America
DOJ releases documents detailing sexual assault allegations against Trump
The US Department of Justice has released records containing sexual assault allegations against President Donald Trump, stemming from an interview with a woman who claims she was introduced to him by Jeffrey Epstein.
According to the summary of the FBI interview, the woman’s primary allegation is that Trump struck her after she bit his penis while he was attempting to force her to perform oral sex.
These three files were released amid an investigation by Democrats into whether the Department of Justice deliberately withheld materials concerning sexual assault allegations against Trump.
Trump has denied any wrongdoing regarding the Epstein allegations and has not been charged with any crimes in connection with them.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized the allegations as “completely baseless accusations from a deeply troubled woman with a history of extensive criminal activity, which are supported by zero credible evidence.”
“These accusations are entirely baseless, a fact further supported by the reality that Joe Biden’s Department of Justice was aware of them for four years and did nothing because they knew President Trump had done absolutely nothing wrong,” Leavitt said. “As we have stated countless times, President Trump has been completely exonerated by the release of the Epstein Files.”
In the files, which were prepared between August and October 2019, the woman—whose identity remains redacted—claims that between the ages of 13 and 15, Epstein took her to New York or New Jersey and introduced her to Trump in “a very high building, in massive rooms.”
The woman claimed that Trump remarked he did not like her being a “boy-girl.” The interview notes interpret this as a reference to a tomboy.
The woman stated that other people were present, though she could not recall their identities.
According to the interview notes, Trump asked the others to leave the room, then said something to the effect of, “Let me teach you how little girls should be.”
The woman recalled that Trump then unzipped his pants and forced her head “toward his penis.” She stated that she “bit it,” and in response, Trump pulled her hair and struck the side of her head.
The woman remembered Trump saying, “Get this little bitch out of here.” At that moment, she said, others returned to the room.
The FBI interview notes contain no information regarding how the incident concluded or how the woman managed to extricate herself from the situation.
In one of the interviews, the woman explained that she had begun working with attorneys and wanted to be transparent about a pending lawsuit “in case the agents decided there might be a conflict of interest.”
The woman stated that she or her relatives had received a series of threatening phone calls, one of which had been left on a colleague’s phone but was directed at her.
She told the FBI she believed these calls were related to Epstein, and, according to the interview notes, whispered, “If it’s not Epstein, then perhaps it is ‘the other one.’” When the agents asked who she meant, the notes indicate she said, “Trump.”
In the final interview, the agents asked again about her allegations regarding Trump, noting in the document that he was “the current US president.”
According to the interview summary, the woman asked, “What would be the point of providing this information when there is a strong possibility that nothing can be done about it at this point?”
Trump has faced numerous allegations of sexual assault and harassment in the past, including accusations from multiple women that surfaced during his 2016 presidential campaign.
The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating whether documents related to Epstein were improperly withheld from the public.
Ranking member of the committee, Democrat Robert Garcia, stated last week, “For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating how the FBI handled sexual assault allegations made by a survivor against President Donald Trump in 2019.”
In response to this statement, the Department of Justice posted on social media, stating that Oversight Democrats should “stop misleading the public by whipping up outrage from the radical anti-Trump base.” The statement added, “NOTHING was deleted.”
“If we temporarily removed files to redact victim identities or personal identifying information, those documents are immediately restored online and made public. ALL relevant documents have been produced, unless a document fell into one of the following categories: duplicates, classified, or part of an ongoing federal investigation.”
The documents emerged as the Trump administration continues to grapple with criticism regarding the processing of the files, roughly 3.5 million of which were released at the end of January.
In addition to accusations that it withheld certain records, the Department of Justice has faced criticism from lawmakers for allegedly exposing the identities of victims and redacting the names of certain men.
On Wednesday, a House committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify regarding the handling of the Epstein files.
America
Trump administration targets 60 nations with new tariff draft under Section 301
The US administration is proposing new tariffs of at least 10% on imports from 60 trading partners, following an investigation into goods allegedly produced using forced labor.
According to a Bloomberg report citing sources within the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), the specific tariff rates will vary based on individual countries’ legislative frameworks regarding forced labor and their capacity to enforce those laws.
Under the drafted regulations, a 10% tariff rate will apply to imports from the European Union, Mexico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, and several other nations. Conversely, goods arriving from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, and Brazil will be subject to a 12,5% tariff.
The USTR stated that the lower tariff rate will apply to products from nations that prohibit forced labor or have committed to doing so. The agency emphasized that states failing to establish such prohibitions or lacking the capacity to effectively enforce them will face the higher tariff rate.
Bloomberg reported that this step represents a continuation of President Donald Trump’s policy to reinstate across-the-board tariffs on all countries, which had previously been ruled unconstitutional.
The proposed tariffs are the result of investigations initiated under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Commenting on the development, Deborah Elms, Head of the Trade Policy Group at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said, “This is highly significant because Section 301 is an extremely powerful tool and is highly unlikely to be overturned. This opens the door to a range of new tariff and non-tariff measures.”
The report noted that the tariffs are being introduced at what could be a turning point for the global economy.
Financial markets are already navigating a sensitive period due to rising gas and oil prices driven by conflict in Iran.
The new tariffs will not take effect immediately. Before implementation, a review and evaluation period will be conducted, which may lead to modifications in the draft proposal.
According to the timeline reported by Bloomberg, written comments on the tariffs must be submitted by July 6. Additionally, the Section 301 Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing on July 7.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argued that forced labor practices in partner nations force American workers to compete on an unequal playing field. “We will no longer tolerate this unfairness,” Greer said.
On the other hand, the USTR proposed certain tariff exemptions that could affect apparel and textile imports. While these goods could enter the US at reduced tariff rates, quotas would be determined based on the respective countries’ existing textile exports to the US.
Beef, tomatoes, bananas, coffee, orange juice, and several other food products will be entirely exempt from the tariffs. Furthermore, double taxation will not be imposed on metals, specific fuel types, and chemicals that are already subject to other duties.
In May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the 10% tariff on foreign imports promoted by President Donald Trump was unlawful. Defending the White House’s objectives following the court ruling, Trump characterized the judges as “radical left-wing” and remarked, “Nothing surprises me. We always find different ways. We make a decision and act in another way.”
In February, the US Supreme Court also ruled that tariffs established by Trump were contrary to the law. The court concluded that the president had exceeded his authority in imposing those duties. Trump, however, claimed that the court was under foreign influence.
America
Google seeks approval to release 32 million mosquitoes in US disease-control project
Google is seeking federal approval to release nearly 32 million mosquitoes in California and Florida as part of a biological pest-control initiative known as the Debug project.
The little-known program aims to combat disease-carrying mosquitoes by releasing millions of sterile male mosquitoes into the environment, an approach designed to stop “bad bugs with good bugs.”
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mosquitoes are classified as the world’s deadliest animals. Of the more than 3,500 mosquito species that exist globally, only Aedes aegypti is responsible for transmitting dengue fever, Zika virus and chikungunya, diseases that sicken hundreds of millions of people each year.
In a statement published on the official website of the Debug project, Google described the issue as a difficult problem to solve, noting that many mosquito-borne diseases lack effective vaccines or treatments.
The statement argued that relying on pesticides is not a sustainable solution because such chemicals become less effective over time and can be toxic. It also said that eliminating standing water alone is insufficient because it is impossible to identify every breeding site used by mosquitoes.
For those reasons, Google said a new approach is required and that it found a solution in what it describes as “good” mosquitoes of the same species.
The project website explains the method as follows:
“Good bugs are the same mosquito species as the bad bugs that spread disease. Our good bugs are male mosquitoes carrying Wolbachia, a naturally occurring bacterium found in nature. This bacterium prevents them from producing offspring with wild female mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes do not bite and cannot spread disease, so the good bugs will stop the bad bugs from reproducing. Over time, fewer bad mosquitoes will remain.”
Scientists involved in the Debug project emphasized that the technique relies entirely on a naturally occurring bacterium, contains no chemicals or toxins, and does not involve genetic modification.
Researchers said similar approaches have been used safely for decades to control other pests. They added that the Debug team is combining scientific and engineering expertise with support from international partners in an effort to suppress disease-carrying mosquito populations.
Project scientists said their approach differs from previous eradication programs because it applies the Sterile Insect Technique on a larger scale through the use of data analytics, sensors and automation.
According to information published in the project’s frequently asked questions section, program officials are working closely with national and local governments, community leaders and research institutions.
Officials said they meet with residents in areas targeted for deployment before operations begin in order to better understand local concerns and priorities.
Google is therefore continuing to pursue federal authorization to implement the project in both California and Florida.
A notice published in the Federal Register shows that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing Google’s applications for an Experimental Use Permit under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
According to details contained in the filing, nearly 16 million mosquitoes would be released in Florida during the first year of the project.
A further 16 million mosquitoes would be released in California during the second year.
Members of the public can obtain additional information and submit comments through the federal rulemaking portal by visiting regulations.gov and entering docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-3951.
America
US Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
US Marine Corps personnel tested a new counter-drone defense system during military exercises held in the Philippines in April.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the system is designed to avoid the continuous use of expensive missiles and instead relies on a coordinated set of countermeasures.
The system consists of two armored vehicles known collectively as MADIS (Marine Air Defense Integrated System).
One vehicle is equipped with an advanced radar system, while the other carries the Stinger air defense missile system. Both vehicles are also fitted with a small cannon, a machine gun and electronic warfare equipment.
According to the report, MADIS is intended to provide military personnel with multiple options for engaging drones, including cannon fire, missiles and electronic warfare tools.
The objective is to reduce dependence on high-cost weapons when protecting military units and other strategic assets.
US Marine Corps officials told WSJ that one of the system’s most effective features is its ability to fire specially manufactured 30-millimeter ammunition equipped with precision fuzes that detonate as they approach a target.
Steven Sawyer, a former ammunition technician at the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, told the newspaper that 30-millimeter rounds are generally less accurate than missiles but are significantly cheaper to use.
Sawyer said that even if five such rounds were required to destroy a drone, the total cost would remain around $11,250.
By comparison, a single Stinger missile costs about $430,000, while Coyote interceptor missiles used in conflicts in the Middle East are priced between $100,000 and $125,000 each.
Sawyer added that 30-millimeter ammunition has proven effective against Shahed-family drones, which cannot be neutralized through electronic warfare methods.
At the same time, he stressed that US defense companies continue to face difficulties producing sufficient quantities of the ammunition. According to Sawyer, the precision fuzes are highly sophisticated electromechanical devices and only a limited number of manufacturers can produce them at scale.
WSJ noted that countering large numbers of inexpensive drones has become one of the most pressing challenges facing modern militaries.
The US military has encountered the problem directly during operations in the Middle East, where it has been forced to expend limited stocks of extremely costly precision-guided munitions.
Previously, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Chinese scientists had developed a combat algorithm known as HG-STR based on a “kill them all” concept.
The algorithm was said to enable swarms of fixed-wing drones to autonomously scan the battlefield and destroy enemy targets even if communications are disrupted and lines of sight are obstructed.
In April, The New York Times, citing three sources within defense and intelligence agencies, reported that the Pentagon assessed Russia’s and China’s drone development programs to be more advanced than those of the United States.
The assessment regarding China’s drone capabilities was reportedly based on analysis of a military parade held in China in September 2025.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
