Europe
Italy’s proposed school reforms dropping Marx from curriculum spark backlash
Italy’s proposed changes to the national school curriculum, which would remove the teaching of Karl Marx while giving greater prominence to conservative Italian thought, have triggered fierce backlash.
The Italian education ministry’s proposals for the secondary-school philosophy curriculum, studied by more than half of Italian students, omit thinkers such as Marx, Fichte, Schelling and Spinoza.
At the same time, the list of figures set to be included in the curriculum features philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who served as education minister under Benito Mussolini and co-authored “The Doctrine of Fascism” with the dictator in 1932.
The proposals have prompted accusations that the far-right government led by Giorgia Meloni is attempting to reshape Italy’s “cultural hegemony”, or dominant ideological norms.
The concept itself was developed by Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, one of the thinkers removed from the curriculum.
“I think there is a political motivation behind this,” said Giorgio Cesarale, professor of political philosophy at Venice’s Ca’ Foscari University.
Cesarale is among 60 philosophers who signed an open letter objecting to the proposals, which has gathered more than 14,000 supporters online.
“The Meloni government has, for several years, been trying in various ways to impose what it calls its ‘new cultural hegemony’,” Cesarale said.
“They believe we need to replace the left-wing or Catholic-democratic hegemony with a conservative one, and they are pursuing this by occupying senior positions in cultural institutions and by introducing into philosophy teaching an approach directly opposed to the great rationalist, secular, atheist, materialist and Marxist thought of the modern world.”
The idea of cultural hegemony was developed by Gramsci in his Prison Notebooks, written while he was imprisoned by Mussolini’s fascist regime.
Culture Minister Alessandro Giuli, a former journalist and far-right activist, is the author of the book “Gramsci Lives”, which examines cultural hegemony from a right-wing perspective.
A module introduced into the curriculum guidelines in 2010 that included Gramsci has disappeared from the new version.
“Without Marx, you cannot understand anything, because a large part of philosophy since then has been a dialogue with Marx or about Marx,” said Francesco Toto, an associate professor at Roma Tre University.
“You cannot understand modernity, or the various struggles by workers or colonised peoples for freedom. Removing him means erasing an important part of history, but also erasing the hopes for freedom and equality that have shaped the last two centuries.”
The proposals also newly incorporate the influence of women in philosophy, but critics say the list of proposed thinkers is superficial and focused on religious mystics.
Defending the plans, Loredana Perla, head of the ministry commission responsible for drafting them, said the process formed part of a “democratic consultation” and that “every contribution will be taken into account”.
Italy’s constitution protects freedom of teaching, and teachers will retain the freedom to diverge from the proposals, since the guidelines are intended as advisory rather than “an attempt to impose a mandatory list”.
Critics argue, however, that textbook publishers will still follow the guidelines closely and that teachers may face pressure within schools to comply with them.
“The ministry guidelines are, of course, only guidelines,” said Stefano Visentin, an associate professor at the University of Urbino.
“Nevertheless, it is clear that teachers may not be able to resist them, especially if school administrations reinforce this pressure, and that this will create pressure on teachers.”
Philosophy is a compulsory core subject in Italy’s classical high schools. Slightly more than half of school students attend these institutions, while the remainder enrol in technical or vocational schools.
That system is considered part of Gentile’s legacy. Although an idealist philosopher, he served as minister during the fascist era and introduced the system through a 1923 reform designed to provide the children of the ruling classes with a grounding in classical works and philosophical thought.
“That is why changing the teaching of philosophy is such an important political step,” Cesarale said.
“It touches on a sensitive point. It redirects education as a whole in a different direction and shapes the young men and women who will become the future ruling class.”
The dispute is the latest controversy to erupt over the proposed revision of the national school curriculum.
The proposals place Italian, European and Western history back at the centre of the history curriculum, rather than broader study of world history and other civilisations. The plan describes this as a deliberate choice.
According to the proposals, the decision is based on “the enormous importance this history has had, and continues to have, in world affairs”.
“This history has provided the universally adopted forms of the modern state, the theoretical foundations of scientific inquiry and progress, the basis of human rights and freedoms, and even the very concept of history itself.”
Teachers and former university lecturers have also criticised the new philosophy curriculum for high schools. In the open letter, 60 professors and intellectuals, including Massimo Cacciari, Giuseppe Licata and Gaetano Lettieri, complained that authors such as Marx, Spinoza, Fichte and Schelling had been omitted.
The group described the removal of these thinkers as a “disaster” for students’ cultural and critical education, arguing that philosophy is essential to developing critical thinking and understanding complexity, and should therefore occupy an important and high-quality place in the curriculum.
According to the signatories, the list of authors included in the new curriculum is “far too indebted to the project of an imagined ‘cultural hegemony’ that a retreating government, with the legislative term nearing its end, is trying to leave behind as a poisoned gift for the world of schools, teachers and, above all, new generations”.
In her response, Perla first thanked the signatories for their views and said:
“At present, a democratic consultation process is under way involving all those concerned with formulating the National Guidelines in the best possible way, and every contribution will be taken into consideration.”
She added that extensive meetings had recently been held with all Italian associations concerned with philosophy.
“During these meetings, alongside appreciation for the formulation of the Guidelines, useful proposals for changes were put forward,” she said.
The draft remains open for public consultation online until May 31. The aim is to implement the reform from the 2027/28 academic year onward.
Europe
UK underwater deterrent facing scrutiny as all active Astute-class submarines remain in port
All five of the Royal Navy’s active Astute-class nuclear-powered attack submarines are reportedly held in port for repairs or maintenance, leaving the UK with no operational vessels of this class ready for deployment.
According to a report by The Telegraph, which cited naval sources, although a sixth submarine of the same class has officially joined the fleet, it is not yet ready for deployment.
The current situation means that the UK temporarily lacks any nuclear-powered attack submarines cleared for active operations. Ryan Ramsey, a former nuclear submarine commander, described the development as a serious warning signal. “We look vulnerable,” Ramsey said. “The Russians know we can’t get our submarines to sea. When you cannot provide a deterrent at sea, you lose credibility in the eyes of the Russians.”
Lord Alan West, the former First Sea Lord and former security minister, also described the state of the submarine fleet as unacceptable and deeply concerning.
The UK Ministry of Defence stated in response to the reports that it does not normally comment on the operational status of the submarine fleet. Emphasizing that British waters remain protected at all times through a range of measures, the ministry added that strengthening underwater capability continues to be a top priority.
Astute-class nuclear submarines are tasked with protecting the UK’s Vanguard-class strategic ballistic missile submarines, which carry the country’s nuclear deterrent, as well as the aircraft carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales during their deployments.
Separately, the UK’s Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, General Gwyn Jenkins, admitted in an interview with the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet in April that the Royal Navy was not sufficiently prepared for a potential war.
While noting that the navy possesses the resources to conduct combat operations and that personnel stand ready to carry out orders, Jenkins added: “But are we as ready as we should be? I think not.” He indicated that efforts to improve readiness levels remain ongoing.
Previously, The Sun newspaper reported that only two of the UK’s six Type 45 destroyers were operational. One of these active vessels, HMS Dragon, was deployed to the Mediterranean to protect British military bases in Cyprus.
The Telegraph also reported that due to a shortage of available ships, the government in London was forced to utilize a German vessel.
The state of the Royal Navy has been described in the British parliament as a “national embarrassment,” while US President Donald Trump has criticized the fleet, referring to it as a “toy navy,” according to reports by The Guardian.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that Russia has no intention of fighting a war with Europe, dismissing such claims as nonsense. Putin has maintained that Western governments are escalating the situation to portray Russia as an adversary.
Europe
Middle East energy shock threatens 1.3 million EU jobs as industrial giants warn of regulatory drag
Morten Wierod, the Chief Executive Officer of ABB, the Swiss-Swedish multinational industrial technology giant, has warned that Europe could face mass unemployment unless it urgently deregulates its economy in the face of an energy shock triggered by war in the Middle East.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Wierod stated that European policymakers are failing to show the necessary sense of urgency regarding reforms, noting that rising gas prices are undermining the European Union’s competitiveness against the United States.
“I hope we don’t have to see a much more severe crisis that leads to mass unemployment. Such a crisis should not be a mandatory prerequisite to gain that sense of urgency,” Wierod said.
ABB, a global leader in electrotechnical and industrial automation, employs approximately 110,000 people worldwide and generates $33.2 billion in revenue. The company operates critical infrastructure businesses, including electrical distribution, building management, robotic equipment for manufacturing facilities, and data center support. Its technologies are utilized in one out of every four data centers globally.
Wierod argued that the single market and the EU as a whole must completely eliminate, rather than merely simplify, excessive regulations to stimulate economic growth. He also criticized Brussels’ plans to reduce dependence on foreign technologies, warning that this approach will lead to unforeseen consequences and rising costs.
“When you build regulation around the ‘Made in Europe’ debate, we always see that there are side effects,” Wierod stated.
Nevertheless, Wierod acknowledged that Europe possesses strong assets, including a skilled workforce, access to high-quality education, and extensive experience in crisis management. He cited the region’s success in reducing its reliance on Russian gas from 35% to less than 10% within a single year as an example of this capability.
However, Wierod pointed out that rising gas prices—driven by supply disruptions in the Middle East caused by the war between the US and Iran—have increased competitive pressures on Europe. “I am not worried that there will be no gas in Europe. There will be gas, but it will be at a higher price,” Wierod said, adding that elevated prices will persist until 2027.
Following operations by the US and Israel, Iran announced the suspension of trade through the Strait of Hormuz. The strategic waterway carries 15% to 20% of global oil, condensate, and petroleum products, as well as more than 30% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies.
Roxana Minzatu, the European Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, also warned earlier this week that rising energy prices could lead to the loss of up to 1.3 million jobs across the EU.
According to European Commission estimates reported by Reuters, the automotive sector is expected to suffer the largest employment decline, with a projected loss of 600,000 jobs. The construction, metallurgy, chemical, and transport sectors could lose 56,000 jobs combined. Additionally, approximately 85,000 jobs in battery manufacturing projects and 58,000 jobs in solar panel manufacturing are reportedly at risk.
European Commission data shows that in 2023, 68% of medium-sized enterprises reported a shortage of qualified personnel, and in 2024, 77% of firms identified this shortage as an obstacle to investment.
According to information obtained by Politico, the Commission plans to include a distinct, dedicated block in its recommendations for the first time, emphasizing the necessity of investing in education, vocational training, adult learning, and staff reskilling.
Data from Eurostat indicates that the EU’s manufacturing sector employs approximately 30 million people. In 2023, the sector accounted for one-quarter of the EU economy’s €9.9 trillion net turnover.
In an analysis published in March, The Wall Street Journal reported that the energy crisis stemming from the war between the US and Iran could drag the European economy into a recession. The newspaper forecast that this development would come as a “bitter surprise” for Europe, noting that most of the announced support measures require large and immediate public expenditures.
Europe
German lawmakers block over €1 billion in defense contracts in procurement crackdown
Two German lawmakers have blocked or forced the renegotiation of defense procurement contracts valued at more than €1 billion, exerting strict parliamentary oversight over the military’s budget spending.
According to a report by the Financial Times, Andreas Mattfeldt of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Andreas Schwarz of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) serve on the Budget Committee of the Bundestag, Germany’s federal parliament.
The committee holds the authority to approve all military procurement projects valued at over €25 million.
In January, the two lawmakers vetoed a €600 million contract intended for Munich-based electronics group Rohde & Schwarz to supply a mobile intelligence system. The parliamentarians objected to the contract being awarded directly without a competitive bidding process.
One month later, they blocked a €462 million direct agreement with defense contractors Rheinmetall and MBDA. The contract was aimed at developing a laser system designed to protect naval vessels from drone attacks.
In February, the lawmakers also successfully lowered the maximum cost of three contracts intended for the procurement of kamikaze drones. Later in April, they halted the planned purchase of 900 diesel fuel tanker containers for the German armed forces, the Bundeswehr. The representatives intervened after discovering that the price of the tankers had doubled compared to a similar purchase made five years prior.
“We have brought about a paradigm shift because we are responsible for the immense amount of money entrusted to us by taxpayers,” Mattfeldt said in an interview with the Financial Times. “I want to be able to say that we have contributed to the Bundeswehr getting the best equipment at the best price.”
Schwarz, who, like his colleague, previously served as a municipal mayor, added: “We do not get involved in ideologies; we use our common sense.” While colleagues and aides jokingly refer to the pair as “the two Andys,” the two lawmakers have nicknamed themselves “the A-Team.”
Budget committee powers stem from past cost overruns
The extraordinary powers of the budget committee over defense procurement date back to 1981. At the time, parliament reacted to severe cost overruns in the Tornado fighter jet program by decreeing that all military projects exceeding 50 million deutsche marks must receive legislative approval.
Today, that threshold stands at €25 million, a limit that one official described as “completely outdated.”
A spokesperson for the German Ministry of Defense said: “Parliamentary control over major acquisitions is an important oversight tool in our democracy.”
-
Middle East2 weeks agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Middle East2 weeks agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
America2 weeks agoUS seeks new tungsten supplies after Iran war drains military stockpiles
-
America1 week agoUS Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia moves to privatize major oil port operator amid widening budget deficit
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina launches long-duration Tiangong mission ahead of planned Moon landing
-
Europe7 days agoUkraine reburies OUN leader Melnyk as Poland and Israel condemn honoring of wartime nationalist figures
