Connect with us

America

Peter Thiel funds Objection.ai startup to launch AI-driven parallel judiciary

Published

on

Peter Thiel, the billionaire founder of Palantir, is funding a new startup that seeks to bypass the traditional legal system by establishing an AI-powered “parallel judiciary.”

According to a report by Coda, the venture is titled Objection.ai. It was co-founded by Aron D’Souza, who worked closely with Thiel during the Gawker lawsuit more than a decade ago.

In 2012, Hulk Hogan sued the media outlet Gawker for invasion of privacy after it published a sex tape involving him. Gawker argued that the video was a matter of public interest, but a Florida jury ruled that its publication lacked news value and constituted a violation of privacy.

Thiel secretly provided financial support for Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker, which had outed Thiel as gay in 2007. In March 2016, a jury awarded Hogan $115 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages, a total later increased to $140 million. The judgment ultimately forced Gawker into bankruptcy.

Objection.ai promises a “fast and cost-effective way to object to statements in the media.” The company states that “anyone can file an objection.” According to the company’s description, these objections will trigger investigations conducted by a team recruited from the CIA, FBI, and British intelligence agencies.

Targeted media organizations and reporters will be given an opportunity to respond. The resulting information is then fed into an AI model, which delivers a verdict. Both the complainant and the targeted party are asked to agree to a binding arbitration process, though the potential consequences of these rulings have not been specified.

While specific financial details remain unclear, the company stated the process would cost approximately $2,000. This figure is significantly lower than the typical legal fees for a crisis communications specialist.

The company’s inaugural list of cases includes:

  • Objections directed at the New York Times regarding its reporting on David Sacks—a close associate of Thiel, former PayPal COO, and Donald Trump’s former “AI and Crypto Czar.” The report examined how Sacks utilized his White House position to benefit his Silicon Valley connections.
  • Objections against the Wall Street Journal regarding disclosures concerning Donald Trump’s contribution to Jeffrey Epstein’s birthday book (a case recently dismissed by a federal judge).
  • Objections against British reporter Hannah Broughton regarding a compilation report published in the British tabloid the Mirror, which alleged that Amazon employees were told to continue working while a colleague lay dead on a warehouse floor.

The list is rounded out by several social media provocateurs, such as Candace Owens, and politicians including Bernie Sanders. According to Coda, the overarching impact is clear: “Thiel’s animosity has been about journalism from the beginning.”

The philosophy of “The Network State”

The Objection.ai team has been explicit regarding its objectives. D’Souza writes on the company’s website: “Gawker was not an isolated case. It was the first major media company to face reality in the age of clicks, outrage, and algorithmic amplification. Since then, the same structural failure has spread everywhere.” He adds, “Peter Thiel and I… didn’t just fight Gawker. We showed that facts still matter, if someone is willing to enforce them.”

The original lawsuit involving the Hulk Hogan sex tape published by Gawker initially concerned copyright infringement; however, the final $140 million judgment that bankrupted the company was based on charges of invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Joining Thiel in providing funding is investor Balaji Srinivasan, author of the book The Network State. The book posits that the nation-state will be replaced by social networks possessing a “sense of national consciousness.”

In a past email to far-right theorist Curtis Yarvin regarding how to handle critical reporting, Srinivasan outlined an early version of the Objection.ai model: “If things heat up, it might be interesting to sic Dark Enlightenment followers on a single vulnerable, hostile reporter, exposing and upsetting them by sending hostile news to their advertisers/friends/connections.”

According to Coda, those behind the project are well aware of the limits of the Gawker ruling’s impact. While the decision forced the company into bankruptcy—a personal victory for Thiel—that was perhaps the least significant outcome of the case.

On a systemic level, the ruling “struck fear into the hearts” of media insurers and newsroom legal counsel, shifting attention toward third-party litigation funding as a potential threat. If individuals with unlimited resources can file lawsuits against news organizations they dislike, constitutional protections may stand little chance against the immense cost and complexity of a defense. The founders have now developed an AI-driven method to amplify these effects.

America

US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land

Published

on

Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.

For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.

Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:

“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”

The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.

Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.

Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.

Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.

Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.

Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.

Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market

The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.

Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.

The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.

Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.

Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.

Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.

William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.

Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.

Continue Reading

America

US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies

Published

on

An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.

Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.

Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.

Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.

Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.

When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.

The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.

Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.

Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war

In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.

Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.

Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.

American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.

Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.

Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.

Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise

The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.

Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.

Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.

Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.

Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.

Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.

Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.

Continue Reading

America

Anthropic posts $80.7bn loss ahead of IPO as computing costs soar

Published

on

Anthropic, developer of the artificial intelligence model Claude, reported a net loss of $80.7 billion for the first six months of 2026 ending 30 June.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal citing the company’s draft initial public offering prospectus, this recorded loss nearly doubled the $42 billion loss incurred across the entirety of 2025.

The vast majority of that enormous figure, accounting for $72 billion, stemmed from accounting-driven book-value write-downs.

In contrast, the company saw a sharp surge in revenue, with turnover in the first half of the year climbing to $16.3 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period of the prior year.

During this period, Anthropic spent approximately $9 billion on computing power and infrastructure needs, surpassing in just six months the $7.3 billion spent across the whole of 2025.

The company has commitments to pay roughly $450 billion over the next seven to 10 years under cloud service contracts.

Under these obligations, contracts are planned for $111 billion with Google Cloud, $110 billion with Amazon Web Services, and $31 billion with Microsoft.

Anthropic will also spend up to $86 billion by 2033 and 2034, respectively, to lease Nvidia chips through smaller AI-focused cloud providers Nscale and Lambda.

The company could spend an additional $750 billion in the coming years to expand its computing capacity.

Roughly a third of the draft IPO prospectus was dedicated directly to risk factors.

The document highlighted the possibility that models could cause tangible real-world harm, noting that artificial intelligence could exhibit a “self-preservation” tendency and produce responses resembling “blackmail”.

Anthropic warned that the scale of damage caused by an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could render insuring against such risks impossible.

According to market expectations, Anthropic’s IPO could rank among the largest transactions in history, potentially surpassing SpaceX’s record.

Following the market debut, the company’s market valuation is projected to reach up to $2 trillion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey