Europe
German bill grants intelligence services sweeping operational powers
Protests are mounting against a draft law approved by the federal government to expand the powers of German intelligence agencies.
Through the new legislation, the government aims to grant German intelligence agencies sweeping new powers.
The bill seeks, among other things, to facilitate agency access to information technology systems, extend data retention periods, and automate data analysis.
Agencies will also be permitted to conduct “online searches” in the future.
According to German Foreign Policy, a major change is that, for the first time since the end of German fascism, intelligence agencies will once again possess the authority to implement “operational measures”.
Under the banner of “defence against hybrid attacks”, Berlin is further blurring the lines separating the police, intelligence agencies, and the military, while increasingly eliminating the distinction between external enemies and domestic critics.
The new intelligence law marks another step by the Federal Republic towards “strategic autonomy”.
A hefty “wish list” for intelligence services
With the draft law on the “reform of the Intelligence Service Act”, the federal government aims to systematically expand the powers of German intelligence services in almost every area.
In this context, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt explicitly thanked Defence Minister Boris Pistorius. Working in close cooperation, the two ministries succeeded in completely rewriting the Intelligence Services Act, doing so “quietly”.
According to the British newspaper The Guardian, the new law fulfills the “wish list of the intelligence services”.
Under these provisions, intelligence agencies will in the future be able to retain collected telecommunications data for longer periods (content data for up to six months and metadata for up to twelve months). This will enable them to analyse this data “retrospectively” as well.
The law also aims to streamline the analytical process, for instance by permitting AI-supported automated analyses and “removing administrative obstacles”.
The “use of tools for biometric comparison of image data, the application of artificial intelligence, and the further processing of data for research and development purposes”, as well as the transfer of data to “other state agencies and private entities”, will be facilitated.
According to the explanation, the overall objective is to “strengthen access to information technology systems” ranging from “smart refrigerators” to private mobile phones and CCTV cameras in public spaces.
BND granted operational powers
Under this legislation, the federal government is also granting the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) and the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution comprehensive powers that, in the words of Interior Minister Dobrindt, “go far beyond intelligence gathering”.
The objective is not merely for the agencies to “see and hear better” in the future, but above all to “take active measures against enemies”.
Alongside online searches, this includes permission to “tamper with” data in the future. The minister justifies this by stating, “This is our mission.”
This measure appears to represent a historical turning point. For the first time since the defeat of Nazism, German intelligence agencies are being granted permission to employ “operational powers”—namely, to take “active measures”. These powers had been reserved exclusively for the police since 1945.
The new powers explicitly encompass “tampering with instruments used in crimes […]”. They also permit “manipulating goods shipments by inserting defective components, targeted intrusion into IT systems in drone factories or chemical weapons laboratories for sabotage purposes, or shutting down or disabling servers belonging to state-sponsored cyberattack groups or disinformation actors”.
Furthermore, all of these actions may now be carried out “proactively”.
Opposition reactions
The proposed draft bill has drawn widespread criticism. For instance, Konstantin von Notz (Alliance 90/The Greens), former chairman of the Parliamentary Oversight Panel for the intelligence services, criticises the bill for failing to distinguish between police work and intelligence work.
Notz supports expanding the powers of the foreign intelligence service (BND), but considers granting the same powers to the domestic intelligence service (BfV) to be “questionable in terms of the rule of law”, as well as “poorly designed and dangerous”.
Under the new law, the domestic intelligence service will in the future be able to enter doctors’ and therapists’ practices undetected, for example.
Consequently, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) and the German Medical Association sharply criticised the measure on the grounds that it would “undermine medical confidentiality and violate the confidential doctor-patient relationship, which must be protected”.
The president of the Hesse State Medical Association regards the draft as “disrespectful to the medical profession”, stating that it damages the relationship of trust between doctor and patient.
Dobrindt rejected this criticism, stating, “I do not agree with this at all, because we always act appropriately.”
The German Journalists’ Association (DJV) emphasised in a statement that “very broad terms” are used in the draft bill. According to the DJV, this means that “even peaceful activities” could fall under intelligence agency surveillance.
Journalists will no longer be able to guarantee the protection of sources in the future. In addition, the “grading of intervention thresholds based on nationality and place of residence” is unconstitutional.
According to the association, contrary to what is envisaged in the bill, foreign journalists and German journalists working abroad must also be protected from the intelligence services.
Who will oversee the intelligence agencies?
Former Federal Data Protection Commissioner Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider had previously warned against centralising oversight authority over the BND within the Independent Oversight Body.
Ulrich Kelber, an honorary professor of data ethics and Specht-Riemenschneider’s predecessor, shares this criticism: intelligence agencies will themselves take the “final decision” regarding “what can be subjected to oversight”.
According to the data protection expert’s assessment, the Independent Oversight Body, which will serve as the sole oversight body in the future, will not be able to appeal against denied access.
The “state of consent” introduced in the bill grants the BND “extensive special powers” while further restricting oversight options.
Moreover, the agency will be able to do this without requiring the Bundestag to declare a state of tension or a state of defence, which had been necessary until now.
Kelber regards this as an “unconstitutional shift of power away from the elected parliament”.
The draft law, which the federal government supports partly by pointing to a purported improvement in oversight mechanisms, gives him the “impression that independent oversight of the intelligence services is being deliberately sabotaged”.
Intelligence treats incidents of unclear origin as “Russian attacks”
Dobrindt also justifies this domestic move by citing a threat emanating from Russia.
Dobrindt asserts that Germany is “the target of hybrid warfare every day”, stating that expanding the powers of the intelligence agencies is merely “a response to the current threat situation”.
During a hearing before the parliamentary oversight committee, Sinan Selen, Vice President of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, admitted that his agency also classifies incidents that cannot be clearly attributed to a specific source as Russian “hybrid attacks”.
This situation further blurs the distinction between external enemies and domestic opponents.
Consequently, under the new law, the domestic intelligence service will in the future be able to use not only real or alleged “hybrid attacks”, but also “significant unrest among broad sections of the population”, as justification for operational measures.
Berlin anticipates that the public would show resistance in the event of war, should NATO troops transit through Germany on their way to the new Eastern Front.
German “strategic autonomy” goes hand in hand with militarisation
Interior Minister Dobrindt asserts that Germany has hitherto been dependent on the support of foreign intelligence services.
Berlin hopes that strengthened German intelligence services will give it a better standing vis-a-vis Washington, Paris, and London, turning it into a serious interlocutor on “equal terms” and moving it away from being a junior partner.
The proposed draft bill aims to ensure that German intelligence agencies “no longer lag behind other European partners”.
According to the minister, this will enable Berlin to “justify its claim to a leadership role in European security policy”.
Europe
EU prepares Ukraine peace mission to Abu Dhabi led by Björn Seibert
The European Union is preparing to take a direct role in the diplomatic negotiations surrounding the war in Ukraine.
According to a report by Euronews television, the European Commission and the European Council are establishing a joint delegation of high-ranking officials to attend an upcoming round of talks between the parties. Björn Seibert, the head of cabinet to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, will lead the delegation.
The German diplomat, described in the report as an influential bureaucrat, is expected to head the team attending the talks scheduled to take place in Abu Dhabi in early November.
“We are strongly committed not only to ending the war, but also to achieving a just and lasting peace. This is our goal, and this is precisely the position we defend in the current talks,” a European Commission representative said in a statement on the matter.
Brussels’s key figure behind the scenes
A European bureaucrat of German descent, Björn Seibert has long been recognized as von der Leyen’s closest aide.
Seibert first joined von der Leyen’s team in 2013 during her tenure as Germany’s defence minister, later moving with her to the European Commission.
According to reporting by Politico magazine, Seibert gradually developed into one of the most powerful figures behind the scenes of European politics.
The magazine noted that Seibert has been directly involved in clearing senior appointments and has played an influential role in managing relations with both the European Parliament and the US.
This setup has also sparked controversy within the institution. Critics claim that concentrating power in the hands of the cabinet chief and von der Leyen leads to excessive centralization in administration, whereas supporters argue the model ensures rapid, efficient decision-making.
If these multilateral contacts materialize to bring together delegates from Europe, Ukraine, the US, and Russia under one roof, they will mark the first talks held in this specific format during the peace process.
Diplomatic engagements so far have been conducted either bilaterally between Russia and the US or as trilateral meetings that included Ukraine.
However, the EU delegation’s participation at the negotiating table is not yet finalized, as the issue remains under consultation.
European capitals have actually spent months searching for a similar diplomatic channel. Politico reported in January that EU member states had discussed appointing a special envoy to lead talks with Moscow over Ukraine, an effort backed by French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.
The Telegraph newspaper reported in October that, alongside Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Czech President Petr Pavel, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen were being mentioned for the European representative role.
The newspaper noted that officials were also weighing the option of creating a joint delegation of representatives instead of choosing a single figure.
Reservations from Moscow over European intentions
Moscow, for its part, views Europe’s position as potentially decisive in resolving the conflict. “It is not enough to talk only with Kyiv; it is necessary to talk with the whole of Europe, which fully backs Kyiv in its desire to prolong the conflict. Perhaps Europe’s stance is of key importance here,” Russian Presidential Aide Yuriy Ushakov said.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitriy Peskov also stated that Moscow would support the emergence of an EU negotiator. “Having a negotiator is good. If that negotiator genuinely seeks to contribute to a peaceful settlement, it would be much better,” Peskov said.
Conversely, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov struck a cautious tone on 27 October regarding European countries’ interest in joining the talks. Lavrov stated that Europe wants a seat at the table without altering its outlook toward Moscow.
Arguing that Europe disregards Russia’s position on the root causes of the conflict, Lavrov emphasized that European nations do nothing beyond levelling accusations and demanding a halt to hostilities.
“This merely demonstrates the Europeans’ desire to join the negotiation process. However, the positions with which they would enter the process remain a major question mark,” the Russian minister said.
Despite these conflicting signals, Russian President Vladimir Putin previously noted that Moscow has not closed the door to dialogue with European nations.
As a preferred European negotiator, Putin previously named former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder.
Europe
EU and Canada to deepen defence ties from Arctic to Black Sea
The EU and Canada will strengthen their partnership to address shared security challenges by deepening defence cooperation stretching “from the Arctic to the Black Sea”.
A draft joint statement prepared for a summit to be held in Montreal on 29-30 October addresses all of these matters comprehensively.
“Canada and the EU are strategic partners in taking more responsibility for our common security and defence,” reads the draft EU-Canada Joint Summit Statement obtained by Rapporteur.
The two sides will “accelerate the implementation” of the Security and Defence Partnership and broaden cooperation across international peace and crisis management, sanctions, defence industry, maritime and space security, hybrid threats, and resilience.
The summit follows a significant political push aimed at bolstering EU-Canada ties.
On 16 September, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney attended European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the European Union address in Strasbourg.
In that speech, von der Leyen suggested making Canada the bloc’s first “associate member”.
The document welcomes Canada’s interest in reinforcing its participation in EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions and operations, as well as Ottawa’s ongoing commitment to European security, “notably on the Eastern Flank from the Arctic region to the Black Sea”.
In the Arctic, both sides plan to reinforce cooperation on “peace, security and resilience”.
The summit statement will also launch “a new, dedicated dialogue on the Arctic, foreign information manipulation and interference, climate security and transport”.
The draft also reaffirms EU and Canadian support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, pledging continuous military and other assistance to Kyiv alongside increased pressure on Moscow.
According to Article 10, the partnership also turns toward the Middle East. There, the EU and Canada aim to work more closely “to support de-escalation, address humanitarian needs”, and contribute to conditions necessary for lasting peace in Palestine based on a two-state solution.
Defence industry cooperation is another priority. The draft highlights existing cooperation pursued through the EU’s Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), Canada’s participation in capability coalitions, and its inclusion in the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) mechanism.
Europe
Merz visits Asia to seek new markets for German defence firms
On his third trip to Asia since taking office, Chancellor Friedrich Merz is seeking new markets, particularly for German defence industry companies.
Alongside drone manufacturer Quantum Systems and Airbus Defence & Space, at least two defence industry firms are among the business delegation accompanying the chancellor on his visits to Singapore, Japan, and South Korea starting on Monday.
Merz is generally attempting to broaden sales markets across the region, partly because German exports to China have suffered a sharp decline.
German industry is consequently seeking alternatives at present. While the federal government now intends to open the way for new arms exports, a military exercise in Japan involving around 100 medical personnel from the Bundeswehr is drawing to a close.
Part of the scenario involves an incident causing numerous casualties on the island of Okinawa.
This is a real threat should war break out over Taiwan, located just 600 kilometres away. That distance is not particularly far for US fighter jets stationed on Okinawa.
Germany is systematically expanding its military and defence cooperation with Japan.
Alternatives to exports to China
Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s trip to Singapore, Japan, and South Korea comes at a time when German companies are making intensive efforts to find alternatives to China for their business in Asia.
Wolfgang Niedermark, an executive board member of the Federation of German Industries (BDI) and Asia expert, observed, for example: “In recent years, we may perhaps have relied too much on China, which is naturally our most important industrial partner.”
To explain the search for alternatives, Niedermark cites “geopolitical” reasons, referring to the rivalry between the West and China, alongside “industrial competition” with China.
Chinese companies are now producing many items they previously imported from Germany for a long time, including high-tech products.
As a result, German exports to China, which still stood at around 107 billion euros in 2022, have dropped sharply since then.
In 2025, they recorded a further decline of approximately 9.7%, reaching a value of just over 81 billion euros.
German exporting companies are consequently searching for alternative markets at present, and Asia stands out as a key export destination.
Asian giants also want to reduce dependence on the US
During his first trip to Asia in office in January, Merz sought to strengthen economic ties with India, including expanding exports to that country.
Japan and South Korea are also promising options. While they are the second and third largest markets for German exporters in Asia, they have so far accounted for only a quarter of the value of Germany’s exports to China. This indicates further potential exists.
Japan and South Korea, like Germany, are also attempting to diversify their economic relationships.
Confronted with fierce attacks from the Trump administration, these countries are seeking to establish profitable ties with alternative partners.
On Thursday, Merz will open the biennial German Business Asia-Pacific Conference, which is being held in Seoul this year.
The event will be led by Economy Minister Katherina Reiche and Siemens Chief Executive Roland Busch.
Busch is travelling with a business delegation of about 30 people that previously accompanied Merz to Tokyo and will accompany him to Singapore this time as well.
Singapore is regarded as the commercial and financial centre of the entire rapidly growing Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
German arms industry sets its sights on Asia
At least two defence industry companies are included in the business delegation accompanying Merz: drone maker Quantum Systems and Airbus Defence & Space.
Quantum Systems supplies the German Armed Forces and the Armed Forces of Ukraine, among others, and is now planning broader growth extending into Asia.
Since the German government withdrew from the French-German FCAS (Future Combat Air System) project, which aims to build a sixth-generation fighter jet, Airbus Defence and Space has been seeking an alternative and is currently considering joining the British-Italian-Japanese GCAP (Global Combat Air Programme) project.
More detailed talks with British company BAE Systems are scheduled to take place this week.
London maintains an open stance towards Germany joining GCAP because it can barely finance this exceptionally expensive project.
However, London, like Japan, is pressing for swift project implementation; the fighter aircraft is envisioned to become operational by 2035.
The German defence industry is not known for implementing its projects quickly.
Airbus also insists on playing a key role in development and production. Shares in GCAP have largely been allocated.
Talks with Japanese project partner Mitsubishi Heavy Industries are expected to take place.
German-US-Japanese exercise on Okinawa
A ten-day military exercise organised by the Japanese armed forces will also conclude on Thursday.
Alongside troops from the US, the Philippines, and New Zealand, the German Armed Forces are taking part in the exercise with around 100 soldiers from their medical unit.
The main venue for the exercise is the Japanese island of Okinawa, situated on the first island chain off the Chinese coast and home to the largest US Air Force base in the Asia-Pacific region.
Okinawa lies approximately 600 kilometres from Taiwan. If conflict breaks out over the island, US troops would probably be expected to intervene from Okinawa. A Chinese attack on the military bases there is also probable.
Exercise Keen Sword, which began last Monday, includes providing initial medical treatment in an incident involving numerous injured personnel, among other elements.
According to the scenario, the Bundeswehr will transport medical supplies and blood products to Okinawa using an Airbus A400M aircraft and subsequently fly the wounded to a suburb of Tokyo.
German medical personnel will take over further treatment of the injured there.
Through this exercise, the Bundeswehr, which is currently preparing primarily for a potential war against Russia, is simultaneously preparing to participate in a large-scale war against the People’s Republic of China.
Relationship between German and Japanese militaries to deepen
Federal Defence Minister Boris Pistorius indirectly confirmed this during his visit to Tokyo in March.
At the time, he was quoted as saying that in addition to focusing on NATO’s eastern flank and “other conflicts, such as in the Middle East,” we must “not lose sight of other regions and the challenges in those regions.”
In this context, cooperation between the German and Japanese armed forces will now become “significantly more intensive.”
As the Defence Ministry indicated at the time, German warships and fighter aircraft were most recently in Japan in 2024 for a port visit and exercises, respectively.
In return, a task force from the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force was in the Port of Hamburg in 2024.
In 2025, Japanese F-15 fighter jets, based on a US model, visited the German Air Force.
Furthermore, as early as 2024, Germany and Japan signed a “comprehensive logistics agreement.”
In the defence industry, the ministry noted that close cooperation already exists between Airbus Defence & Space and Kawasaki Heavy Industries.
Both companies have collaborated for decades on the construction of H145 multi-role helicopters, which are also used by Bundeswehr special forces.
Pistorius stated at the time that “much more potential” still exists for this cooperation.
-
America1 week agoHow Elon Musk fuses private empire with state power, Ben Tarnoff explains
-
Europe1 week agoAfD leader Weidel calls funding lost Ukraine war a grave mistake
-
Middle East1 week agoEgypt delays parliamentary vote on deploying troops to Saudi Arabia
-
America7 days agoUS wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
-
America1 week agoAt least 47 major US data centre projects halted or cancelled
-
Middle East1 week agoNetanyahu unveils security doctrine and regional alliance map
-
Europe1 week agoEU rejects US proposal to resume Russian gas flows through Ukraine
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEx-BND head Hanning tied to former Mossad chief amid spy inquiry
