly suited to refining heavy, high-sulfur Venezuelan crude. According to data from Jefferies, this grade of oil typically trades at a discount of $5 to $8 per barrel compared to Brent crude.

“Refiners love dirty oil”

“This is a perfect opportunity for Reliance; their refinery units love these dirtier grades of oil—they always have,” a source familiar with the position of Indian oil companies told the Financial Times.

Michael Kugelman, Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center (formerly with the Atlantic Council), noted that India stands to gain significantly from this transition.

“Private Indian energy giants could generate substantial revenue by processing large volumes of Venezuelan heavy crude. India can also achieve its goal of diversifying its imports, particularly at a time when it is reducing Russian oil intake,” Kugelman evaluated.

Reliance, formerly the largest Indian buyer of Russian raw materials, announced it would cease purchases from Russia after Washington imposed sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft in late October.

In a statement last week, the company indicated it would consider resuming Venezuelan oil purchases if Washington permits sales to buyers outside the US.

US to release 50 million barrels of oil to the market

US President Donald Trump has announced that the US will take up to 50 million barrels of oil from Venezuela and sell it at market prices.

Trump stated that he would personally manage the resulting revenue to ensure it benefits the people of both nations. Meanwhile, Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced that the US would continue to sell oil produced in Venezuela for an “indefinite period.”

One source told Reuters that Reliance is prepared to purchase Venezuelan oil from US companies or other authorized entities, provided it is offered at attractive prices.

Caution from New Delhi

Following the operation by US forces at the presidential palace in Caracas, which resulted in the removal of Maduro, the government in New Delhi issued a brief statement expressing “deep concern” regarding the recent events in Venezuela.

In late August, Trump had increased import tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50% in a bid to pressure the country to halt its Russian oil purchases.

Premasish Das, Executive Director of Oil Markets for Eurasia, Africa, and the Middle East at S&P Global, told the Financial Times: “Indian refining companies are very familiar with Venezuelan crude and will be ready to resume purchases as soon as the right conditions are established.”

Diplomacy

OECD warns prolonged Iran energy shock could trigger global recession and spike inflation

Published

on

A prolonged disruption in energy supplies resulting from conflict in Iran would deal a severe blow to the global economy, according to a new economic outlook report published on Wednesday.

The research data indicated that such disruptions are highly likely to push countries into recession and lead to an increase in unemployment.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) described the effects of the war in question as the “dominant force shaping the global economic outlook.”

The report noted that if disruptions become persistent, global growth could slow down significantly, falling from 2.1% in 2026 to 1.8% in 2027. This deceleration could depress the world economy to levels not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession.

“With upward pressures from high commodity prices partially offset by weakening final demand, global inflation would rise by 0.4 percentage points in 2026 and by 1.3 percentage points in 2027,” OECD Chief Economist Stefano Scarpetta stated in the report.

Developing economies with limited energy reserves, alongside Asian economies heavily dependent on crude oil, fuel, and natural gas, were identified as being among the hardest hit by this situation.

Focusing on an alternative short-term scenario, researchers reported that if energy production and shipments through the Strait of Hormuz return to pre-conflict levels, growth could rebound to 3.1% in 2027.

The researchers stated that the vulnerability of the global economy to a “single choke point” underscores the necessity of strengthening supply chains and creating a more diversified energy supply. They emphasized that increasing investment to escape dependence on fossil fuel imports is now more urgent than ever.

The report also pointed out that rising defense spending this year is unlikely to expand productive capacity unless it generates spillover effects in non-defense sectors through innovation.

Scarpetta noted that policymakers face difficult decisions, stating, “Central banks could look through supply-driven price increases as long as inflation expectations remain well-anchored and second-round effects are kept under control. However, a policy move may become necessary if price pressures broaden or if growth weakens significantly.”

Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has kept oil prices high since the US and Israel launched initial strikes against Iran in late February.

Although average fuel prices in the US have declined due to the influence of recent talks aimed at reaching an agreement to end the conflict, they remained high at $4.26, according to data released by AAA on Wednesday.

Following an average of $3.14 last year, the average last week also remained elevated, standing at the $4.50 level.

Public opinion polls conducted since the beginning of the conflict have revealed that a majority of Americans do not support the war due to the prolonged impacts on the cost of living.

The latest poll, published by Politico on Friday, showed that more than 60% of respondents believe President Trump has not done enough to protect Americans from the economic impacts of the war.

Fifty-three percent of those surveyed expressed that the cost of living is at the worst level they can remember, while a majority stated that their financial situation has deteriorated since Trump returned to office.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Five Eyes intelligence alliance warns of Chinese spy recruitment on LinkedIn and job sites

Published

on

The “Five Eyes” international intelligence alliance has warned that Chinese operatives are actively trying to recruit government and military personnel and compromise their loyalty in an effort to gain a tactical advantage over the US and its allies.

In a rare joint statement, the intelligence agencies of the US, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand asserted that China is increasingly utilizing professional networking sites and employment platforms, such as LinkedIn and Indeed, to secure access to classified information.

The joint communique noted that the Five Eyes agencies have uncovered multiple cases where individuals handed over sensitive information, subsequently leading to criminal prosecutions.

According to the agencies, Chinese intelligence officers and their accomplices pose as consultants, human resources specialists, or think-tank personnel to post online job advertisements for positions such as foreign policy and defense analysts.

The joint statement declared that the Chinese operatives “ultimately aim to acquire privileged military, political, and economic intelligence that could give China a strategic and tactical advantage over the Five Eyes.”

Western intelligence units have assessed that those targeted include military personnel, among whom are individuals holding top-secret security clearances and others stationed in the Indo-Pacific region.

The targeting efforts by the Chinese state also extend to academics, journalists, and freelance writers, according to the communique.

The Five Eyes agencies have documented a five-stage blueprint used in these recruitment operations, which often involves commissioning reports based on sensitive information related to China, defense, and the Indo-Pacific.

The warning noted that China is prepared to pay between several hundred and several thousand dollars per report.

“Certain types of data could put the lives of frontline military or other personnel at risk, undermine our economic prosperity, and enable interference in our democratic processes,” the statement said, adding that even unclassified information can be valuable to the Chinese state when aggregated with other data already in the possession of its intelligence services.

The bulletin also cautioned that individuals who leak information face criminal prosecution under espionage laws.

The alert follows a previous warning issued last year by the UK’s domestic security service, MI5, which stated that Chinese agents were using LinkedIn to target British lawmakers.

In a statement, UK Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the UK “will continue to tackle hostile activity by a range of states, including China.”

The joint alert also alleged that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has been deploying fake remote IT workers to gain access to major corporations.

This North Korean methodology, partially uncovered by Google’s Threat Analysis Group, is driven by a “dual motivation” of fulfilling state objectives and securing personal financial gain, making these actors particularly dangerous, the bulletin noted.

Despite the new warning, Jarvis indicated that the UK would maintain its diplomatic relations with Beijing.

“We are clear that engaging with China is in our national interest, not least because it allows us to directly challenge behaviors we will not tolerate—such as this activity uncovered by MI5 and our partners—while cooperating in areas of clear benefit to the UK,” Jarvis said.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey