Middle East
Who is Iranian commander Reza Mohammad Zahedi that killed in Israeli strike
A top Iranian commander among six others were killed in an Israeli missile strike targeting the Iranian Consulate in Damascus, the Syrian capital. Iran confirmed the killing of Brig Gen Mohammad Reza Zahedi, a senior commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps IRGC’s Quds Force in Syria and Lebanon, his deputy Gen Haid Haj Rahimi and five other military personnel.
The other five were identified as Hossein Amanollahi, Seyyed Mahdi Jalalati, Mohsen Sadaqat, Ali Agha Babaei and Syed Ali Salehi Rozbahani, all officers of IRGC.
The airstrike on the Iranian embassy’s five-storey annex killed seven members of the IRGC, which runs Iran’s overseas military operations and Zahedi and Rahimi are the highest-ranking Iranian military official to be killed since 2020 assassination of Gen Qassem Suleimani in Baghdad, the capital city of Iraq.
Zahedi held key positions and was responsible for monitoring the region and was considered as a key figure to maintain Iran’s ties with Hezbollah and Syria president, Bashar al-Assad. His deputy, Rahimi was also an important figure in the region and now with their elimination, Tehran could face challenges in its operation across the Middle East as it relies on networks of people to do so and these killed IRGC’s members were playing key roles in this area.
Indeed, the death of Zahedi is a great loss to the IRGC and yet another blow after the assassination Suleiman. The killing of these officers, especially Zahedi and his deputy will definitely create a security-vacuum and IRGC will also lose its networks created by these officials in the region. Meanwhile, finding a successor to Zahedi in the wake of crisis in the Middle East, will not only be time-consuming, but also a challenge task for Iran.

Mohammad Reza Zahedi joined the IRGC two years after the 1979 Islamic revolution.
Zahedi, also known as Hasan Mahdavi, joined the Iranian military forces just two years after the 1979 Islamic revolution. Zahedi was 63 years old, and spent four decades in the Iranian military and his initial command was during the Iran-Iraq war. Zahedi was leading a larger headquarters to focus on training of military students and in 2005, he was appointed as the commander of IRGC’s ground forces and the appointment was approved by the country’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei.
Zahedi was also responsible for regular meetings with Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary general of the Lebanese Hezbollah group after the death of Sulimani and that’s why the US has imposed sanctions on him.
In contrast to similar attacks, Iran promptly confirmed Zahedi’s death
For the first time in a while, Iran has immediately confirmed the death of Zahedi and pledged to retaliate. Iranian President Ebrahim Raeisi said that “Zonists crime will not go unanswered” and called it a fresh act of aggression by the Israeli regime.
He called the Israeli missile attack on Iran’s consulate as a “terrorist crime” and a gross violation of international regulations and expressed condolences to the people of Iran and the families of the killed officers.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman, Nasser Kanani has said that this is the right of Iran to take countermeasures and Iran’s ambassador to Syria, Hossein Akbari also stressed that Tehran will give a decisive response to the Israeli regime. Zahedi’s son also urged the government of Iran to not let his father’s death go unanswered.
However, Israel has yet to comment on the airstrike and the Biden administration, a close aide to Israel, has also rejected its involvement, stating no consultation was made on the airstrikes between the two countries.
China says it opposes actions cause escalation of tenses in Middle East
Meanwhile, the UN Security Council will discuss the deadly strike later on Tuesday at a meeting requested by Syrian ally Russia.
“Iran reserves its legitimate and inherent right under international law and the United Nations Charter to take a decisive response to such reprehensible acts,” Iran’s mission to the world body said.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Wang Wenbin said that his country condemns the attack on the Iranian embassy in Syria, and the security of diplomatic institutions cannot be violated.
Syria’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity should be respected, and China opposes any actions that lead to an escalation of tensions in the Middle East, CGTN quoted Wang as saying.
Taliban terms Israel’s Iranian embassy attack as violation of diplomatic norms
The interim-government of Taliban in Afghanistan has strongly condemned Israel’s attack on the consular branch of Iranian embassy in Damascus, terming it “a blatant violation of diplomatic norms and attempt at provoking wider regional insecurity.”
“The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan calls on the influential countries of the world and the region to prevent the crimes of the Zionist regime in Gaza and beyond the Gaza Strip,” Taliban foreign ministry said in a statement.
It furthered: On the one hand, the continuation of crimes by this (zionist) regime has turned into a serious challenge for regional and world security, and on the other hand, it has raised serious questions about the effectiveness of international laws and institutions.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
