Connect with us

Asia

Afghanistan blames US for nurturing Daesh

Published

on

The Afghan Taliban have directly blamed the US behind the creation and training of Islamic State (IS), also known as the Daesh terrorist group, and termed Daesh as an American phenomenon. The comment was made by the Taliban’s governor for Kabul Mohammad Qasim Khalid, who also claimed that he has evidence proving the US’s involvement in nurturing Daesh.

Khalid said that the US is not willing to see a peaceful and stable Afghanistan, that’s why it supports the Daesh group, and also employs various tactics to destabilize the country.

The official also rejected the US claim that Taliban helped Washington against al-Qaeda. There is also no cooperation between the Taliban and al-Qaeda, a terrorist group, where US President Joe Biden claimed that Washington is getting help from the Taliban to end the al-Qaeda threat.

This statement of Biden also contradicts the UN report released last month, saying that Taliban maintains “strong and symbiotic” ties with al-Qaeda.

Taliban rejects existing of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan   

“Do you remember what I said about Afghanistan? I said al-Qaeda would not be there. I said it wouldn’t be there. I said we’d get help from the Taliban. What’s happening now? What’s going on? Read your press. I was right,” Biden said when a reporter asked if he admitted to mistakes during the withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

Meanwhile, Taliban Defense Minister Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid blamed the US for obstructing international recognition of Afghanistan, and strongly denied cooperation with US in countering al-Qaeda.

The Taliban defense Mullah Yaqoob (Right) and interior ministers Sirajuddin Haqqani (left)

Yaqoob said that al-Qaeda does not exist in Afghanistan and accused Washington of violating Afghan airspace. “We want all the countries, including the US, to respect Afghanistan’s independence.”

Concerns over transforming Daesh leaders to Afghanistan

In an astonishing statement, Iran’s foreign minister, Hossein Amirabdollahian had claimed that leaders and fighters of Daesh have relocated to Afghanistan from Iraq, Syria, and Libya. Though the Taliban rejected the news, but in case, the terrorist group’s personnel pose a significant challenge for the Taliban, who have already fought against the group in the last several years.

Amirabdollahian has expressed concern of instability in Afghanistan and concern that any direct repercussions on the border region with Iran will affect his country’s peace. He also focused on forming an inclusive government in Afghanistan in order to stop the flow of Afghan refugees to Iran.

Iran did not recognize the Taliban government so far, blaming lack of such an administration as the main factor.

However, Taliban’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi strongly rejected Iran’s claim and said that the Taliban have fought against Daesh in the past and “will never allow this group to enter Afghanistan. Balkhi also said that the Taliban has neutralized the destructive capability of the group.

Iran should focus on constructive economic and political ties

“We reject the Iranian foreign minister’s allegation asserting that ISIS (Daesh) leaders have been transferred to Afghanistan from Iraq, Syria and Libya. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has meticulously fought against Daesh both during & after the end of the occupation,” Balkh said.

Balkhi reiterated that the Taliban will not allow anyone to threaten the national security of Afghanistan, or use our territory against others.

“The Iranian officials should rather focus on constructive economic, political and social relations between the two neighboring and friendly peoples and countries instead of raising false alarms about Afghanistan,” he added.

Balkhi also said that it should be remembered that Afghanistan does not have a common border with the aforementioned Arab countries, instead of placing the burden of responsibility on others, countries should fulfill their intonational obligations regarding the security of their borders.

It is important to mention that despite the Taliban’s claim, Daesh was able to carry out dozens of attacks in Afghanistan since August 2021, when the Taliban toppled the republic and regained power.

Daesh has significantly intensified violent activities since 2021   

Earlier this year, Taliban lost its two high-ranking officials – governor for Balkh province and acting Badakhshan’s governor. The two officials were killed by Daesh suicide bombers. Moreover, a classified document leaked from the Pentagon this year, has revealed that Afghanistan has become a significant coordination site for Daesh, from where they plan attacks across Europe, and Asia. The terrorist group also conducts “aspirational plotting” against the US, according to the report.

Recently, the United Nations in Afghanistan reported that Daesh has intensified its violent activities, including suicide bombings, ambushes, and assassination with a total of 224 attacks since 2021.

One of the violent activities was when Daesh carried out a bombing during evening prayers in Kabul that resulted in the death of 21 worshippers, including an influential cleric, while over 30 others received injuries. The frequent attack has brought renewed attention to the threat posed by Daesh to the Taliban.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey