Connect with us

Middle East

Iranian people should eliminate the enemy

Published

on

Iran has been engulfed in deadly protests these days after Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman, died in police custody on September 16. Amini was arrested by Iran’s morality police for allegedly wearing her headscarf too loosely. Hijab is compulsory in Iran, and police patrolling around the city to control. Iranian authorities claim that Amini died of heart failure, but her family and protestors accused Iranian police for her murder.

One day after Amini’s death, Iranian people, men, women and elderly took to the streets to protest her death. It was a nationwide protest, and peaceful at the outset. However, gradually it turned violent with the protestors somehow deliberately attacking police, their vehicle, burning public properties, etc…

The world community called on Iran to stop repressing the protestors; however, Iran accused the US of using the unrest to try to destabilize the country.

New sanctions

US, and Canada already imposed sanctions on different group involved in Amini’s murder. Canada blamed Iran for disregarding human rights time and time again and violently crackdown against protestors unacceptable. The US had imposed sanctions on Iran’s morality police and called the unit responsible for the death of Amini.

However, Iran accused the US of supporting rioters but claimed that the US will fail as usual to weaken Iran’s stability. The last time Iran took the US responsible for deadly demonstrations was in 2019 in which reportedly 1,500 people were killed.

Germany also summoned Iranian ambassador in Berlin to urge stop using force against protestors with more threat of sanctions. Meanwhile, Iran summoned UK and Norwegian ambassadors over what it called interference and hostile media coverage of the ongoing protests.

Foreign powers try to benefit from unrest 

One can easily agree now that foreign powers provoke the unrest in Iran  with two purposes; first, to paint that the present regime of clerics in Iran is autocratic; second, to create unprecedented unrest to topple the regime.

It is absolutely understandable that the US will spare no efforts to clinch any opportunity against Iran and this has political agenda and goals and has nothing to do with civic purposes. But of course, the victims are mainly civilians.

A police motorcycle burns during a protest over the death of Mahsa Amini, a woman who died after being arrested by morality police in Tehran. September 19.

Iran has already arrested several foreigners, including staff members of certain embassies who allegedly not only participated in the demonstrations, but also supported and funded the protestors. It’s not too hard to understand why the US, or a specific enemy of a country, supports a group or groups of rebels to use it against a country when its rulers do not allow certain attire or certain conduct.

These groups not only funded or created, but also gave excessive coverage in different media channels with the aim to create a storm in a teacup. Enemy is the enemy!

Iranian people should eliminate the enemies from protests and  deal with the country’s political disagreement through peaceful means and demonstrations. Of course the death of Amini is unjustifiable, those responsible must be held accountable, but destroying the country hurts themselves most.

Middle East

Qatar fund pledges $500 billion for US investments

Published

on

Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), plans to invest an additional $500 billion in the US over the next decade.

Mohammed Al Sowaidi, the Chairman of QIA, helped establish the institution’s presence in the US and explore opportunities there for many years.

Now, as the head of the $524 billion state-backed entity, he is pledging to invest an amount close to the fund’s current size as part of the Gulf country’s significant commitment.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Al Sowaidi stated that the new investments will target areas traditionally favored by the fund, such as artificial intelligence, data centers, and healthcare, while also aligning with President Donald Trump’s agenda of reindustrializing the US.

The $500 billion constitutes nearly half of Qatar’s total commitment of $1.2 trillion made during Trump’s visit this week.

“We are not divesting from other markets; we are increasing our presence in the US,” Al Sowaidi said, adding that the current US policy environment offers a “more promising direction” for long-term capital.

QIA is not the only institution in the Middle East pursuing an aggressive, US-focused investment strategy. Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, state institutions in the United Arab Emirates, and the Kuwait Investment Authority are also planning to invest billions of dollars in similar sectors. This could lead to increased competition for the same deals and a higher risk of overpaying for assets.

Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds control $4 trillion in assets. The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority ranks first, followed by the Kuwait and Saudi Arabian investment authorities. QIA is ranked fourth in this list.

Al Sowaidi took over as CEO last year during a significant period for the fund, a time when billions of dollars are expected to flow into the treasury with the expansion of the country’s natural gas projects.

Anticipating new capital inflows, Al Sowaidi plans for the fund to provide capital to large companies, acquire stakes in publicly traded companies, and prioritize larger deals.

This marks a departure from QIA’s recent focus on smaller venture capital deals. Nevertheless, Al Sowaidi said this move is not a “real strategic change or transformation,” but rather an “further evolution” of the fund’s approach to keep pace with rapid global change.

QIA is already the world’s eighth-largest sovereign wealth fund and owns a number of high-profile assets, such as the Harrods department store and the Shard skyscraper in London.

Al Sowaidi joined QIA in 2010 under the leadership of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, who is considered one of the Middle East’s most recognized investors.

Sheikh Hamad was succeeded at QIA by Ahmed Al-Sayed, who helped facilitate many large deals, including Glencore’s acquisition of Xstrata for $29 billion.

Al Sowaidi, on the other hand, spent his early career in America, where he helped establish the US office and eventually became the head of investments for the region.

Holding bachelor’s degrees in finance and statistics from the University of Missouri, Al Sowaidi held positions such as head of private equity funds and head of the QIA Advisory office in New York.

At that time, QIA was known for acquiring stakes in prominent companies like Barclays and Credit Suisse.

Al Sowaidi said the fund typically acquires minority stakes in successful businesses, and transaction size varies greatly depending on the asset class.

“In publicly traded stocks, we can make large investments. In the private equity space, we can do multi-billion dollar transactions, but we can also maintain our agility, especially in sectors like technology or healthcare,” the executive said.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Israel, Syria officials discuss normalization in secret Azerbaijan talks

Published

on

Israeli and Syrian officials discussed the possibility of joining the Abraham Accords, including normalization and a border agreement, during secret talks in Azerbaijan. Türkiye was also involved in the discussions.

It has emerged that Israel has been conducting secret talks with the new Syrian administration led by HTS. According to reports from Channel 12 television, relayed by The Times of Israel, recent contacts involved discussions on Syria’s potential accession to the Abraham Accords and the prospect of normalizing diplomatic relations with Israel. It was reported that the talks were facilitated by the United Arab Emirates (UAE), while the newspaper Haaretz wrote that Qatar was also involved in the process and that discussions had been ongoing for months.

Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Shara, confirmed last week that security-related discussions were continuing through mediators but did not comment on possible diplomatic relations.

Channel 12 reported that a meeting was recently held in Azerbaijan, during which the head of the Israeli Army Operations Directorate, Major General Oded Basyuk, met with representatives from the new Syrian administration. According to the report, Turkish officials were also present at the meeting.

Last week, US President Donald Trump invited Syria’s new leader, Ahmed al-Shara, to join the Abraham Accords. Trump reiterated this invitation during his meeting with Shara in Riyadh. Following the meeting, he stated, “I suggested to him that he join the agreement, and he said yes.” However, Trump indicated that they were at the beginning of the process, saying, “There is still much to be done.”

According to Channel 12, Israel greeted Trump’s lifting of sanctions against Syria with cautious optimism. This is because Israel is not disregarding the possibility that this situation could affect the shaping of its northern border and future relations between the two countries.

This situation differs from Israel’s previous stance. According to the report, Israel had previously been hesitant about the idea of interacting with the Shara administration, which it had labeled “terrorist” and which has a history with groups linked to Al-Qaeda. However, the view is now gaining traction that Syria could move out from under Iran’s influence and potentially come under the influence of the US. It is assessed that these developments could also have a positive impact on Israel-Türkiye relations.

According to a Reuters report from February, Israel advocates for Syria to remain decentralized and isolated from the outside world. In this context, Israel continues its diplomatic pressure on the US, particularly with the promise of protecting the Druze community living in the north.

Israel’s military operations in Syria also continue after the overthrow of the Assad regime. Israel continues to bomb former regime military targets across the country and has also deployed ground troops to the Syrian side of the Golan Heights and some points south of Damascus.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Questions surround US-Saudi Arabia mega defense deal

Published

on

The US describes the $142 billion defense agreement signed with Saudi Arabia as “the largest defense sales deal in history.”

The agreement, announced during US President Donald Trump’s visit to the Middle East this week, appears to be an ambitious and comprehensive deal involving purchases related to air force and space, missile defense, coastal security, and various other improvements.

On the other hand, when the announced sum and previously declared budget figures are considered together, the dimensions of the agreement raise doubts.

Bloomberg points out that, like the broader $600 billion economic agreement, the defense deal also lacks any details.

The report indicates that those skeptical of the administration’s activities immediately raised questions about the figures.

For example, according to estimates by Bruce Riedel, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution, Saudi Arabia’s total defense budget for this year was only $78 billion.

Riedel, a former senior US intelligence and national security official, says, “This is great advertising; it makes this trip look like a magnificent success. But the numbers are inconsistent.”

The White House, the Pentagon, and the Saudi Arabian Embassy did not respond to questions about the details of the agreement, such as which systems the kingdom will purchase, the terms of the potential contract, and delivery dates. The US State Department, in turn, referred questions to the White House.

Bloomberg states, “Of course, both Democratic and Republican administrations have a long history of turning previous agreements into headline-grabbing comprehensive deals for presidents to sign during their trips,” and notes that Trump had done this before, during his first presidential trip to Saudi Arabia in 2017, when he announced that the Saudis would spend $110 billion on US weapons to modernize their military.

This package included deals negotiated under the Obama administration, as well as other agreements that were in the early stages of a long process requiring Congressional approval and negotiations between the buyer and defense companies.

According to a fact sheet released by the State Department in January, the 2017 agreement has so far resulted in over $30 billion in military sales to Saudi Arabia.

Another potential obstacle is Saudi Arabia’s ability to afford large-scale defense purchases due to falling oil prices and significant domestic obligations.

The country has had to take on more debt, with its debts increasing by approximately $30 billion in the first quarter, reaching a record level.

If an agreement is finally reached between the White House and Saudi Arabia, experts will begin to sort out new and old elements. According to State Department data, active US military sales to Saudi Arabia already exceed $129 billion.

According to Bloomberg, while the figures may be unclear, they may not actually be very important. According to experts, the agreement also emphasizes the depth of the US-Saudi Arabia partnership.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey