Asia
Taliban bans political parties in Afghanistan, citing un-Islamic
Two years after the Taliban victory following the US troops withdrawal that resulted into the collapse of the republic system, the Taliban has come up with an astonishing statement to ban activities of all political parties in Afghanistan.
At the time when the Taliban were seeking to normalize ties with the world for the sake of recognition, the Taliban decision to impose a complete ban on activities of political parties had shown that there is no room for any wider-political engagement.
The announcement was made by the Taliban Minister for Justice, Shikh Maulavi Abdul Hakeem Sharae who said that activities of political parties are banned because neither they have any standing in Sharia law nor they have any national interest to serve the country.
While presenting his annual report of his ministry in Kabul, the capital city, he said that people also liked these political parties, terming them against peace and prosperity of the country.
The ban was imposed just days after the Taliban marked the second anniversary of their return to power in Afghanistan after 20 years of war with the foreign troops and the then Afghan security forces.
Taliban disallowed political activities in past two years
Taliban since 15 August 2021, has generally disallowed political activities from the get-go, and this decision has further strengthened this idea while the Taliban have been resisting international pressure to form a more inclusive government.
The official said that the “interim government” has representatives from all ethnicities and tribes and was broad-based, rejecting the participation of officials of the past government as “betrayal of their long struggle against foreign occupation forces and the republic government.”
Till 2021, at least 70 major and minor political parties were formally registered with the justice ministry of Afghanistan. However, after the return of the Taliban, the political party has crumbled and also there is no political leader inside Afghanistan. The Taliban has already restricted the freedom of association and assembly.
The Taliban however also passed some rules which have severely cut basic freedoms in most facets of daily life. These restrictions include the ban of girls from schools and women from workplaces, also from public baths to public parks and traveling alone without a male partner.
In fear of Taliban persecution or arrest, a large number of political figures are out of the country and those tiny numbers that are inside the country are not allowed to travel abroad.
Dialogue among the Afghans
However, efforts have been underway to bring the Taliban, the current ruler of Afghanistan, and Afghan politicians in exile under one table as part of the reconciliation process. The Taliban is not too much interested in launching a wide-range of dialogues with opposition aimed to form a broad-based government. The Taliban already said that if the opposition want to stay in Afghanistan they can come, but they will not be given any government posts.
Former US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation, Zalmay Khalilzad has recently said that the Afghan politicians in exile should return to their country.
“There is opposition in every country. And they live inside the country and don’t run away,” Khalilzad said, referring to the Afghan politicians in exile.
On the other part, the Taliban also needs to form a constitution and formulate its policy based on that. Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, a former Taliban diplomat, called on the Taliban to come with a document for a legal process and called it important to preserve Afghanistan’s sovereignty.
Taliban running the country without constitution
“The constitution will provide a clear picture of how to deal with internal affairs and how to interact with the world,” he added.
Indeed, with the withdrawal of all foreign troops after 20 years of involvement in the Afghan war, the majority of Afghan political leaders had no other choice but to flee the country, fearing retribution for their association with the US backed former government.
“Now we need to provide a legal document for the Afghan politicians to assure them of their security and give them all liberties, including political activities,” said a Taliban official, wishing anonymity.
He said that political parties are operating in other countries, and questioned why they should be banned in Afghanistan. “As a government, the Taliban should let the leaders of the certain political parties to operate and hold gatherings. The Taliban should not be afraid of these political figures,” he added.
Self-exiled politicians openly opposed Taliban rule
“These political leaders in the last 20 years did nothing for the country and the people. I am sure if they return back to Afghanistan, even people in their own community and tribe will not welcome them,” he added.
Many self-exiled Afghan political leaders have openly opposed the Taliban rule and called for dialogue. However, the Taliban is not interested in dialogue with them but also not opposing their return to Afghanistan. These political leaders have announced armed resistance against the Taliban and called on the international community to support them but they received no backing for their campaign.
Though the Taliban was not recognized by the foreign countries, but at the same time the world is no more interested in supporting the opposition of the Taliban.
An Afghan political expert, Torek Farhadi said that the Taliban are eager to follow the example of Gulf countries to serve the country without any political parties.
“This system is very good for a country like Afghanistan in case the Taliban allows the participation of the women and people from all walks of life in politics to decide on their future,” he added. The participation of people doesn’t mean conspiracy against the government.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
