Connect with us

Middle East

Palestinian groups reject Trump’s Gaza plan as international reactions diverge

Published

on

While Arab and Islamic countries praise Trump’s Gaza plan, officials in Gaza argue that Washington is trying to establish a “trusteeship administration” that would legitimize the Israeli occupation and deny Palestinians their fundamental rights.

Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza condemned the “peace plan” announced by US President Donald Trump alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing it as “vague” and stating that the text serves to prolong the genocide in Gaza.

“We will not accept any proposal that does not include our people’s right to self-determination and protection from massacres,” said Hamas leader Mahmoud Mardawi, describing Trump’s announcement as an “attempt to stifle the momentum and recognition the Palestinian state has gained in the international arena.”

According to Al Jazeera, Qatari and Egyptian mediators delivered the joint US-Israeli text to Hamas’s negotiating team during the night.

Ziyad al-Nakhalah, Secretary-General of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, also used harsh words for the proposal: “This is a US-Israeli agreement that fully reflects Israel’s position. It is a formula for the continuation of the assault on the Palestinian people. Israel wants to impose through the US what it could not achieve through war. Therefore, we see this announcement as a recipe for setting the region on fire.”

Ismail al-Thawabteh, Director of the Gaza Government Media Office, rejected Trump’s 20-point plan, stating that it does not offer a permanent solution; on the contrary, he said it aims to establish a trusteeship regime that would legitimize the Israeli occupation and disregard the rights of Palestinians.

“The only way to stop the genocide is for Israel to cease its attacks, lift the siege, end the systematic destruction, and guarantee the right of Palestinians to live freely and establish an independent state. Any proposal that envisions Gaza as a demilitarized security zone, devoid of sovereignty and under international administration, is unequivocally rejected by the Palestinian national conscience,” he stated.

Voices from the ground: “Unrealistic, risk of manipulation”

Ibrahim Judeh, located in the so-called humanitarian zone of al-Mawasi in southern Gaza, told AFP, “It’s clear the plan is unrealistic. The US and Israel have written a text with conditions they know Hamas will never accept. This means the continuation of war and suffering.”

Abu Mazen Nassar expressed similar concerns, saying the US-Israeli proposal could be a “trick” to force Palestinian resistance groups to release hostages without offering a guarantee of peace in return: “This is outright manipulation. What does it mean to hand over all detainees when there are no official guarantees for ending the war?”

“As a people, we will reject this mockery. Whatever Hamas decides now, it is already too late.”

Support from Arab and Muslim leaders

In contrast, the foreign ministries of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Qatar, and Egypt issued a joint statement praising Trump’s “sincere efforts” to end the genocide in Gaza.

The text stated, “The ministers affirm their readiness to work positively and constructively with the United States and the parties to ensure the finalization and implementation of the agreement, emphasizing that this should be done in a way that ensures peace, security, and stability for the peoples of the region.”

EU: The best opportunity

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen indicated a positive view of the plan presented by US President Donald Trump for a ceasefire in Gaza and stated that the EU is ready to contribute: “The conflict must end with the urgent delivery of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza and the immediate release of all hostages. The two-state solution remains the only viable path to a Middle East where the Israeli and Palestinian peoples live side-by-side in peace and security, free from violence and terror.”

EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas argued that the plan offers the “best opportunity” to end the war.

Ramallah is cautiously pleased

The Palestinian Authority made a positive reference to the plan, reiterating its commitment to working with the US and its partners to reach a “comprehensive agreement that will pave the way for a just peace based on the two-state solution.”

A written statement from the Palestinian Presidency emphasized that Palestine believes the US President will find a path to peace. It expressed the will to work and engage constructively with the US, regional countries, and other partners to end the conflict in Gaza.

It was noted that any agreement concerning Gaza must include provisions for “preventing the annexation of land and the displacement of Palestinians, halting unilateral steps that violate international law, the complete withdrawal of Israel from Gaza, and the unification of territories and institutions in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, with the Gaza Strip under one roof.”

Furthermore, the statement stressed the need to end the occupation and pave the way for a just peace based on the two-state solution, which envisions an independent Palestinian State living side-by-side with Israel in peace, security, and good neighborly relations.

Middle East

US submits draft IAEA resolution demanding immediate Iranian cooperation on enriched uranium

Published

on

The United States has approached the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to determine the fate of Iran’s highly enriched uranium.

According to a report by Reuters, which cited diplomatic sources and obtained a draft resolution prepared by the US and presented to member states, Tehran is being called upon to provide the agency with precise and clear information regarding its nuclear material accounting and monitored nuclear facilities.

The text drafted by the US demands that the Tehran administration grant all necessary access permissions required to verify this information. The draft resolution emphasizes that Iran’s cooperation is a vital and urgent necessity, stating that the process must be executed without any delay.

The current draft does not yet include a referral to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which would typically be expected following an IAEA resolution declaring that Iran has violated its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). That violation decision was issued on June 12, 2025, one day before a 12-day war waged by the US and Israel against Iran last year. Diplomats speaking to Reuters indicated that the option of referring the matter to the UNSC remains under evaluation.

The Al Mayadeen television channel also reported, based on a copy of the draft resolution it obtained, that Washington is lobbying member states of the IAEA Board of Governors intensively to support its position.

These diplomatic moves coincide with a call from IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi for renewed engagement with Tehran. In his statement, Grossi said, “I call on Iran to work constructively with the agency to facilitate the full and effective implementation of safeguards in Iran. Re-engaging is of utmost importance.”

Reuters had previously reported in early June that the US was preparing a draft resolution to censure Iran at the upcoming IAEA meeting.

The Tehran administration continues to accuse the IAEA of systematically leaking sensitive and confidential information to Israel. At the end of the 12-day war last year, the US targeted Iran’s critical nuclear facilities and claimed to have destroyed Tehran’s entire nuclear program. However, intelligence assessments at the time revealed that Washington’s claims did not reflect reality.

Since those attacks, the IAEA has been requesting access to the struck nuclear facilities for inspection purposes. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi characterized the agency’s request last year as malicious.

In early April, Washington announced it had launched a rescue operation for a pilot downed in Iranian airspace. However, during the operation, US forces encountered stiff resistance from Iranian soldiers and, according to reports in the press, lost numerous aerial assets.

Following these developments, the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement suggesting that the military move conducted by the US under the guise of a pilot rescue operation may have been part of a deceptive and covert mission with the actual objective of stealing enriched uranium.

Continue Reading

Middle East

IAEA reports no major change in Iran nuclear assessment despite three months of conflict

Published

on

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported no major changes in its assessments of Iran’s nuclear program since clashes between the US, Israel, and Iran began approximately three months ago, according to a report sent to United Nations (UN) member states on Thursday.

The confidential report, reviewed by the Reuters news agency ahead of next week’s meeting of the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors, revealed very few differences compared to previous reports prepared before the conflict began.

In the report, the agency reiterated its call for Iranian officials to provide updated information on the status of their enriched uranium stockpiles.

According to Reuters, the report stated: “The Director General has stressed that the effective implementation of Iran’s Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) Safeguards Agreement is mandatory and urgent, and that this implementation cannot be suspended by Iran under any circumstances.”

Since Israel and the US bombed the nuclear installations for the first time last June, the UN nuclear watchdog has been unable to return to these sites, and Iran has not shared updated data regarding the status of its stockpiles.

“The issue of the Agency losing continuity of knowledge regarding all previously declared nuclear material at the affected facilities in Iran needs to be addressed with extreme urgency,” the confidential report warned, referring to the sites affected by the US and Israeli bombardments.

Iran’s nuclear program became one of the primary triggers of the conflict, with the Trump administration asserting that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat.”

The issue also represents one of the greatest impasses in the recent round of negotiations aimed at ending the conflict.

Nevertheless, both sides have reached a tentative agreement to extend the delicate ceasefire in the three-month conflict for an additional 60 days, reopen the Strait of Hormuz to transit, and establish a framework mechanism for comprehensive talks on the future of Iran’s nuclear program and stockpiles.

However, this emerging memorandum of understanding still awaits approval from President Donald Trump and Iranian leaders.

According to a report by The Associated Press, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio painted an optimistic picture of the talks between the US and Iran during his testimony on Tuesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Appropriations Subcommittee.

“Just a month ago, they agreed to negotiate certain aspects of their nuclear program that a year ago they refused to even mention,” Rubio told senators, later adding that instability within the Iranian leadership has complicated the talks.

Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance noted last Thursday that negotiators continue to exchange proposals on certain terms of the agreement, including Iran’s nuclear capacity.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Qatar and UAE LNG tankers go dark in Strait of Hormuz to evade security risks

Published

on

Qatar and United Arab Emirates liquefied natural gas (LNG) tankers are turning off their transponders in the Strait of Hormuz, shifting their logistical strategies in response to ongoing military conflict in the Middle East and the closure of the strategic waterway.

According to a Bloomberg report citing industry sources and vessel-tracking data, as time and patience run thin for both nations, tankers have begun operating under radio silence to conceal their movements and secure their LNG shipments.

The report noted that neither Qatar nor Abu Dhabi, the federal emirate of the UAE, is subject to international sanctions. Despite this, state-owned QatarEnergy and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. (ADNOC) are employing these “going dark” tactics to minimize security risks for their vessels and crews transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

Vessel-tracking data revealed that in May, at least four Qatari LNG vessels and four tankers linked to Abu Dhabi-based ADNOC transited the Strait of Hormuz without transmitting tracking signals. Sources speaking to Bloomberg stated that Qatari authorities requested captains of state-owned and chartered tankers to turn off their Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponders when navigating around the Ras Laffan port—the world’s largest LNG export terminal—as well as when transiting or exiting the Persian Gulf.

The implemented security measures extend beyond turning off transponders. Sources reported that vessels have been instructed to transit the gulf in pairs to enhance security, and tanker captains who refused to comply with the “shadow” navigation protocols have been replaced.

Industry sources speaking to Bloomberg warned that the increase in covert transits undermines the fundamental rules of international maritime trade and transforms these shipping routes into high-risk areas.

They emphasized that until recently, every cargo in the LNG sector could be tracked in real time, but these newly adopted tactics have eliminated that transparency.

Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at energy consultancy MST Marquee, commented on the situation, saying: “It is entirely natural for Persian Gulf LNG producers to try to avoid Iranian attacks and consequently adopt shadow fleet methods. This could persist as long as Iran continues to control and threaten transits through the Strait of Hormuz. This practice may continue for a long time even after a peace agreement is signed.”

Following the start of US and Israeli attacks on Iran, the Tehran government closed the Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for approximately 20% of global oil shipments and 30% of global liquefied natural gas.

After negotiations in Islamabad failed, US President Donald Trump announced on April 13 that he would impose a blockade on Iranian ports. In late May, he announced that the blockade was lifted as part of the planned peace treaty process with Tehran.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey