Middle East
Iran strikes UAE oil port as Strait of Hormuz battle escalates
Fresh attacks erupted in the Gulf on Monday as the United States and Iran fought duelling naval blockades for control of the Strait of Hormuz, with an Emirati oil port set ablaze.
The new salvos of missiles and drones followed the launch of a fresh operation by US President Donald Trump to open the Strait of Hormuz, the vital energy trade chokepoint that has been effectively closed since the US and Israel began strikes on Iran in February.
Before Monday drew to a close, several merchant vessels in the Gulf reported explosions or fires; the US said it had destroyed six small Iranian military boats; and an oil port in the United Arab Emirates, which hosts a major US military base, was set on fire by Iranian missiles.
Trump offered few details of the new initiative, which he announced on social media and termed “Project Freedom,” aimed at helping stranded ships transit the strait. The announcement came two days after the expiry of the legal deadline for him to obtain congressional authorisation for the war under US law. Trump told Congress the war was “over,” rendering the deadline moot — a claim contested by some lawmakers.
It was the first explicit attempt to use military force to open the world’s most important energy shipping route since last month’s ceasefire announcement. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, for its part, had said that transit could only occur with its permission. Shipping insurance costs have also surged. For weeks, the US Navy has been blockading Iran’s maritime commerce; Iran says that is itself an act of war.
But Trump’s latest move appeared to backfire, failing to produce an uptick in merchant vessel traffic while triggering a promised show of force from Iran. Iran had threatened to respond to any escalation with new strikes on US-hosting neighbours. Major shipping companies have said they will likely await an agreed end to hostilities before attempting to traverse the strait.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Monday’s events demonstrated that there is no military solution to the crisis. Noting that peace talks under Pakistani mediation were progressing, he warned the US and the UAE against being “dragged into a quagmire by malign actors.”
“Project Freedom is Project Deadlock,” he wrote on social media.
Despite that, the US military said two US-flagged merchant ships had transited the strait, supported by Navy guided-missile destroyers, without specifying when. Iran denied any passage had occurred in recent hours, while Maersk said the US-flagged Alliance Fairfax had exited the Gulf via the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, accompanied by the US military.
The commander of US forces in the region claimed his fleet had destroyed six small Iranian boats; Iran denied this. Admiral Brad Cooper said he had “strongly advised” Iranian forces to stay clear of the US military elements conducting the mission.
Iranian officials released a map showing an expanded maritime zone they said was under their control. The zone extended beyond the strait to encompass long stretches of the UAE coastline.
South Korea reported that a merchant vessel, the HMM Namu, had suffered an explosion and fire in its engine room in the strait; no one on board was harmed, though a spokesperson said it was unclear whether the fire resulted from an attack or began internally.
The British maritime security agency UKMTO reported that two ships had been hit off the coast of the UAE, while Emirati oil company ADNOC said one of its empty crude tankers had been struck by Iranian drones.
Following drone and missile attacks reported inside the UAE throughout the day — including an assault that ignited a fire at Fujairah, a major oil port — the UAE said the Iranian strikes represented a serious escalation and that it reserved the right to respond. Fujairah lies outside the strait, making it one of the few export routes for Middle Eastern oil that does not require passage through the chokepoint.
The government also announced a shift to remote learning for school students for security reasons.
Iranian state television said military officials confirmed they had carried out the attack on the UAE in response to “US military adventurism.”
Earlier, Iran said it had opened fire on a US warship approaching the strait and forced it to turn back. An initial Iranian report stated that a US warship had been hit; the US denied this, and Iranian officials later described the fire as warning shots.
Reuters could not independently verify the full situation in the strait on Monday, with the warring parties issuing contradictory accounts.
Oil prices surged more than 5% in volatile trading on news of the intensifying Iranian attacks.
Iran’s joint command issued a notice to commercial vessels and oil tankers that they must coordinate with its armed forces.
“We warn that any foreign armed force, above all the aggressive US military, will come under attack if it seeks to approach and enter the Strait of Hormuz,” the statement said.
The US and Israel suspended their bombardment of Iran four weeks ago, and US and Iranian officials held one round of face-to-face peace talks. Attempts to arrange new meetings, however, have failed.
Iranian state media said on Sunday that the US had conveyed its response to a 14-point Iranian proposal via Pakistan and that Iran was evaluating it. Neither side provided details.
Iran’s proposal envisioned postponing talks on its nuclear energy and research programmes until an agreement is reached on ending the war and resolving the maritime standoff. Trump said at the weekend that he was still studying it but would likely reject it.
The latest US intelligence indicates that Iran’s nuclear programme has sustained limited damage since the war began, officials told Reuters. Iran says its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful and for civilian purposes. Iran’s nuclear facilities were bombed in US and Israeli strikes last year. Trump argues he wants to eliminate Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles to prevent Tehran from reaching the point where it could further process them into a nuclear weapon.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe6 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy6 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe2 weeks agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East2 weeks agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America2 weeks agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Europe6 days agoRome protests AfD poster depicting South Tyrol as independent state
