Asia
South Korean leader Lee clashes with Israel as Hormuz tanker crisis threatens energy security
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung’s recent diplomatic confrontation with Israel is driven by factors beyond a standard defense of human rights, according to regional analysts. The shift in rhetoric appears increasingly tied to critical energy security concerns and a strategic signal directed at Donald Trump.
At least 26 South Korean tankers are currently believed to be stranded near the Strait of Hormuz. Analysts suggest this logistical crisis alone explains why President Lee engaged in a high-stakes diplomatic dispute with Israel last week.
The controversy erupted on Friday after Lee commented on video footage purportedly showing Israeli soldiers pushing a body off a rooftop.
“We need to verify whether this is true and, if so, what actions have been taken,” Lee wrote. He further stated that there is “no difference” between such wartime killings and the Holocaust or the “comfort women”—a reference to Korean women forced into sexual slavery by Japanese forces during World War II.
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded swiftly, accusing Lee of trivializing the genocide of the Jewish people on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day. Israeli officials further alleged that the South Korean leader was amplifying a “fake account” notorious for spreading anti-Israel disinformation.
Israel maintained that the video, which it claimed was “investigated and handled appropriately months ago,” depicted an adult militant killed during an operation in the West Bank rather than a child, as some reports had suggested.
Lee responded to the criticism hours later, stating: “The only thing that can be considered a slight consolation is that this involved a corpse rather than a living person.” He added, however, that “treating a corpse in such a manner remains a violation of international law.”
Tankers in limbo
South Korea, the world’s 10th largest economy, is heavily dependent on oil transported through the Strait of Hormuz. Prior to the current conflict, the strait served as a conduit for approximately 25% of all seaborne petroleum trade, making it the world’s most vital energy chokepoint.
Nam Sung-wook, a security analyst and former head of the South Korean Institute for National Security Strategy, told the South China Morning Post that approximately 26 South Korean tankers are currently stalled in the region. Nam, now a distinguished professor at Sookmyung Women’s University, noted that the potential closure of the strait during a US-Israeli conflict with Iran is becoming an increasingly urgent economic threat for Seoul.
Lee Jun-han, a professor of political science at Incheon National University, observed that South Korea “cannot be blamed for adding its voice to growing international calls for a ceasefire and an end to human rights violations.”
However, Jhee Byong-kuen, a professor of political science at Chosun University, offered a more strategic interpretation. “(Lee) was indirectly signaling to Washington that South Korea will not be dragged into a war it does not want,” Jhee said.
This comes as Trump increasingly voices frustration with allies he perceives as “free-riders” who do not sufficiently support Washington’s military efforts, specifically targeting South Korea alongside Japan and the European Union.
Seoul’s damage control
As the diplomatic row intensified over the weekend, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs not only questioned Lee’s motives for sharing the video but also pointed out his silence regarding “recent Iranian and Hezbollah terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens.”
Seoul’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs attempted to de-escalate the situation on Saturday, reframing Lee’s remarks as an expression of “universal human rights” rather than a specific stance on any individual conflict. The ministry reiterated that South Korea condemns terrorism and maintains deep empathy for the victims of the Holocaust.
President Lee issued his own final statement on Sunday via social media, writing: “The sovereignty of every nation and universal human rights must be respected, and aggressive war must be rejected.”
“Empathy applies not only to individuals but also to international relations… If you want to be respected in return, you must respect others,” he added.
Experts maintain that at the core of the dispute is the potential economic devastation an extended conflict could inflict on the South Korean economy.
Domestic political reaction
The incident has sparked significant debate within South Korea’s domestic political sphere.
The conservative People Power Party accused Lee of “showing off over a conflict thousands of kilometers away” while “ignoring human rights violations in North Korea.” The party characterized the tension with Israel as a “diplomatic disaster.”
In response, Lee’s ruling Democratic Party defended the statements. They pointed to South Korea’s recent co-sponsorship of a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution regarding North Korea as evidence that the president’s commitment to human rights principles remains consistent.
Asia
China launches patrols east of Taiwan after Japan and Philippines open maritime boundary talks
Beijing said it had conducted law enforcement patrols in waters east of Taiwan in response to a decision by Japan and the Philippines to launch talks on maritime boundary delimitation.
According to a statement from the China Coast Guard, a flotilla led by the vessel Daishan carried out law enforcement patrols “in accordance with the law” on Monday.
China Coast Guard spokesperson Jiang Lue said the operation was “a necessary action” in response to Japan and the Philippines “unilaterally announcing the start of negotiations on maritime delimitation in waters east of China’s Taiwan Island.”
“Such an announcement seriously infringes upon China’s territorial sovereignty and its maritime rights and interests,” Jiang said.
“We urge Japan and the Philippines to immediately cease all illegal actions that violate China’s sovereignty and rights,” he added.
Jiang also said the coast guard would continue strengthening its control and management of the relevant waters and that China would take concrete measures to “resolutely safeguard territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests.”
The United States and most of its allies, including Japan and the Philippines, do not recognize Taiwan as an independent state and acknowledge it as part of China. The United Nations has also adopted resolutions reflecting this position. However, Washington continues to provide arms to Taiwan as part of its broader efforts to counter China and encourages its allies to do the same.
Following a summit in Tokyo between Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the two countries said in a joint statement issued on Thursday that they had agreed to begin “formal negotiations” to delimit their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and continental shelves.
Beijing condemned the planned talks as “completely illegal and invalid” and swiftly lodged formal diplomatic protests with both Tokyo and Manila.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Friday: “The so-called delimitation negotiations are entirely illegal, invalid and void. They will have no impact whatsoever on China’s claims or on China’s exercise of its legitimate rights in the area east of Taiwan Island.”
The latest escalation comes at a time when relations between Beijing and both Tokyo and Manila are already strained. Japan and the Philippines are treaty allies of the United States, while China remains engaged in separate territorial disputes with Japan in the East China Sea and with the Philippines in the South China Sea.
As US attention and resources have increasingly shifted toward the war involving Iran, and as the White House has made the Western Hemisphere a strategic priority, Japan and the Philippines have stepped up diplomatic engagement in the region commonly referred to as the Indo-Pacific.
That effort has included building closer security and defence ties with other countries, prompting Beijing to accuse them of encouraging bloc confrontation in the region.
Japan and the Philippines do not share a maritime boundary. However, their seabed claims could overlap because both countries seek to extend their legal continental shelves beyond 200 nautical miles, equivalent to 370 kilometres or 230 miles.
The overlapping area lies east of Taiwan, southwest of Japan’s Ryukyu Islands and north of the Philippines’ Batanes Islands.
Yang Xiao, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China’s highest-ranking state-affiliated think tank, said Taiwan’s EEZ and continental shelf are part of the area under discussion.
“These are China’s rights and are not something that the two sides can negotiate among themselves,” Yang said.
In an interview published on Sunday by Yuyuan Tantian, a social media account affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, before the China Coast Guard announced the patrols, Yang said Beijing would take “historic and unprecedented” countermeasures against Tokyo and Manila.
“Since they are negotiating in a three-party overlapping zone, we can also take further steps to advance our jurisdiction in the waters east of Taiwan,” Yang said.
“If the other side insists on reckless and destructive actions, we will inevitably introduce new countermeasures.”
Yang described the waters east of Taiwan as a vital maritime area for the island’s economic activities.
“If these waters are divided between Japan and the Philippines, that would clearly harm the interests of the people living on Taiwan Island,” he added.
Asia
SoftBank overtakes Toyota to become Japan’s most valuable company
As artificial intelligence reshapes industrial structures in Japan and South Korea, stock market rankings are being redrawn. SoftBank Group has overtaken Toyota Motor to become Japan’s most valuable listed company.
SoftBank shares have surged as the global artificial intelligence rally gathers momentum, lifting the technology conglomerate’s market capitalisation above that of Toyota for the first time in more than two decades.
The shift reflects a broader reordering of Japan’s equity market. Automakers, alongside banks, steelmakers, energy companies and other traditional heavy industries, are losing ground to chipmakers and companies linked to artificial intelligence.
SoftBank shares jumped 14% on Monday, reaching a new record high. The company’s market value climbed to 48 trillion yen, or $301 billion, making it the most valuable company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
Toyota had long held the top position, with a market capitalisation of approximately 45 trillion yen. The last time SoftBank surpassed Toyota was in March 2000, at the peak of the dot-com bubble.
SoftBank’s rapid rise has been driven by strong earnings performance and its substantial investment in ChatGPT developer OpenAI.
The Japanese company reported net profit of 1.82 trillion yen, or $11.4 billion, for the first three months of 2026, 3.5 times higher than in the same period a year earlier. The group is also increasing its investment in OpenAI, completing a $10 billion investment in April and committing to invest an additional $20 billion later this year. Total investment is expected to reach roughly $65 billion.
According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI plans to file for an initial public offering and aims to list in the United States as early as September. Some media reports suggest the company could seek to raise $60 billion through the offering, potentially valuing it at more than $1 trillion. Such a transaction could become the largest initial public offering in history.
Investors expect the IPO to significantly boost SoftBank’s investment gains. Those expectations have helped drive the technology group’s share price higher. SoftBank shares have risen about 127% since early April.
The company is also planning to invest up to 14 trillion yen in the construction of data centres in France.
Asia
China and Serbia agree to expand cooperation in emerging sectors
Chinese President Xi Jinping met Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in Beijing, where the two leaders discussed bilateral ties and oversaw the signing of multiple cooperation agreements. Xi also awarded Vucic the Friendship Medal of the People’s Republic of China.
The meeting between Xi Jinping and Aleksandar Vucic began with an official welcoming ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
The two leaders then proceeded to formal talks. Xi said China and Serbia had achieved “positive results” since jointly launching the construction of a “China-Serbia community with a shared future in the new era” in 2024.
Xi said the partnership had not only benefited the two peoples but had also set an example for international relations.
The Chinese president described relations between China and Serbia as an “iron friendship” based on deep historical ties and mutual trust.
Calling on both sides to strengthen exchanges, deepen practical cooperation and continue supporting each other on issues concerning their core interests, Xi also said the two countries should align their development strategies and advance cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative. In this context, he pointed to transport, energy and infrastructure projects.
Xi also called for expanding cooperation in emerging sectors such as artificial intelligence, the digital economy, green energy and advanced manufacturing.
Aleksandar Vucic congratulated China on the start of implementation of its 15th Five-Year Plan. Vucic also expressed confidence in China’s future development under Xi Jinping’s leadership.
The Serbian president said Belgrade attached great importance to relations with China and firmly supported Beijing on issues concerning China’s core interests.
Vucic thanked Chinese companies for their contributions to Serbia’s economic development and infrastructure construction.
Saying the two countries had made notable progress since establishing their comprehensive strategic partnership, Vucic added that cooperation had expanded across numerous sectors.
The Serbian president also praised China’s role in international affairs, saying Beijing approached smaller countries on the basis of equality and respect and defended international law.
Following the talks, the two leaders witnessed the signing of more than 20 cooperation agreements covering politics, trade, science and technology, education, legal affairs and culture.
The two sides also issued joint statements on steadily advancing the construction of a China-Serbia community with a shared future in the new era and jointly supporting the implementation of four global initiatives.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
