Connect with us

Diplomacy

G20 in the shadow of global crises

Published

on

Indonesia Island Bali is busy hosting the most strained edition of the G20, or Group 20 countries on 15 and 16 November. The annual summit will host for two days with including G20 members – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union. The G20 was created after the Asian financial crisis in 1999, and the members consider themselves something of a superpowers club that manages future crises.

Beside political issues such as US-China tensions and Russian-Ukraine war, there are plenty of other issues on the discussion block. Soaring inflation, the ever-looming threat of a global recession, nuclear threats and perhaps most alarming of all, a rapidly warming earth are key agenda of discussions.

Amid all this ambiguity, the host and Indonesian President Joko Widodo is trying to play chief dealmaker, however, the success of the summit is in limbo.

No peace without dialogue

Of course, the host leader, Widodo will try level best to make this summit a success. He already insisted on co-existence and peace, and believes that there would be no peace in the world sans dialogue.

In fact, Widodo seemed sanguine about what has been described as the most diplomatically delicate and stressful G20 ever, but the first face-to-face meeting between US President Joe Biden and China’s leader Xi Jinping at the sidelines of the summit, have reported positive. Both sides made their best efforts to refrain from “cold war” which shows the first success of the summit.

Mr. Widodo has good relations with both Washington and Beijing as they remained as top trade partners, but in recent years China has consistently ranked as one of its top foreign investors.

Mr. Widodo is hosting the G20 summit as he is in the final stretch of his presidency as he has to stand down after two terms in the presidential palace.

Will the G20 make progress on many crippling issues?

Undoubtedly, there are plenty of issues to deal with. The COVID-19 pandemic has wrecked the global economy as it affected the supply chains. It has also slowed down global trade where even many developing countries pushed into the verge of bankruptcy.

The second headache is war in Ukraine that has created a global energy crisis and runaway inflation, prompting central banks to drastically raise interest rates.

All this is adding up to what the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is predicting will be a bad 2023 for the global economy. The 2023 slowdown will be broad-based, with countries accounting for about one-third of the global economy poised to contract this year or next, according to the IMF. It is feared that the global economy continues to face steep challenges as the IMF said that the worst is yet to come and, for many people, 2023 will feel like a recession.

This time G20 summit comes aimed political wrangling

It would not be wise to think that all the issues will be resolved in the summit. This time the world leaders are much divided on several fronts, starting from the Russia-Ukraine war to US and Middle Eastern issues and from Turkey to EU substance and so on. In such a context, it would be a difficult task on how to address these problems. The best Mr. Widodo can do in this summit is to open a window for discussions between the leaders which itself is a big development and pave the ground for face-to-face talks.

Much of G20’s work happens behind the close doors

It’s unlikely all the issues will be resolved in Bali in just two days of meetings. It has several dimensions, and needs more practical steps once promised by the world leaders to overcome it. Though there is high hope at the summit, but, in fact much of the G20’s work happens quietly behind the scenes, with leaders and high-ranking officials meeting throughout the year under a rotating presidency to address global economic challenges.

Rising tensions and deepening economic crisis have highlighted the need that these leaders should share the outcome of the summit in order to provide some relief to the anxiety of the people who are scrambling with delicate economic conditions and worried over the trend of daily inflation.

However, this year’s summit would take place in the backdrop of food and fuel prices spiking worldwide, and the renewed threat of nuclear war. There will also be one conspicuous absence around the table, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia is represented at the summit by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey