Diplomacy
Starmer faces Cabinet rift over US-Iran military operations
Internal discord has fractured the British government regarding the US-led military operations against Iran and the authorization for American forces to utilize British military bases.
According to reports from The Telegraph, during a meeting held the Friday preceding the strikes, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves, and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed vehement opposition to the UK supporting what they characterized as an illegal, preemptive military campaign.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer initially supported his ministers, resisting pressure from Donald Trump to permit US bombers to launch strikes against Iran from Royal Air Force (RAF) bases in Gloucestershire and the Chagos Islands.
Less than 48 hours later, however, the Prime Minister pivoted. US B-2 stealth bombers are now scheduled to arrive in the coming days at Diego Garcia, a military installation on the Chagos Islands, to conduct what have been described as “limited, defensive” missions.
President Trump indicated that large-scale US strikes remain pending, contingent upon Iran’s continued aggression toward Western allies in the Gulf and the Middle East.
Furthermore, the US has reportedly destroyed an Iranian warship with a submarine near Sri Lanka. This action marks the first such naval engagement involving a submarine since the sinking of the General Belgrano by the UK during the Falklands War.
During the National Security Council meeting on Friday, Energy Secretary Miliband voiced fierce opposition to the imminent US airstrikes, focusing on the potential repercussions for the UK’s energy security.
The meeting followed more than two weeks of contentious deliberations with President Trump and his administration.
Miliband leads opposition to Iran war
These deliberations included a heated exchange between the UK’s Deputy National Security Adviser, Matt Collins, and Elbridge Colby, the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development.
Reportedly relying on the legal counsel of Attorney General Lord Hermer, Miliband articulated what was described as a “grumpy, pacifist, legalistic, and highly political” argument against both the airstrikes and British participation.
“He [Miliband] fundamentally dislikes Trump and dislikes this Iran business,” a source remarked to The Spectator.
Miliband’s position was supported by the Chancellor and the Foreign Secretary, who advocated for Starmer to maintain a firm stance against Washington’s pressure to join the conflict.
Conversely, Defence Secretary John Healey reportedly favored granting permission for the use of British bases to protect allies from Iranian retaliation.
The Prime Minister’s initial refusal to authorize the use of Diego Garcia drew sharp criticism from President Trump.
On Monday, Trump told The Telegraph that the Prime Minister had “greatly disappointed” him; by Tuesday, he had further remarked that Starmer was “no Winston Churchill” and was “ruining the relationship.”
According to Western officials, preparations are underway at Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for the arrival of US combat aircraft this week.
The Telegraph also reported that the Type 45 destroyer HMS Dragon, which Starmer stated on Tuesday would be deployed to defend the British base in Cyprus, will not arrive for another two weeks as it was not slated to depart Portsmouth until next week.
The vessel had been undergoing maintenance prior to the announcement of its deployment to the Eastern Mediterranean; however, the HMS Duncan remains available for immediate deployment.
Starmer: US Aircraft Operating from UK Bases
During parliamentary proceedings on Wednesday, Conservative MP Gareth Bacon questioned the Prime Minister: “The US is our most important international strategic partner. Does the Prime Minister believe that his hesitant and ambiguous response to the events in the Middle East this week has strengthened or weakened this relationship?”
Starmer defended his position, stating that the British military had been in contact with the US for several weeks and that British forces were actively engaged in operations to protect American lives.
In the House of Commons, Starmer justified his initial decision to withhold base access, asserting that there was no legal basis or “viable, well-thought-out plan” at the time.
Starmer stated:
“US aircraft are operating from UK bases. That is how the special relationship works. British jets are intercepting drones and missiles to protect American lives in the Middle East from our shared bases. That is how the special relationship works. We share intelligence daily to ensure the safety of our people. That is how the special relationship works. Obsessing over President Trump’s recent remarks is not the special relationship.”
Military assets deployed by the UK include radar systems, ground-based air defense, counter-drone capabilities, and combat aircraft.
“Since Saturday morning, a significant number of F-35s and Typhoons have been on patrol, not just in the Middle East but across the entirety of Cyprus. Further missions were conducted throughout the night. Typhoons have been specifically tasked with the defense of Qatar, while F-35s have supported other regional partners,” the Prime Minister added.
A spokesperson for the Prime Minister subsequently stated:
“The Prime Minister has been exceptionally clear that he will only take decisions that align with the UK’s national interest and ensure the safety of the British people.”
US withheld operational details from UK
According to The Guardian, the US did not share specific operational details or the precise timing of the joint US-Israeli strikes against Iran with the UK beforehand.
The US decision to exclude the UK from the official notification loop regarding the airstrikes coincided with Keir Starmer’s initial refusal to allow US access to British military bases.
Government sources indicated that while the UK usually aligns with the US on military matters, it is difficult to determine whether the lack of formal notification was unprecedented.
A source from Whitehall confirmed that the UK was aware an operation was imminent through the buildup of equipment and intelligence via “normal channels,” but was not informed of the exact timing or operational specifics.
The UK decided to evacuate its embassy in Tehran on Friday, signaling an awareness of the impending strikes, though details regarding the timing over the weekend remained undisclosed.
RAF Akrotiri houses 4,000 personnel and is home to F-35 and Eurofighter jets. Beyond RAF Akrotiri, the UK’s largest permanent overseas airbase, the country maintains three other permanent installations in the region.
These include a naval support facility in Bahrain, a joint logistical support base in Duqm, Oman, and the Donnelly Lines facility at Al-Minhad Air Base in the UAE.
British forces also possess access to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.
Additionally, Diego Garcia, located in the Indian Ocean, remains within striking range for long-range US bombers targeting Iran.
Regional allies frustrated: ‘You did not protect us’
Other British allies have expressed dissatisfaction with Starmer’s response to the conflict.
Kyriakos Kouros, the High Commissioner of the Republic of Cyprus to the UK, told The Times that Cyprus expected at least a robust defense from Britain, given that the UK maintains two sovereign base areas on the island.
“The French are coming; we expect the British to be there as well, because as I said, we are not just defending the Cypriots on the island,” Kouros said.
The Times further reported that Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have expressed concerns regarding the UK’s tepid reaction to the Middle East conflict.
The UK operates a naval support facility in Bahrain with approximately 300 personnel. This facility is located near the site where Iran launched a successful missile attack against the US Fifth Fleet headquarters.
Defence Secretary John Healey noted that the missile impacted less than 200 meters from British forces.
Gulf nations, including the UAE, have been reportedly incensed by the delay in granting permission to use joint bases, including Diego Garcia, to conduct “defensive” airstrikes against Iranian missile sites.
Public criticism reflects deep-seated frustration among Britain’s regional allies regarding the perceived slow response to Iranian retaliation.
A source familiar with the concerns of the UAE remarked: “There was a sense that the Prime Minister had to be dragged there. This clearly leaves a poor impression in the eyes of the Gulf Cooperation Council.”
Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters, equipped with Martlet missiles capable of neutralizing aerial threats, are scheduled to arrive in Cyprus in the coming days.
Kouros noted that while the deployment of the HMS Dragon was “welcomed,” the vessel’s arrival remains more than a week away.
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
