Asia
Taliban bans political parties in Afghanistan, citing un-Islamic

Two years after the Taliban victory following the US troops withdrawal that resulted into the collapse of the republic system, the Taliban has come up with an astonishing statement to ban activities of all political parties in Afghanistan.
At the time when the Taliban were seeking to normalize ties with the world for the sake of recognition, the Taliban decision to impose a complete ban on activities of political parties had shown that there is no room for any wider-political engagement.
The announcement was made by the Taliban Minister for Justice, Shikh Maulavi Abdul Hakeem Sharae who said that activities of political parties are banned because neither they have any standing in Sharia law nor they have any national interest to serve the country.
While presenting his annual report of his ministry in Kabul, the capital city, he said that people also liked these political parties, terming them against peace and prosperity of the country.
The ban was imposed just days after the Taliban marked the second anniversary of their return to power in Afghanistan after 20 years of war with the foreign troops and the then Afghan security forces.
Taliban disallowed political activities in past two years
Taliban since 15 August 2021, has generally disallowed political activities from the get-go, and this decision has further strengthened this idea while the Taliban have been resisting international pressure to form a more inclusive government.
The official said that the “interim government” has representatives from all ethnicities and tribes and was broad-based, rejecting the participation of officials of the past government as “betrayal of their long struggle against foreign occupation forces and the republic government.”
Till 2021, at least 70 major and minor political parties were formally registered with the justice ministry of Afghanistan. However, after the return of the Taliban, the political party has crumbled and also there is no political leader inside Afghanistan. The Taliban has already restricted the freedom of association and assembly.
The Taliban however also passed some rules which have severely cut basic freedoms in most facets of daily life. These restrictions include the ban of girls from schools and women from workplaces, also from public baths to public parks and traveling alone without a male partner.
In fear of Taliban persecution or arrest, a large number of political figures are out of the country and those tiny numbers that are inside the country are not allowed to travel abroad.
Dialogue among the Afghans
However, efforts have been underway to bring the Taliban, the current ruler of Afghanistan, and Afghan politicians in exile under one table as part of the reconciliation process. The Taliban is not too much interested in launching a wide-range of dialogues with opposition aimed to form a broad-based government. The Taliban already said that if the opposition want to stay in Afghanistan they can come, but they will not be given any government posts.
Former US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation, Zalmay Khalilzad has recently said that the Afghan politicians in exile should return to their country.
“There is opposition in every country. And they live inside the country and don’t run away,” Khalilzad said, referring to the Afghan politicians in exile.
On the other part, the Taliban also needs to form a constitution and formulate its policy based on that. Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, a former Taliban diplomat, called on the Taliban to come with a document for a legal process and called it important to preserve Afghanistan’s sovereignty.
Taliban running the country without constitution
“The constitution will provide a clear picture of how to deal with internal affairs and how to interact with the world,” he added.
Indeed, with the withdrawal of all foreign troops after 20 years of involvement in the Afghan war, the majority of Afghan political leaders had no other choice but to flee the country, fearing retribution for their association with the US backed former government.
“Now we need to provide a legal document for the Afghan politicians to assure them of their security and give them all liberties, including political activities,” said a Taliban official, wishing anonymity.
He said that political parties are operating in other countries, and questioned why they should be banned in Afghanistan. “As a government, the Taliban should let the leaders of the certain political parties to operate and hold gatherings. The Taliban should not be afraid of these political figures,” he added.
Self-exiled politicians openly opposed Taliban rule
“These political leaders in the last 20 years did nothing for the country and the people. I am sure if they return back to Afghanistan, even people in their own community and tribe will not welcome them,” he added.
Many self-exiled Afghan political leaders have openly opposed the Taliban rule and called for dialogue. However, the Taliban is not interested in dialogue with them but also not opposing their return to Afghanistan. These political leaders have announced armed resistance against the Taliban and called on the international community to support them but they received no backing for their campaign.
Though the Taliban was not recognized by the foreign countries, but at the same time the world is no more interested in supporting the opposition of the Taliban.
An Afghan political expert, Torek Farhadi said that the Taliban are eager to follow the example of Gulf countries to serve the country without any political parties.
“This system is very good for a country like Afghanistan in case the Taliban allows the participation of the women and people from all walks of life in politics to decide on their future,” he added. The participation of people doesn’t mean conspiracy against the government.
Asia
ASEAN and China deepen ties amid threat of new US tariffs

On Thursday, ASEAN foreign ministers emphasized the strength of the bloc’s relationship with China as they sought to deepen ties with Beijing in the face of new “reciprocal” punitive tariffs threatened by US President Donald Trump. Experts believe Trump’s aggressive tariff policy is bringing ASEAN and China even closer.
In his opening speech at a meeting in Kuala Lumpur with ASEAN foreign ministers and their Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan said that China is “one of ASEAN’s most important and dynamic partners.”
“This relationship is built on mutual trust, common interests, and growing economic interdependence,” he said.
Wang echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the countries’ shared Asian identity and goals. “China has always seen ASEAN as a priority in its neighborhood diplomacy and sees the region as a pioneer in building a global community with a shared future for humanity,” he said.
The meeting was part of the annual Ministerial Conference of ASEAN foreign ministers. Following the meeting, there will be meetings with Japan, China, and South Korea, as well as with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other dialogue partners.
Addressing the ongoing geopolitical shifts, Wang noted that the current global turmoil and transformation raise questions of unity or division, peace or conflict, and cooperation or confrontation.
“We must learn from history, actively promote an equal and structured world order, and push the international system toward greater justice and equality by supporting inclusive and shared economic globalization,” he said.
Trade relations
Since 2020, ASEAN and China have remained each other’s largest trading partners, with total trade volume reaching $770.9 billion in 2024, a 10.6% increase from the previous year.
In May, the two sides announced the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) 3.0 agreement after nine rounds of negotiations spanning two and a half years.
The upgraded agreement includes nine new chapters covering the digital economy, green economy, and supply chain connectivity. China’s Ministry of Commerce described this framework as a gateway to building the China-ASEAN mega-market.
Meanwhile, ASEAN members are preparing for new US tariffs set to take effect on August 1. The tariffs are set at 40% for Myanmar and Laos, 36% for Cambodia and Thailand, 32% for Indonesia, 25% for Malaysia and Brunei, and 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines. Washington has not yet announced an updated rate for Singapore, which was taxed at a 10% rate when the tariffs were announced in April.
Response to tariffs
On Wednesday, at the start of the ASEAN foreign ministers’ meeting, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated that trade is being used as a tool for “pressure, isolation, and control,” adding that “tariffs, export restrictions, and investment barriers have now become sharp instruments of geopolitical competition.”
In a speech to parliament on Wednesday, Indonesian Finance Minister Sri Mulyani called for multilateral institutions such as the World Trade Organization, the UN, and the World Bank to play a more significant role in the trade war. “The role of these multilateral institutions has been greatly weakened and is not even respected,” she said.
Thailand announced $1.22 billion in mitigation measures. According to Deputy Finance Minister Paopoom Rojanasakul, Thailand’s central bank is also expected to further loosen its monetary policy to reduce tariffs.
A draft of the joint communique from the foreign ministers’ meeting, seen by Nikkei Asia, describes unilateral tariffs as “counterproductive” and warns that they “risk exacerbating global economic fragmentation and posing complex challenges to ASEAN’s economic stability and growth.” The draft, expected to be released on Friday, affirms that ASEAN is “committed to working constructively with all partners to this end.”
Asia
Chinese navy chief and top nuclear scientist expelled from legislature

The chief of staff for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, Vice Admiral Li Hanjun, and Liu Shipeng, the deputy chief engineer of the state-owned China National Nuclear Corporation, were removed from their positions in the country’s legislative body.
Li is the latest in a series of PLA generals and a handful of defense industry executives implicated in a widespread investigation within the military.
In a statement on Friday, the NPC Standing Committee announced, “The Navy Soldiers’ Congress has decided to remove Li Hanjun from his post as a representative to the 14th National People’s Congress.”
The Gansu People’s Congress also dismissed Liu Shipeng from his role as an NPC deputy.
Additionally, the Standing Committee revealed it had voted to remove Miao Hua, a former top general who previously oversaw the PLA’s ideological work, from the Central Military Commission (CMC), China’s highest military command body led by President Xi Jinping.
The removal of Li and Liu from their NPC memberships suggests they are facing serious disciplinary action.
China typically remains silent about purges within the military, and announcements from the NPC are one of the few indicators of such campaigns.
There is little public information available about Li and Liu, as both have worked in sensitive positions.
Before becoming the navy’s chief of staff, Li, 60, was the deputy director of the CMC’s Training and Administration Department. He was appointed to this role after serving for a year in the CMC’s Office for Reform and Organisational Structure.
In 2014, he was promoted to vice admiral upon his appointment as commander of the naval base in Fujian province, where Miao also spent a significant part of his career. At that time, he was the director of training at the China Naval Command College and was soon promoted to president of the school.
According to official media reports, nuclear scientist Liu was born into a family that “served China’s nuclear dream for three generations.”
As the deputy chief engineer at CNNC, which oversees all aspects of China’s civil and military nuclear programs, Liu also served as the Communist Party secretary and president of CNNC’s “404 base” in Gansu.
Covering an area of over 1,000 square kilometers, the base was established in 1958 and is the country’s first and largest nuclear research center. It played a crucial role in the development of China’s first atomic bomb in 1964 and its first hydrogen bomb three years later.
This secretive base is still considered a key hub for China’s nuclear deterrence and nuclear industry.
According to statements from provincial authorities, Liu was named “Gansu’s outstanding entrepreneur” in 2023.
Asia
China, US reach agreement on export controls

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce announced on Friday afternoon that Beijing and Washington have remained in close contact since the two-day trade talks in London earlier this month, confirming the details of a framework agreement.
“China will review and approve export applications for controlled items in accordance with its laws and regulations, and the US side will, in turn, lift a series of restrictive measures against China,” the ministry stated.
“We hope the US side will cooperate with China in line with the important consensus and conditions established during the conversation between the two presidents on June 5,” the statement continued.
On Thursday, US President Donald Trump said the US had “signed” a trade deal with China the previous day, without providing details.
“We signed the deal with China yesterday, right? We signed the deal with China,” Trump said at a White House event introducing a budget law. “With the China deal, we are starting to open up China,” he added.
He also mentioned that a “very big” deal, likely with India, would be signed soon.
Rare earth elements
Following the event, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters that the US and China had signed an agreement codifying the terms decided upon in previous trade negotiations.
“They will deliver rare earth elements to us,” Lutnick said in a televised interview with Bloomberg, adding that if this commitment is fulfilled, Washington will lift its “countermeasures.”
Rare earth elements, essential for producing high-tech products, including those for the defense industry, were a major point of contention in the trade talks. China holds a near-monopoly on the supply of these minerals due to its massive share of global refining capacity.
Responding to a question on Thursday about rare earth exports, ministry spokesman He Yadong said China had approved a “certain number” of applications and would “continue to strengthen” the review and approval process for eligible applications.
He added that Beijing is willing to “strengthen communication and dialogue” with other countries on export controls and actively promote appropriate trade.
Lutnick also stated that the US plans to reach agreements with 10 major trading partners in the coming weeks. The deadline for countries to negotiate trade terms before higher tariffs are reinstated was July 9, following a 90-day suspension of import tariff hikes announced on April 2.
The two negotiating teams concluded the London talks by announcing they had agreed “in principle” on a “framework” that both sides would take home for their respective leaders to review, as they sought to get their uneasy truce, signed last month in Geneva, back on track.
The negotiations began after a highly anticipated phone call between Xi Jinping and Trump, which seemingly ended an intractable stalemate.
In the weeks following the initial agreement in Switzerland, Washington claimed China was restricting exports of critical minerals, while Beijing reacted to US restrictions on semiconductors and threats to impose visa barriers on Chinese students.
-
Europe2 weeks ago
New MI6 chief’s grandfather was a Nazi collaborator known as ‘The Butcher’
-
Middle East3 days ago
Israel details plan for ‘humanitarian zone’ in Rafah, called a ‘concentration camp’ by critics
-
Asia2 weeks ago
Chinese navy chief and top nuclear scientist expelled from legislature
-
Middle East2 weeks ago
US proposes $30 billion deal to Iran for halting uranium enrichment
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
Armenia signals potential complete withdrawal from CSTO
-
Asia2 weeks ago
China, US reach agreement on export controls
-
Diplomacy4 days ago
Iran must reverse religious fatwa to develop nuclear weapons, says McGovern
-
Europe2 weeks ago
Germany’s SPD faces ‘Russia rebellion’ at party congress