Connect with us

Asia

Russia-China trade volume hits $240 billion as Putin hails historic ties

Published

on

The surge in commercial and economic relations between Russia and China was underscored at the China-Russia Bilateral Trade and Investment Fair in Harbin, an event coinciding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s state visit to Beijing.

Evaluations reported by the Financial Times emphasized that economic bonds between the two nations are strengthening daily. Following the launch of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine in 2022, bilateral trade volume recorded a rapid acceleration, reaching historic peaks.

The newspaper noted that Chinese companies have played a decisive role in this growth by occupying the market share vacated by Western suppliers following their withdrawal from the Russian market.

Jiang Ting, sales manager at the China-based Zhejiang Xibeihu Special Vehicles, which produces amphibious all-terrain vehicles, stated that Russia has been one of their primary export markets from the beginning. Jiang noted a significant increase in orders from Russia over the last two years, attributing this development to the rise in demand created by the conflict in Ukraine.

Jiang further explained that the company does not track the end-users of the vehicles, noting that the equipment can be utilized for transporting personnel and cargo across wetlands, marshes, and mountainous terrain.

Xia Er, a representative of the import firm Jiaowu Beidahuang Agricultural Holdings, reported that the trade war between the US and China has led to a reduction in Chinese corn imports from the US, despite rising demand. During the same period, relations between Russia and China improved, with Russian corn seeing heavy demand in the Chinese market. Xia shared data indicating that her company’s corn imports from Russia have surged from 2,000 tons per month to 90,000 tons over the last five years.

Wang Haoyue, a representative for Huashen International, a manufacturer of medical supplies and cosmetic devices, announced that the company has submitted applications for export licenses targeting Russia.

At the fair, a Chinese vendor who requested anonymity disclosed that they supply furniture belonging to a well-known Danish brand directly from factories in China to sell to Russia via the internet. The seller noted that the withdrawal of Western brands from the Russian market has created new opportunities for them, adding that the Denmark-based manufacturer is unaware of the situation.

Wang Changchun of Heilongjiang Luge New Materials, a seller of prefabricated ready-made homes, reported increased demand from clients in Moscow and Vladivostok due to Western sanctions and the increasing difficulty for Russian citizens to travel to Western countries.

Numerous traders attending the fair reported that the Chinese yuan and Russian ruble are being used increasingly in commercial transactions in place of the US dollar. It was noted that Chinese companies have established dedicated subsidiaries to decouple their Russian commercial activities from their parent companies, aiming to protect themselves from sanctions risks.

Entrepreneurs further stated that local financial institutions, particularly small regional Chinese banks, continue to facilitate these transactions.

In Harbin, the capital of the border province of Heilongjiang, commercial relations with Russia have a deep historical background. The city’s foundations date back to Russian workers employed in railway construction during the 19th century, and it continues to carry Russian traces in its architecture, cuisine, and social life. This trade fair is held alternately in Harbin and the Russian city of Yekaterinburg.

At this year’s fair, Chinese companies showcased construction equipment, building materials, electronic products, and logistics services to Russian buyers. According to information on the official website of the Russian National Center, Russia’s participation and offerings were primarily focused on cultural elements.

On May 20, the second day of his visit to China, Vladimir Putin stated that relations between Moscow and Beijing have reached their highest level in history. Putin emphasized that bilateral trade volume has grown more than 30-fold over a quarter-century, surpassing the $200 billion threshold for several consecutive years to reach approximately $240 billion by 2025.

As part of the state visit, 40 inter-agency and corporate agreements were signed, and a joint declaration regarding the development of bilateral relations was adopted.

Previous reports by Bloomberg, citing sources close to the Russian government, indicated that Moscow aimed to resolve hurdles regarding the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline project during this visit. However, the Financial Times reported that a final agreement on the project has not yet been reached. According to the newspaper, Russia’s largest energy companies, Rosneft and Gazprom, were not represented at the Harbin fair.

Asia

China leads $54bn capital injection into state banks and insurers

Published

on

China’s Ministry of Finance will lead a total capital injection of $54 billion into state-owned insurance companies and banks as part of a coordinated push to reinforce the capital structure across the country’s financial system, according to details disclosed by the institutions in statements on Sunday.

China Life Insurance (Group) Co, the country’s largest life insurer, will receive 35 billion yuan ($5.2 billion) in capital support, whilst China Taiping Insurance Group will receive 7 billion yuan.

In a separate announcement, People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China (PICC) said it plans to raise up to 15 billion yuan via a private placement of A-shares to the Ministry of Finance. The company stated that the proceeds will be used to replenish its capital.

The initiative could fortify the financial position of state insurers, which have been called upon to support the equity market with medium- and long-term funds. At the same time, it could position these institutions to help regulatory authorities manage smaller and higher-risk insurance companies.

Financial sector stability

China’s insurance industry has been contending with shrinking profitability caused by prolonged low interest rates. Solvency ratios across numerous small and medium-sized insurers have also deteriorated.

China Export and Credit Insurance Corp stated that the Ministry of Finance will inject 10 billion yuan to boost the company’s core capital. China Reinsurance (Group) announced that it will execute a capital increase of 3 billion yuan.

“The capital injection represents an important step for enhancing the financial sector’s capacity to serve the real economy and promoting high-quality development across the financial and insurance industries,” China Life said in a statement. The insurer added that the capital support will improve the group’s resilience to risks.

Taiping also noted that the funds provided will strengthen the company’s solvency and other core metrics.

Banks benefit from recapitalisation plan

Separately, three state banks announced on Sunday that they will receive capital support totalling 290 billion yuan.

The recapitalisation framework was first announced during the annual parliamentary meetings in March this year. The move broadens a funding mechanism deployed last year to strengthen the capital structures of several other major state-owned lenders.

Agricultural Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), two of the country’s largest state-owned lenders, announced plans to raise up to 160 billion yuan and 100 billion yuan, respectively, through private placements of A-shares to the Ministry of Finance, China National Tobacco Corp, and affiliated entities.

Both lenders confirmed that all net proceeds will be deployed to replenish their Core Tier 1 capital. The measure is expected to help sustain credit expansion at a juncture when Beijing is increasingly relying on state lenders to support economic growth.

Weak credit demand remains a persistent headwind for the world’s second-largest economy, while continuing to erode profitability across the banking sector.

Export-Import Bank of China, one of the country’s three policy banks, stated that the Ministry of Finance will inject 30 billion yuan of capital into the institution, thereby bolstering its capital base.

Continue Reading

Asia

BOJ faces critical rate decision as US presses for faster hikes

Published

on

The Bank of Japan faces a critical policy showdown as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declares that the era of massive stimulus is over.

When the US joined Japan’s efforts to support the yen, it did not do so unconditionally. This week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent laid out the terms clearly: accelerate interest rate hikes and abandon outmoded ideas regarding massive economic stimulus.

A month after the rare joint intervention carried out by the US and Japan to bolster the yen, Bessent told Reuters that recent currency movements were not disorderly, signalling little appetite for fresh market intervention.

Instead, he expressed hope that Bank of Japan (BOJ) Governor Kazuo Ueda would “do the right thing” in monetary policy to combat the weak yen.

With inflationary pressures mounting, the BOJ was already widely expected to raise interest rates in September. However, Bessent’s remarks effectively boxed the central bank in, while increasing pressure for a faster pace of rate hikes going forward.

“The joint intervention in July was Bessent’s message to Japan that it now needs to get its act together on inflation,” said Izuru Kato, chief economist at Totan Research and a veteran BOJ watcher.

“Japan faces a currency crisis that is becoming increasingly difficult to control without US assistance. For a country in such a position, raising rates even once every three months may be too slow,” Kato said.

The weak yen has pushed up import prices and headline inflation, raising household living costs and creating a headache for Japanese policymakers.

From Washington’s perspective, a BOJ that moves too slowly on rate hikes, combined with loose fiscal policy, could trigger a sell-off in the yen and Japanese government bonds. This could disrupt financial markets with spillover effects reaching US Treasury yields—an outcome Washington wants to avoid.

Markets are focused on potential remarks by BOJ Governor Ueda following his participation in a two-day meeting of G20 finance leaders in Asheville, North Carolina, which concludes on Tuesday. A US Treasury official told Japanese public broadcaster NHK that Bessent met Ueda on Sunday and conveyed that interest rate hikes were necessary.

Even without US pressure, recent hawkish communication from the BOJ indicates it is preparing for a near-term rate hike in response to broadening inflation pressures.

“Given all the pressure coming from producer prices, consumer inflation is likely to accelerate. If that happens, the BOJ must act,” said a source familiar with the central bank’s thinking.

However, a September rate hike is already factored into market pricing. Consequently, the BOJ may need to commit to faster rate increases to alleviate downward pressure on the yen.

“Japan’s real interest rates are clearly too low. One or two more rate hikes will not be enough to reverse the yen’s downward trend,” said Naoyuki Shinohara, Japan’s former top currency diplomat.

Oxford Economics announced that it now expects the BOJ to raise rates in September and December this year, followed by a third hike in April 2027—a faster tightening cycle than the firm initially projected.

“The economic and political cost of disappointing the markets and the US has become too great for the BOJ and the government to ignore,” Shigeto Nagai, head of Japan economics at Oxford Economics, said in a report published on Monday.

For dovish Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the starkest message may be Bessent’s declaration that the era of Abenomics is over. Introduced in 2013 to end prolonged deflation, Abenomics combined sweeping monetary easing, heavy government spending, and a structural growth strategy.

Speaking to Reuters on the country’s fiscal policy, Bessent said Japan had defeated deflation and should now “sit back and enjoy the success of Abenomics and let it run its course.” Some analysts interpreted these remarks as a critique of Takaichi’s expansionary fiscal approach.

“This is a message to the Takaichi administration to avoid excessively loose fiscal policy,” a Japanese government official said regarding Bessent’s comments.

A senior ruling party official said: “These remarks show that the US is stepping up its demands on Japan’s policies.”

Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

Takaichi, an advocate of Abenomics, has laid out an ambitious spending agenda aimed at boosting investment in growth areas and easing the impact of rising living costs on households.

Following Takaichi’s pledge to remove spending caps in key growth areas, Japanese media reported that ministries and public agencies likely submitted their highest-ever initial budget requests for the upcoming fiscal year.

The focus on large-scale spending has unnerved investors, driving Japanese government bond yields to 30-year highs, which could also generate knock-on effects for US Treasury yields.

“The best way to support the yen would be for the Takaichi administration to deliver a credible message committing to fiscal reform,” said Shinohara, who also served as deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) following his tenure at the Ministry of Finance.

“However, the likelihood of that happening is extremely low,” Shinohara added.

Continue Reading

Asia

India faces mounting hurdles to reach developed economy status by 2047

Published

on

The Indian economy expanded by more than 7% in the previous quarter, but according to an analysis by Bloomberg, this pace may prove insufficient to realise Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s target of transforming the country into a developed nation by 2047.

Modi aims for India to attain developed economy status by 2047, which marks the centenary of the country’s independence from Britain.

Ashok Lahiri, a representative of a state-backed think tank, argues that gross domestic product (GDP) must expand by approximately 9.25% annually over the next 21 years to achieve this objective.

The programme, titled “Viksit Bharat” or “Developed India”, has become one of the foremost priorities of Modi’s third term as prime minister.

However, some economists express doubt over whether India can reach this target at its current pace of expansion.

Historical growth rates lag behind targets

Economic growth averaged 6.3% between 2000 and 2024. This figure sits well below the country’s current potential rate of 7.5% to 8%.

The report noted that over the past 50 years, the Indian economy recorded growth of 9.25% or higher on only three occasions: in 1975, 1988, and 2021.

Should the Indian economy grow at a rate below 8% annually, it is assessed that the country could slip into what is known as the “middle-income trap”.

This concept describes an economic condition in which rising wages and costs erode the advantage of cheap labour, whilst worker productivity and skill levels have not yet risen enough to compete successfully with developed economies.

The report also noted that attaining high-income country status remains a distant prospect. As of 2025, per capita income in the country stands at $2,813.

For India to cross the high-income threshold by 2047, this figure must increase more than sixfold to reach approximately $18,000.

Targets missed across industry and investment

Economists state that the manufacturing industry must be expanded to accelerate India’s growth.

The Modi administration is also placing emphasis on this sector, yet its share of GDP has remained at roughly 16% to 17% for more than a decade. This proportion falls significantly short of the 25% target set by Modi.

Economists further emphasize that expanding high-tech exports, lifting private sector investment, and curbing reliance on energy imports could accelerate economic growth.

It is also noted that the country needs to draw more foreign investment into manufacturing. Despite record levels of foreign direct investment, India is reportedly struggling to retain this capital domestically.

Indian companies are progressively stepping up their investments abroad, whilst foreign investors are scaling back funding for local ventures.

A high domestic savings rate is likewise critical for India’s economic growth.

Savings allow the construction of factories and infrastructure to be financed without excessive reliance on costly borrowing and foreign capital. However, the capacity of Indian households to save remains constrained by relatively low income levels.

According to a 2021 report by NITI Aayog, approximately 87 million people in India aged between 15 and 29 are neither employed nor in education or vocational training.

Owing to a shortage of employment opportunities, roughly 60% of the working population is self-employed, with the bulk of this cohort engaged in the low-income agricultural sector.

Shumita Deveshwar, Chief Economist at GlobalDataTS Lombard, noted that without a rise in private sector investment and an acceleration in job creation, India will struggle to maintain GDP growth above 6%, let alone reach the pace of over 8% required to achieve developed economy status.

The country’s administration plans to undertake record borrowing of 17.2 trillion rupees (approximately $187 billion) during the fiscal year starting 1 April. This sum represents an 18% increase compared with the current year and surpasses Bloomberg’s previous forecast of 16.5 trillion rupees.

The government projects that the ratio of the fiscal deficit to GDP, which stands at 4.4% in the current period, will decline to 4.3% in the next fiscal year.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey