America
State Department outlines aggressive ‘Donroe Doctrine’ and ‘America First’ overhaul for 2026-2030
A strategic plan released by the US Department of State confirms the Trump administration’s intent to focus on the “Western Hemisphere” while signaling that its “national security” strategy will be anchored in “American exceptionalism.”
Detailing foreign policy strategy for the 2026–2030 period, the document emphasizes an “America First” approach to global diplomacy and national security.
The plan prioritizes national sovereignty through strict border enforcement and diminished deference to international organizations. Key regional objectives include establishing dominance in the “Western Hemisphere” via the “Donroe Doctrine” and deterring aggression in the Indo-Pacific.
Economic targets focus on the re-industrialization of the US, securing supply chains, and maintaining technological superiority over rivals such as China. Furthermore, the strategy aims to transform foreign assistance into a targeted tool of statecraft that prioritizes trade over traditional aid.
Ultimately, this framework seeks to restore American exceptionalism by aligning all diplomatic and commercial relations with the nation’s core national interests.
The “America First” policy outlined in the plan redefines US national sovereignty by rejecting global integration and advocating for strict border control and independence, transforming global engagement into a structure that is pragmatic, transactional, and responsive to concrete national interests.
This approach characterizes the prior consensus on multilateralism and globalization not merely as self-defeating, but as a path toward “civilizational and geopolitical suicide.” A similar perspective regarding Europe and migration was previously articulated in the US National Security Strategy (NSS).
National sovereignty receives particular emphasis in foreign affairs planning. The policy establishes that the US government’s primary duty is to ensure the nation’s survival as an “autonomous republic.” This definition of sovereignty is presented through three fundamental pillars:
Absolute Border Control: The plan argues that the era of mass migration has ended, viewing “uncontrolled migration” as an affront to sovereignty and a tool used by previous administrations to harm the nation. Sovereignty is redefined to include the active “reverse migration” of those with no right to remain, alongside rigorous vetting to ensure visitors do not hold attitudes hostile to American principles.
Rejection of global governance: The US declares it will no longer submit to “unelected international bureaucrats” or international organizations that act contrary to American interests. This includes the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which is viewed as a “soft global governance” program incompatible with US sovereignty.
Protection from foreign interference: According to the plan, sovereignty also requires protecting the natural rights of Americans from foreign censorship and influence operations, including efforts by international organizations attempting to restrict freedom of speech under the guise of combating “hate speech” or “disinformation.”
The US Department of State declares that henceforth, global engagement will shift away from the “arrogant paternalism” of attempting to reshape the world in the image of Western democracies, moving instead toward “pragmatic diplomacy” and “realism.” This new stance prioritizes “peace through strength” and a clear prioritization of resources.
In the “Western Hemisphere,” this policy constitutes the “Donroe Doctrine,” which advocates for the “absolute supremacy” of the US. Moving beyond the traditional Monroe Doctrine, this doctrine treats not only foreign military presence but also unchecked economic interference by powers outside the hemisphere, migration, and drug trafficking as hostile acts.
The US aims to empower “self-reliant allies” who contribute their “fair share” to collective security. For instance, the “Civilizational Alliance” with Europe demands that NATO allies spend 5% of their GDP on defense and assume primary responsibility for conventional European defense.
Foreign policy is acknowledged as being increasingly driven by commercial interests, with the aim of “re-industrializing” the US and ending reliance on foreign supply chains. The document explicitly links economic security with national sovereignty, declaring the use of tariffs to correct trade deficits and the employment of commercial diplomacy to prevent rivals like China from dominating critical industries.
The strategic plan outlines seven sectors as the focal point of US re-industrialization efforts:
Energy and Resources: Energy production and critical minerals.
Advanced Manufacturing and Hardware: Advanced manufacturing, robotics, machine tools, and shipbuilding.
High Tech and Computing: Semiconductors, computing, artificial intelligence (AI), data storage, and quantum science.
Healthcare: Pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Aerospace and Defense: Space and aviation, unmanned and autonomous systems, and material sciences.
Infrastructure: Critical and advanced infrastructure, telecommunications, and transportation logistics.
Future Science: Biotechnology.
In addition to this broad list, the document indicates that specific attention is paid to certain sub-sectors to ensure economic and technological dominance. For example, regarding energy dominance, special emphasis is placed on natural gas, nuclear technology, and nuclear fuel exports. This is viewed as a means to end Europe’s dependence on Russia and stimulate domestic economic growth.
The plan effectively eliminates USAID by transferring its functions to the Department of State to ensure aid serves as an “instrument of statecraft” rather than “philanthropy.” The new focus will be “trade, not aid,” prioritizing private sector collaboration and investment that advance specific US diplomatic and security objectives.
Starting in 2026, the Department of State aims to spend at least 40% of its total aid budget in the Western Hemisphere and East Asia regions. This target represents a significant reorganization of resources in line with strategic priorities, as the plan notes that in 2024, USAID spent only 10% to 15% of its aid budget in the Western Hemisphere and Asia-Pacific regions.
The document deems the previous policy “unacceptable” and argues that aid must be refocused on these priority areas to advance US economic, security, and diplomatic goals.
The strategic plan defines the US response to China’s rise as the “defining story of the 21st century.” Citing its economic weight and strategic sea lanes, the document characterizes the Indo-Pacific region as critical to US interests, outlining a strategy based on “peace through strength” to deter aggression and restore American economic independence.
The primary economic objective in the Indo-Pacific is to support US re-industrialization and break dependency on Chinese supply chains. The strategy explicitly rejects “dependencies created by China” and outlines various measures to counter Beijing’s economic influence. For example, it declares aggressive opposition to China’s “intellectual property theft” and “predatory state-directed economic strategies.”
The Middle East is mentioned briefly in the plan. US strategy in the Middle East focuses on strengthening self-reliant allies, deepening economic and technological integration, and countering hostile attacks.
The strategy document highlights the Abraham Accords as the primary model for regional engagement. It emphasizes creating “self-reliant allies” capable of addressing regional challenges independently by establishing economic and technological partnerships with the US.
Israel is defined as a key strategic and technological partner. The Department of State plans to lead efforts to export the “American artificial intelligence technology stack” specifically to “trusted partners like Israel.” This is seen as a way to secure a competitive advantage and deny adversaries access to cutting-edge technologies.
The strategy explicitly states that the US will not permit international organizations to be used as weapons to target “citizens of partner nations like Israel.”
The document notes that the US uses its power to facilitate peace in unresolved conflicts, citing the example of Israel and Gaza.
The strategy identifies Iran as a geopolitical rival alongside China and Russia. The US pledges to “rigorously protect” its political, security, and economic interests against Iranian violations by maintaining a posture of “peace through strength” to deter Iran’s “aggression.”
The plan also proposes “burden sharing” with Europe in the Middle East, setting an expectation for European allies to assume greater responsibility for global security. Specifically, it calls on European states to make a “net contribution to the security of Africa and the Middle East” while rebuilding their own conventional defense capacities.
America
US Senate panel seeks records in Trump-linked crypto investigation
Richard Blumenthal, the ranking Democrat on the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), has requested documents from cryptocurrency exchange Binance, Tether, and crypto projects linked to President Donald Trump as part of inquiries into potential financial irregularities and conflicts of interest.
The documents were requested to be submitted by 4 January 2027.
Senators warned that they would resort to compulsory measures if the request was refused.
Entities sent document requests include World Liberty Financial and Fight Fight Fight LLC, both linked to President Trump’s family.
Blumenthal began examining the activities of these entities in May 2025 following reports that they may have engaged in transactions with foreigners under federal criminal investigation, attracted investments from foreign governments, and violated public ethics rules.
Notably, in 2026, it emerged that individuals close to the Abu Dhabi royal family had signed an agreement with the Trump family to purchase 49% of the shares in World Liberty Financial for $500 million.
The company, founded in September 2024 by the US President and his sons, launched a token called WLFI.
According to official disclosures, Trump made $800 million from this token alone.
Conversely, crypto analytics firm Nansen calculated, by tracking 1.48 million crypto wallets, that approximately two-thirds of those who invested in the token after its launch in January 2025 incurred losses.
While many retail investors spent several thousand dollars on purchases, the largest investors poured in millions of dollars.
Trump also launched his own memecoin, TRUMP, on 17 January 2025, prior to his inauguration.
Rising 10.6-fold in value within three days, the cryptocurrency’s market capitalisation reached $15 billion at its peak.
However, after those three days, the price entered a downturn, plunging by 97%.
Trump reported in his financial disclosure that he earned $635 million in income from sales of these memecoins.
In July 2026, Blumenthal held public hearings on the family crypto projects from which the President made $1.4 billion.
The losses suffered by TRUMP memecoin investors were also addressed during these hearings.
Cryptocurrency exchange Binance and Tether, which issues the largest stablecoin, USDT, are under scrutiny over their dealings with the Trump administration.
Lawmakers suspected conflicts of interest stemming from the exchange’s collaboration with World Liberty Financial.
Previously, a group of senators had demanded an inquiry into the terms of the presidential pardon granted to Binance founder Changpeng Zhao.
Separately, The New York Times reported that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) gaining access to American artificial intelligence chips coincided with a $2 billion investment by a UAE entity into Binance using USD1, a stablecoin issued by World Liberty Financial.
While this deal rapidly expanded the volume of tokens in circulation, it enabled Trump’s company to generate revenue from interest on government bonds where USD1 reserves were held.
Trump, for his part, described the report as slander.
America
US credit card debt hits record $1.29 trillion, New York Fed reports
Americans’ credit card debt reached a record $1.29 trillion in the third quarter, according to a new report published by the New York Fed.
Falling behind on credit card payments can trap struggling households in a cycle of fees, credit score downgrades, and increasingly expensive borrowing.
Although delinquency rates across the country have shown improvement, the latest figures indicate that financial distress is concentrated in lower-income communities.
Consumer credit card balances rose by $22 billion in the third quarter, representing an increase of 1.7%. This figure is $52 billion higher than it was a year earlier.
The figures are not adjusted for inflation, which may mean that part of the increase reflects rising prices rather than more borrowing in real terms.
Total household debt, which includes mortgages, student loans, and auto loans, rose by $334 billion in the third quarter to reach a record $19.1 trillion.
This total represents an increase of $5 trillion compared to 2019, just before the pandemic.
The volume of credit card balances falling into serious delinquency is declining, indicating some improvement in Americans’ ability to make their payments on time.
The rate of credit card debt transitioning into serious delinquency fell to 6.9% in the third quarter. However, this rate remains distinctly higher than the 5.2% recorded prior to the pandemic.
Americans living in lower-income neighbourhoods are facing greater difficulty in keeping up with their credit card payments compared to more affluent groups, according to a separate report published by the New York Fed on Tuesday.
Delinquency rates across all neighbourhood income tiers remain above pre-pandemic levels, while the gap between the wealthiest and poorest areas has widened since 2022.
In the lowest-income neighbourhoods, 10.3% of credit card balances transitioned into serious delinquency over the past year.
This is more than double the 4.4% rate observed in the wealthiest neighbourhoods.
The average credit card balance per borrower now stands at $6,678, according to TransUnion’s third-quarter analysis report.
Among borrowers under the age of 30, the rate of credit card debt falling at least 90 days delinquent reached the highest level, according to the Fed’s report.
Democrats won the midterm elections promising to bring down prices, but delivering relief that voters can genuinely feel in their household budgets will be a difficult target to achieve.
America
Mamdani quietly asks Trump to release detained immigrants
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is using his rapport with US President Donald Trump to secure the release of selected detained immigrants.
According to reporting by Politico, Mamdani persuaded Trump during their second White House meeting in February to free a university student who had been detained that day by ICE.
The outcome served as validation for Mamdani, who pointed to the release of the Columbia University senior as proof that his surprisingly cordial relationship with Trump could produce tangible results for New Yorkers.
Mamdani subsequently continued to seek similar immigration-related interventions from the Republican president.
Since that February meeting, Mamdani and his aides have quietly forwarded the names of approximately two dozen immigrant New Yorkers held in ICE custody to Trump’s team, asking the president to order their release.
Two sources familiar with the matter said Mamdani most recently shared names of detained immigrants during a September meeting with Trump at Gracie Mansion.
The sources said the individuals in question had no serious criminal records, though they declined to disclose their identities, citing safety concerns.
According to Politico, these ongoing efforts regarding detained immigrants indicate Mamdani’s belief that he can leverage his rapport with Trump to advance causes the mercurial president might not ordinarily support.
Mamdani’s decision not to disclose these continued appeals publicly suggests an inclination to keep his interventions private to improve their chances of success.
Yet it remains unclear whether any immigrant besides Columbia University student Elmina Aghayeva has actually been released as a result of these efforts, and concern is mounting within City Hall that the window for securing such releases may be closing.
Mamdani’s aides working on the releases, including his Chief of Staff Elle Bisgaard-Church, communicated primarily with Trump’s White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, according to people familiar with the matter.
Last week, Trump replaced Wiles with Stephen Miller, the architect of the administration’s most hardline immigration proposals and one of the loudest internal voices urging the president to pursue a mass deportation agenda in his second term.
A person familiar with the Mamdani administration’s thinking said the mayor’s team views it as unlikely that Miller will continue cooperating in the manner Wiles did, given his stance on immigration.
Mamdani spokesperson Dora Pekec declined to comment on internal concerns regarding Miller and did not provide details about the immigrants whose release the mayor had requested.
Pekec noted, however, that Mamdani has “consistently advocated directly on behalf of New Yorkers in his calls and meetings with the president.”
Murad Awawdeh, a close Mamdani ally and president and CEO of the New York Immigration Coalition, said the mayor’s team should not halt engagement with the Trump administration on immigration matters because of Miller’s promotion:
“Stephen Miller is a cruel individual who has spent his career attacking immigrants, but he is not the president; Donald Trump is, and this is his deportation agenda. New York expects the president to work with the mayor to serve this city and end the terror in our communities. Miller’s promotion changes none of that.”
Mamdani’s warm dynamic with Trump has confounded both allies and critics.
During last year’s New York mayoral election, Trump referred to Mamdani as a “communist lunatic” and threatened to have him arrested.
In turn, the 35-year-old democratic socialist branded the president a “fascist” and pledged to fight him relentlessly if elected mayor.
Yet that animosity fell away late last year during their first White House meeting, where an amicable tone prevailed.
The thaw culminated in September at Gracie Mansion, where Trump said Mamdani had “great potential” to be a “terrific mayor.”
Mamdani returned the compliment by noting that the president had “built quite a bit of housing in our city.”
Despite the polite exchange, questions remain over how much substantive progress Mamdani can genuinely secure through Trump, including on immigration.
To date, Aghayeva’s release stands as one of the few concrete concessions Mamdani has obtained from Trump.
Aides on both sides are also discussing a multi-billion-dollar federally backed housing initiative in Queens, and last month Mamdani used his channel to Trump to help secure a temporary visa for a Ghanaian woman whose son was shot and killed in the Bronx.
Beyond those instances, few tangible results have emerged, though Trump’s decision not to enact punitive measures against New York is viewed by Mamdani’s allies as a win for the city.
Trump’s political standing is widely seen as weakened following the Republican Party’s loss of both houses of Congress in elections last Tuesday.
How this political shift will affect Trump’s willingness to engage with ideological adversaries such as Mamdani remains uncertain.
Miller’s appointment as chief of staff appears to signal little presidential interest in moderation, particularly on immigration policy.
Even so, the mayor said last week that he does not intend to stop seeking Trump’s assistance, despite “fierce” policy disagreements.
“We have found an area of common interest in the well-being of New York City, and as long as that can deliver for our city, I’m going to keep that door open,” Mamdani told Politico on Friday in Puerto Rico.
Mamdani and other elected officials from New York had gathered in Puerto Rico for the annual Somos political conference.
Two days later, in an interview on Fox News, a network Trump is known to watch regularly, Mamdani described a “productive relationship” with the president, saying the two text and speak by phone frequently:
“Through those conversations, we were able to get a New Yorker out of ICE detention. We were able to secure a visa for a grieving mother who would have otherwise had to watch her son’s funeral from thousands of miles away. What that tells me is: My job is to deliver for New Yorkers, and I have to work with whoever has the power to do that, wherever they may be.”
-
Diplomacy1 week agoSecular dress code dispute exposes deeper Türkiye-Azerbaijan strains
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russia weigh energy deals and corporate return in peace talks
-
Europe5 days agoEU urges citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits for crises
-
Middle East2 weeks agoUS warns Gulf allies of possible Iran strikes after midterms
-
America2 weeks agoBolsonaro reportedly leaves Brazil on jet linked to scandal-hit firm
-
Asia1 week agoChina expands Africa arms sales, displacing France and Western rivals
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSteinmeier seeks to de-escalate German-Chinese tensions on visit
-
Europe2 weeks agoEU prepares Ukraine peace mission to Abu Dhabi led by Björn Seibert
