Connect with us

Diplomacy

Britain declares end of globalization era

Published

on

In 2016, the United Kingdom dealt a significant blow to the international order of the last 40 years by voting to leave the European Union (Brexit). Now, it is officially declaring the end of globalization.

According to a report in The Times, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will announce the end of the globalization era, following US President Donald Trump’s imposition of harsh tariffs and an “America First” policy that triggered a global trade war, casting a shadow of uncertainty over markets.

The report indicates that in his address to the nation today (April 7), the Prime Minister is expected to admit that the globalization that began after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 has “disappointed” millions of voters. He is also likely to acknowledge why Trump’s economic nationalism has resonated with supporters who believe they have not benefited from free trade and mass migration.

Citing a senior British official, the report states that while the UK does not agree with Trump’s 10% “basic” tariff and other recent protectionist measures, the Starmer government recognizes the dawn of a new era in which Trump’s methods have garnered significant support.

The official, whose views were included in the report, said, “Trump did something we don’t agree with, but there’s a reason people are behind him on this. The world has changed, globalization is over, and we are now in a new era. We must demonstrate that our approach, a more active Labour government, a more reformist government, can provide answers for people in every part of this country.”

Today’s speech will be Starmer’s first major intervention since Trump introduced comprehensive taxes on imports. During this speech, Starmer will acknowledge that the seismic effects on the global economy prove that the UK needs to “move further and faster” to boost growth through “supply-side reforms.”

Starmer signaled his intentions for today’s speech in an article published in the Sunday Telegraph yesterday (April 6).

The Prime Minister stated that he is ready to use industrial policy to “shield British business from the storm” expected from US President Donald Trump’s wave of tariffs.

Starmer said he would continue to seek a trade agreement with the US to avoid some tariffs, but also discussed the possibility of state intervention to protect “national interests.”

Starmer wrote, “Some people may be uncomfortable with this; the idea that the state should directly intervene to shape the market has often been ridiculed. But we cannot cling to old sentiments when the world is changing so rapidly.”

The British leader announced that this week they would accelerate plans to increase local competitiveness to be less exposed to new global shocks.

In the article, the Prime Minister reiterated the government’s view that it would “remain calm and fight for the best deal” with the US, but said that “all options are on the table,” adding, “I will only make a deal if it is right for British business and working people.”

The British government also plans to make pro-growth announcements this week, such as easing regulations for electric car manufacturers and bringing forward some parts of the government’s industrial strategy.

In addition, London held an “economic and financial dialogue” with New Delhi last Wednesday to accelerate a trade agreement, while also striving for a new agreement with Australia.

In a move foreshadowing Starmer’s announcement, Treasury Secretary Darren Jones also declared the end of the globalization era.

Speaking on the BBC’s “Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg” program, Jones was asked whether globalization, which led to a boom in imports of cheap clothing, electrical goods, and other products, had ended.

Jones replied, “Yes, it has ended. The Prime Minister himself said this this morning. Globalization as we have known it for the last few decades has ended.”

Jones stated that this change means that the UK needs to “improve” its relations with allies around the world while also investing in its own economy. He denied that ministers were “scrambling” for a solution.

The Secretary insisted that the government is “trying to overcome these challenges” and that is why it is “investing in industrial policy as well as the NHS [National Health System] and skills.”

The UK government has maintained its policy of not responding to US tariffs with tariffs, as other countries have done, and ministers have said they prefer a “calm” approach focused on a UK-US trade agreement.

“We hope to make a deal,” said Jones, arguing that as a result of diplomacy on tariffs, they have “a better outcome” than other similar countries.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey